[HN Gopher] Alphabet selling Google Domains assets to Squarespace
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Alphabet selling Google Domains assets to Squarespace
        
       Author : brycewray
       Score  : 95 points
       Date   : 2023-06-15 20:59 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.bloomberg.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.bloomberg.com)
        
       | wg0 wrote:
       | Anyone knows how domain name pricing works? Why some domains are
       | cheaper in first year and then 10 times expensive the next year?
       | Can a domain registrar exploit the situation where they know you
       | have a good business around that domain so now the domain price
       | per year is let's say 5,000 dollars?
        
         | dsgnr wrote:
         | I work in the domain industry and there are a few answers.
         | 
         | A company can be a registry for a tld, like how Google owns the
         | .app tld. That is different than a registrar, like godaddy, who
         | resells the names in namespaces provided by registries. The
         | registries set the price for that tld and other things like
         | requiring .app namespace to be secure, so you need HTTPS and an
         | SSL certificate for your website to load on most browsers. Due
         | to these SSL requirements, domain forwarding isnt supported.
         | another example of requirements set by a registry is the .AI
         | namespace which is more expensive by default (over $125 a year
         | last i looked)and requires a minimum of 2 years when you
         | register.
         | 
         | Registries also charge more for names they think are worth
         | more. So if you see a premium .app name that cost $2,000 per
         | year, that is because the registry (Google in the case of .app)
         | decided the name was valuable (probably because its a short
         | common noun) and they want a lot more per year for it. Ive
         | never heard of this happening after someone already had it for
         | cheaper, so no rug pull type situations.
         | 
         | As for why some names renew for more than when you first get
         | them, its a strategy for registrars (not registries) to attract
         | new customers. Companies give items away at a discount or loss
         | to get you into their ecosystem and then make profits at
         | renewals. It's like the getting a free smartphone from a phone
         | company and then paying more for the service than if you had
         | owned the phone and not got it free.
        
         | thesuitonym wrote:
         | I'm not an expert here by any means, but my understanding is
         | that some TLDs are just more expensive, but for the first year
         | they're sold at a discount to get you in the door.
        
       | crazygringo wrote:
       | Can we hopefully avoid the worn trope of Google killing products
       | in this thread?
       | 
       | Because it's _not_ being killed, it 's being transferred to
       | another company. (If this reporting is correct.)
       | 
       | Which is something to _celebrate_ , not criticize. With
       | Reader/Stadia/etc., wouldn't users prefer that it _had_ been
       | transferred rather than killed?
        
         | CameronNemo wrote:
         | For stuff like stadia, which has no real identical products, a
         | transfer would indeed be nicer.
         | 
         | But the whole sell of the google domains product is that you
         | are getting a domain _from Google_. If it is no longer from
         | google, the product is largely indistinguishable from those
         | from other large cloud providers like Cloudflare or AWS (or
         | more boutique or focused offerings like Porkbun and Namecheap).
        
         | WillPostForFood wrote:
         | There is little difference here between killed and sold.
         | Squarespace charges 66% more per year for .com domain, so it is
         | going to make sense to transfer out for most people. Same
         | result as if Google killed it, just a slightly longer window to
         | go through the hassle of transferring.
        
         | lozenge wrote:
         | I mean, they're domains, you can't kill them.
         | 
         | This is like saying Photos isn't killed because they didn't
         | delete old photos when you exceed your new low quota.
        
           | resolutebat wrote:
           | That's very different from "killed".
        
       | DazWilkin wrote:
       | I'm a long-term, several domains user of Google Domains and
       | disappointed to learn of this sale.
       | 
       | Several others have suggested porkbun and I'm interested to see
       | that it provides an API
       | (https://porkbun.com/api/json/v3/documentation).
       | 
       | Do folks have experience with this API?
       | 
       | I have a hacky a solution to update Google Domains Dynamic DNS
       | record but would value a more functional API to update DNS
       | records. Had I known about this before today, I may have migrated
       | my domains to porkbun for this reason alone.
        
