[HN Gopher] DJI Mavic 3 Pro
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       DJI Mavic 3 Pro
        
       Author : notmysql_
       Score  : 71 points
       Date   : 2023-04-26 15:06 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.dji.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.dji.com)
        
       | wand3r wrote:
       | Every device manufacturer tends to fib a bit on battery life vs.
       | real world, however, 45 mins of flight time is impressive. Even
       | if its 30-35 mins fully maxed out that can give you a lot of time
       | to creat content and explore
        
         | icholy wrote:
         | I find that DJI fibs about their transmission range, but not
         | battery life.
        
           | sammyteee wrote:
           | tbh, once you realise you can get in into FCC mode, the
           | advertised distances become a lot more realistic... :)
        
           | steve_adams_86 wrote:
           | I agree. I get fairly bad range in my small city, even with
           | line of site. I get serious lag at around 2km. In places with
           | less interference, it only bumps up to around 2.75-3km. It's
           | advertised as having 10-15km range or something.
           | 
           | On the other hand, 3 batteries in a Mini 3 is pretty much
           | guaranteed to keep it in the air for 90 minutes. It's very
           | impressive. Our custom quad manages more like 20m with twice
           | the battery capacity (though, twice the weight as well).
        
         | nine_k wrote:
         | Tangentially: I wonder if a really long-flying quad copter can
         | be made using a regular ICE + generator as a source of
         | electricity. Carbohydrates are still more energy-dense.
        
           | BizarroLand wrote:
           | I assume the issue is not the energy density but the support
           | density.
           | 
           | I have a 3DR Solo and it can carry up to 1 lb of extra weight
           | for 20 minutes or so on a full charge, and run for 30ish
           | minutes while only carrying its gimbal.
           | 
           | The battery in the 3DR Solo weighs about 1.3 lbs itself, and
           | the frame is by no means lightweight. Assembled it weighs at
           | least 70% more than the Mavic 2 Pro that I occasionally get
           | to use at work.
           | 
           | To fly my drone, the 3dr solo draws an average of 14.2 volts
           | at 15 amps (so close to 200 watts on average) but up to 800
           | watts at peak.
           | 
           | You would need an ICE and Generator combo that can put out an
           | average 200 watts of constant power but that can peak at 800
           | for short periods that weighs less than 2.3 lbs including
           | fuel that runs for more than 20 minutes to equal that 1
           | battery.
           | 
           | For instance, this is one of the most well known and light RC
           | ICE machines:
           | 
           | http://www.mecoa.com/hp/vt/21.htm
           | 
           | It weighs 9.5 oz and runs for 45 minutes on 6 oz of diesel
           | (probably not at maximum output, but still.)
           | 
           | So you're at roughly 1 lb (assuming 1/2 oz of screws and
           | tubes to connect the motor to the fuel and both to the frame.
           | 
           | However, there is an issue here. This motor is rated at .35
           | hp. 1 hp is roughly 746 watts of power. That means max rev,
           | full bore, this 1 ICE only has enough power before conversion
           | losses to hover my 3dr solo in calm winds.
           | 
           | So, let's find a bigger motor.
           | 
           | https://hobbyking.com/en_us/ngh-gt17-17cc-gas-engine-with-
           | rc...
           | 
           | This one is much better. 1.8 hp at max revs, so 1300+ watts.
           | But, it weighs 1.87 lbs.
           | 
           | Add in fuel and you're at the max, so good to go, right?
           | 
           | Well, the next problem is that even though we have an engine,
           | we don't have a generator to convert from fuel to electric.
           | 
           | You would also need some supercapacitors or batteries to
           | store the charge, some system to integrate the control of the
           | motor into the drone, more mounting materials.
           | 
           | And, you are already over the weight limit. That doesn't mean
           | it can't be solved, for instance you could use a hexacopter
           | or octocopter to increase how much carrying capacity you
           | have.
           | 
           | Basically, you can do it, but there are better ways to do it.
           | You would have to design an ICE RC Drone from scratch
           | accounting for all of the intricacies and difficulties of
           | using combustion engines in a drone and controlling them
           | safely just to get what will probably be a slower, more
           | expensive and more fragile drone that breaks down more often
           | and needs frequent servicing intervals.
        
             | nine_k wrote:
             | I see. Likely this setup could work on a larger copter, but
             | won't work on a tiny device.
             | 
             | Makes sense; thanks for the details.
        
           | andruby wrote:
           | A hybrid helicopter with 4 blades? There's a lower limit for
           | weight to fit the ICE (we can't scale an ICE down much), so
           | it might end up pretty close to a smallish helicopter
        
             | nine_k wrote:
             | I remember two-stroke ICEs for model planes that
             | comfortably set on the palm of my hand, not even being a
             | teenager.
             | 
             | A can of fuel possibly takes more space than a battery, but
             | likely weighs less anyway.
             | 
             | Say, this randomly found guy is pretty tiny:
             | https://www.horizonhobby.com/product/15la-
             | abn-.15-airplane-g...
        
               | tonyarkles wrote:
               | The trick with the tiny little model aircraft engines is
               | that you typically get a decent lift/drag efficiency
               | multiplier with fixed wing vs. quadrotor. In my
               | experience, there seems to be a somewhat scale invariant
               | power requirement of ~200W/kg (applies to a 249g Mavic
               | Mini and much larger 25kg units). For a fixed-wing, you
               | can get a 5:1 or 10:1 L/D and get away with more like
               | 20-40W/kg instead.
               | 
               | You also probably don't want to direct-drive a multirotor
               | off of the gas motor but rather convert it to electricity
               | so that you maintain the rapid control authority on the
               | motors. There are companies that make suitable
               | powerplants, e.g. https://www.pegasusaero.ca/hybrid-
               | advantage
        
           | NegativeLatency wrote:
           | Maybe but it becomes a lot less practical to store and manage
           | the gas compared to batteries.
           | 
           | I suspect we'll see tailsitter models come out eventually
           | that combine the benefits of fixed wing aircraft.
           | 
           | Someone did make one with a lawnmower but it has death
           | machine vibes:
           | 
           | https://diydrones.com/profiles/blogs/gas-powered-
           | quadcopter-...
        
       | causality0 wrote:
       | I'll probably keep my Mini 2 until someone has the semi-legal
       | cojones to put a 4G transceiver in a drone. Now that would be
       | some great fun.
        
