[HN Gopher] Argos Catalogue Kettle Pages, 1976/1985 (2017)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Argos Catalogue Kettle Pages, 1976/1985 (2017)
        
       Author : JdeBP
       Score  : 36 points
       Date   : 2023-06-25 06:10 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (wearethemutants.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (wearethemutants.com)
        
       | scrumper wrote:
       | Wow, what a trip. The Russell Hobbs chrome-on-copper (number 11,
       | first page of the '76 catalog) is like a wormhole to my childhood
       | kitchen. I remember that red rocker switch so clearly now, how it
       | felt to turn it on and off. It was beautifully spring loaded, so
       | you'd push it a bit then the spring would take over and snap it
       | on. My mum taught me how to make her a cup of tea when I was old
       | enough to reach it - well before I liked the stuff.
        
         | ris wrote:
         | Was going to say the same thing, only ours was the stainless
         | steel one (No. 10). Lasted us well into the 90s.
        
       | mjburgess wrote:
       | Amongst the upper working class, the argos catalogue featured as
       | a central part of holiday (christmas esp.) life until perhaps the
       | mid-2000s.
       | 
       | You could walk into any argos and take one of the 1000pg+
       | catelogues of massive pallets of them, and paw them over days.
       | 
       | The working class, typically unsentimental in the UK, would then
       | purchase the child's designated item for xmas. The pretence of
       | "santa clause", i think, more often a middle class ritual.
        
         | adhesive_wombat wrote:
         | Kind of off topic but the actual "Santa isn't real" moment for
         | me was that some children _really believed it_. To us, it was
         | always on the same level as the fairies (led by BDFL
         | Tinkerbell, obviously) in my grandmother 's garden or the tooth
         | fairy: fun to imagine but clearly, literally, make-believe and
         | I thought everyone was just playing up to the same fun thought-
         | experiment.
         | 
         | And, indeed, the Argos catalogue was, for me, pored over all
         | year round. In turn I discovered the multi-volume RS print
         | catalogue and _real desire_ set in. Sadly Santa didn 't have a
         | trade account so took a while to scam an account that permitted
         | no-lower-limit free shipping.
        
           | Graffur wrote:
           | Most children do not know what a "thought-experiment" is. I
           | actually feel very sorry for you and other children who never
           | believed.
        
           | Peanuts99 wrote:
           | I had the same feeling about God at a Christian camp.
        
       | WediBlino wrote:
       | The laminated book of dreams.
        
       | mikestew wrote:
       | _Argos pioneered a new form of catalogue retail where customers
       | made their order in one of the company's high-street shops before
       | waiting for their items to be brought out from the warehouse at
       | the rear._
       | 
       | Sounds a lot like the British version of the U. S.'s Service
       | Merchandise[0]. Write down your order on a little sheet of paper,
       | hand it to store personnel, wait for your items to come rolling
       | down the roller ramp.
       | 
       | On an unrelated note, but from TFA:
       | 
       |  _In 1979, 42% of British citizens lived in council housing_
       | 
       | Wait a minute, wut? Explain to this former colonist what cultural
       | cue he's missing, because how is it possible that 42% of a
       | country's population lives in public housing? Or is it not
       | "public housing", as in U. S.-style subsidized housing? Or were
       | times just that bad in Great Britain in the 70s? EDIT: thanks for
       | the context, responders. Apologies if I worded it poorly.
       | 
       | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_Merchandise
        
         | _dain_ wrote:
         | _> Explain to this former colonist what cultural cue he's
         | missing, because how is it possible that 42% of a country's
         | population lives in public housing?_
         | 
         | Because they criminalized private construction of housing. It
         | can only be done after a lengthy procedure where you beg for
         | permission from a bureaucrat.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Town_and_Country_Planning_Act_...
         | 
         |  _> The Act established that planning permission was required
         | for land development; ownership alone no longer conferred the
         | right to develop the land.[1]_
        
         | philjohn wrote:
         | Not sure it's classed as "times that bad" (although the 70's
         | weren't great), but more a political decision that people of
         | less means could have affordable housing.
         | 
         | Then Thatcher allowed people to buy their council houses, and
         | we are where we now are.
        
         | jrmg wrote:
         | Asking if things were 'just that bad' is a bit of a value
         | judgement. Yes, they were 'just that bad', but from WWII to 70s
         | the view that the government _should_ be involved in things
         | like housing was a lot more prevalent in the UK than it is now.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_house
        
         | hereonout2 wrote:
         | That was in 1979, the 42%, it's nothing like that now. But yes
         | they are / were greatly subsidised housing. This was after a
         | period of massive home building and the introduction of the
         | welfare state after WW2.
         | 
         | I don't think Britain was a shining economic example back then
         | (it was known as the sick man of Europe), but council houses
         | seemed rather a good thing.
         | 
         | My mother's parents were given one in the late 50's, where they
         | raised four children and my grandparents resided until there
         | deaths 50+ years later. Although council housing still exists
         | it's much rarer now, and your chances of recreating what my
         | grandparents had are slim to none.
        
