[HN Gopher] GitHub Accelerator: our first cohort and what's next
___________________________________________________________________
GitHub Accelerator: our first cohort and what's next
Author : sebg
Score : 217 points
Date : 2023-04-13 12:33 UTC (10 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (github.blog)
(TXT) w3m dump (github.blog)
| paranoidxprod wrote:
| Great to see Dioxus there. I was looking at Rust GUI libraries
| and Dioxus seemed like one of the most interesting to me, but
| still felt pretty early in development. I did notice in their 0.3
| release post they mentioned "This release represents an
| absolutely massive jump forward for the Dioxus ecosystem. We hope
| to ship future features more quickly into stable now that many of
| the desired breaking changes have been incorporated into the core
| library." so I am excited to see how the project progresses!
| jkelleyrtp wrote:
| We're super excited about the funding. It's letting us bring on
| some of the core team full time for the summer and part time
| for the year.
|
| Our goal with Dioxus is to eat Electron, React Native, Flutter,
| Phoenix, Gatsby, and NextJS with one stack.
| quaunaut wrote:
| > Our goal with Dioxus is to eat Electron, React Native,
| Flutter, Phoenix, Gatsby, and NextJS with one stack.
|
| What of Phoenix are you looking to tackle?
| jkelleyrtp wrote:
| We love LiveView and we love the developer experience.
| Dioxus recently launched support for HTML-over-websocket
| (LiveView) and we're slowly working on wrapping axum/hyper
| in a Dioxus-focused API.
| wofo wrote:
| Thanks for working on LiveView! Next to Rust, one of my
| favorite ecosystems is .NET and Blazor has been a game-
| changer when writing desktop apps. I'm looking forward to
| having something similar in Rust!
| datadeft wrote:
| Amen to that. It would be pretty amazing to write Rust for
| the UI everywhere.
| erlend_sh wrote:
| Parts of the Dioxus stack are also becoming framework-agnostic,
| like Blitz the "High performance HTML and CSS renderer powered
| by WGPU":
|
| https://github.com/DioxusLabs/blitz
| jkelleyrtp wrote:
| A full list of projects that are being spun out as framework-
| agnostic:
|
| - taffy: flexbox+css grid https://github.com/DioxusLabs/taffy
|
| - blitz: html/css renderer
| https://github.com/DioxusLabs/blitz
|
| - sledgehammer: faster than websys bindings
| https://github.com/demonthos/sledgehammer/
|
| - native-core: salsa but for UI trees https://github.com/Diox
| usLabs/dioxus/tree/master/packages/na...
|
| - tui: native-core+terminal rendering
|
| We want to make sure every part of the stack is available for
| anyone.
| dmix wrote:
| I've always been curious what sort of relationship
| https://nuxtjs.org/ has with Next.js and whether they will
| significantly diverge as their own entity (I haven't had the
| opportunity to use Nuxt 3 yet). Especially with all of the noise
| around projects like Remix.
|
| Happy to see them on the list none-the-less.
| dlxfoo wrote:
| [dead]
| re-thc wrote:
| Next is for React and Nuxt is for Vue...
| dmix wrote:
| Well obviously (I'm surprised two people have replied to
| state this fact), Nuxt's whole pitch was literally "Next for
| Vue".
|
| I was talking about conceptually diverging instead of just
| being inspired by Next.js, given recent developments with
| Remix and https://astro.build/.
| evntdrvn wrote:
| Awesome to see Simon on there with datasette, and HTMX. Woot!
| imaurer wrote:
| Best part of Simon being part of it, is that there will be a
| great record of it from his blog and TILs.
| 255kb wrote:
| I'm thrilled to see my project (https://mockoon.com) being part
| of this first cohort! It's a great opportunity but it's also good
| for open-source projects in general. It can only contribute to
| make our industry more sustainable.
|
| Here is the list of the 20 projects that have been selected:
|
| - https://github.com/analogjs/analog: Analog is a fullstack meta-
| framework to build applications and websites with Angular
|
| - https://github.com/Atri-Labs/atrilabs-engine: The Python web
| framework to build production-grade apps
|
| - https://github.com/bigskysoftware/htmx: Makes AJAX, Web
| Sockets, etc. available directly in HTML
|
| - https://github.com/code-hike/codehike: Tools for building all
| types of code walkthroughs: blogs, docs, slides, tutorials, etc.
|
| - https://github.com/DioxusLabs/dioxus: Friendly React-like GUI
| library for desktop, web, mobile, and more, written in Rust.
