[HN Gopher] Scientists' report first X-ray of a single atom
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Scientists' report first X-ray of a single atom
        
       Author : wglb
       Score  : 81 points
       Date   : 2023-06-05 15:25 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (phys.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (phys.org)
        
       | retrocryptid wrote:
       | Isn't this just EPR w/ X-Ray photons?
       | 
       | I say "just", but maybe EPR w/ X-Ray photons is really hard. I
       | can't say this is my area of experimental expertise.
        
         | jpmattia wrote:
         | > _Isn 't this just EPR w/ X-Ray photons?_
         | 
         | From a quick read: I don't think so. There's no magnetic field,
         | and the collected electron can be from a pair (ie both spins in
         | one orbital)
         | 
         | I think it is better described as exotic STM: In normal STM,
         | you put a bias on the tip relative to the material, and then
         | put the tip close enough to the material so that a valence (or
         | free) electron tunnels across the vacuum.
         | 
         | In this work, it appears they put the tip close to the atom and
         | then whack one of the inner electrons with an x-ray photon,
         | which is then collected by the tip. [I don't understand how
         | they engineer the fields so that the scattered electron is
         | collected by the tip, but I'm assuming the atom to be measured
         | is somehow connected electrically to create a bias between the
         | sample and tip. If anyone has access to the paper, don't keep
         | it a secret.]
         | 
         | Corrections welcome, I'm curious myself how this works.
        
         | el_oni wrote:
         | My quick skim looks like its more like XPS or XAFS or XANES.
         | Mixed with AFM
        
       | programmertote wrote:
       | > A team of scientists from Ohio University, Argonne National
       | Laboratory, the University of Illinois-Chicago, and others, led
       | by Ohio University Professor of Physics, and Argonne National
       | Laboratory scientist, Saw Wai Hla, have taken the world's first
       | X-ray SIGNAL (or SIGNATURE) of just one atom.
       | 
       | Tangential, but the lead scientist's name, Saw Wai Hla, sounds
       | like he is from Myanmar (Burma). As a citizen of Myanmar, I'm
       | proud that one of my fellow country people contributed to
       | science.
        
         | EddieEngineers wrote:
         | Myanmar also has https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moe_Z._Win and
         | the late https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Paw :)
        
         | npsomaratna wrote:
         | Are you still located in Myanmar? I traveled there a few years
         | ago--beautiful country and friendly people.
        
         | PretzelPirate wrote:
         | Saw Wai Hla did get his masters at Yangon University so there's
         | a good chance he's from Myanmar.
        
       | deepspace wrote:
       | As a layman, I thought that this kind of resolution had been
       | achieved with STMs decades ago. I wish the article explained the
       | advantages of using X-rays.
        
         | jpmattia wrote:
         | The resolution is not the innovation here. Where "conventional"
         | STM collects valence or free electrons, this work is probing
         | the electron structure, using Xray photons to kick one out from
         | the inner orbitals.
        
       | codethief wrote:
       | I don't think it's got that much to do with classic X-ray imaging
       | anymore. It sounds much more like a scanning (electron/tunneling)
       | microscope.
        
       | dash2 wrote:
       | "Scientists".
        
         | ginnungagap wrote:
         | Why would they not be?
        
           | bilekas wrote:
           | dash is referring to the grammar.
           | 
           | I'm also guessing that's also what all the downvoters missed
           | too.
        
             | selimthegrim wrote:
             | Ironically it would be just fine with a dash after report
        
             | Retric wrote:
             | I got his point and still downvoted for derailing the
             | thread.
        
         | tabtab wrote:
         | Let's x-ray that apostrophe, it may be hiding something.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | bilekas wrote:
         | I'm glad someone else noticed it. It's really annoying to see
         | the ' misused like that.
         | 
         | The correct use for some context : "The scientists' report was
         | really interesting"
        
           | tabtab wrote:
           | Where's GrammarGPT when you need?
        
         | [deleted]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-06-06 23:01 UTC)