           | 2b3a51 wrote:
           | Not sure there is a lot of subsidy for council/housing
           | association housing. Building costs paid back over 60 years
           | or so generally. Perhaps land may be allocated?
        
         | cjs_ac wrote:
         | > Wait a minute, wut? Explain to this former colonist what
         | cultural cue he's missing, because how is it possible that 42%
         | of a country's population lives in public housing? Or is it not
         | "public housing", as in U. S.-style subsidized housing? Or were
         | times just that bad in Great Britain in the 70s?
         | 
         | There were a few factors.
         | 
         | 1. Yes, many people were very poor. Today, many Britons are
         | still very poor.
         | 
         | 2. In the war, an awful lot of housing was destroyed. Entire
         | towns (Harlow and Milton Keynes are prominent examples) were
         | built from open countryside to house the displaced. The
         | overwhelming majority of this housing remained in government
         | ownership until Thatcher's 'Right to Buy' reforms, which are
         | the origin of the present housing crisis in the UK.
         | 
         | 3. Prior to the war, the United Kingdom was the most densely
         | populated country on Earth; during the war, people 'mucked in'
         | to help each other during the nationwide trauma of Total
         | War[0], and after the war, returning servicemen and
         | servicewomen demanded that the sacrifices made amount to
         | something. The governments formed by the Labour Party from 1945
         | to 1980 instituted a great many social reforms - the National
         | Health Service, expansion of state schooling, social care, and
         | so on - that made good on these demands, and were seen as
         | improvements to the nation, rather than government overreach.
         | 
         | [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_war
        
           | _dain_ wrote:
           | They also introduced the Town and Country Planning Act of
           | 1947, which made it illegal to build any kind of housing or
           | modify existing housing without asking permission from the
           | government. We would not need council housing nowadays if the
           | private sector were simply allowed to fill the market demand.
           | We are no longer in the days when children played in the
           | rubble of cities flattened by the Luftwaffe.
           | 
           | Blaming Thatcher is too kind to the current government.
           | They're the ones who keep listening to nimbys. Thatcher's
           | mistake is that _she didn 't go far enough_; axing the 1947
           | Act and its descendants should have been part of the supply-
           | side reforms.
           | 
           | The fondness for council housing is an example of a peculiar
           | psychological coping mechanism of Britons, stemming from
           | imperial decline. We pretend a necessary evil was something
           | positively desirable all along. The Americans are right, it
           | is actually embarrassing to have 42% of your population in
           | state-owned housing, I'm sorry to say.
        
             | atchoo wrote:
             | Please no-one pay this extreme ideological crankery any
             | note.
        
             | gorgoiler wrote:
             | One counterpoint to this is Lisbon, with its unregulated
             | building codes. If you've shoulder barged a doorway that's
             | too narrow, looked out of a window that's one third
             | obscured by a brick wall, or sat on the can and had your
             | knees hit the walls, you'll know what I mean.
             | 
             | Planning and standards aren't quite the same thing, but
             | unregulated building has negative consequences on quality
             | if not quantity. Does terrible Portuguese architecture go
             | hand in hand with an abundance of affordable housing?
        
               | _dain_ wrote:
               | This is a common fallacy trotted out by opponents of
               | planning deregulation. They conflate it with building
               | codes, as if the planning laws have anything to do with
               | health and safety, fire mitigation, and so on.
               | 
               | The example we should look to is Japan. Being a country
               | prone to earthquakes and tsunamis, they have rigorous
               | building codes. But they have very loose planning
               | restrictions. Meaning, so long as you make the building
               | safe and habitable, you have a great deal of latitude to
               | build what you want, _by right_ , within an urban or
               | suburban area.
               | 
               | https://twitter.com/380kmh/status/1638247647776473089
               | 
               | https://twitter.com/AntBreach/status/1121362679367598080
               | 
               | It is that key phrase "by right" which is lacking in the
               | UK. You cannot build anything by right. This must change.
        
       | danw1979 wrote:
       | All those kettles from the 70s look realy well made. Maybe it's
       | the abundant chrome.
        
         | adhesive_wombat wrote:
         | How unprofitable. Much better to use bits of metallised plastic
         | which flake to death in a few years. Cheaper to make and those
         | suckers'll be back soon enough.
         | 
         | You can probably fix the flex properly too, new ones often have
         | a moulded captive boot in the cable instead of a screw clamp.
        