|
| - https://github.com/EddieHubCommunity/LinkFree: Connecting with
| your audience with a single link, showcasing your content and
| projects.
|
| - https://github.com/FashionFreedom/Seamly2D: Design CAD to
| democratize and de-centralize fashion design & production.
|
| - https://github.com/fastai/nbdev: Increase developer
| productivity by 10x with a new exploratory programming workflow.
|
| - https://github.com/formbricks/formbricks: Open-source Qualtrics
| alternative
|
| - https://github.com/GyulyVGC/sniffnet: Cross-platform
| application to comfortably monitor and analyse network traffic
|
| - https://github.com/JessicaTegner/pypandoc: Pypandoc provides a
| thin wrapper for pandoc, a universal document converter.
|
| - https://github.com/mockoon/mockoon: Mockoon is the easiest and
| quickest way to design and run mock REST APIs.
|
| - https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt: An intuitive framework for
| building web applications, built for the edge.
|
| - https://github.com/responsively-org/responsively-app: A dev-
| tool for web developers that aid in faster responsive web page
| development.
|
| - https://github.com/simonw/datasette: An open source multi-tool
| for exploring and publishing data
|
| - https://github.com/spyder-ide/spyder: The scientific Python
| development environment - https://github.com/strawberry-
| graphql/strawberry: A GraphQL library for Python that leverages
| type annotations
|
| - https://github.com/termux/termux-app: A terminal emulator for
| Android that provides 2000+ linux packages to code on phone
|
| - https://github.com/TimothyStiles/poly: Poly is a fast, well
| tested Go package for engineering organisms.
|
| - https://github.com/trpc/trpc: End-to-end typesafe APIs made
| easy. Never write another API contract again.
|
| Edit: formatting and updated repo links
| beanclap wrote:
| super cool congrats :)
| sphars wrote:
| Exciting to see both Termux and HTMX be selected, looking
| forward to what comes of it
| dmix wrote:
| Looks like Github linked to Nuxt's old repo and not
| https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt
| 255kb wrote:
| Thanks for noticing, will check with owner and GitHub team.
| theturtletalks wrote:
| So glad to see codehike here! Pomber has been building amazing
| open-source projects and codehike will be a game changer for
| documentation.
| pomber wrote:
| Thank you!
| theturtletalks wrote:
| No problem man. I don't know if you remember, but you
| helped us add Codehike to our documentation some time back!
| recursivedoubts wrote:
| looking forward to participating and accelerating htmx's old man
| cloud-yelling to levels not previously thought possible...
| infogulch wrote:
| Congrats! I hope the money goes to even more memes and
| references. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35532520
|
| How do you hope that the sponsorship will help HTMX?
| heyfrommatt wrote:
| Microsoft has had a fraught relationship with the developer
| community since, well, forever. They seemed to think that buying
| a developer favorite like GitHub would mend those fences.
|
| Nope.
| tough wrote:
| The more they own, the less I like them.
|
| VSCode, Github, TypeScript...
| GyulyVGC wrote:
| Amazing list of projects!
| jrochkind1 wrote:
| As a rubyist who loves ruby but isn't afraid to admit I see it
| declining in popularity... I can't help but notice there seems to
| be no ruby on the list. Plenty of python.
| config_yml wrote:
| Maybe to avoid looking biased? Github already puts a lot of
| money towards ruby.
| [deleted]
| nop_slide wrote:
| Hyped to see htmx and datasette!
| myroon5 wrote:
| Github star history graph of the batch:
|
| https://star-history.com/#trpc/trpc&termux/termux-app&respon...
|
| nuxt, trpc, termux, and responsively look pretty popular
| nindalf wrote:
| Yeah, not pasting in my personal access token into a random
| website.
| tedmiston wrote:
| You can use the new Fine-grained Personal Access Tokens [1]
| (as opposed to the original ones, now called "Personal Access
| Tokens (Classic)".
|
| With the fine-grained tokens, you can literally grant this
| site:
|
| - Repository access: none
|
| - User permissions: none
|
| - Repository permissions: none
|
| [Or if you want to be really paranoid, make a burner
| account... -\\_(tsu)_/-.]
|
| But also, star-history.com is not a random site -- the repo
| [2] has 4k stars and has been around since 2015 and has been
| popular for over a year.
|
| If you've ever tried to make a public app that depends on
| GitHub APIs, the limits without taking PATs are very, very
| low -- totally insufficient for an app with any popularity,
| so there's not really an alternative.
