[HN Gopher] Clojure is a product design tool (2015)
___________________________________________________________________
Clojure is a product design tool (2015)
Author : dustingetz
Score : 71 points
Date : 2023-06-22 20:16 UTC (2 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (precursorapp.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (precursorapp.com)
| croes wrote:
| >[:p "Sentence with period after " [:a {:href "#"} "a link"] "."]
|
| Isn't that Hiccup and not Clojure Script?
| ARandomerDude wrote:
| Yes, but the Hiccup library works with both Clojure and
| ClojureScript.
|
| Edit: I guess it's the Hiccups port that works for Cljs. Either
| way hiccup notation is standard for both.
| jetti wrote:
| It is Clojurescript. It is just a vector that contains a
| keyword, map and string. The Hiccup library would convert that
| to HTML but at the end of the day, it is all Clojure(Script)
| data structures.
| nathants wrote:
| reagent remains sota for frontend.
| thih9 wrote:
| Should we add (2015) to the submission title?
|
| The blog post has no date, but I found an earliest entry at
| waybackmachine from march that year [1].
|
| [1]:
| https://web.archive.org/web/20150314172909/https://precursor... .
|
| Edit: I see the title has been updated, thanks!
| jimbob45 wrote:
| I sure wish we could move beyond HTML + JS into a unified Clojure
| browser. HTML is what's holding the web back and there's no
| excuse for JS to be the only browser scripting language at this
| point.
| zengid wrote:
| I think that once the WASM-GC is standardized and shipped (and
| perhaps once WASM can directly talk to the DOM), JavaScript
| will lose some dominance. I think a lot of folks will stick
| with it, personally, but I'm excited that more languages will
| eventually feel browser-native.
| giovannibonetti wrote:
| Related: Penpot - The Open-Source design & prototyping platform
| [1] is implemented in Clojure.
|
| [1] https://github.com/penpot/penpot
| systems wrote:
| Currently whenever I think of Clojure I remember this post
|
| https://www.reddit.com/r/Clojure/comments/a79aln/clojure_web...
|
| As far as I know the situation did not improve, I had high hopes
| for Clojure, but i think it will eventually be as forgotten as
| Groovy
| 147 wrote:
| I used to do Clojure professionally. I think the community's
| disdain for frameworks really stunted Clojure's adoption.
|
| Currently, I'm learning Elixir and Phoenix.
| Lyngbakr wrote:
| > _How does someone who has never built a SPA before, let alone
| ever build a web application in Clojure /S suppose to get
| started?_
|
| I think that _Clojure for the Brave and True_ [0] is a good
| place to start for Clojure in general, while _Web Development
| with Clojure: Build Large, Maintainable Web Applications
| Interactively_ [1] covers the web app side of things.
|
| [0] https://www.braveclojure.com/
|
| [1] https://pragprog.com/titles/dswdcloj3/web-development-
| with-c...
| shaunxcode wrote:
| Aww yes the fiction of no friction: the funnel back to blub.
| The way is no way.
| trafnar wrote:
| The haml/clojure comparison made me feel compelled to share the
| Imba (https://imba.io/) equivalent.
|
| <p> "Sentence with a period after {<a href="#"> "a link"}."
|
| Working demo: https://scrimba.com/scrim/cW2QWgTd
| cutler wrote:
| Om is definitely not the place to start Clojure web development.
| I'm not sure it's even maintained. Kit and Fulcro are full-stack
| frameworks but if it's just SPA then re-frame is best option.
| a_c wrote:
| Before reading, I thought it is about Clojure helping designer to
| collaborate with engineers and getting customer insight on how
| the designed product is used. I was completely off.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-06-22 23:00 UTC)