       | maherbeg wrote:
       | What are the top recommendations to migrate to these days?
        
         | CameronNemo wrote:
         | I have heard great things about porkbun, but I personally use
         | namecheap and am quite happy with that.
        
           | ROTMetro wrote:
           | I use both these and am happy with both. Porkbun was the best
           | deal I found on the AI tld.
        
         | petecooper wrote:
         | At the risk of spamming this thread: Porkbun has been excellent
         | for me.
        
           | brycewray wrote:
           | Agree re Porkbun.
        
       | JPHPJ wrote:
       | Classic Google
        
       | latexr wrote:
       | > In an unexpected announcement today, Google Domains is "winding
       | down following a transition period," (...)
       | 
       | Google killing a product should no longer be a surprise to
       | anyone. It's the opposite of Monty Python's Spanish Inquisition:
       | everybody expects it.
       | 
       | https://killedbygoogle.com
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Spanish_Inquisition_(Monty...
        
         | juujian wrote:
         | I guess the only surprise here is that they're selling it.
        
           | Kye wrote:
           | It's probably some contractual obligation as a registrar.
        
         | [deleted]
        
           | [deleted]
        
       | panda88888 wrote:
       | Any recommendations on registrars? I may have to move a couple of
       | domains off Google Domains / Squarespace.
       | 
       | Edit: I am located in the US.
        
         | focusedone wrote:
         | nearlyfreespeech
        
         | SXX wrote:
         | UPD: Yeah I wasn't avare they been bought out recently. That's
         | really unfortunate to hear.
         | 
         | Gandi served me well for last 10 years:
         | 
         | * Plenty of zones supported with reasonable prices.
         | 
         | * Have team account access for companies.
         | 
         | * In case of emergency there is an option to renew domains
         | registered with Gandi even without being owner.
        
           | panda88888 wrote:
           | Thanks for the recommendation. Looks like Gandi got bought
           | out recently. Not sure if it's for better or worse--will do
           | some more research.
        
             | SXX wrote:
             | That's a bummer. I guess it's about time for me to stop
             | recommending them.
        
           | ROTMetro wrote:
           | Just yesterday there was a post here not too thrilled about
           | how Gandi is handling their latest price increases and their
           | dropped support for 'free included' email?
           | 
           | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36321783
        
         | petecooper wrote:
         | Porkbun has been excellent for me.
        
         | statico wrote:
         | Namecheap is great.
        
       | ramesh31 wrote:
       | Does this mean GCP users will have to use a third party registrar
       | now? What a joke.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | rafaelturk wrote:
       | This is so disappointing, shame, Google Domains was an epic super
       | simple product..
        
       | science4sail wrote:
       | Related post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36346619
        
       | brycewray wrote:
       | https://archive.is/YCFbt
        
       | trafficante wrote:
       | I've been a (paying) customer of Google Domains for quite a
       | number of years now. Better options have arisen for my needs over
       | the years (largely family name domain parking and email
       | aliases/forwarding), but it honestly hasn't been worth my time to
       | bother rejiggering everything and transferring it all out.
       | 
       | I guess now it is? How bad is Squarespace for this sort of "set
       | it and forget it" kinda thing?
        
       | donmcronald wrote:
       | Google is one of the only DynDNS providers that do one secret per
       | hostname rather than a shared secret. I wonder if that's going to
       | get killed too.
        
         | proactivesvcs wrote:
         | Afraid.org does, too. https://freedns.afraid.org/
        
       | waboremo wrote:
       | Now would be a good time for Cloudflare to announce they've
       | (finally) added .app and .dev support.
       | 
       | Nonetheless, Squarespace isn't bad but I found their domain
       | pricing to be overpriced to target the specific market that
       | doesn't really care about domain pricing they just want their
       | domain and Squarespace set up at once. I can't see myself
       | sticking around post the grace period mentioned.
        
