[HN Gopher] Viable offspring derived from single unfertilized ma...
___________________________________________________________________
Viable offspring derived from single unfertilized mammalian oocytes
Author : birriel
Score : 40 points
Date : 2023-06-01 17:36 UTC (5 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.pnas.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.pnas.org)
| rf15 wrote:
| Isn't this kind of research illegal? Because the results usually
| are. (I say as someone who used to own marbled crayfish[1])
|
| [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marbled_crayfish
| jacquesm wrote:
| Interesting, they forbid to 'breed' it but that's apparently
| not really how it works for these particular animals. A single
| individual will be happy to reproduce without any breeding
| taking place and there isn't much that you could do to stop it
| short of killing the creature.
| RicoElectrico wrote:
| But is it because of the origin, or rather the invasive species
| status?
| Bang2Bay wrote:
| f*k... Oh. we dont have to any more. :)
| 082349872349872 wrote:
| In _Brave New World_ , they don't have to fuck, yet find plenty
| of opportunity to do so anyway. (and we are told this is
| somehow a dystopia?)
|
| Lagniappe: "cloning can be worthwhile"
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMkjoQ6S7oQ
| l1n wrote:
| in mice.
| fallingfrog wrote:
| I hope!
| RobotToaster wrote:
| Next, dinosaurs.
| Idiot_in_Vain wrote:
| Dinos are a few orders of magnitude harder. No DNA or RNA
| fragment can even remotely survive over 65M years. To make
| something similar to a dino researchers will have to produce
| a working mix of bird and reptilian DNA - which is enormously
| complicated.
| bpodgursky wrote:
| This is a case where there's not a super compelling reason to
| believe it would fail in other mammals.
| JeanSebTr wrote:
| that's the kind of news I expect to be in mice and not in
| humans ;)
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-06-01 23:01 UTC)