[HN Gopher] Japan's Shrinking Population Faces Point of No Return
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Japan's Shrinking Population Faces Point of No Return
        
       Author : jerryjerryjerry
       Score  : 15 points
       Date   : 2023-04-30 20:29 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.newsweek.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.newsweek.com)
        
       | Bran_son wrote:
       | > Conservative policymakers and a cautious public mean Japan is
       | much more likely to look for internal, rather than external,
       | solutions to the demographic crunch, despite projections pointing
       | to the inevitability of more immigration.
       | 
       | Suppose they choose to "solve" it with immigration - what will
       | happen? It will enable their current fertility-destroying system
       | to persist, shrinking their population indefinitely, while
       | supplementing it with immigrants.
       | 
       | Social-economic systems that cause below-replacement fertility
       | are in this way much like parasites, feeding off the host nation.
       | Without immigration, eventually this will cause enough of a
       | crisis, or a high enough fever, to continue the analogy, that
       | will allow the nation to shake off the parasite and change their
       | system to something sustainable.
       | 
       | But immigration functions as anesthetic and immunosuppressant -
       | keeping the host population just comfortable enough that they go
       | gentle into that good night, and giving the parasite economic
       | system a new host to feed on.
        
         | jleyank wrote:
         | It's not entirely the economic system, other than women no
         | having careers after giving birth. It's more the social system,
         | and the fact that younger women don't want to seem to want to
         | play anymore. Educated women pretty much anywhere in the world
         | tend to have fewer children, fewer still if the economic costs
         | and penalties increase. The government has to decide that
         | children are desired, the social compact has to be rewritten to
         | improve the position of women (from broodmare/housemother to
         | coequal partner) and then the country needs a bit of good luck.
         | There's still 10's of millions of them there, so they have time
         | to piddle about "deciding and choosing" what to do.
         | 
         | Perhaps this is a good example of the downside of social
         | nationalism in a world that intercommunicates so quickly and so
         | effectively?
        
           | slaw wrote:
           | Women want to postpone giving birth after they try carriers.
           | Once they succees or fails they want to have children, but
           | very often at that time they are too old. If country would
           | give incentive that it covers cost of child rising, many
           | women would probably decide to have children.
        
           | yutijke wrote:
           | Aren't countries like Japan or South Korea known for
           | gruelling work hours?
           | 
           | I think the economic system itself is not conducive for
           | healthy families where both parents get sufficient time to
           | spend with kids or family.
           | 
           | In the past this may have been papered over with the cultural
           | expectation that the woman takes care of the house and family
           | and the man works, but this cultural framework has been
           | broken and done away with without any replacement, cultural
           | or economical.
        
         | jimmygrapes wrote:
         | [flagged]
        
         | epolanski wrote:
         | Immigrants eventually become Japanese citizens though when they
         | themselves settle in Japan and have families there.
         | 
         | I think Japanese case is very interesting because one would
         | think they have the economy and social stability to show us how
         | it's done.
        
           | twelve40 wrote:
           | ...and they adopt Japanese lifestyle and also go extinct in a
           | couple generations?
        
           | Bran_son wrote:
           | > Immigrants eventually become Japanese citizens though when
           | they themselves settle in Japan
           | 
           | That's great if you want to preserve Japanese paperwork and
           | populate Japan's geography, but doesn't help the Japanese
           | people themselves.
        
             | questime wrote:
             | Nativism is a dead ideology, you can keep posting
             | ethnonationalist dogwhistles on hackernews but it doesn't
             | change the fact that the world is becoming increasingly
             | multicultural. The evidence is overwhelming for this being
             | a good thing - and the alternative is rapid decay
        
             | guhidalg wrote:
             | Careful, are you saying that Japanese-ness is genetic or
             | cultural?
        
               | slaw wrote:
               | To be Japanese you have to look like Japanese and talk
               | like Japanese. You need both genes and culture. If you
               | are Japanese descendant born in US you are American. If
               | you are not Japanese American born and raised in Japan
               | you are not Japanese.
        