         | brycewray wrote:
         | I briefly transferred one of my domains from Google Domains to
         | Cloudflare, but at least at that time CF required the domain to
         | use its DNS. While that's generally not an issue with me
         | because I use other CF services, I felt it might limit me too
         | much down the line so I transferred the domain back to Google
         | after the 60-day waiting period. Ah, well.
        
           | waboremo wrote:
           | Yep still the case. Good if you're already using cloudflare
           | and therefore the at cost pricing can wind up saving you a
           | bit, otherwise you would be better served with the likes of
           | porkbun or namecheap. Gandi used to be another before it was
           | sold.
        
       | brycewray wrote:
       | I've been using Google Domains for a few years (previously used
       | Namecheap); but, a few months ago, I took a domain I don't
       | actively use and transferred it to Porkbun after reading so many
       | positive comments on HN about that registrar. I was thinking,
       | "Well, you never know about Google, so I may as well see how it
       | goes, just in case." Have, indeed, been very pleased with
       | Porkbun. The article says it'll be some months before this deal
       | goes through, but...
       | 
       | *Later edit*: Decided to go ahead and transfer the other domains
       | there, too. Done.
        
       | wsgeorge wrote:
       | How long until the "don't trust Google to not kill a product"
       | feeling becomes so widespread it begins to hurt them? I don't
       | know any historical precedents...
        
         | o_m wrote:
         | It has been like that for a long time, but it seemed like a lot
         | of people thought they wouldn't kill GCP. But this makes sense,
         | they might partition GCP instead of just killing it.
        
           | wsgeorge wrote:
           | > it seemed like a lot of people thought they wouldn't kill
           | GCP
           | 
           | I'm one of them. Cloud services is a large opportunity Google
           | will be stupid to ignore/give up. I anticipate the service
           | evolving, but I don't see an outright death of Google Cloud.
           | 
           | I'm not throwing Google a challenge ;)
        
             | re-thc wrote:
             | I would have thought domains is part of cloud.
        
         | lordfrito wrote:
         | After being an enthusastic early advocate for Google (Gmail
         | since invite in 2004), I've been slowly migrating away from
         | Google for years.
         | 
         | The turning point for me was when they killed Google Music,
         | which I had been using for a decade, forcing me to move my
         | large catalog of songs elsewhere. I self host via Plex now.
         | Strike 1.
         | 
         | Then they killed the "free domain email", which became freeish
         | (grandfathered) "google workgroups", which became pay up or we
         | kill it. I spent many hours back and forthing with their email
         | support trying to get admin access to my account to no avail.
         | They claimed I needed to reach out to my domain admin. Uhhh
         | sorry I own it and I'm the only guy thats on it or ever used
         | it. There's no one else but me (I never had an admin, as I was
         | just somehow transitioned during the grandfathering). No luck.
         | I (nervously) let Google auto-kill the account, after quickly
         | migrating everything to Fastmail via IMAP (and hand moving my
         | calendar!). Strike 2.
         | 
         | Then (long story short) my Google Fi and Google Pixel
         | experience was fine, until it suddenly wasn't. No human to
         | complain to. Top of the line Pixel phone died like 14 months
         | from purchase, no recourse. Buy a new phone or else. Strike 3.
         | 
         | The pattern is clear, Google services are fine up until the
         | moment they aren't. At that point you're up a creek, as there
         | are (by design) no humans to complain to.
         | 
         | All that is left now is my domain on Google Domains (well that
         | and a free gmail account which I forward), which I figured was
         | safe-ish (as they can't possibly pull the rug out from
         | underneath domain owners can they?). But secretly been
         | monitoring for signs I need to drop that as well. Looks like
         | the time is now.
         | 
         | So.... any thoughts on whether Squarespace will be an
         | improvement? Or should I start looking for another domain name
         | registrar?
        
