[HN Gopher] Ian Hacking has died
___________________________________________________________________
Ian Hacking has died
Author : furcyd
Score : 74 points
Date : 2023-05-28 17:31 UTC (5 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.nytimes.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.nytimes.com)
| moritz wrote:
| "Ian Hacking was a one-person interdisciplinary department all by
| himself" -- true that. One of the greats.
| mitchbob wrote:
| Archived:
| https://archive.ph/2023.05.28-161235/https://www.nytimes.com...
| techno_tsar wrote:
| Rest in peace. He taught at my university (University of
| Toronto), and he was obviously a rock star in the philosophy
| department. Still, as an undergrad, I was too concerned with
| drinking and passing my classes to really give his work serious
| intellectual consideration.
|
| Moving into a new home the summer I graduated, I found a pile of
| books left on the curb. One of them was Ian Hacking's
| _Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the
| Philosophy of Science_. I ended up tearing through it, utterly
| fascinated by the ideas and the philosophical landscape -- an
| agenda of discussion -- that he laid out so clearly, like a
| dictionary. I used to be quite naive when it came to science -- I
| thought philosophical topics around it were not worth thinking
| about. But he slapped the naivete out of me and single-handedly
| deepened my curiosity in science as an enterprise, as a social
| worldview, and as a variety of competing epistemic outlooks with
| profound implications.
|
| Reading this article, I'm glad that he received the accolades and
| attention that he had. So much to think about, and what an
| incredible amount of thinking he did in his life.
| davidivadavid wrote:
| Still remember randomly coming across his book "Representing and
| Intervening" when I first got interested in philosophy of
| science. Pleasantly readable and illuminating. Great companion
| piece to other works by Cartwright or van Fraassen.
| lukeasrodgers wrote:
| It's been a long time since I read it, but Social Construction of
| What? was a great book, philosophy at its best, in my opinion:
| lending clarity and rigor to concepts that reach into law,
| psychology, medicine, ethics, and the every day.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-05-28 23:00 UTC)