[HN Gopher] Modern Image Processing Algorithms Implementation in C
___________________________________________________________________
Modern Image Processing Algorithms Implementation in C
Author : symisc_devel
Score : 103 points
Date : 2023-06-06 17:07 UTC (5 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (sod.pixlab.io)
(TXT) w3m dump (sod.pixlab.io)
| cwoolfe wrote:
| Visit the url below for much of the same content but without ads.
| https://sod.pixlab.io/
| remipch wrote:
| It looks promising.
|
| I like the way each algorithm is explained with minimal example
| and demo images.
|
| I'm looking for such a lightweight vision lib to embed simple
| image manipulation programs on tiny ESP32-CAM boards.
|
| OpenCV seems too heavy to integrate on such small devices.
|
| So far, I've been able to develop simple image processing
| programs with CImg[1] (simple filtering, image cropping, adding
| text).
|
| I'll try to spend some time exploring this SOD lib, thank you for
| sharing.
|
| [1] https://cimg.eu/
| Iwan-Zotow wrote:
| better than OpenCV ?
| realPtolemy wrote:
| Curious to know as well
| cozzyd wrote:
| easier to integrate into C-based stuff, probably...though
| unfortunately doesn't seem to make it easy to work without
| dynamic allocation, which makes it not as useful as it could
| be...
| slicktux wrote:
| Better in what sense?
| HumblyTossed wrote:
| Anything like this but for photo imaging manipulation?
| Solvency wrote:
| Is there anything substantially different here from the way any
| modern post-processing shader works right now? For example:
| https://threejs.org/examples/webgl_postprocessing_rgb_halfto...
| dima55 wrote:
| Don't know about the algorithms, but this is a C library: for
| computers. threejs is a javascript library: for browsers
| elcritch wrote:
| Note this is GPL which will make it a harder sell vs OpenCV in
| many cases. I'd guess they're looking to use the non-GPL for $$
| model.
|
| Nevertheless, it looks interesting. It looks really nice for
| embedded where you don't always have the GPU for compute.
| realPtolemy wrote:
| Thanks for sharing!
| ladberg wrote:
| Since it seems like the poster works for the company: the ads on
| this article are all semi-nsfw for me, more-so than the average
| GAd I see (is that something you can tune?). I reported them to
| Google but that might be a black hole.
|
| Additionally, why in the world does a technical blog for a for-
| profit company need ads?
| nico wrote:
| Same here
|
| I got three images, two of pretty college women, and a third
| one that I can't tell exactly what it is, but it's skin color
| and my first impression was very NSFW
| symisc_devel wrote:
| Hello,
|
| It's a blog post by one of our engineers. Authors are free to
| monetize their content without inference from the company.
| GMoromisato wrote:
| I got ads for LEGOs because I have kids and have recently
| searched for LEGOs [this is less of a humblebrag and more of a
| sigh at how old and boring I've gotten.]
|
| I'm curious if the degree of ad personalization varies by site
| (do some sites show more personalized ads?). Or maybe the
| average demographic of a site's viewers is somehow factored in?
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-06-06 23:00 UTC)