[HN Gopher] Hypervisor Development in Rust
___________________________________________________________________
Hypervisor Development in Rust
Author : ingve
Score : 181 points
Date : 2023-04-15 12:11 UTC (10 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (memn0ps.github.io)
(TXT) w3m dump (memn0ps.github.io)
| LatticeAnimal wrote:
| This article seems to be targeting Windows. Does anyone know how
| different the process is on Linux? (Or if there are Linux-
| specific resources like this)
| anaisbetts wrote:
| All of the NT functions used here have 1:1 Linux kernel
| equivalents, they are all very fundamental kernel operations
| that every kernel will have
| traceroute66 wrote:
| AWS Firecracker[1] ?
|
| [1]https://firecracker-microvm.github.io/
| LatticeAnimal wrote:
| I mean in-depth guides like the one that was linked, not
| technologies, but thank you
| ghostpepper wrote:
| Not Linux but this is for UEFI
| https://tandasat.github.io/Hypervisor-101-in-Rust/
| rektide wrote:
| https://github.com/tandasat/Hypervisor-101-in-Rust is there to
| help
|
| https://github.com/cloud-hypervisor/cloud-hypervisor isn't
| educational necessarily but is one of the most technically
| progressive fastest developing highest funded vm projects ever,
| and there are oodles of tech talks on it. I am not qualified to
| make any specific recommendations, but there's tons of stuff
| here.
| the_duke wrote:
| > and there are oodles of tech talks on it
|
| Can you recommend a few good ones?
|
| Searching Youtube for cloud-hypervisor doesn't yield anything
| solid.
| carom wrote:
| Highly recommend the Gamozolabs streams for this type of work
| too. [1]
|
| 1. https://m.youtube.com/@gamozolabs/playlists
| davemp wrote:
| This is a pretty good article about CPU virtualization, which is
| a key starting point (as this seems to be the starting point of a
| series).
|
| What I'm interested in at the moment is device virtualization,
| which seems like a pretty hairy problem in the current KVM
| paradigm. IOMMU is a big step but it seems there's just a lot of
| grunt work left for getting the host/guest drivers working well.
|
| It almost feels like exokernel [0] path would have been
| preferable over having to write windows/linux/mac host drivers
| for virtualizing buses/devices. We already have a very awkward
| overlap with UEFI drivers. Maybe we just need new HW bus designs
| that are more of a switch than mux, I haven't gone deep enough
| into modern bus controller designs to know though.
|
| The reality of doing this kind of research/work is a special hell
| though, because you sit in a crossfire between
| hardware/firmware/os/application vendors.
|
| [0]: https://wiki.osdev.org/Exokernel
| bpye wrote:
| There are features that improve device virtualisation. Things
| like SR-IOV allowing for multiple virtual functions on a single
| device, and ATS which (among other things) means that device
| memory doesn't need to be pinned. The issue is that these
| features are at best supported on expensive data centre
| devices.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-04-15 23:00 UTC)