         | Ancapistani wrote:
         | It's done in the long range FPV community. Not super common -
         | it's expensive, and you aren't allowed to fly farther than you
         | can see the drone (and safely fly it by sight alone, and
         | monitor the airspace around it) but it's done.
         | 
         | I've not specifically kept up with the long range community,
         | but I want to say I've recently seen videos of test flights out
         | to 100km using an independent radio link (i.e., 5.8GHz analog
         | video + 9xx MHz control link).
         | 
         | That said, power density is going to be your first limiting
         | factor. You're either going to have to seriously tune your
         | airframe for long-range flight (and greatly compromise
         | performance), or you're going to have to move to a fixed-wing
         | design.
         | 
         | Multirotors must maintain thrust (and therefore, expend power)
         | to provide lift; fixed-wing designs provide lift as long as
         | they are moving forward. The flight time of a fixed-wing design
         | that's light enough and has a long enough glide profile is
         | unlimited in practice. You can catch thermals and updrafts to
         | gain speed, altitude, or both.
         | 
         | I have a 1m foam glider that I've flown for well over an hour.
         | The vast majority of that time was with the motor turned
         | completely off and the prop folded flat against the fuselage.
         | I'd soar out over the field where I was flying. There was a
         | creek at the edge of the field and a small hill on the other
         | side of it, creating a "barrel" of air. Flying in low, I'd
         | catch the bottom of that current, ride it up the hill side,
         | then pick up speed as I crested the hill and gently turned back
         | toward the field. That particular location is great on chilly
         | spring and fall mornings, because the temperature gradient
         | between the creek and wind coming over the hillside is so
         | great.
        
         | oh_sigh wrote:
         | Why? The range is like 9 miles so it is hard to get the device
         | out of range of the radio on the battery charge.
        
       | trollied wrote:
       | The active tracking is very impressive (see this review, 10 mins
       | in): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejmGSZtLu6I The way it flies
       | sideways & dodges obstacles, even while the person is running all
       | over the place, is awesome.
        
       | 0xfedbee wrote:
       | They don't have to copy Apple's website style to sell products.
        
       | amelius wrote:
       | I don't like that the propellers don't have guard rings around
       | them.
        
         | Ancapistani wrote:
         | They make them, they just aren't standard equipment. They also
         | reduce flight time and agility, and in come cases can interfere
         | with your field of view.
         | 
         | I've got hundreds of hours flying quadcopters at this point,
         | and the only times I've ever wanted prop guards on a photo
         | drone have been for flying indoors or very near hot air
         | balloons.
        
           | amelius wrote:
           | And you took the risk of flying without guards?
           | 
           | If yes -> This is why they should be there by default.
        
       | Tepix wrote:
       | Awesome new cameras, but how do you land these things safely on a
       | sailboat? It's always tricky and scary.
        
         | yreg wrote:
         | I once did this and it was rather scary.
         | 
         | I was sailing in Croatia (on sails) and we've spotted some
         | dolphins. So I launched a Mavic Air to observe them from
         | closer. Soon the wind picked up and so did the waves. I piloted
         | the drone back to the boat and planned to catch it in my hand,
         | but I haven't felt comfortable doing so, since the boat moved
         | like crazy, while the drone was static in the air. Don't forget
         | to imagine the million ropes and wires in the air, which is
         | just the reality of being on a sailboat. Wind howling, captain
         | shouting orders, drone's proximity and low battery alarms
         | loudly screaming.
         | 
         | I had to do something, so I hovered above the bow net and
         | killed the motors. It fell into the net and didn't damage its
         | propellers/gimbal.
         | 
         | edit: 2.5MB dolphin video: https://files.catbox.moe/98n85f.mp4
        
           | eimrine wrote:
           | How the motors were killed? Were they melted their coils or
           | was anything cracked?
        
             | privong wrote:
             | I think they mean that they turned off the motors to let
             | the drone drop into the net.
        
             | palotasb wrote:
             | He means he stopped the motors to let the drone free-fall
             | into the net.
        
             | vetinari wrote:
             | Put the left stick down right (4-5 o'clock) and the right
             | stick down left (7-8 o'clock). It will turn off the motors
             | instantly.
        
               | yreg wrote:
               | Yes this is what I did. Good thing to know, by the way.
               | Since you don't need it unless you need it, and then when
               | you need it you absolutely don't have the time to look it
               | up.
        
               | vetinari wrote:
               | This command ("Combination Stick Command") is also useful
               | in other situations: the same command can both start and
               | stop the motors. It is exactly what you are going to use
               | when launching and landing in your hand; once you are
               | holding the drone in your hand, and you want to start or
               | stop.
               | 
               | But now: how are you going to do it, when you are holding
               | the drone in one hand, remote in another and do a command
               | with both sticks? Don't you need a third hand for that?
               | The answer is no. You need a lanyard for your remote.
               | That way, you can use one hand for holding the drone and
               | the other for pushing the sticks.
        
         | Ancapistani wrote:
         | Short answer - you don't.
         | 
         | I've flown from boats a handful of times, and it's stressful.
         | When I started, I would ask them to keep the boat as still as
         | possible, hover next to the boat, then slowly move over to me
         | so I could reach it. Grab it from underneath and flip it over
         | to kill the motors.
         | 
         | That's obviously not safe, and it's not hard to find photos in
         | drone groups of people's hands after a failed attempt to do
         | exactly this. It's not pretty.
         | 
         | After that I came across an old indoor practice goal for soccer
         | players - basically a net on a stand. I modified it to lay flat
         | and started using it. I'd get the quad close to the boat, hover
         | a couple of feet over the net, and kill the motors. It worked,
         | but felt like I was risking my quad dropping into the ocean
         | every time I did it.
         | 
         | These days I've gone back to hand-catching, but with a vertical
         | grip that I mounted under the aircraft. I 3D printed a
         | "harness" of sorts that fits around the fuselage and has a
         | Picatinny rail on the bottom (like on a rifle). I picked up a
         | cheap vertical grip designed for a gun that I can quickly mount
         | on the rail - it extends ~6" below and gives me something to
         | grab without being on the same plane as the props. It works
         | well enough, but isn't perfect. It would interfere with the
         | field of view on something with a 360o camera gimbal (like an
         | Inspire), and has a significant impact on flight time and
         | performance even though I did all I could to reduce the weight.
        
