[HN Gopher] What gets to the front page of Hacker News?
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       What gets to the front page of Hacker News?
        
       Author : mikpanko
       Score  : 109 points
       Date   : 2023-07-04 17:53 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (randomshit.dev)
 (TXT) w3m dump (randomshit.dev)
        
       | reaperman wrote:
       | > _ShowHN posts almost never make the front page ( <2%)_
       | 
       | Based on other details of analysis, I believe this means 2% of
       | front pages posts are ShowHN. Not that 98% of ShowHN posts fail
       | to reach front page. But the author doubles down on this
       | confusion with flawed methodology:
       | 
       | > Second, and perhaps more importantly, the dataset doesn't
       | record the attempts made to get to the front page, i.e. all posts
       | on Hacker News in a given day. It's possible that there are
       | orders of magnitude more blog posts posted but fewer that make
       | the FP, whereas 95% of any academic paper submitted makes the
       | front page (extreme figures used for illustrative purposes). So
       | for simplicity, I'll say "the likelihood of making the FP" which
       | assumes a constant rate of conversion from post to FP across
       | different categories.
       | 
       | and also doubles down on the logical fallacy in their conclusion:
       | 
       | > _ShowHN is very valuable, but is not likely to land your
       | product on the front page._
        
         | sxg wrote:
         | Exactly. This is an analysis of what the front page is composed
         | of rather than what gets to the front page.
        
         | acover wrote:
         | For curiosity's sake I wanted to estimate the probability of
         | getting to the front page with a show hn. The easy but terrible
         | way is to just look at a few new show hn from yesterday and
         | look at how many got more than 50 points.
         | 
         | The answer ~4% (3/79). Please expect gigantic error bars.
         | 
         | Links checked:
         | 
         | 2/30 from
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/shownew?next=36572237&n=61
         | 
         | 1/30 from
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/shownew?next=36564410&n=91
         | 
         | 0/19 from
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/shownew?next=36556170&n=121
        
           | Aachen wrote:
           | #3 currently has 25 points, #8 has 14, and #12 has 9 points.
           | Not sure that 50 points is a good measure of whether it has
           | been on the front page.
           | 
           | What does that mean anyway, does being on #25 for three
           | minutes count?
        
             | acover wrote:
             | You are right "on the front page" is not a good question.
             | The question I wanted to answer is "succeeded in getting
             | significant attention".
             | 
             | 50 votes is arbitrary but represents about 5000 views and
             | often means there was some discussion.
        
               | SoftTalker wrote:
               | So typically, 1% of readers will vote on a post?
               | 
               | It would not surprise me. I occasionally vote on
               | comments, but almost never vote on posts.
        
               | acover wrote:
               | It's just a rule of thumb and varies alot between
               | communities.
               | 
               | https://old.reddit.com/r/TheoryOfReddit/comments/1fd2tu/d
               | ata...
        
       | ape4 wrote:
       | This article breaks it down by category. But that doesn't really
       | say much. Its about content.
       | 
       | For example a blog post by Linus Torvalds has a better chance
       | than a blog post by me. (I don't think he has a blog - but we've
       | see some salty commit messages etc by him).
       | 
       | Similarly, if its an academic paper titled "P = NP proven" it
       | will probably shoot to the font page.
       | 
       | Companies that just want their stuff to be on the front page need
       | to make more interesting stuff.
        
       | matricaria wrote:
       | Apparently writing about it will get you there.
        
       | folex wrote:
       | I like that the URL is basically the answer to the question.
        
       | syngrog66 wrote:
       | I have not cracked the code yet.
       | 
       | I am 99% certain by now, after a decade plus observing it that if
       | one submits a URL one gets into a very competitive race with
       | folks using voting rings or otherwise paid/inauthentic upvoting
       | services.
       | 
       | Luck of the lightning bolt may be a factor too.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | LovinFossilFuel wrote:
       | Content that is personally placed there by front tech socialist
       | dang.
        
