[HN Gopher] The Statistics Handbook (free culture LaTeX handbook)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Statistics Handbook (free culture LaTeX handbook)
        
       Author : carlocck
       Score  : 92 points
       Date   : 2023-05-29 08:39 UTC (14 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (github.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (github.com)
        
       | shrubble wrote:
       | I appreciate this greatly... I am working with people that don't
       | understand even the basics (such as a survey with 49 responses
       | means that the margin of error is over 10% and thus comparing 1
       | month's results of say '68 per cent' with next month's '75' is
       | meaningless); hope that this will help me better explain what
       | they are missing.
        
         | sokoloff wrote:
         | My favorite is when a survey result is presented with "as many
         | digits as my calculator showed", often allowing me to derive
         | how many responses were likely received.
        
         | 2b3a51 wrote:
         | Your example includes just about every manager I have ever
         | worked with in a 35 year teaching career.
         | 
         | National exam pass rate of 67% does not imply that every class
         | of 20 will have 14 or 15 passes!
         | 
         | I really appreciate the author providing access to the LaTeX
         | source as well.
        
         | sillymath3 wrote:
         | > I am working with people that don't understand even the
         | basics (such as a survey with 49 responses means that the
         | margin of error is over 10%
         | 
         | I don't understand this, if the population if just 49 people
         | then the margin of error is zero. So intuitively the bigger the
         | population the bigger the bound for the margin of error.
        
       | sillymath3 wrote:
       | In 10.4 A/B testing is just a list with several points and there
       | is not warning about having a deep understanding. For example,
       | the point of selecting a sample is not easy, if you take a sample
       | of something on 1 july of 2020, you have to consider if the
       | weather, the day of week, people on vacation or anyone of
       | thousands of factor is going to make your sample not adequate to
       | generalize the result to other circumstances. Using statistics
       | correctly requires neutralizing many sources of errors. It is not
       | easy to get a good representative sample.
        
       | carlocck wrote:
       | Wrote this 30-page essay that aims to explore an approach to
       | statistics for the layman - from simple average to stochastic
       | gradient descent. Open source, free culture code - happy sharing.
        
         | brudgers wrote:
         | For a potential reader like me, linking to a PDF would be
         | better because a Github repository is not how I typically
         | engage with texts.
        
           | elteto wrote:
           | The PDF is _right there_.
        
             | brudgers wrote:
             | On my screens, the readme is what I see (and on my iPhone,
             | that's pretty much all I see). It talks about licensing,
             | not statistics.
             | 
             | As a reader I clicked on the link to read about statistics,
             | not licensing.
        
             | azalemeth wrote:
             | Or, for the even-lazier user, right here: https://raw.githu
             | busercontent.com/carloocchiena/the_statisti...
             | 
             | (Great project. I lecture stats to biochemists and getting
             | them interested is half the battle; convincing them why
             | it's worth learning what the computer does the other half)
        
               | brudgers wrote:
               | I took the time to provide feedback with the intent of
               | helping the author present their work in a way that will
               | engage with more people.
               | 
               | Most people never use GitHub.
        
             | mihaic wrote:
             | I missed it as well. It's a bit confusing how the Github
             | interface doesn't show the extension easily when the file
             | name is too long.
        
       | Pinegulf wrote:
       | Worth the price. Keep em coming.
        
         | clircle wrote:
         | > worth the price
         | 
         | ...
        
           | rvbissell wrote:
           | There are many things in the human experience that aren't
           | worth a price of zero. For these, you must pay someone to
           | take them off your hands.
        
           | mdp2021 wrote:
           | Interpreting the expression <<Worth the price>> from Pinegulf
           | is not immediate.
           | 
           | Surely, as rvbissell wrote nearby, there are contributions
           | around of negative value - though maybe rarely in technical
           | publications of this kind.
           | 
           | If you want to donate to Carlo Occhiena, information does not
           | seem immediately available, but his personal website -
           | carloocchiena.com - contains his E-Mail address at the bottom
           | of the JS generated typing, linked at <<mi puoi scrivere una
           | mail>>.
        
       | clircle wrote:
       | So many intro to statistics books... what's there left to say?
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | 2b3a51 wrote:
         | So many people without understanding. Perhaps we need a tonne
         | of different approaches?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-05-29 23:01 UTC)