         | andy_ppp wrote:
         | They really should allow auto updating of the Home location,
         | however if you're moving while landing getting that right is
         | probably quite difficult.
        
           | ben7799 wrote:
           | You can update the home point and have been able to for a
           | long time. And this is zero concern if you're good at manual
           | landing. I've never really ever used their RTH feature the
           | entire time I've been flying, my experience goes back to well
           | before R/C aircraft had any RTH or landing assist.
           | 
           | It's more that you just have to remember to update the home
           | point, and if you don't the drone will suddenly fly off far
           | way out to open water, and if you're not playing it safe you
           | could then run out of battery before you can fly back.
           | 
           | This stuff is annoying, but anyone being responsible and
           | making sure they budget plenty of reserve power ends up being
           | fine.
        
             | [deleted]
        
           | Ancapistani wrote:
           | You can, for both DJI and Autel (the largest commercial
           | manufacturers). There is similar functionality for the
           | homebrew flight controller firmwares out there (e.g.
           | iNav/ArduPilot).
           | 
           | I'm most familiar with Autel's system, since that's what I
           | fly 99% of the time. It has the option to update your home
           | point, but it also has two modes: RTH to takeoff point, and
           | RTH to the controller.
           | 
           | RTH = "Return To Home"
           | 
           | The problem with all of the above is the "failsafe". If the
           | quad loses connection to the controller, by default it will
           | return to the takeoff point and land. You can set it up to
           | RTH to either the the takeoff point or the last known
           | position of the controller, then land or hover until
           | connection is re-established.
           | 
           | On a boat, you're constantly moving. If you lose connection,
           | the drone immediately loses the current position of the
           | controller, so you have to turn the boat around, manually
           | find the drone, and cross your fingers that you're able to
           | reconnect to it before the batteries die and it descends into
           | a nice, slow, controlled landing in the middle of the ocean.
           | 
           | Identifying alternate safe landing sites before taking off is
           | part of the pre-flight checklist for any flight, but it's
           | especially important when operating over water. Doubly so if
           | you're taking off from a boat. Whenever possible, I make sure
           | to end my flights with enough battery that I can make it back
           | to land if I have to. I've planned to use (inactive) oil
           | platforms in the Gulf of Mexico in an emergency. I have no
           | idea how I would have gotten ahold of the owners and gotten
           | access to it to retrieve my drone if I'd had to use it, but
           | I'd rather work out those details later than lose it or be
           | forced to ditch it in the water.
        
         | ben7799 wrote:
         | I've done it on a motorboat and that's freaky enough.
         | 
         | At least with my DJI the "home point" is the trick. As the boat
         | moves you move, but the home point is/was fixed at a GPS
         | location, not a radio location.
         | 
         | So you have to stay on top of updating the home point (which
         | requires menu digging) or the drone eventually freaks out and
         | tries to fly away back to where the boat's route started, which
         | could be a great way to lose the drone.
         | 
         | In the end for me the DJI's level of software nanny plus
         | sketchy china issues have kind of sealed the deal that next
         | time I won't buy a DJI. There are a lot of places that I can
         | legally fly in a responsible manner that DJI's nanny software
         | basically stops or makes extremely inconvenient. On top of
         | places where a low altitude flight would be allowed and they
         | completely block it, their "unlock" process in other warning
         | type areas has been so buggy I've had many times I can't fly
         | even though it's legal because their system isn't working
         | right.
         | 
         | Being able to completely disable RTH (maybe you can?) and or
         | make the home point auto-update to the transmitter location
         | instead of a fixed GPS location would be a lot better.
        
           | Ancapistani wrote:
           | > Being able to completely disable RTH (maybe you can?)
           | 
           | I believe so.
           | 
           | I've not flown a DJI "seriously" in a couple of years, but my
           | Autels can be set to stop and hover at a given altitude if
           | connection is lost. I'm pretty sure I remember DJI having the
           | same option.
        
         | croutonwagon wrote:
         | This guy had some good tips. Not sure if its this video or
         | another. But i saw it in a youtube rabbit hole a while back>
         | 
         | One of the tips is to turn off RTH though.
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MsDUQjn9Bk
         | 
         | Funny enough I was telling my buddy about the video. And he
         | mentioned he had some youtuber go fishing with him and bragging
         | about some drone he had. He didnt turn off RTH and it went in
         | the drink when the batteries ran down.
        
         | bigwheeler wrote:
         | Practice makes perfect- I've launched and landed while sitting
         | in a floating touring kayak at sea dozens of times with the
         | Mini 3 Pro. I've only knicked myself once so far!
        
       | bborud wrote:
       | "Your Favorite Chinese multi-sensor distributed spying platform".
        
         | fredsmith219 wrote:
         | That's why I fly my Mavic Air:To take up PRC spy CPU time
         | analyzing the really boring stuff I do. I'm doing my part.
        
         | FpUser wrote:
         | I am way more concerned about domestic spying. I would not give
         | a rat's ass if DJI steals my pics and locations. I photograph
         | what I consider pretty places and that's the extent. They can
         | have it.
        
         | nine_k wrote:
         | Why would a drone have any internet access? It may want it, but
         | should not _need_ it, nor given it.
        
           | 1024core wrote:
           | It needs it to make sure it follows any local flight
           | restrictions, like no-fly zones.
        
             | FpUser wrote:
             | My drone stayed without connection for more than a year
             | already. Sure it politely says at startup that said zones
             | need an update but other than that keeps functioning
             | without a hitch.
        
             | Ancapistani wrote:
             | 1) Other manufacturers don't have restrictive geofencing
             | like DJI - it's not a regulatory issue, but liability.
             | 
             | 2) DJI's flight restrictions are determined by DJI, not the
             | FAA. They don't align with each other, so you end up having
             | to keep track of and comply with _two_ airspace systems.
             | 
             | That's why I abandoned DJI for my business use. I wasn't
             | able to take off to cover an event at an airport for which
             | I had FAA approval. DJI gave their approval... but the code
             | didn't work, and it required that I have Internet access on
             | the phone I was using to fly to boot.
        
