[HN Gopher] Show HN: Trivai.app - AI powered trivia questions, w...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Show HN: Trivai.app - AI powered trivia questions, with references
        
       Hi HN!  As many of you, I've had a lot of fun playing around with
       LLMs the past few months and I wanted to show you what I've built.
       I made a trivia website using GPT3 a while back just to have
       something to play with. My initial interest was to see if I could
       get structured responses to build a UI around, and if I could get
       the LLM to refer back to what piece of text it used to create
       questions and answers with.  The initial results were pretty good,
       but not good enough. Fast forward a few months, GPT 3.5 was
       released to the public and I was released from my work.  I decided
       to pick this up again and have been making some changes.  - I've
       generated almost 3000 questions.  - I initially only let signed up
       users generate questions due to cost concerns. Since 3.5 is much
       cheaper, I've opened up the question generation for everybody.  - I
       built a prompt comparison tool so I could tweak the prompt to get
       better responses.  - I've added some more data to the questions.
       This includes a more free form explanation to the correct answer
       (separate from the references), and categories for all questions.
       - I've been working on a question improvement process. This means I
       collect issues, generate new variations of the question and let
       people vote on them. Voting and question improvement is currently
       only available to signed in users.  I have many more ideas I'd like
       to explore, but I would appreciate your feedback and would be happy
       to answer any questions about the site or its development.  You can
       access the references by pressing the explanation text when you've
       answered a question correctly.
        
       Author : yummytummy
       Score  : 10 points
       Date   : 2023-04-17 17:43 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (trivai.app)
 (TXT) w3m dump (trivai.app)
        
       | beardyw wrote:
       | Did "20th century British art" and got "Which group of artists in
       | Germany strove for emotional Expressionism?". Something wrong
       | there.
        
         | yummytummy wrote:
         | Thank you for trying it out!
         | 
         | I'm matching the search queries with a Wikipedia page right
         | now, and in this case it found "20th century art".
         | 
         | If you press the explanation
         | 
         | "Die Brucke was a group of German artists who strove for
         | emotional Expressionism."
         | 
         | You'll see the reference highlighted in the Wikipedia page
         | 
         | "Die Brucke strove for emotional Expressionism"
         | 
         | I agree that it might be a bit confusing, I'll see if I can do
         | anything to make these situations clearer.
         | 
         | Thanks!
        
       | yummytummy wrote:
       | Check out the pregenerated questions if you just want to see what
       | the questions look like.
       | 
       | And press the text that shows up after a correct answer to see
       | what references the question is based on!
        
       | sphars wrote:
       | Something is wrong with this question[0]. It looks like the topic
       | is Larry Sanger, one of the choices is Gerry Sanger, the
       | "correct" answer is Jimmy Wales, and the explanation says
       | Lawrence Sanger is the correct answer.
       | 
       | Something screwy here. Seems pretty good otherwise
       | 
       | [0]: https://i.imgur.com/Rht9jbu.png
        
         | yummytummy wrote:
         | Thank you for reporting it!
         | 
         | I've actually seen this particular question before. It's hard
         | to figure out why some questions get bad or wrong answers. This
         | question also doesn't have a proper reference.
         | 
         | I think it's difficult to get the initial result perfect 100%
         | of the time. So far, my solution to this is an upvote/downvote
         | system. This lets me either hide downvoted questions, or
         | improve them. Right now a user who downvoted can report an
         | issue, and I will generate new variations of the question. If
         | either of the variations receive enough upvotes, the question
         | will be updated.
        
           | gumballindie wrote:
           | Have you considered using a database and static questions and
           | answers? This technique gets 100% perfect results each time
           | and needs less energy.
        
             | yummytummy wrote:
             | It would actually be interesting to know what the energy
             | required by a human is to research a topic, think of
             | plausible options, find references and type it out.
             | 
             | I'm not sure how much energy Trivai requires, or if it's
             | even remotely comparable, but you might be happy to know
             | that all generated questions are stored in a database.
             | 
             | I would guess that humans produce "perfect" results 95+% of
             | the time. In my own tests, Trivai gets "good" results, ~90%
             | of the time.
        
       | bosmanos wrote:
       | Interesting, will have a try. Seems like a fun project
        
         | yummytummy wrote:
         | Thank you!
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-04-17 23:02 UTC)