               | guhidalg wrote:
               | Then immigration is not going to prevent Japan from a
               | population collapse, I suppose to you that's a reasonable
               | end to the Japanese people.
        
               | slaw wrote:
               | Immigration is not going to prevent Japanese people from
               | population collapse, but it can prevent Japan as a
               | country. These two are not synonyms. Some other nations
               | can live in Japan. There are minorities of Koreans and
               | Chinese living in Japan now
        
               | wsgeorge wrote:
               | In spite of the problems this has caused, contemporary
               | society will eventually have to accept the place genetics
               | and tradition has in forming ethnic identities, if it
               | intends to ever value distinct ethnicities.
        
               | Bran_son wrote:
               | It very much accepted the role of genetics when Rachel
               | Dolezal claimed to be black, or Elizabeth Warren claimed
               | to be part Cherokee. It seems some groups are allowed to
               | gate their identity behind ancestry, while others aren't.
        
               | guhidalg wrote:
               | Thanks for introducing "what about ism" to the
               | discussion. Your example of white women trying to pass as
               | ethnic MINORITIES in the US is nothing at all like saying
               | Japanese-ness is genetic.
        
               | clove wrote:
               | lol @ "careful," as if it's dangerous to disagree with
               | you.
               | 
               | I live in Japan, btw, and the people here in general
               | don't consider immigrants to be Japanese, no matter how
               | well said immigrants speak Japanese or contribute to
               | society.
               | 
               | If you asked a Japanese person, and that person gave you
               | a "honne" answer, he or she would most likely say
               | "genetic." I guess the Japanese should be "careful," lest
               | they draw your ire.
        
               | Bran_son wrote:
               | It's both, and it boggles my mind how so many can (claim
               | to) be so deluded as to say it's entirely the latter.
               | Notably, their culture has changed dramatically over the
               | last ~300 years (as it has for most nations), yet one
               | wouldn't claim they are no longer Japanese on that basis.
               | 
               | And the Japanese themselves consider Japanese-ness
               | genetic, so who are you to tell them otherwise?
        
               | guhidalg wrote:
               | I am a human being who can tell them they're really
               | bigoted for linking genetics with Japanese-ness. That
               | line of thinking isn't new at all, and it's responsible
               | for tragedies like miscegenation laws, eugenics,
               | genocides, slavery, and (clearly) the demise of the
               | native Japanese population for fear of immigration.
               | 
               | Of course people can believe that there's a genetic
               | component to Japanese-ness, and they are free to become
               | extinct as a result.
        
             | netsharc wrote:
             | Well, let's have a stroll through a minefield, but reading
             | GP's comment made me wonder if yeah, a country full of
             | migrant Japanese should/can be considered "Japanese", or if
             | we're only counting the population with centuries of
             | "native Japanese blood" as "Japanese".
             | 
             | For the sake of discussion, say if the government
             | "imported" Scandinavian[1] families with their traditions,
             | etc, to Japan, probably they'll keep this culture, and
             | you'd have "parallel societies". Maybe only if the migrant
             | families have kids who are young enough to grow up with the
             | Japanese culture, and for some people maybe even that's not
             | Japanese enough, because of their migrant parents'
             | influence on them, and maybe only the kids of these kids,
             | who'd have assimilated even more Japanese culture while
             | growing up, would be sufficiently Japanese.
             | 
             | Edit to add: the alternative, a bunch of Scandinavians
             | living in Scandinavian neighborhoods and sending their kids
             | to Scandinavian schools (with their own cultures/languages)
             | would bring about a totally different community within a
             | few generations, which one could say "not very Japanese",
             | or "a very different Japan".
             | 
             | [1] I had a different origin country before I changed it to
             | "Scandinavian", I have a feeling changing the country has
             | an effect on how people would perceive such a migration,
             | but hey maybe I'm projecting my own bias.
        
         | timeon wrote:
         | Not sure if it makes sense to argue around analogy.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-04-30 23:02 UTC)