[HN Gopher] First space images captured by balloon-borne telescope
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       First space images captured by balloon-borne telescope
        
       Author : colinprince
       Score  : 73 points
       Date   : 2023-04-23 19:05 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.utoronto.ca)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.utoronto.ca)
        
       | slackfan wrote:
       | Glad this one wasn't shot down.
        
       | Eduard wrote:
       | > scientific balloon the size of a football stadium.
       | 
       | In the photo, it doesn't look that big - or does the balloon
       | expand significantly more within the high-altitude low-pressure
       | atmosphere?
       | 
       | ...
       | 
       | Also: here is the SuperBIT Wikipedia article:
       | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super-pressure_Balloon-borne...
        
         | xingyzt wrote:
         | According to the description of this NASA image [1], they flew
         | a 7-million-cubic-feet super-pressure balloon in 2009.
         | Approximating as a perfect sphere, that's around 120 feet in
         | radius / 80 yards in diameter. And "When development ends, NASA
         | will have a 22 million-cubic-foot balloon", which is around 170
         | feet in radius / 110 yards in diameter. These things also look
         | squashed when inflated [2], so they're probably even wider
         | horizontally. Basically, you can fit an entire football field
         | inside along with some stands.
         | 
         | 1. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:NASA-
         | NSF_super_press...
         | 
         | 2.
         | https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Super_v_zero_pressur...
        
           | aardvarkr wrote:
           | 40 yds*
        
             | xingyzt wrote:
             | radius vs diameter
        
       | TomK32 wrote:
       | So, the balloon flies above 99.5% of the atmosphere, but the
       | telescope hangs under the balloon, so it have to take photos more
       | sideways than straight up? Got to be a lot more than 0.5% of the
       | atmosphere in the frame then.
        
         | aaron695 wrote:
         | [dead]
        
         | dontwearitout wrote:
         | They have a video of it launching on their instagram
         | (superbit.telescope), it looks like it has a very long tether
         | beneath the balloon
        
       | detrites wrote:
       | > The Super Pressure Balloon-Borne Imaging Telescope (SuperBIT)
       | was flown to the edge of space
       | 
       | > SuperBIT flies at an altitude of 33.5 kilometres
       | 
       | Just _no_. I could understand say, shaving a few km off to get
       | the project into  "space". Maybe ten. I get that space is a bit
       | of a blurry boundary and somewhat arbitrary up there.
       | 
       |  _But not seventy._
        
         | stametseater wrote:
         | "Edge of space" is a pretty loosey-goosey expression. For
         | instance:
         | 
         |  _" What it takes to fly spy plane U-2 to the edge of space"_
         | https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20140224-flying-at-the-ed...
         | 
         | (The U-2 flies at something around 21 to 25 kilometers,
         | depending on what source you go by.)
        
           | wongarsu wrote:
           | Interesting. Apparently some people consider the Armstrong
           | Line [1] (where pressure is low enough that water boils at
           | body temperature, at about 18km) to be the start of "near
           | space". As opposed to "outer space" which starts at the
           | Karman line at 100km (unless you are in the US, where outer
           | space starts at 50miles/80km instead)
           | 
           | 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armstrong_limit
        
         | elbigbad wrote:
         | "Edge" is doing a lot of work here, haha. In fact, a paper
         | airplane has flown higher than this balloon!
        
         | zeckalpha wrote:
         | For others, the definition is generally
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karman_line
        
       | 7373737373 wrote:
       | Unfortunately there is no further information about the exposure
       | time of these images
        
         | prewett wrote:
         | I couldn't even find a repository of the images, which I would
         | assume would have information on exposure time. Makes me wonder
         | if these are testing images. The closest I could find was 17
         | minutes for an image from their 2016 run.
         | 
         | https://www.mn.uio.no/astro/forskning/aktuelt/arrangementer/...
        
       | p1esk wrote:
       | So if we can do these, why do we want to launch super expensive
       | orbital telescopes?
        
         | ahmedfromtunis wrote:
         | Because these are still inside Earth's atmosphere -- there's
         | much less of it up there, sure, but even that little air can
         | have a great impact.
        
       | marcodiego wrote:
       | Title is very misleading. Other balloon-borne telescopes have
       | captured images. These are just the first images of "this
       | specific telescope".
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-04-23 23:00 UTC)