       | irrational wrote:
       | > Statistically, your best shot of getting your writing to the
       | front page of Hacker News is by writing something (with nothing
       | to promote) on your personal website or blog.
       | 
       | I've thought about starting a blog. I'm curious if you noticed
       | what the most popular blogging sites were while gathering your
       | statistics?
        
       | samwillis wrote:
       | This is a good rundown but misses the biggest thing, _random
       | chance_.
       | 
       | Depending on time of day the your post will stay on page one of
       | "new" for between 20-40 minutes. It needs about 4-6 upvotes in
       | that time to drop onto the bottom of the homepage, and then with
       | that a chance of more eyeballs. Some people skim page two and
       | look for thing with a couple of votes for closer inspection, but
       | the reality is you have that brief moment to catch attention of
       | people _who are interested in your topic_.
       | 
       | The more high profile the item you're posting is the more likely
       | it will catch the attention of people who are interested in the
       | short window. More obscure topics are obviously harder to catch
       | those initial votes.
       | 
       | The new page is very busy at some particular times of day. It can
       | be a good idea to post more obscure topics in a "down time"
       | period.
       | 
       | 2-6pm UTC is by far the busiest time, you often see corporate
       | posts aiming to land in new during this time, even to the point
       | of scheduling their blog posts for this window. The payoff in
       | traffic is worth the chance of a very brief period on page one of
       | new.
       | 
       | The other thing to note is that HN is a different place at the
       | weekend, interesting long reads do well then along with somewhat
       | fun and silly side projects.
       | 
       | Also consider "Show HN" posts, they have a different ranking
       | "gravity" and can be easer to get into the homepage, but don't
       | necessarily stay there or as high for as long. If you are
       | launching something, this is your best bet. They also hang around
       | on the "show" page for days with a log tail of traffic.
       | 
       | Finally there is the "second chance pool" [0], I don't know the
       | details of who or how, but some posts are flagged to be given a
       | second chance on the bottom of the homepage. Sometimes hours or
       | days later. A surprising proportion of top of homepage posts come
       | from that pool - good things have a high chance of entering it.
       | 
       | Best advise, write what you're interested in and keep posting.
       | 
       | 0: https://news.ycombinator.com/pool
        
         | eatonphil wrote:
         | Wow, while I knew about the pool, I didn't know there was a
         | page that actually showed it.
        
           | josters wrote:
           | On that note, here[1] is a resource with some more
           | undocumented HN features.
           | 
           | [1] https://github.com/minimaxir/hacker-news-undocumented
        
           | pyeri wrote:
           | Exactly! There is no link on the main hn page to this pool,
           | how are we supposed to visit there? And if nobody visits,
           | what's even the use of having this pool!
           | 
           | Who knows what other hidden nuggets these chosen few
           | Illuminati are hiding!
        
             | antognini wrote:
             | As I understand it the way it works is that items from the
             | pool are randomly put on the front page for some fraction
             | of users so you don't have to directly visit the pool page.
        
             | eatonphil wrote:
             | That's not how it works exactly. It's just that this pool
             | page is a list of all the pages that have been submitted
             | back to the second chance pool by the mods.
        
         | morkalork wrote:
         | The second chance pool is a pretty good example of just how
         | mercilessly random getting on the front page is. Lots of cool
         | and interesting stuff just slips by and gets drowned out the
         | first time it's submitted.
        
           | antognini wrote:
           | I had a blog post last year that made it to the top of HN
           | thanks to the second chance pool.
           | 
           | I submitted the post to HN on a Saturday and it got I think
           | two upvotes before slipping off of "new" and I figured that
           | was the end of that. But to my surprise I happened to check
           | HN Sunday evening and found that it was near the top. I had
           | no idea that something like that was possible.
        
           | linux2647 wrote:
           | Case in point: TFA was submitted five days ago[0] and barely
           | got any upvotes. Now this second submission has over 100
           | upvotes and made the front page
           | 
           | [0]: https://hn.algolia.com/?q=https%3A%2F%2Frandomshit.dev%2
           | Fpos...
        