|
| [1]: https://github.blog/2022-10-18-introducing-fine-grained-
| pers...
|
| [2]: https://github.com/star-history/star-history
| barbazoo wrote:
| lol, yeah, I guess you can restrict scope but still, nice try
| jrochkind1 wrote:
| You can't restrict very much/very well. I think you still
| can't restrict to specific repos?
|
| How much do we have to fundraise to give github to
| implement API tokens for which you can limit auth for more
| common use cases?
| charrondev wrote:
| I know I have access to fine grained access tokens (beta)
| which let you get very granular on a per repo. I'm not
| sure if this is generally available or only because we
| are on Github Enterprise though.
| pankajdoharey wrote:
| Its like Google summer of code but better.
| riffraff wrote:
| GSoC was about bringing young people into FLOSS, this is
| helping people who actually maintain those projects.
|
| I think they are vastly different, tho I am unsure which one
| would be more valuable in the long run.
| qbasic_forever wrote:
| Very cool, this looks like a great list of projects. I like that
| it's not a bunch of well-known and big names. It looks like stuff
| that is just getting traction and having a push with dedicated
| time to maintain could be a huge benefit for them.
| beanclap wrote:
| I agree! At the same time its cool that they also picked a few
| proven projects like Nuxt or tRPC. Good mix :)
| throwawaaarrgh wrote:
| I'm not saying this is a bad thing. But why $20k? It's obviously
| not a salary... It could pay for infrastructure if a project
| needed it, but if the project doesn't... I'm having a hard time
| understanding how it helps sustain the project. I personally
| wouldn't do both a full time job _and_ work on an OSS project in
| all my spare time, for the money. If I really need that project I
| 'm gonna do it regardless, and if I don't need that project,
| sacrificing all my free time isn't worth $20k.
| armchairhacker wrote:
| $20k for 10 weeks of work seems like a good deal. It's only 10
| weeks so you can't just quit your job; but if you are in
| between jobs, can go on leave, or (most likely case) work part-
| time and just don't get paid enough, it's a big help. And it's
| certainly better than nothing which is what most OSS devs get
| unfortunately
| intelVISA wrote:
| $20k is one or two weeks in a HFT sweatshop vs. trading your
| project/dignity into M$?
|
| Not seeing the value prop from GitHub here.
| tedmiston wrote:
| > But why $20k?
|
| One side note, is that it appears to be $20k _per maintainer_
| vs _per project_.
|
| From the post:
|
| > GitHub Accelerator is a 10-week program where open source
| maintainers receive an initial sponsorship of $20K to work on
| their project ...
|
| > The 2023 cohort has 20 projects, with 32 participants ...
|
| As others have noted, it's not a lot of runway, but maybe
| enough to not have to freelance on the side and that full-time
| focus for 3 months could be enough to snowball into a full-time
| "ramen-profitable" business (maybe). It'll be interesting to
| see how the first cohort plays out.
| evanelias wrote:
| No, it appears to be $20k _per project_ , as per
| https://accelerator.github.com/#faq --
|
| "$20,000 stipend per project ($2,000 per week of
| participation) for the duration of the 10 week program. If
| there are multiple participants from a project, the stipend
| is divided evenly between them."
| replygirl wrote:
| dropping work for three months for a $n fellowship is the
| same thing as switching to a $4n job without benefits that
| you know will fire you in three months. $20k is not enough
| for that sort of thing
| systemvoltage wrote:
| Probably the cheapest way to advertise and build goodwill.
| raincole wrote:
| Because it's just 10 weeks. It's very clearly not a "salary"
| (as "salary" is usually measured by years), but more like a
| contracted work that lasts 10 weeks. $20k is more than most
| jobs posted on Upworks (etc).
| gumballindie wrote:
| Depends on the country of stay. If you are in Pakistan or India
| then those 20k is quite a lot. Not so much in Italy or Spain.
| vincentkriek wrote:
| 20k for 10 weeks is a pretty decent salary, even in the EU.
| Might not be super competitive for short term work but it's
| definitely enough to live on in most places.
| capableweb wrote:
| Even in most (all?) Mediterranean countries, 2000/week is
| pretty good pay, would work out to 8000/month, which is on
| the upper-end when it comes to writing code for the usual web
| stuff. Pair it with that you get to work on FOSS, I'm having
| a hard time imagining a similar position with similar pay.