               | atourgates wrote:
               | This has been incredibly frustrating for me.
               | 
               | DJI arguably makes the best consumer drones - and as a
               | platform I love my Mini Pro 3. It's small and light
               | enough to easily put in a pack, easy to fly, and just
               | works well apart from DJI's geofencing system.
               | 
               | HOWEVER - I'm heavily restricted from using it at my own
               | property, not because of the FAA or any other government
               | restrictions, but because of DJI.
               | 
               | I live about 10-miles from an airport. Per the FAA's on
               | "B4UFLY" app - my rural property is clear of any
               | restrictions, outside of the altitude restricted zone of
               | the airport. However, DJI draws their own "FlySafe Geo"
               | map differently, and places me in an altitude zone where
               | I'm limited to 150-meters.
               | 
               | This wouldn't be so bad, except that I live next to a
               | large hill/small mountain, that's a great place to fly
               | over and take photographs.
               | 
               | If I were to go to the top of the mountain (also in DJI's
               | altitude restricted area) and take off, I could fly out
               | 150m from the top of the mountain, no issues. But since
               | DJI takes no note of the ground height changing as you
               | fly, if I take off from my property and try to fly my
               | drone to the top of the mountain, I'd crash into its side
               | long before I got there.
               | 
               | There's really no solution to this issue, besides hoping
               | that someone creates a hacked firmware for my drone that
               | ignores DJI's restrictions, like they have for other DJI
               | models.
               | 
               | If another manufacturer developed a comparable drone that
               | didn't suffer from DJI's restrictions, I'd buy it in a
               | second.
        
               | e12e wrote:
               | AFAIK in Norway (all of EU?) you need Internet in order
               | to fly close (regulated, not closed, airspace) to an
               | airport - the drone self-reports position and id to air
               | traffic control, so they don't show up as unidentified
               | blip on their radar.
               | 
               | In my home town basically the entire air space is
               | regulated due to the location of the airport/flight
               | paths.
        
         | Teever wrote:
         | Do you have any idea if there are jailbreaks for these things
         | or alternate firmwares?
        
           | Ancapistani wrote:
           | There are. They tend to lag a little bit when a new model
           | comes out, but AFAIK everything is eventually unlocked.
        
         | andy_ppp wrote:
         | I doubt they care much about you taking some videos on holiday!
         | Probably don't use it to fly over military sites and there is
         | zero risk.
         | 
         | I worry that some of the worlds great companies get caught in
         | the power wars of the US and China. Both countries working
         | together has been so good for the world - nobody will be as
         | prosperous without the other - but who cares as long as the
         | powerful people in the US and China get to maintain or increase
         | their power.
        
           | mint2 wrote:
           | With the apps the issue isn't the ability of China to harvest
           | data on someone at a kids sports events or what not or what
           | basketball team they like.
           | 
           | The issue is that for example with TikTok the American
           | citizen/national with relatives has been watching videos on
           | <sensitive topic> and now their relative back in China had a
           | visit from the authorities, or this info gained from the app
           | on this politician or journalists or their family could be
           | used for leverage, or a number of scenarios like that.
           | 
           | The chinese authorities already illegally sets up "police"
           | stations abroad in various countries. The authorities already
           | do apply pressure to relatives still in China.
        
       | cypherpunks01 wrote:
       | When will these compact drones become less noisy? I know there
       | are new propeller designs being researched to be much less like a
       | swarm of bees is flying around near you, but don't know how far
       | off they are to retail commercialization. It just makes it hard
       | to stomach flying a drone in a pristine environment knowing you
       | are disturbing all human and non-human animals nearby.
        
         | 0_____0 wrote:
         | To some degree it's inescapable with the small props. The
         | higher end DJI models have enormous props which are better for
         | noise as well as endurance. 16" props on the Inspire 3.
         | 
         | The natural extent of this progression is to have one or two
         | very large 2-4 blade rotor (for low disc loading, high
         | endurance, lower rotor speed and noise), with a small auxiliary
         | rotor for yaw control if only using one lift rotor.
         | 
         | Yes, the natural endpoint is in fact just a helicopter. Only
         | reason we don't see more of that (edit: in photo drones
         | specifically) is the mechanical complexity.
        
           | Ancapistani wrote:
           | I've not actually measured the volume of various props - I
           | can, and should! - but based on my memory I don't think it's
           | quite as simple as "smaller props make more noise".
           | 
           | For FPV stuff, I've flown everything from 25mm to 9" (prop
           | size). The ones that seemed quietest were 2.5"-3", very
           | light, and designed for performance.
           | 
           | I think it has to do with the pitch of the noise and the
           | "idle point" of your motors.
           | 
           | Smaller props turn faster, and the faster they're turning the
           | higher the pitch of the noise they produce. At some point it
           | borders on inaudible. Even if it's technically producing more
           | decibels (It might be! I've not tested that.), it isn't as
           | disruptive. Larger props turn slower, producing less noise
           | and at a lower pitch.
           | 
           | "Idle point" is what I'm calling how much throttle you have
           | to give it to hover. For my favorite 5" freestyle FPV quad,
           | that's 18% (+/- 2% depending on temperature and humidity).
           | It's acceptably quiet if I'm just hovering or slowly moving
           | around, but sounds like an angry weedeater if I'm flying
           | aggressively. The idle point for my 2.5"-3" quads is probably
           | around 25%; my 7" long range build is 12%.
           | 
           | The more throttle you give it, the faster the props spin, the
           | louder and higher pitched it is.
        
         | jml7c5 wrote:
         | Zipline is using a rather strange propeller design that is
         | apparently effective:
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOWDNBu9DkU&t=831s
        
           | 404mm wrote:
           | I saw that! I'm sure they will patent it and consumers will
           | be stuck with more traditional designs. Sigh, the patent law
           | really needs a refresh, considering how rapid research and
           | market response became.
        
             | is_true wrote:
             | Do patents work when competing with a chinese company?
        
               | 404mm wrote:
               | Lol! I suppose they work if that Chinese company wants to
               | sell in the US.
        
         | imiric wrote:
         | Exactly. All this focus on improved image quality, battery life
         | and whatnot, but no mention about noise levels, or even R&D
         | into the area.
         | 
         | Currently, only the video is usable from drone footage, which
         | is a huge limitation. All drone footage either has music or an
         | audio track from an external source overlaid on top of it.
         | 
         | I wonder if the propeller and wind noise could be cancelled or
         | removed with some fancy algorithms. It wouldn't eliminate the
         | produced noise, but it would at least make the audio track
         | usable.
        