         | hbn wrote:
         | It seems to me it already has. I spent ~ a decade being pretty
         | immersed in the Google ecosystem, and after going through the
         | ringer dozens of times and finally realizing being one of their
         | users will never stop being an unpaid, unrespected beta tester,
         | I gave up on them. Bought an iPhone and moved services from
         | Google where possible.
         | 
         | I remember this[1] article from a few years ago on the subject
         | of Google's shutdowns hurting its brand. It's even funnier to
         | read now with it being written shortly after Stadia's launch.
         | The author and everyone else were pointing out that they have
         | little expectation for the service to be around in a few years.
         | And it turned out we were right!
         | 
         | [1] https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2019/04/googles-constant-
         | pro...
        
           | noizejoy wrote:
           | > finally realizing being one of their users will never stop
           | being an unpaid, unrespected beta tester ...
           | 
           | ... and AI trainer
        
         | themadturk wrote:
         | Probably not until they sunset free Gmail, at which point there
         | will be millions of voices screaming out in terror.
        
         | screye wrote:
         | It already has. There is a reason that GCP has struggled to
         | find their calling.
        
         | Joe_Boogz wrote:
         | already happened for me, I've transitioned away from Google
         | almost entirely.
         | 
         | The only place I interact with google these days is my Google
         | TV. Here's to hoping they don't drop support for that as well.
        
         | gbN025tt2Z1E2E4 wrote:
         | It's already happening for years now. Just look at Stadia.
        
         | PlutoIsAPlanet wrote:
         | It's now a self fulfilling prophecy.
         | 
         | No one used Google Stadia because Google kills things with
         | little warning, which subsequently caused Google to kill
         | Stadia.
         | 
         | Google will never be able to launch another product.
        
         | smoldesu wrote:
         | Precisely as long as it takes YouTube to fail, which is their
         | last remaining meaningful cash cow (besides advertising).
        
           | sokoloff wrote:
           | Is YouTube even "besides" advertising?
        
         | alex7734 wrote:
         | Isn't it already? The list of products killed is so long that
         | most people have probably got burnt at least once by Google.
         | 
         | https://killedbygoogle.com/
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | gumby wrote:
       | Sold for 1x or 2x revenue. Not that great a business. But 8 years
       | in "beta"??
        
       | gbN025tt2Z1E2E4 wrote:
       | Jeez, could they have possibly given less notice? Now I have to
       | scramble to migrate all of my domains away from
       | Google/Squarespace this weekend. Damn it.
       | 
       | I have zero desire to be in business with Squarespace.
        
         | Sunspark wrote:
         | Why do you feel the need to do this? Do you anticipate that all
         | your traffic will now be routed to the Kremlin?
        
           | gbN025tt2Z1E2E4 wrote:
           | I don't like businesses I haven't specifically chosen
           | managing my digital affairs and buyouts put me in that
           | position. Plus I don't trust Squarespace at all.
           | 
           | Fortunately this is the last Google product I was still
           | using, so after this migration I will be 100% google free,
           | which will be a great day.
        
             | Sunspark wrote:
             | Sounds like you had a very deep relationship with Google
             | that went beyond just a simple registration of a domain
             | name.
             | 
             | I don't know Squarespace as a company, but looking at the
             | wikipedia entry, they are a publicly-traded American
             | company on the NYSE and appear to have removed websites
             | that promoted bigotry or hate, etc. so how bad could they
             | really be? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squarespace
        
               | gbN025tt2Z1E2E4 wrote:
               | > ...appear to have removed websites that promoted
               | bigotry or hate, etc.
               | 
               | This is exactly the problem. I don't go to a domain
               | registrar to be my parent and/or make social decisions
               | for me. I go there to register domains and manage DNS
               | records, that's it. That Squarespace management felt the
               | need to assert themselves into that process with social
               | contagion related matters is deeply concerning and
               | frankly, a deal breaker for me. It'd be like AT&T
               | cancelling your phone service because they didn't like
               | the content of your conversations.
        
         | CydeWeys wrote:
         | They've given months of notice! The transfer process is gonna
         | take awhile and you don't have to scramble to do anything this
         | weekend.
        