         | samwillis wrote:
         | Oh, thought of another important one to add.
         | 
         | HN post titles have to (mostly) match the title of the
         | page/article. Think carefully how you title your posts so that
         | they are descriptive enough about the post. Short titles, like
         | "why we are awesome", with no lead or indication of topic do
         | very badly.
         | 
         | For GitHub repositories, include a description of the tool
         | along with the name of it in the readme title.
         | 
         |  _Your page title is your HN post title._
        
       | Y_Y wrote:
       | Sex, drugs, rock-'n'-roll, lisp, rust, pg, homogeny, scq123,
       | madness, bliss, short shorts.
        
       | alexwasserman wrote:
       | Now I'm curious about the ratio of RSS to front-page readers.
       | 
       | I only read HN (and all "news" content) through NNW or Feedly, so
       | I get strict published order.
       | 
       | This means there are plenty of article I wish weren't flagged off
       | HN, and plenty with no comments I wish had commentary.
       | 
       | But, overall, I see what's probably more genetically
       | representative of posts, not the hive mind.
        
       | ChrisArchitect wrote:
       | Admist all the discussion here about faulty methodology and
       | conclusions, how about we stop upvoting this (and similar
       | content) to help out the front page quality and maybe give some
       | more of those Show HN's a chance
        
       | politelemon wrote:
       | > On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting.
       | That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to
       | reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that
       | gratifies one's intellectual curiosity.
       | 
       | > And of those product announcements that made the FP, a good
       | deal of them are (a) from established companies and products like
       | Apple,
       | 
       | I've often observed this and found these two at odds. HN often
       | turns into a promotional mouthpiece with pieces that are
       | distinctly incurious.
        
       | e-dant wrote:
       | Yeah, I don't know how my filesystem watcher made it to the front
       | page either
        
       | djbusby wrote:
       | I've got all of HN in SQLite if anyone else wants to play. You'd
       | wanna hydrate into something better.
       | 
       | Share on Torrent maybe? Like 640MiB per year.
        
       | u_name wrote:
       | I was tempted to answer the title with "domainname checks out",
       | but that wouldn't do hackernews any justice.
       | 
       | Although imho it seems really random what makes it to the
       | frontpage i agree that there is always an interesting mix of blog
       | posts, news articles and technical content.
       | 
       | Maybe it also depends on the time of the day (different audiences
       | active, having a slightly different taste)?
        
       | post-it wrote:
       | > In my job as technical writer / marketer1, the most common
       | question I get from companies I work with is "how do we get to
       | the front page of Hacker News?"
       | 
       | Genuinely surprising. Does everyone read HN but just never
       | mentions it?
        
       | zachlatta wrote:
       | I have a fair amount of experience getting things to the front
       | page of Hacker News because I sometimes share work from Hack Club
       | (https://hackclub.com), a coding nonprofit I work for.
       | 
       | By far, beyond any tricks or special hacks, the most effective
       | mechanism is just posting things people on HN will genuinely find
       | interesting. And that's the beauty of this place!
        
       | jbs55 wrote:
       | " A blog post from a corporate entity only has a 8% shot at
       | making the FP"
       | 
       | This is not the same as saying 8% of the FP is corp blog posts
       | 
       | Actually stopped reading at this point
       | 
       | Also first post
        
       | codingdave wrote:
       | If this is a marketer trying to figure out how to get a product
       | launch to the front page, there are a few errors in their
       | thinking:
       | 
       | 1) Show HN is the right answer. End of story. That is how we
       | specifically say to HN, "Look at this thing I made!", regardless
       | of whether you are an established user or new to the site. Just
       | do that.
       | 
       | 2) Their goal isn't actually to get "to the front page". Their
       | goal is to get eyes on their work. See #1.
       | 
       | 3) Unless their target market is actually the HN crowd... why are
       | they wanting our eyes, anyway?
        
         | neilv wrote:
         | > _3) Unless their target market is actually the HN crowd...
         | why are they wanting our eyes, anyway?_
         | 
         | I was wondering that, too. Investors? Hiring?
        
