[HN Gopher] Epicurus for Our Time
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Epicurus for Our Time
        
       Author : diodorus
       Score  : 71 points
       Date   : 2023-04-05 18:51 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (lareviewofbooks.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (lareviewofbooks.org)
        
       | pelasaco wrote:
       | Less Epicurus and more Aristotle. We need eudaimonia, which is
       | achieved through the cultivation of virtues and the development
       | of a good character.
        
       | foundart wrote:
       | I think a better article on Epicurus is
       | https://psyche.co/guides/how-to-seek-out-and-savour-lifes-jo...
       | 
       | > Forget shallow hedonism. Follow this philosophy for wondrous,
       | unexpected joys and resilience against inevitable misfortune
       | 
       | And
       | 
       | > Epicurus thinks that we not only need friends, but that friends
       | contribute the most to life's goodness. Friend groups give us
       | confidence of support in times of material and emotional
       | distress, and they help us learn about ourselves and the world.
       | Sometimes only friends can effectively communicate difficult
       | truths. For Epicurus, the crowning grace of good friends is their
       | role in building the library of joyful memories we rely on in
       | times of difficulty, boredom or misfortune.
        
       | eternalban wrote:
       | _" I would rather discover a new aetiology than acquire the
       | Persian crown."_ - Epicurus
       | 
       |  _"In physics, where he is the most pretentious, Epicurus is a
       | perfect stranger. Most of it belongs to Democritus; where he
       | deviates from him, where he endeavours to improve, he spoils and
       | worsens it."_ - Cicero
       | 
       |  _"Of this great man [Democritus] we scarcely know anything but
       | what Epicurus borrowed from him, and Epicurus was not capable of
       | always taking the best."_ - Leibniz
       | 
       | Epicurus' philosophy very much reminds me of Goethe's regarding
       | _perception_ of colors (contrasted with the objective position of
       | Newton regarding colors). As I am aging I am becoming convinced
       | that the experience is the meaning, and youthful insistence on
       | "meaning of life" is precisely _pre-mature_. (And as a Persian, I
       | think he also made the right call regarding the crown of Persia
       | ..)
       | 
       | [The quotes are taken from Karl Marx's school thesis btw.]
        
         | criddell wrote:
         | What was meant by Epicurus is a _perfect stranger_ in physics?
         | Does it mean he didn 't interact with other physicists? Was
         | physics something different 2000 years ago?
        
           | ColanR wrote:
           | I think it just means he was really bad at it.
        
         | kromem wrote:
         | Except that it's the Epicureans that got the closest to modern
         | scientific knowledge in hindsight.
         | 
         | Lucretius's De Rerum Natura is the only extant work from
         | antiquity to explicitly describe the claim that what we see
         | around us started from senseless primordial beings that through
         | intermediate mutants came to be what we see around us via the
         | process of survival of the fittest in relation to reproduction.
         | 
         | It also claimed that trait inheritance occurred as the result
         | of a "doubled seed" from each parent.
         | 
         | It theorized that quantized matter must be governed by a degree
         | of uncertainty in outcomes for free will to exist ("the
         | swerve").
         | 
         | That light was also quantized and what we see is the result of
         | these quantized parts moving very quickly.
         | 
         | That thunder and lighting might occur at the same time but one
         | moves faster to reach us.
         | 
         | That the entire world was the result of primordial quanta
         | randomly interacting.
         | 
         | That this was not the only world like it, but was one of an
         | uncountable number of worlds all from this random process.
         | 
         | So that's great that a bunch of idiots in antiquity who had no
         | idea what was actually correct thought that Democritus was
         | superior (who they also claimed was just ripping off Mochus of
         | Sidon) and Epicurus the lesser. But their opinions are hardly
         | authoritative given they would have also claimed most of the
         | above wasn't true.
         | 
         | The Epicurean understanding of nature was _outstanding_ in
         | retrospect with the exception of his local cosmology.
        