| asicsp wrote:
| It'd depend on several factors, won't it? Those who are already
| working on OSS projects have found their balance (or willing to
| work despite challenges). This amount might make small or big
| difference for them. You should also consider that how much
| this is worth will depend on where they live too (for example,
| my yearly expense is less than $2000).
| 255kb wrote:
| It definitely depends on the maturity of the project and the
| country you live in.
|
| I was selected to be part of this first cohort with Mockoon.
| I'm from Luxembourg, so 20k is surely not a life changing
| amount of money. However, I quit my job two years ago to focus
| full-time on it. I think that I can make a living (probably a
| mix of paid services and sponsoring) while keeping the app
| open-source. But it's a long hard road and I am freelancing on
| the side which gave me the right balance but not complete peace
| of mind, financially speaking. So, while it's not a life
| changing amount, it will buy me some precious time. I also feel
| really motivated by this awesome recognition (after 5 years of
| work on this project) and I am looking forward the 10 weeks of
| coaching. So, all in all, it's a bit of a life changing event
| for me :)
|
| (Edited a bit for clarity)
| fulafel wrote:
| Middle income is $10-$20 per day[1]. $2k per week = $400 per
| day = 20x - 40x middle income. Minus taxes. And I guess you
| need to factor in that the figure includes people who are not
| employed. But still should leave you in the ~10x group.
|
| [1] https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2015/07/08/a-global-
| middl...
| bigfatfrock wrote:
| Finally, software engineers can break out of the $10-20 per
| day income bracket!
| pomber wrote:
| I maintain one of the selected projects. $20k means that I can
| focus on the project without taking any freelance work on the
| side for a while. Hopefully making the project more attractive
| to sponsors, hopefully snowballing into more OSS and less
| freelance.
| pomber wrote:
| By the way, https://github.com/sponsors/code-hike/
| hardwaregeek wrote:
| Yeah that's not a lot of runway. But it could be reasonable for
| a student or for someone living in a low cost of living
| location. Or if you have savings from your job and just need a
| little boost to get started. Or if you're okay with living
| frugally, which seems to be how people like Andreas Kling or
| Andrew Kelley get by. But yeah it's not really a sustainable
| model.
| goodpoint wrote:
| Don't forget that GitHub belongs to Microsoft. This is yet
| another attempt at controlling the OSS world.
|
| (Not to mention control developer salaries.)
| goodpoint wrote:
| A rain of silent downvotes, how interesting...
| WhyNotHugo wrote:
| I'd say this is more about positioning themselves as "someone
| who cares about open source" more than anything else.
|
| Their main product is proprietary, and they have a looong
| history of vendor lock-in and anti-competitiveness (including:
| Extend, Embrace, Extinguish). Giving out these grants lets them
| present themselves as someone who cares and funds open source,
| even if their core business stands strongly against it.
|
| Perhaps people in tech mostly now GitHub's and MicroSoft's
| reputation. But if says "we love open source and even give out
| grants", its easy to understand why legislators would believe
| that both parts of the statement to be true.
| jkelleyrtp wrote:
| FWIW, we (Dioxus) are using the $20K to fund an internship for
| one of our contributors. We're hoping the program will act like
| VC funding (marketing, really) and help us unlock larger
| corporate sponsorships.
|
| [1] http://github.com/dioxusLabs/dioxus
| recursivedoubts wrote:
| I view the money as a nice-to-have bonus. The big benefits of
| the program are:
|
| - validation by Github of your open source project
|
| - the signal boost associated w/ that validation
|
| - the actual content of the course (licensing, managing issues,
| etc.)
|
| - meeting other open source people to discuss what is working
| and what isn't
|
| 20k is nothing to sneeze at, but, as you say, most people
| aren't in the open source game for the money...
| nro337 wrote:
| Awesome to see trpc and Mockoon on here!
| 255kb wrote:
| Thanks! I am glad to be in this list too (Mockoon) :)
| precompute wrote:
| Looks like they peppered in some weird projects in there as well.
| I'd have expected some "hard software engineering" projects as
| well, but I guess not everyone is ready to be a spokesman for
| github's view of the world.
|
| https://github.com/EddieHubCommunity/LinkFree : "Your profile
| will have links to your social media and content. You can also
| add your timeline, testimonials, and upcoming events that you are
| participating in."
|
| Sounds lame. Is this really worth including in this list?
|
| https://github.com/JessicaTegner/pypandoc: "Pypandoc provides a
| thin wrapper for pandoc, a universal document converter."
|
| So random. Why not support pandoc instead?