           | pphysch wrote:
           | > Currently, only the video is usable from drone footage,
           | which is a huge limitation.
           | 
           | For what use cases? Outdoor concerts? The acoustics at 100ft
           | in the air are unlikely to be great anyways.
           | 
           | I wouldn't call it a huge limitation.
        
             | dron57 wrote:
             | I just want to watch Ukranian drone videos with glorious
             | full sound Russian explosions without the annoying Ukranian
             | techno.
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | Ancapistani wrote:
             | I've used on-board audio a few times, but it's rough.
             | 
             | The only case that comes to mind where it was really
             | successful IMO is if you're using an FPV quad to chase a
             | vehicle: race cars, dirt bikes, monster trucks, etc. All of
             | those things are loud enough that they're clearly audible
             | over the prop and wind noise. If anything, for dynamic
             | chase footage, the sound of the quad's motors spinning up
             | adds interest.
             | 
             | Otherwise, you're not going to hear anything worthwhile
             | from the air.
        
         | FpUser wrote:
         | Few deer I saw did not seem to care at all about the drone.
         | Neither have raccoons, beavers, squirrels, chipmunks and birds.
        
           | jamies wrote:
           | Cool, yeah, just fly your drone next to wildlife and claim
           | they don't mind.
        
             | jmspring wrote:
             | Living in a rural area with a lot of deer and other nature,
             | they are one consideration.
        
           | FpUser wrote:
           | Save the drama, they literally hang out in my backyard (well
           | except beavers) but add foxes and rabbits
        
           | tristanb wrote:
           | If i'm in nature and i hear a drone, its annoying AF, and it
           | just makes me want to throw rocks at it.
        
             | FpUser wrote:
             | I hear loud music from drunk campers on the lakes way more
             | often than I hear drones.
        
           | blululu wrote:
           | This strikes me as a rather callous lack of empathy.
           | Personally, I find the mosquito whine of drones to be really
           | annoying - especially when I am trying to enjoy the peace and
           | serenity of a natural environment. There is nothing more
           | obnoxious than going surfing only to have some creep buzz you
           | with a drone. It's really intrusive and the sound is plain
           | just obnoxious. I'm trying to enjoy the ocean like people
           | have done for eons and someone else can't seem to enjoy it
           | without flying a high pitched squealing camera over my head?
           | It's a shame too because as a camera enthusiast I would love
           | to be able to take shots like the ones DJI features on its
           | website. They are spectacular views. But the obtrusive
           | rudeness of the technology is the one thing holding me back.
        
             | thinkmassive wrote:
             | I hear ya, but to your point about "some creep buzzing
             | you," at least you're aware of it for now.
             | 
             | A silent drone could be much creepier...
        
           | Ancapistani wrote:
           | Are you in a relatively urban area?
           | 
           | In my experience, a wild deer can hear a photography
           | quadcopter from ~200' away. They "spook" if I approach closer
           | than ~150'.
        
             | FpUser wrote:
             | There is a farm I regularly pass on my bicycle and closer
             | to the end of the summer they have boatload of deer coming
             | in an wandering on the field. I have zero clue what they do
             | on that field. Anyways those pay zero attention to my drone
             | and go about their business whatever that is.
        
           | bityard wrote:
           | Geese definitely do not like drones.
        
         | pwatsonwailes wrote:
         | There's some interesting research around toroidal propellers
         | which move the same amount of air, but create far less
         | turbulence and so make a less annoying noise. However, they're
         | not going to get significantly quieter until the energy density
         | of the batteries gets significantly better (a lot of what
         | you're moving with a drone is your energy storage).
         | 
         | There's always a hope that someone might invent a really silent
         | propellor, and there's some funky stuff you can do there with
         | trailing edge profiles, but I don't think we'll see a huge leap
         | beyond toroidals for a while.
        
           | jcims wrote:
           | Zipline has built an interesting asymmetric design that's
           | remarkably quiet. Mark Rober featured it in one of his recent
           | videos.
           | 
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOWDNBu9DkU&t=831s
        
             | pwatsonwailes wrote:
             | It does a similar sort of thing - asymmetric offset
             | propellors shunt the frequency of what gets emitted way
             | down. It still emits a similar amount of energy, but the
             | direction of emission changes, and with the lower
             | frequency, there's a lower perceived sound. Toroidal props
             | actually have less sound coming off them, and at a lower
             | frequency. I've got some ideas about how you'd potentially
             | then have a greater spread of frequency by creating an
             | offset toroidal, but I suspect the efficiency goes down,
             | and I've got better things to do with my time than model
             | sound profiles of weird, hard to manufacture (other than
             | printing) prop geometries.
             | 
             | Related note - the offset bit is similar to how car tyres
             | work by having patterns in the tyre which spread the
             | frequency response generated by each, so they don't have a
             | multiplicative effect.
             | 
             | (I can get really boring on applications of acoustic design
             | but I'll cut off there)
        
               | robotguy wrote:
               | >I can get really boring on applications of acoustic
               | design
               | 
               | I found that fascinating. TIL about the car tire noise.
               | 
               | I think you've got the right kind of audience here.
        
               | jcims wrote:
               | 100%
        
       | yreg wrote:
       | Would love to get a new shiny thing, but it's difficult to excuse
       | since my 5 year old Mavic Air still works very well and feels
       | amazing.
       | 
       | If you are looking into getting a (no-DIY) drone, consider a
       | second-hand Mavic, they are cheap and great. Maybe get a new
       | battery or two.
        
         | trollied wrote:
         | I agree. They are great fun to fly, and also very beginner
         | friendly.
        
         | Ancapistani wrote:
         | I fly an Autel Evo 2 Pro, and love it - but I still recommend
         | people new to drones pick up a used DJI Mavic Mini (or Mini2)
         | when just getting into aerial photography. You can pick them up
         | barely used, with three batteries, charger, and carrying case
         | for ~$250 if you shop around.
         | 
         | I've had five of the things at this point. I keep buying them
         | when I find them cheap, and passing them on to people who are
         | entering the hobby/field. It's always a good idea to have a
         | backup when I'm working a job, and the Mini series is small and
         | light enough that I can throw it in my camera bag even when I'm
         | not planning on flying.
        