         | fpoling wrote:
         | But then who among Ancient Greek philosophers was good at
         | physics? They only tried to explain, that is, tell stories
         | about how things worked. They did not try to make predictions
         | and verify that they matched the reality.
        
           | eimrine wrote:
           | There is no physics in Liberal Arts but there were Geometry,
           | Music, Astronomy - some parts of which are parts of what
           | today is called Physics. All I know about pure Physics in
           | Ancient times is Zeno's paradoxes which is how they used to
           | analyze movement and maybe three Archimedean simple machines
           | among the 6 classical ones which is how they applied their
           | knowledge about movement into practice.
        
       | fogzen wrote:
       | We cannot heal the wasteland within while creating a wasteland
       | without. We cannot fix the problem until we recognize the
       | problem: industrial society and the hubris of technological
       | progress. The more we attempt to improve on nature, the more we
       | destroy nature and ourselves. We have alienated ourselves and our
       | soul in the aimless pursuit of progress. We have gained little
       | yet lost nearly everything. But why must we progress? Nature is
       | fine as it is. We are fine as we are. Our internal and external
       | wasteland is caused by the blind pursuit of decadent desire.
       | 
       | Epicurus had a garden. When was the last time you spent the day
       | in a garden, napped under the shade of a tree, smelled the plants
       | and the flowers, and saw the moon and the stars in all their
       | glory?
        
         | nathan_compton wrote:
         | "Nature is fine as it is. We are fine as we are." I used to
         | feel this way sometimes, but now I see this as a facile
         | capitulation to the complexity of life. I have a kid. 100 years
         | ago there would be a damn good chance they wouldn't make it to
         | adulthood and now its a virtual certainty. I'm delighted about
         | that.
         | 
         | It is funny that we are all using the garden as a metaphor
         | here. A garden isn't natural. It is a technological artifact. A
         | subjugation of nature as surely as a parking lot (though
         | assuredly more subtle). We have the power to act in the world.
         | Nature has produced in us a profound power to act. We can't
         | pretend it doesn't exist.
        
           | pelasaco wrote:
           | > I have a kid. 100 years ago there would be a damn good
           | chance they wouldn't make it to adulthood and now its a
           | virtual certainty. I'm delighted about that.
           | 
           | Unless some nihilism crazy person, full of cocain, decides
           | that the school and the kids there are responsible for his or
           | her problems. The self-critics exercised in the west is
           | destroying it's civilization. Last week was in US, yesterday
           | in Brazil. Berlin, almost every day.
        
             | yamtaddle wrote:
             | The odds of this remain effectively nil. The numbers are
             | readily available.
             | 
             | Cars, ODs, and suicide are _much_ bigger concerns for those
             | with kids. Or should be. Any one of those dwarfs the risk
             | of death or injury in a school shooting, which is so far
             | down the list that it 's in the company of a ton of things
             | that nobody ever gives a thought.
             | 
             | Separately, school shootings are a national disgrace and
             | shouldn't happen, certainly not at anything like the rate
             | they do, but they're not _actually_ a risk worth worrying
             | about on an individual level.
        
               | pelasaco wrote:
               | > Cars, ODs, and suicide are much bigger concerns for
               | those with kids.
               | 
               | Well swimming pool, but thats are either accidents or
               | personal tragedies. It always happened, it will always
               | happens.
               | 
               | > Separately, school shootings are a national disgrace
               | and shouldn't happen
               | 
               | school shooting or school Rampage is a world problem.
               | Another countries with less guns, but still a world
               | problem.
               | 
               | > but they're not actually a risk worth worrying about on
               | an individual level.
               | 
               | Statistics are good for argumentation (50 million kids in
               | the schools, just 2000 injured in shootings), but if you
               | have kids in the elementary school, or school in general,
               | you will worry on an individual level. Actually the pools
               | supports that https://www.cbsnews.com/news/gun-violence-
               | schools-parents-ch...
        
