[HN Gopher] The First 'Apple Silicon' - The Aquarius Processor P...
___________________________________________________________________
The First 'Apple Silicon' - The Aquarius Processor Project
Author : tim_sw
Score : 48 points
Date : 2023-05-28 13:59 UTC (9 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (thechipletter.substack.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (thechipletter.substack.com)
| Taniwha wrote:
| isn't this the hobbit/crisp core that was supposed to go in the
| newton?
| joezydeco wrote:
| No, Hobbit was a descendent of the AT&T Bellmac processor.
| fidotron wrote:
| The end fate of Hobbit at Apple is not unrelated to ARM
| either (https://tompittard.com/media) :
|
| > "Tom Pittard and Paul Gavarini of ATG spotted the ARM
| architecture (late 1985), rightly inferring Acorn had shared
| 6502 experience and motives. Investigation began. Pittard and
| Gavarini went to work on the Mobius project. Their two-year
| effort created a board using a VLSI Technology ARM2 chip plus
| software emulating the entire Apple desktop computer lineup:
| a 6502 or 65C816 running Apple II code, and a 68000 running
| Mac code. All emulated code ran faster on the ARM2 processor
| than the corresponding native versions. ... Mobius terminated
| quietly - but Pittard kept the prototype in his office." ...
| "In the afterglow of Mobius, Tom Pittard did a presentation
| for Apple engineering teams on his benchmarks a few months
| after work halted. Heads turned. Of particular note were the
| results from Pittard's Lisp benchmarks on ARM2." ... "Tesler
| [Lary Tesler], a veteran of Xerox PARC and an expert on GUIs,
| saw Pittard's results. He grasped where the ARM architecture
| could take Newton [Apples first handheld device]"... "Tesler
| had an endgame in mind... He based that on the status of
| Hobbit [a competing processor design], Tom Pittard's ARM2
| benchmark results, and roadmap discussions with the ARM
| development team."
| Taniwha wrote:
| We hired one of the guys who worked on Apple's hobbit/crisp
| or the newton, he'd git his cpu back from the fab, worked
| first time, but politics suddenly went ARM - he quit
| jasoneckert wrote:
| The author of the article paints a picture of a situation in
| which expensive hardware was purchased on a whim without much
| planning beforehand. This hardware was ill suited to their task,
| and ultimately led to failure of the project while others (e.g.,
| ARM) were quickly producing RISC designs with low budgets.
|
| This sort of thing isn't uncommon in larger organizations that
| have money to burn on R&D. As a result, it's probably safe to say
| Apple was in a position that allowed them to burn a lot of money
| in the late 1980s.
| sillywalk wrote:
| Seymour Cray was reported to have used a Mac for part of the
| Cray Supercomputer design work.
| danw1979 wrote:
| > In due course, the team found that the Sun workstations that
| they attached to the supercomputer could run their software
| just as quickly as the Cray itself.
| twoodfin wrote:
| I'm going to give the technical management the benefit of the
| doubt here, and assume the $15M Cray wasn't primarily for chip
| design, but rather architectural simulation.
|
| This was intended to be a parallel system across several
| layers, while wrapping in a number of novel architectural
| ideas. It would not have been ridiculous to assume having a
| massively parallel supercomputer to experiment with those ideas
| more quickly would be worth the expense.
| wrs wrote:
| The Cray was put to good use doing plastic injection molding
| simulations that saved millions of dollars on prototype mold
| tools. This was the era when the desktop Mac folks were making
| insanely complex screwless plastic cases that basically snapped
| together.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-05-28 23:01 UTC)