       | agwa wrote:
       | 8 of my last 10 blog posts[1] made the front page of HN. Before
       | that, my posts only made the front page infrequently. What
       | changed is I started picking topics and framings which are more
       | appealing to HN readers, and I credit Michael Lynch's course[2]
       | for helping me to do that. He is surely one of the best
       | authorities on what reaches the front page of HN.
       | 
       | [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=agwa.name
       | 
       | [2] https://hitthefrontpage.com/
        
         | amelius wrote:
         | SEO -> HNO
        
       | waprin wrote:
       | My anecdotal experience agrees that blog posts with promotions
       | are better than "here's my product" , on average. Though you can
       | just do both.
       | 
       | I've front paged Hacker News a few times and I've recently had a
       | lot of success promoting a product on Reddit.
       | 
       | Often times I see boostrappers hype up Twitter as a marketing
       | channel and lament that Reddit / Hacker News is impossible since
       | it's a lottery to get upvotes, mods take stuff down, and users
       | are hostile to promotion. While there's some truth to that, I
       | think these people don't "get" these upvote platforms.
       | 
       | If you drive-by and drop off a link to a product, it'll probably
       | get lost. If you write something really interesting then leave a
       | promotional message at the end, it'll probably work fine. On
       | sites like Reddit specifically, it's better to put more content
       | in the post rather than link out (sucks for your site's SEO but
       | much more likely to get upvoted).
       | 
       | There's definitely some luck to Hacker News but cream also does
       | tend to rise to the top and you're allowed to re-submit.
       | 
       | It's annoying that there's a subset of HN and Reddit that think
       | that anyone trying to make a dime on the internet is somehow sub-
       | human, but they are a minority . I followed my strategy with a a
       | Reddit post recently and the person complaining about my
       | promotion of a paid product at the end got 13 downvotes (
       | https://www.reddit.com/r/poker/comments/13wt05l/lsg_hanks_ri... )
       | . Because people liked the content so will forgive a promotion if
       | there's some value add.
       | 
       | Ultimately people value being entertained and value learning
       | useful information. So if you can do one of those two things,
       | they will probably forgive a product shoutout.
       | 
       | Funny thing is I really struggle with Twitter and have the
       | "tweeting into a void" problem but Reddit / HN seem to come more
       | naturally to me. Though I'm guessing the secret is another
       | variation of "be more entertaining or more informative".
       | 
       | But you can also try different stuff, you can do a Show HN and a
       | blog post.
       | 
       | There's one last really important thing I don't see mention on
       | Max Woolf's Hacker News undocumented. If you submit your own blog
       | too many times without enough upvotes, you will get auto-flagged.
       | So make sure you submit some random other stuff you find
       | interesting to please the algorithm gods. But that goes back to
       | "act like a regular member of the community and the community
       | will forgive some self-promotion".
        
         | beardyw wrote:
         | Or better still be a regular member of the community. Nothing
         | raises my hackles like something posted and commented on by a
         | group who have hardly a karma point between them.
        
       | dylanjcastillo wrote:
       | Interesting. But I believe you're be wrong about Show HN (as
       | others have pointed out).
       | 
       | Show HN makes for an effective way to get to the front page,
       | based on three reasons:
       | 
       | 1. You don't need that many votes to make it to the front page,
       | and the votes don't need to happen in the first minutes after
       | you've posted.
       | 
       | 2. Many people use shownew[1] in addition to newest[2] to
       | discover content on HN.
       | 
       | 3. Show HN posts remain visible for a longer time on shownew
       | compared to regular posts on newest.
       | 
       | When you post using Show HN, your post stays for a long time in
       | shownew (right now the last one there was posted 19 hours ago),
       | while on newest your post has to gather votes very quickly to
       | make it to the front page (the last post visible there is from
       | ~50 minutes ago). So Show HN gives you a higher chance of getting
       | your post "discovered".
       | 
       | In my case, I've made it to the front page 4 times out of 21
       | posts. 3 of those were Show HN posts.
       | 
       | [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/shownew
       | 
       | [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/newest
        
       | golergka wrote:
       | > What gets to the front page of Hacker News?
       | 
       | > (randomshit.dev)
       | 
       | Well. I think the title almost answers itself.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-07-04 23:01 UTC)