           | tragomaskhalos wrote:
           | Last time I bought a kettle my wife did her nut because I
           | went for the 20 quid option rather than spending PS80 on some
           | prop from a lifestyle magazine, however I maintain that my
           | reasoning was sound - all modern kit is indeed built with a
           | depressingly imminent obsolescence, to which price point
           | confers only limited immunity, and this is exacerbated by the
           | brutal hardness of London water, which will scale and calcify
           | any appliance that so much as looks at it.
        
           | lm28469 wrote:
           | Using plastic is much better, especially for the parts in
           | contact with water. You wouldn't want boiling water in
           | contact with metal, it might leach chemicals that would end
           | up in your system
        
             | switch007 wrote:
             | Huh? Millions of cooks every day boil liquid in metal pans.
             | What's the issue?
        
       | tiernano wrote:
       | on a slightly related note, Argos pulled out of the Irish market
       | on 24th June 2023. I think a mix of Brexit and competition from
       | Amazon and other online retailers was the final nail in the
       | coffin. It could never compete on price, but did have a large
       | selection of stuff...
        
       | JdeBP wrote:
       | I take the final paragraph with a huge grain of salt, having had
       | an older relative who lived through it describe to me the
       | _hugely_ aspirational atmosphere of the U.K. in the 1950s and
       | 1960s.
       | 
       | We cannot deduce history from the pages of one company's sales
       | catalogue, merely the changing fortunes of that company; nor from
       | a piece of fairy cake.
        
         | ggm wrote:
         | But, since people who lived through this time are still alive
         | we have oral history and other approaches.
         | 
         | I think this catalogue is illustrative of an ideal. And, other
         | catalogues will tell a similar story.
         | 
         | As a child of prior times I certainly recognised social coding
         | in the change from old kitchen ware to new. The utility
         | function of Teflon was high but the ability to signal "I can
         | afford to buy new things" was also high.
         | 
         | Tupperware was pure utility function in colours, but it failed
         | to signify success. Snobs like me rather looked down on it
         | (shamefully, I regret my past)
        
           | mikestew wrote:
           | _Tupperware was pure utility function in colours, but it
           | failed to signify success. Snobs like me rather looked down
           | on it (shamefully, I regret my past)_
           | 
           | It is an unfortunate outcome of the sales and marketing of
           | Tupperware (multi-level marketing). So the ecosystem of
           | Tupperware was looked down upon, similar to Amway. And if you
           | have Tupperware, then you have been to a Tupperware party.
           | The upper crust, I am confident, do not attend Tupperware
           | parties.
           | 
           | But the products themselves? Awesome quality and
           | functionality...at least they used to be.
        
             | gorgoiler wrote:
             | Elizabeth II kept her breakfast cereal in Tupperware --
             | this article probably just means commodity plastic food
             | storage, but maybe HM sent out secret shoppers to
             | Knightsbridge parties?:
             | 
             | https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2012/may/20/what-
             | th...
        
       | Marazan wrote:
       | Argos were well ahead of the curve shopping tech wise which
       | formed a large part of the reason that Sainsburys bought them.
       | 
       | While Amazon was being pleased as punch about offering next day
       | delivery on items (actual delivery time highly variable) Argos
       | was offering completely reliable _same day_ delivery.
       | 
       | It is quite amazing how smooth the process is, even if you cant
       | get same day delivery you will invariably be able to get same day
       | pickup. In extreme cases even if the item is not in stock locally
       | if you order early enough in the day their logistics are so good
       | they can move it same day to your local store for collection for
       | zero extra charge.
        
         | railton wrote:
         | I get all my high end electronics through Argos as then I don't
         | have to run the "is it fake" gauntlet with Amazon. Highly
         | recommend.
        
           | [deleted]
        
       | ajb wrote:
       | Argos was originally a promotional scheme called "Green Shield
       | Stamps", whereby you could only buy things from them via stamps,
       | which were a perk of buying other things at other retailers:
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Shield_Stamps
        
       | Lio wrote:
       | Wow, these take me back.
       | 
       | I'm particularly elated to see the good ol' Goblin Teasmade
       | there. It's an alarm clock that wakes you up with a freshly made
       | pot of tea. What could be more British than that?
       | 
       | They used to have them as prizes on TV game shows. Seems
       | laughable now, the idea that anyone (other than me) would get
       | excited by the thought of winning a Teasmade.
        
         | scrumper wrote:
         | We never had one because my mum thought they'd burn the house
         | down while we slept...
        
       | HeckFeck wrote:
       | Argos had a website put up where you could browse every one of
       | their published catalogues. I think they put it up in 2020 to
       | commemorate the ending of their printed catalogue.
       | 
       | Alas, they weren't PDF or any sort of download and the website
       | was discontinued shortly thereafter. Quite the shame; what I'd do
       | to see the 2005 or 2007 catalogues again!
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-06-26 23:01 UTC)