[HN Gopher] Athens Charter
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Athens Charter
        
       Author : pantalaimon
       Score  : 24 points
       Date   : 2023-04-21 10:12 UTC (12 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (en.wikipedia.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (en.wikipedia.org)
        
       | RC_ITR wrote:
       | A lot of people (in this thread and elsewhere) try to defend
       | corbu as a visionary whose ideas were ruined by cheap
       | construction of whatever, but it's simply not the case.
       | 
       | Humans need nature and green space, that's an easy thing to agree
       | with.
       | 
       | But putting small amounts of green space in between everything
       | (rather than centralizing it) is an awful idea.
       | 
       | Not only does it make everyone travel (probably drive) past the
       | green space to get anywhere, it makes the green space worse by
       | making it a pseudo space where it's not nature (you still see
       | buildings), but it's also not useful civic space for the city.
       | 
       | He made cool buildings and his are some of the few brutalist
       | buildings people think look cool, but he was just dead wrong on
       | urban design.
        
         | stephc_int13 wrote:
         | Le Corbusier is a cautionary tale of human hubris and the worst
         | part of 20th century modernity.
        
       | stephc_int13 wrote:
       | [flagged]
        
         | glompers wrote:
         | > should be more widely understood and, IMHO, criticized. I
         | think this is almost as bad as the Nazis.
         | 
         | Cultivating too exalted a view of our human potential/destiny
         | -- Modernism and some postmodernisms both following in a long
         | line of philosophical aspirations to transcend internal issues
         | as well as exterior ones -- and having too low a view of human
         | potential/destiny each lend themselves to evil, for sure.
         | 
         | Immoderate moderation in all things, on the other hand, can be
         | no less proud of its profound public-spiritedness though.
        
       | burlesona wrote:
       | Corbusier and his acolytes were almost singly responsible for the
       | many urban planning (and related social justice) atrocities of
       | the mid century, especially in the US.
       | 
       | If you're interested in the more recent counter-movement trying
       | to roll back some of these mistakes, see the Charter for the New
       | Urbanism: https://www.cnu.org/who-we-are/charter-new-urbanism
        
         | rahen wrote:
         | He's also responsible for a lot of urban atrocities in the
         | former soviet countries, with endless rows of commieblocks
         | lined up on extremely wide avenues / urban highways.
         | 
         | At least it can accommodate some form of mass transit, but it's
         | even more anti-individualistic, soulless, and dehumanized than
         | the US sprawl.
         | 
         | In both cases, those mistakes were the result of central
         | planning. Most of them were fixed with the Aalborg charter,
         | which reverted from central planning to a more organic,
         | spontaneous growth with a bit of regulatory oversight.
        
         | betaby wrote:
         | Atrocities are those plywood 'houses' and whole urban sprawl in
         | USA and Canada. They have enormous environmental cost, in
         | contrast of those ideas of Corbusier. And even then, you
         | suburban cardboard bungalow inside is Corbusier, just think a
         | second about that.
        
           | glompers wrote:
           | I suppose I see the axes differently. If a city is going to
           | be there, there are going to be a bunch of costs; but I don't
           | want built space to be constrained and crummy for people by
           | being either A) favela/bidonville/slum decrepit and pest-
           | riddled
           | 
           | B) manicured like a plywood subdivision to maximize resale
           | value, at the expense of freedom to add on and be playful, cf
           | Daniel Pinkwater's classic book "The Big Orange Splot"
           | 
           | C) homogenized by high design prefabricators "because people
           | don't mind having identical phones if the phones are cheap
           | but good, so, people won't mind having identical homes on
           | that basis either"
           | 
           | D) unwalkably sited
           | 
           | E) arrayed in vertical cul-de-sac residential stalks with no
           | personal private life at ground level or F) mass-customized
           | for them by AR/VR&cement-extrusion-robot-rental
           | prefabricators and perhaps well-meaning building code
           | officials who will find it much safer to pre-warranty the
           | strength of such homes than try to verify the safety of
           | people's own manually cobbled-together creations
           | 
           | I'd rather suggest that the downsides of B thru F can be
           | avoided if A were pursued in the absence of economically
           | marginal conditions that usually are its raison d'etre.
           | 
           | A neighborhood where everyone is well-housed but often
           | inclined to iterate their physical surroundings and
           | contribute to greater building skills and greater building
           | beauty would be a pretty interesting environment in which to
           | raise a family...
        
       | twelvechairs wrote:
       | People love to dump on Corbusier for all the ills of 20th C city
       | planning. Worth noting
       | 
       | - These congresses were groups of architects (generally of
       | private houses) struggling to come to terms with how to plan
       | massive cities. At a time of population explosions, new ways of
       | living, modern construction technology etc. City planning really
       | didn't exist as a discipline. No hard science or social science
       | around cities. Etc. You cant really blame them for not getting
       | things right.
       | 
       | - Much of this work led to postwar quickly and cheaply built
       | social housing. Which was much needed in the postwar world
       | however turned worse later especially when public housing became
       | segregationist ghettos for lower classes in the late 20th C. You
       | cant really blame these early modernists for that.
       | 
       | - Corbusier in fact had many of the ideas that did stick (as
       | opposed to many of the other attendees) - the unitee d'habitation
       | was an incredible system. He obviously didn't understand streets
       | or social interaction in a way that Jane Jacobs did much later
       | but he did understand mass production, concrete and internal
       | apartment planning in ways that led the world.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-04-21 23:01 UTC)