[HN Gopher] Block 39% of all HTML smuggling by just blocking Jav...
___________________________________________________________________
Block 39% of all HTML smuggling by just blocking JavaScript
document.write()
Author : mfi
Score : 13 points
Date : 2023-06-28 17:45 UTC (5 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.xorlab.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.xorlab.com)
| JohnFen wrote:
| > it's clear that straight-out blocking HTML attachments with
| JavaScript is not an option for most organizations, as it would
| impact important business communication.
|
| I suppose it depends on what your job is. My habit of decades for
| personal email is to not allow HTML at all. I do the same in the
| office. Sometimes, this means I'm reading the HTML source
| directly to get the information, which is inconvenient, but it's
| worth it to me.
|
| Fortunately, most important emails I get contain no HTML at all,
| or use only trivial HTML that doesn't hinder reading the source.
|
| I do wish people wouldn't use HTML in emails at all (it rarely
| adds anything useful to the email), but that's not the world I
| live in.
| hn666 wrote:
| Honestly, while it is kinda sad it's the reality: it has great
| marketing potential (although it's a concept I inherently
| despise, it's giving me a job atm).
| JohnFen wrote:
| I would welcome marketing emails using HTML wholeheartedly if
| no actual people used it, because it would make automatically
| detecting and deleting the marketing emails much easier.
| mrguyorama wrote:
| >As it turns out, 81% of the emails containing HTML files with
| JavaScript are malicious, while only 19% are legitimate.... it's
| clear that straight-out blocking HTML attachments with JavaScript
| is not an option for most organizations, as it would impact
| important business communication.
|
| Oh of course, how dare we suggest companies stop doing sketchy
| things in their ~spam~ ~marketing~ _notification_ emails that are
| explicitly trying to get you to click on links full of
| gobbledygook, training normal users that an ugly and unclear link
| is an expected form of communication! Nah, we could never tell
| businesses that sending a link that asks me to click a sketchy
| looking button to log into my bank account is something that
| should be discouraged because it makes users used to clicking on
| phishing emails.
|
| Instead, we will just pretend to do stuff while half the company
| fails the bi-yearly phishing screening, including most of our VPs
| yieldcrv wrote:
| 19% is very high.
|
| like even a 5% false negative rate would be too high
| malfist wrote:
| 81% could simply be the amount of spam a user gets and is
| ignored. There's some huge variables to control here.
| Waterluvian wrote:
| My email disallows images and javascript/html. I have yet to
| suffer for this. If anything it's like the Adblock of email. And
| I'm not one of those "block all javascript on the Web" people.
| saurik wrote:
| Same (including that I am not one of those people who block
| JavaScript on the web; hell: I don't even use an ad blocker),
| though a few times a year I do run into a service that both
| explicitly provides a text/plain segment (so the mechanism that
| would just try to give me the text from the html segment isn't
| used) that is useless (missing links, doesn't have a text form
| of some code, etc.) and I have to open the code of the email to
| find the link; this is easily, however, solved in the email
| client and does not require activating either images or
| javascript/html.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-06-28 23:02 UTC)