|
| It seems like a political statement by Microsoft. The list only
| has "trendy" stuff, carefully moves around any and all "AI"
| stuff, and none of it seems experimental at all. If I didn't know
| this was "Github Accelerator" and was shown the list, I'd have
| assumed this was some VC's list of prospective Open Source
| programs that could turn a penny or two down the road.
|
| It seems pretty obvious to me that now that Github has cornered
| the "open source" market, it's on the "Extend" phase, looking to
| change how Open Source is approached.
|
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguis...
| ignoramous wrote:
| The messaging was that an independent panel would select, and
| not Microsoft per se.
| precompute wrote:
| It says "Github accelerator" not "Github community
| accelerator" or something. Pretty sure micro$oft had a big
| hand in it, they wouldn't allow the pilot for their program
| to be so "unsupervised".
| numbers wrote:
| This list is great to see because as a supporter and user of open
| source projects, I am glad smaller projects are getting this too!
| Hopefully it keeps going!
| mickael-kerjean wrote:
| That looks awesome, when is the next batch coming? What are the
| conditions for the funding? My OSS project is a Dropbox like UI
| for S3, SFTP, FTP, NFS, SMB and pretty much every other file
| transfer protocol: https://github.com/mickael-kerjean/filestash
| Would that fit in your scope?
| ignoramous wrote:
| Any FOSS project you're open to work full-time is within scope,
| iirc.
|
| Btw, what you're building sounds very similar to spacedrive:
| https://github.com/spacedriveapp/spacedrive
| tough wrote:
| AFAIK Spacedrive hasn't delivered a release yet, so it's nice
| to see some competitors delivering.
| pomber wrote:
| As the maintainer of one of the selected projects
| (https://codehike.org/), I really appreciate what GitHub is
| doing, putting the money and trying different approaches (last
| year it was $450K across 900 projects).
| Kwpolska wrote:
| > JessicaTegner/pypandoc Pypandoc provides a thin wrapper for
| pandoc, a universal document converter.
|
| To be frank, that doesn't seem like a project worthy of $20k to
| me. Not very many commits recently [0], it has 918 source lines
| of code in the main package, and 547 lines of test code -- it
| even describes itself as a "thin" wrapper, and the only thing it
| does is converting some arguments to Pandoc flags and calling the
| Pandoc executable. How many more features could be added to this
| project? What is it missing now?
|
| [0] https://github.com/JessicaTegner/pypandoc/commits/master
| [deleted]
| therein wrote:
| [flagged]
| hmoodie wrote:
| [flagged]
| RangerScience wrote:
| To be frank (and then polite and constructive), I think the
| relevant question is "What am _I_ missing? " rather than "What
| is _it_ missing? "
|
| ..and my guess would be that this is something like a cohort
| experiment. I'd bet they selected projects to have a broad
| sampling of kinds of projects, so they could see what working
| with them was like and what kind of impact they'd have -
| similar to a marketing trying out different audiences and types
| of ads, or startups running market experiments, or VCs shot-
| gunning to see what sticks, or developers doing 'probes' into
| problems and/or with technologies.
|
| AFAICT, GitHub wanted to get some data around the questions
| "What's involved in us getting funding to open source projects
| / developers, and what kind of impact can that funding have?"
|
| Even if your judgement of this specific project is apt (that
| it's weirdly small and inactive for receiving a grant), that
| may be the _point_.
| Spinnaker_ wrote:
| [flagged]
| jjeaff wrote:
| Don't do that. Don't diminish the work of someone simply
| because they are a woman. Even assuming that money was given
| as part of some diversity program, to imply that is the only
| reason she got an investment is to imply that there are
| simply no qualified women out there deserving of investment.
|
| It's just like the criticism of Biden having appointed "so
| many" Black female judges. As if they are not perfectly
| qualified or even more qualified than a white male judge
| would have been. Not to mention the fact that
| "qualifications" has never really been the criteria for any
| of this.
|
| In other words, merit is far too nebulous a concept for a
| true "meritocracy" to ever exist.
| ignoramceisblis wrote:
| When decisions are made specifically based on superficial
| characteristics like skin color and sex, you shouldn't be
| surprised when people wonder if decisions are/were made
| specifically based on superficial characteristics like skin
| color and sex.
|
| eg. on Biden: https://news.yahoo.com/the-inside-story-of-
| how-biden-promise...
|
| The promise of the superficial characteristics came first.