           | coolspot wrote:
           | Don't recommend Mini 1 which is wi-fi with a very bad range
           | especially in city. Mini 2 is OcuSync with theoretical range
           | of 10km (7mi) FCC.
        
       | eimrine wrote:
       | Ukrainians need this for their counteroffencive. They name Mavic
       | 2 as their favourite drone.
        
         | chasd00 wrote:
         | is the primary use of drones in the Ukraine war for recon? I
         | know they're also using them to drop grenades and fly into
         | targets. I'm sure every military in the world is watching drone
         | use very carefully. An FPV flying RPG warhead in a dense urban
         | environment sounds like an absolute nightmare to defend
         | against.
        
       | drcongo wrote:
       | Never found the idea of owning a drone appealing before, but this
       | thing does look pretty great.
        
         | Ancapistani wrote:
         | Start with a used Mavic Mini. Seriously.
         | 
         | They're like $200, and will teach you what you want in a drone.
         | That way, when you go to spend real money on one, you'll be
         | able to make an informed decision.
         | 
         | If you can't spare the $200, I'd argue you probably shouldn't
         | be diving deep into this hobby. You certainly shouldn't be
         | spending $3k on this one.
        
           | coolspot wrote:
           | Don't buy Mavic Mini 1 because it uses wi-fi for connection.
           | Rather buy Mini 2 which uses OcuSync and provides 10km range.
        
       | l33tman wrote:
       | From a hacking perspective, DJI previously seemed to be pretty
       | nice with SDKs etc allowing you to get the video feed, send
       | controls to the drone etc. But from what I can see they stopped
       | supporting this for most (commercial) drones from Mavic 3 and
       | onwards... Anybody know otherwise?
       | 
       | What I'd want is to be able to remote control it from any other
       | device, it doesn't really matter if it's an Android/iOS app or
       | running on linux/windows.
        
         | gotschi_ wrote:
         | One can vnc into the dji rc and control it from wherever you
         | are.
         | 
         | Problem is: the remote disables radios when connected to
         | usb/power.
         | 
         | So rooting the dji android (which the FCC hack does) is a must
         | and then you only need to enable the radios.. only..
        
       | phplovesong wrote:
       | [flagged]
        
         | canadiantim wrote:
         | Use of the word orcs is incredibly unfortunate as it's clear
         | you're just trying to dehumanize other people. I get why, but I
         | don't think the ends justify the means.
        
           | hem777 wrote:
           | Are you or your people being, or have been, slaughtered by a
           | fascist, barbaric military?
           | 
           | If yes, I'm sorry and I understand your position. If not,
           | gtfo.
        
         | otabdeveloper4 wrote:
         | Both sides use them for great effect in the same way.
        
       | lofaszvanitt wrote:
       | When will this be jailbreaked?
        
       | seatac76 wrote:
       | Does anyone have an authoritative source on what data DJI
       | captures and relays to China?. I want to buy a drone but
       | concerned about privacy.
        
         | thinkmassive wrote:
         | Have you considered Skydio instead?
        
         | doodlesdev wrote:
         | Honestly? Assume they collect everything, such as location, the
         | pictures and videos taken (and not taken), flight paths (this
         | one I know for sure), telemetry from the device and drone, etc.
         | Even if they're not doing it now there's no reason they
         | wouldn't in the future, they are basically a monopoly when it
         | comes to consumer drones and they are in China, they don't give
         | a ** about privacy.
         | 
         | Ironically, I do recommend them, they simply are the only
         | option in the market right now and all of their drones have
         | something interesting to offer.
        
           | Ancapistani wrote:
           | If you have log sync turned on - which I think is the default
           | - your entire flight path is sent to the cloud. There are
           | also a number of thumbnails from the flight visible in the
           | web app. They're very low resolution, but I don't know if
           | that's all that's sent or if they're downscaling them server
           | side.
        
         | haunter wrote:
         | There have been some audits including the full network capture
         | with Wireshark
         | 
         | https://www.precisionhawk.com/hubfs/Retest_DJI%20Cybersecuri...
         | 
         | https://www.auvsi.org/sites/default/files/DHS%20report.pdf
         | 
         | This is from the DOI, see from page 40
         | https://web.archive.org/web/20190916135227/https://www.doi.g...
         | 
         | >We did not detect any leakage of data to DJI servers with any
         | of the apps. However, all three apps make a Domain Name
         | System(DNS) request to the computer hosting the WiFi network to
         | resolve the IP address of "www.dji.com" when they are first
         | started. This DNS request goes to the router or a DNS server,
         | and does not actually communicate with any DJI servers, but it
         | does tell the app the IP address of DJI servers. The DJI Pilot
         | Beta app follows this DNS request up with a ping to one ofthe
         | DJI servers, and receives a ping response back. This ping is
         | used by the app to check that the server is up and can receive
         | messages. The ping does not contain any data, but the server
         | could get the IP address of the tablet and the time the app was
         | started (since that's when the ping is sent)
        
       | RugnirViking wrote:
       | I can't see the dang product in the first 5 seconds on the
       | product page. Sure theres a dim shot of it folded if I scroll
       | down (although its covered by popup consent forms), but I want to
       | see the drone clearly without sitting through an artsy video.
       | Something like the second and third picture on
       | https://store.dji.com/dk/product/dji-mavic-3-pro?vid=137691
       | showing it folded and unfolded are SO much better
        
       | stoicjumbotron wrote:
       | This and their latest Inspire 3 are truly a feat of engineering
        
         | smlacy wrote:
         | If only such a statement could be made about their horrible
         | mobile apps needed to fly these drones.
        
           | vetinari wrote:
           | Use DJI RC/RC Pro. Still based on Android, but standalone
           | device. DJI Fly is fine there.
        
           | josefresco wrote:
           | Speaking of that software I resurrected an old DJI drone for
           | a family member and after takeoff the app prompted me with so
           | many warnings/errors/updates/notifications that I crashed.
           | Truly horrifying to see a drone drifting towards you (and
           | others) while you're furiously tapping to close warnings.
        
           | bgun wrote:
           | This is because software development still doesn't and has
           | never qualified as capital-E Engineering. If "software
           | engineering" were held to any of the same kind of rigor and
           | responsibility that applies to mechanical, civil, aerospace
           | or nearly any other "Engineering" discipline, we might not be
           | in the technological & sociopolitical hellscape we are in
           | right now.
        
