[HN Gopher] When should a decision be fast, or slow?
___________________________________________________________________
When should a decision be fast, or slow?
Author : tosh
Score : 54 points
Date : 2023-04-09 15:56 UTC (7 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (longform.asmartbear.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (longform.asmartbear.com)
| lucinda-garrret wrote:
| A decision should be fast when it is needed urgently or if the
| person making the decision is confident about all possible
| outcomes. And if not it's best to take one's time(slow)
| cruunchMuncher wrote:
| I rad in a book that fast thinkers is best. So decisions should
| be fast
| ceejayoz wrote:
| You might consider some skepticism towards one-size-fits-all
| solutions.
| kbelder wrote:
| I read a book about military strategy... I forget the author, but
| it was a US General shortly after WWII.
|
| He stressed how he realized that you should make a final decision
| as late as possible, and no later. That is, be _prepared_ to
| immediately decide as soon as the question is upon you, and
| delaying would be harmful; but so long as you can delay the
| decision without consequence, you should delay.
| [deleted]
| xtagon wrote:
| The "prepared" part seems like good advice because many
| decisions can be made in advance, only contingent on future
| information. You might not be able to decide far in advance
| what _exactly_ to do, but you might be able to decide what to
| do if X or Y happens, and what to do otherwise. Then when the
| moment comes and X happens, you can decide fast.
|
| The article talks a bit about imperfect information, which does
| throw a bit of a wrench in this, so it doesn't apply to every
| situation.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-04-09 23:01 UTC)