| Then a solution (a candidate, in this case) was chosen from
| a limited solution set
|
| When people do things like this, they make it clear they
| don't want optimal outcomes, with regards to performance
| and the like. They make it clear that other, superficial,
| characteristics carry greater weight.
|
| This hurts any functioning society, certainly in the long-
| term. However, some people want that--for some societies.
| jjeaff wrote:
| Regardless of any "superficial" characteristic (I think
| many would argue that being Black in America in anything
| but superficial) what exactly do you think an optimal
| outcome is when selecting something like a judge? What is
| a high "performance" judge? Because even though for the
| first few hundred years of our nation's history, we
| selected judges only from a very large group of old,
| white, catholic/protestant men, we sure have come up with
| plenty of incompetence and corruption.
|
| Should we hire judges based solely on their LSAT score?
| Or perhaps only judges from the most ivy league,
| selective law schools? Or maybe we should select for
| judges who can recite the law by memory?
|
| Judges need to represent the people that they stand in
| judgement of. You want people that know what it is like
| to grow up poor or to grow up under racism or whatever.
| And Black women are severely underrepresented in the
| federal judiciary.
|
| Of course, any person selected as a judge needs to meet a
| minimum level of competence (something that has usually
| been the case up until at least a few selections from the
| last administration). Regardless, the solution set of
| Black female attorneys and judges is plenty large to be
| able to find fully qualified candidates for many, many
| federal appointments.
| RangerScience wrote:
| _Although I completely agree with you_...
|
| ...I 'm not seeing anything on the readily available info
| indicating a gender either way.
| Kwpolska wrote:
| https://github.com/JessicaTegner/pypandoc/commit/4becb4e6
| 734...
| RangerScience wrote:
| a) thank you!
|
| (and I say this with an intention towards satire)
|
| b) _why the hell was finding that worth your time_
| Shekelphile wrote:
| > b) why the hell was finding that worth your time
|
| Generally the only reason people dig up a trans person's
| deadname is for harassment or discrimination.
| draw_down wrote:
| [dead]
| systemvoltage wrote:
| Completely disagree. The wokeness from these corporations,
| the DEI culture, the dividing contemptuous nature of this
| ideology needs to be openly and fiercely criticized. It's
| destroying the very fabric of America.
|
| The fact that we are not allowed to do that on HN speaks
| for its ideological and dangerous grip on free thinking.
| The chilling effect is real.
| Shekelphile wrote:
| Treating a trans developer as no different from a cishet
| developer is not 'wokeness'.
| ignoramceisblis wrote:
| I think it's pretty clear from the parent commenters that
| they believe the developer /is/ being treated differently
| --with a bias/preference given that the developer is
| supposedly trans.
| Shekelphile wrote:
| No, they don't. They insinuate that because it's a
| conveinient dogwhistle - the claim is always the same
| whenever a non cishet/white person attains any level of
| success.
| [deleted]
| ignoramceisblis wrote:
| "Insinuate" what? "Dogwhistle"?
|
| Maybe I was being too equivocal. The parent commenters
| /do/ believe the developer is receiving preferential
| treatment based on one aspect of their declared identity.
| And it's not hard to share their sentiment: what warrants
| a thin Python wrapper library, which does not really
| bring new capabilities itself, receiving $20k when there
| are many other projects which could make an even bigger
| impact with that money? It seems unusual to me.
| Especially when considering they were choosing from a
| pool at GitHub scale, which is about as diverse as it
| gets in the open source software community.
|
| I don't share the belief that "non cishet/white" people
| are unduly denigrated when they achieve success--not more
| than any other person on average, anyway. In fact, I see
| quite the opposite: there's tremendous amounts of pride
| when "non cishet/white" people achieve success.
| Shekelphile wrote:
| > I don't share the belief that "non cishet/white" people
| are unduly denigrated when they achieve success--not more
| than any other person on average, anyway. In fact, I see
| quite the opposite: there's tremendous amounts of pride
| when "non cishet/white" people achieve success.
|
| If that was the case you wouldn't be here to continue
| doubling down on casting doubt on someone's success.
| ignoramceisblis wrote:
| You seem to mistakenly believe I'm someone who cares
| about the person's identity. I don't. The only object of
| consideration is the project, and only its recent
| "success" is in question: there are many other projects
| that I believe would benefit much more from the
| resources, more than a thin Python wrapper library.
| AbuAssar wrote:
| really looking forward for AnalogJs to compete with next/nuxt!
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-04-13 23:01 UTC)