         | passion__desire wrote:
         | This just popped up in my feed.
         | 
         | DJI MAVIC 3 PRO - THE GIFT OF FLYING | Cinematic Video
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6cgcpfKt3g
        
       | hintymad wrote:
       | Spy drone or not, why can't US companies design and manufacture
       | better products to compete with DJI?
        
         | pjc50 wrote:
         | There's a whole synergistic Shenzen ecosystem of companies, and
         | the US is a very expensive place. Most of the people with the
         | skills to do this are already working for either FAANG or the
         | long tail of other US tech companies, not on something as
         | comparatively low value as drones. The US is simply higher up
         | the value curve for manufacturing.
        
         | cultofmetatron wrote:
         | we gutted most of our manufacturing and outsourced it to china
         | decades ago. we Let our entire non military manufacturing
         | industry die on the vine so there isn't much of a culture of
         | supply chain left.
         | 
         | blame harvard business school. The cumulative damage of their
         | Alum to the american economy is astronomical
        
           | hintymad wrote:
           | > non military manufacturing industry die
           | 
           | Without a booming civil manufacturing industry, how could our
           | military industry stay competitive? There was a reason that a
           | toilet for Airforce would cost north of $20K.
        
           | ApolloFortyNine wrote:
           | Meh, there's been fears of imports damaging the home
           | country's manufacturing/economy for hundreds of years. It's
           | why tariffs have existed for ages. If the government valued
           | manufacturing at home, they've had the tools for years to
           | make it happen.
           | 
           | Of course, are citizens ready to pay more than double in some
           | cases? Not sure.
        
             | cultofmetatron wrote:
             | > If the government valued manufacturing at home, they've
             | had the tools for years to make it happen.
             | 
             | agreed and thats why I emphasized _non military_
             | manufacturing.
        
             | vuln wrote:
             | > If the government valued manufacturing at home, they've
             | had the tools for years to make it happen
             | 
             | Well as long as we are "green washing" everything
             | manufacturing will never return to the US.
             | 
             | Americans would rather offshore and pollute in other
             | countries instead of attempting to manufacture in the US
             | while be suffocated by regulations.
        
           | Salgat wrote:
           | Can we stop with this nonsense myth? The US is the second
           | largest manufacturer in the world. Does manufacturing make up
           | as large a share of our economy as it did in the past? No, of
           | course not, that's a normal progression to a service economy,
           | which is why the US is so wealthy.
        
             | hintymad wrote:
             | > The US is the second largest manufacturer in the world
             | 
             | The US used to the largest. I was wondering if we should
             | stay the largest, and most importantly the best. Case in
             | point, the average age of workers in our shipyard was more
             | than 55. The number of shipyards in the US has been
             | decreasing over the years. I can see how that will help us
             | innovate on and build better and cheaper ships, for
             | military or not. Another data point, Intel can't compete
             | with TSMC when it comes to manufacturing chips. Plus, if
             | the so-called "low-end" manufacturing is gone, how could we
             | possibly train the next generation of engineers? My
             | assumption is engineering will be like writing software, a
             | person who can only draw boxes will not be a good software
             | engineer, and the person could not even learn draw boxes
             | well without years of programming experience.
        
         | zamnos wrote:
         | Skydio seems to be doing just fine, though their customers are
         | more companies that want security rather than consumers.
         | 
         | I think what killed it is the FCC rules, which make it illegal
         | to fly in a large number of places where it really shouldn't
         | have to be. This severely limits the size of the market for a
         | $1,000 gadget.
        
         | bityard wrote:
         | It's much more expensive to manufacture lots of stuff in the
         | US, but clothing and electronics probably top the list. Most
         | people aren't willing to pay 3x the cost of an equivalent item
         | just for the warm-n-fuzzy "Made in USA" sticker on it. A few
         | are, but most aren't.
        
         | c_elegant wrote:
         | DJI is a vertically-integrated beast with CCP ties; it won the
         | monopolist position in 2015 against venture-backed 3D Robotics.
         | Skydio, the largest US entity, really only exists as a
         | protectionist hedge.
         | 
         | Consumer products mean low prices, the opposite of what America
         | does well.
        
           | hintymad wrote:
           | > Consumer products mean low prices, the opposite of what
           | America does well.
           | 
           | This is actually sad. Ford could drive down the cost of
           | automobile down to $4000 while its workers could earn $5 an
           | hour. America used to be the industrial behemoth what could
           | manufacture and innovate better, faster, and cheaper. What's
           | interesting is that there was a powerful country that would
           | mock the US for producing things cheap but not necessarily
           | crafty in late 19th century and early 20th century. Yeah,
           | that was Britain. We all know how history went.
        
         | e12e wrote:
         | Arguably Prox Dynamics (now Flir) is able to compete in certain
         | segments?
         | 
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Hornet_Nano
         | 
         | https://www.flir.eu/news-center/military/qa-flir-acquires-wo...
        
       | rektide wrote:
       | DJI seems to be the one company that requires sideloading the
       | Android app. DJI makes great products, but there's really few
       | companies who I would trust less to give unvetted access to my
       | phone.
       | 
       | I know the Android app sandboxing should help a lot, but there's
       | enough unknowns & potentially lurking security holes that I
       | really wouldn't want to trust them. They also are 100% the most
       | likely company on the planet to self-update & start truly-epic-
       | level spying on the world if China ever gets a little bit more
       | nervous. It's just not a tenable proposition to trust DJI with
       | this security stance; no one at the company has the power nor
       | right to say no, & as such there's no basis for trust to form.
        
         | yreg wrote:
         | I get why people want the end of the App Store monopoly and I
         | apprieciate the idea of being able to run anything I want on my
         | hardware, but this here is the reason why I'm hesitant.
         | 
         | As a user I want the big developers to have to bend the knee to
         | Apple. I don't want to side load my DJI app, I don't want to
         | download Instagram from the Meta store.
         | 
         | I don't agree with all of Apple's rules (and also with the way
         | the app revenue is split), but I'm mostly satisfied with them.
        