       | Sunspark wrote:
       | Amazing. Even a low-effort paid stream for Google meets the
       | graveyard.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | [deleted]
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | WillPostForFood wrote:
       | for .com
       | 
       | Google Domains - $12/yr (includes private whois)
       | 
       | Squarespace - $20/yr (includes private whois)
       | 
       | Yeah, total rip off. There are plenty of Registrars that are at
       | $12 (AWS), or less (Porkbun $9.73).
       | 
       | Google is double screwing it's users. First by selling them off,
       | then by selling them to a price gouger.
        
         | brycewray wrote:
         | I had a sinking feeling when I read this in TFA:
         | 
         | > Squarespace said it will honor Google Domains customers'
         | renewal prices for at least 12 months following the close of
         | the deal.
         | 
         | ... knowing it meant Renewal Sticker Shock, eventually, for
         | those who stay.
        
       | fasteddie wrote:
       | Another headstone in the google graveyard. This one doesn't make
       | any sense to me, either, unless there are weird regulatory issues
       | they want to avoid since it seemed like a very popular registrar.
       | Or maybe they just didn't want to staff any limited customer
       | support team.
        
         | meepmorp wrote:
         | At least they're not just ending service and telling people to
         | find a new registrar and transfer their stuff.
        
         | theonlybutlet wrote:
         | Financial metrics were probably meh.
        
         | johnfernow wrote:
         | > This one doesn't make any sense to me
         | 
         | I'm also confused, it's a paid product! If it wasn't making
         | enough money, why didn't they just raise the price? It already
         | wasn't the cheapest name registrar, so I don't think people
         | were selecting it solely based on cost (I went with it because
         | of the free 100 email aliases included, but others liked the
         | clean layout and simplicity compared to some other options.)
         | 
         | I get why they kill free things that don't make them money, but
         | it seems very strange with a paid product, especially when, as
         | others have said, they have GCP, which will presumably require
         | a third party registrar in the future.
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36346941
        
       | petercooper wrote:
       | Does anyone know whether or not this ties in with Google Registry
       | (a.k.a. Charleston Road Registry)? That's the entity that owns
       | GTLDs like .app and .dev. I'm going to guess Google is hanging on
       | to that part of it.
        
       | oldstrangers wrote:
       | Wow, I really can't trust and rely on Google for anything can I?
       | This is absurd. I have so many domains I'll have to move over.
       | 
       | The UX at Squarespace is just terrible and I want nothing to do
       | with it.
        
       | danjoredd wrote:
       | I've been using them for my domains for a couple of years now.
       | This is a bit upsetting. I guess I will transfer my domains to
       | name cheap or something
        
       | kelnos wrote:
       | I guess at least this time they didn't outright kill it, and is
       | transferring customers to another registrar...
        
       | jacooper wrote:
       | Didn't they just introduce the .zip TLD?
        
       | rogerkirkness wrote:
       | I was a Google die hard, everything except Reader that they
       | killed made sense. At this point it seems like the CFO is in
       | charge and no good product is safe.
        
         | nocoiner wrote:
         | Reader probably made "sense" too for the axe-wielding CFO, in
         | that I can't imagine it generated any meaningful revenue. But I
         | also can't imagine it consumed much in the way of resources
         | either...
         | 
         | I still use Gmail, but that's it for me among Google's
         | offerings. (I can't easily transition away from that due to
         | using my email address for several hundred login credentials,
         | though I suppose I really should begin that project.) But
         | certainly for anything new, I have no confidence in any Google
         | products, paid or unpaid.
        
       | donatj wrote:
       | I knew better than to trust Google, and yet... I switched
       | everything to Google Domains because the UI was very clean and
       | the attempted upsells were minimal.
       | 
       | I had moved from GoDaddy to Name.com years prior for similar
       | reasons but Name burned my good will.
       | 
       | Is there a service that replaces Google Domains in simplicity and
       | not pushing add-ons?
        