           | archagon wrote:
           | Then the future of computing will be in the hands of mega-
           | corporations. Have an innovative app idea that goes against
           | corporate policy? Too bad, won't happen.
           | 
           | Strict sandboxing and a robust permissions model can still
           | give you security with these kinds of apps.
        
             | rektide wrote:
             | It really bothers me that DJI is basically the one notable
             | example that gives the anti-sideloading FUD-dites some
             | ammunition. It's generally not a real issue, DJI are just
             | extra punks, and yeah, sandboxing should offer really good
             | protection in general, but maybe maybe your drone is live
             | uploading all drone data to the CCP perhaps.
             | 
             | Freedom enables choice. Humanity's greatness is built
             | entirely off our ability to explore possibilities & create
             | new ways. Gating innovation behind what Apple & all the
             | governments permit us is just not an option for the most
             | important most noospheric device on the planet. Not having
             | choices is to let ourselves be chained up in the PKD Black
             | Iron Prison. I refuse that dejection.
        
               | yreg wrote:
               | >Freedom enables choice.
               | 
               | One could argue that also for the freedom to choose a
               | curated platform. Android exists and prospers, I have a
               | choice.
        
               | rektide wrote:
               | What happens when Android starts clamping down, as they
               | have? Android ever more ratchets shit down, and more and
               | more essential apps like Termux simply can't make it
               | through the Google gauntlet. What happens if Android
               | stops allowing sideloading?
               | 
               | I hear this defense a lot from the anti-sideloaders, that
               | it's fine that this platform have no freedom, because
               | there's another popular platform with some freedom. Even
               | with the DJI example here before us (which so far has
               | been icky but had no known actual bad consequences), I
               | roundly do not get the argument, do not see the appeal of
               | being trapped, of arguing everyone else on this platform
               | needs to be under the fist of Cook & every government on
               | the planet & without feet to stand on.
               | 
               | And it's repugnant to me that the defense is that there
               | is one other platform where freedom exists, as if it's OK
               | that one set of folks fall down the slippery slide &
               | leave the rest of humanity tottering for themselves,
               | trying to keep feet under them against perpetual
               | universal software helplessness.
               | 
               | Apple has basically been winning the AT&T position
               | against Carterphone. They've used monopoly power to
               | control push around dominate & extract, to make up
               | whatever terms it wants for the world. That's a position
               | that damned & binds humanity, and one we have rejected
               | already quite clearly, but now that computers are
               | involved it's free game to coral the humans & other
               | entities & to rollback the Carterphone right to modify
               | the world about you.
               | 
               | There's one plan I'm OK with here, which is Apple can
               | keep it's closed platform but has to let other OS run on
               | iPhone & make equal use of the hardware. If apple demands
               | control over iOS, I think that's an alternative out for
               | hardware owners.
        
               | yreg wrote:
               | >There's one plan I'm OK with here, which is Apple can
               | keep it's closed platform but has to let other OS run on
               | iPhone & make equal use of the hardware.
               | 
               | This is an interesting idea. It sounds pretty good
               | actually.
        
             | [deleted]
        
         | steve_adams_86 wrote:
         | I'm in the same camp. I got my son a Mini 3, which is a stellar
         | quadcopter in its own right, but the DJI ecosystem is a
         | spectacle to behold for some good and many bad reasons.
         | 
         | One issue could be that they don't communicate compatibility
         | between devices very well, so it's very hard to know if buying
         | one thing will lead to being very limited and locked in -- even
         | within the DJI ecosystem. People often find themselves needing
         | to buy more equipment to accomplish seemingly trivial things.
         | For example, the controller we got can't install apps and it
         | doesn't work with a multitude of other quads DJI sells. Why
         | not? Are they good reasons or bad? Where can I find clear
         | explanations? I'm sure the controller is very resource
         | constrained, but can't I just opt into bad performance if I
         | don't mind? Is the controller incompatible with other quads due
         | to radio protocols, or is this a choice intended to force
         | eventual upgrades?
         | 
         | Without being able to tell with certainty, sometimes it begins
         | to seem a little manufactured and nefarious.
         | 
         | Otherwise, the fact that their protocols are all proprietary
         | and I can't use the controller with custom quads is very
         | frustrating. I have a Radio Master TX12 that I can't use with
         | any DJI products, and a DJI controller I can't use with any
         | custom quads already built or that I could ever build.
         | 
         | That's all crazy. Sure, tight integration means better
         | performance, but the extent to which it's closed off is unreal.
         | 
         | Although the Mini 3 is a genuinely awesome device, I don't
         | think I'll buy DJI again. I think I'd rather buy into open VTX
         | hardware and use my own camera to record footage. It's a huge
         | compromise in convenience and upfront cost, but if you care a
         | lot about the hobby it's perhaps well worth it. The flexibility
         | afforded is enormous.
        
         | miohtama wrote:
         | Is there any other reason to force sideloading except that
         | China hates Google?
        
           | capableweb wrote:
           | - No need to deal with Google or the Play Store and
           | everything that comes with, having to do reviews and all that
           | 
           | - Faster deployments to actual devices. AFAIK, you could even
           | implement self-updating if you're feeling brave
           | 
           | - No sharing of data to Google and/or Play Store.
           | 
           | - Basically everything that the Play Store is now allowed, as
           | you set your own rules (besides local regulation).
           | 
           | Basically, lots of goodies for developers and companies who
           | want to skirt whatever safety Google has setup, with minor
           | benefit to the users themselves.
        
       | 1024core wrote:
       | $2200 ... welp.
        
         | Ancapistani wrote:
         | Not out of line with comparable airframes.
         | 
         | Here's what I fly: https://amzn.to/41F7wnL
         | 
         | It's been out a while, but is roughly comparable in every way
         | except the camera. The Autel camera has a slightly larger
         | sensor, but only one lens: with the DJI you get a telephoto and
         | medium telephoto lens as well. The DJI will also do Apple
         | ProRes RAW output while the Autel doesn't.
         | 
         | There are other differences, but I'd argue they're relatively
         | minor, and mostly boil down to personal preference.
         | 
         | Autel Evo 2 Pro v3: $2,500 DJI Mavic 3 Pro Cine: $2,999
        
       | mtlynch wrote:
       | I'm surprised the base price is only $2k.
       | 
       | I have no experience with drones, but based on the video, I was
       | expecting it to be like a $40k product.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-04-26 23:02 UTC)