         | mastry wrote:
         | Try hover.com. They have never sent me spam and upsell attempts
         | are very minimal during purchase (mostly for their email
         | service, I think).
        
       | freewizard wrote:
       | It seems Domain is part of Cloud in Alphabet's revenue breakdown,
       | which recently turned profit with just $191m in 23Q1. Not sure
       | the exact term and accounting operation, but this sale of $180m
       | may just double that line of income?
        
       | fragmede wrote:
       | That makes no sense. Just as long as they don't shut down Keep,
       | I'll stay sane though.
        
       | juliand wrote:
       | Thank god my dependency on Google services keeps going down with
       | every year that passes
        
       | renewiltord wrote:
       | This is interesting. Part of the fact that Google owned Domains
       | was that GCP domain validation was smooth when doing this. Now,
       | we probably have to do the slow motion validation. Bit annoying,
       | honestly.
       | 
       | But, ah well.
        
       | wildrhythms wrote:
       | This is so disappointing. I never had an issue with Google
       | Domains. It offered free WHOIS protection, easy to buy a domain
       | and set it up. Nothing fancy. No BS fees. Shame
        
         | pomstazlesa wrote:
         | The "free WHOIS protection" is something they have to offer, if
         | they[or anyone else] wants to do business in Europe and be GDPR
         | compliant.
        
         | veave wrote:
         | I like porkbun.com for the same experience.
        
       | w10-1 wrote:
       | I'm sad to see this, not b/c I like Google, but because domain
       | names are otherwise a manipulative space, and Google was saving
       | us from that.
       | 
       | Domain service - name registry - is a weird market because it
       | includes cross-subsidizing businesses and the information has
       | value (and people will pay for anonymity to avoid hassle), so buy
       | decisions aren't just price/performance.
       | 
       | Google and Cloudflare can offer it near cost just to build
       | goodwill in their clients (i.e., to save them from predation).
       | Cloudflare promises for renewals to only pass through their
       | costs, which makes sense (they make back their customer
       | acquisition cost on the first purchase).
       | 
       | What's the business model of others like porkbun? By hypothesis,
       | you have to pay more to go without the cross-subsidy. If cost is
       | on par, then you might expect them to be marketing the
       | information or to customers somehow. Perhaps just making it back
       | on anonymity charges?
       | 
       | At a minimum, the company would need to have some real
       | reputational concerns about maintaining good relations with
       | customers. E.g., with porkbun, it's super-cute in an ostensibly-
       | benign jurisdiction, but it's a completely hidden LLC who's
       | privacy concerns seem limited only to WHOIS anonymity. What
       | exactly prevents them (or any successor in interest) from
       | misusing the information they have?
       | 
       | On the internet, associating real people with IP's will always be
       | a key goal of governments and criminals, and yet domain name
       | services are a free-for-all with no underlying privacy
       | guarantees.
        
       | orbz wrote:
       | The thing I take biggest offense to is the fact that I hear about
       | this from Bloomberg before Google making any outreach. Also no
       | mention of if Google Cloud Domains is impacted.
        
       | dangerboysteve wrote:
       | (in the voice of David Attenborough) And thus starts the great
       | domain migration of 2023. 10 million fledgling domains begin
       | their search for safety in new homes, far away from the coming
       | impending onslaught of upsells and limited time offer emails.
       | Some will find refuge in Cloudflare, others, not so.
        
         | akpa1 wrote:
         | I moved a domain _away_ from Cloudflare a month or so ago, only
         | to be faced with this. Just my luck.
        
           | pokoblond wrote:
           | Is there something wrong with Cloudflare?
        
             | akpa1 wrote:
             | I have unrelated issues with Cloudflare becuase they're a
             | single entity that controls access to far too much of the
             | internet, in my opinion.
             | 
             | In this case specifically, I moved the domain away since
             | they want you to pay extra money to use custom DNS servers.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-06-15 23:01 UTC)