               | yamtaddle wrote:
               | So your point is that... people worrying about something
               | that's not actually a notable risk, is the problem? You
               | responded to "at least my kids have access to modern
               | medical care" with "but school shootings" and I pointed
               | out that they're not actually a significant danger for
               | kids, and you've come back with "but people are worrying
               | regardless", so I'm rather lost.
        
         | moe091 wrote:
         | People aren't going to like this, if most people did then the
         | modern age wouldn't be what it is. I think it's important for
         | people to see things from outside the bias of their current
         | age, the "spirit of the times", before they can do anything
         | other than perpetuate the existing modern biases and
         | blindspots. Which isn't an easy thing to do, even if everyone
         | learned the historical context of the world and learned about
         | the changes in societies and personalities over time, it's very
         | difficult not to view all that context through the filter of
         | modern perspectives and miss the essence of it completely
        
         | csdvrx wrote:
         | > We have alienated ourselves and our soul in the aimless
         | pursuit of progress.
         | 
         | Evidence required
        
           | eimrine wrote:
           | Pursuit of anything is a pain for the pursuiter, I mean
           | otherwise he might be just calm.
        
           | moe091 wrote:
           | _Gestures widely at the world_
        
         | FredPret wrote:
         | Here's the thing.
         | 
         | Homo Sapiens' ancestors used technology, including tools. We
         | evolved into, and in the context of, a technological
         | environment.
        
         | 082349872349872 wrote:
         | For me, HN is a largely-textmode garden, without whose walls
         | are a cacophony of autoplay shorts, and within whose walls I
         | may hope to find conversation and the ingredients for an active
         | life of the mind.
         | 
         | (NB: dang serves as a bit of a fountain: hope springs eternal
         | in his patient moderation, and we are grateful in return!)
        
           | Gordonjcp wrote:
           | HN isn't great for conversations because if you post more
           | than a couple of times in a thread you start getting "You're
           | posting too fast" messages.
        
             | eimrine wrote:
             | HN is maybe fits better for conversations between humans,
             | it really sucks if you have to post one message per minute
             | or faster.
        
         | randomopining wrote:
         | Evolutionary pressure in the form of intra-human competition.
         | Look at CCP China vs the US. China is going to add like 80% of
         | new coal-powered power plants. All so they can get cheap energy
         | to get ahead of the US/West. The US has done the same thing.
         | 
         | Businesses are run by people who want to earn money to get
         | ahead of others. Yeah some business are legit creating new
         | things, but many are just making people want to buy useless
         | widgets or waste their time on an ad pipeline platform.
        
           | moe091 wrote:
           | The current stage of development of consciousness that the
           | world is going through(and seemingly reaching the end of) is
           | one of competition and individualism. There are good and bad
           | aspects of this, as with all other stages of development, but
           | the level selfishness that comes along with it and motivates
           | individuals to destroy things in order to outdo each other
           | isn't a universal thing, in the grand scheme of the
           | development of human consciousness it's just one of many
           | phases.
           | 
           | That's the main reason why I think there's no legislating or
           | protesting our way out of the big problems(though that
           | doesn't mean those things are useless). The way only way out
           | is through the development and maturation of humanity.
           | Obviously you can't force that on people though, all you can
           | do is focus on your own self-development and give others the
           | respect and dignity required not to impede on their own self-
           | development, regardless of how much you may disagree or
           | dislike them
        
       | lordleft wrote:
       | Epicurus is compelling, but I ultimately reject his philosophy in
       | favor of Stoicism / Academic Skepticism for two reasons:
       | 
       | a) The Epicurean belief that emotional disturbance/perturbation
       | is basically bad stymes emotional thriving. In a podcast with
       | fellow Stoic Massimo Pigulicci, therapist and Stoic Scholar
       | Donald Robertson points out that this idea is very close to the
       | statement "anxiety is bad", a belief that correlates strongly
       | with a host of pathological mental conditions/states.
       | 
       | b) The Epicurean aversion to anxiety pushes us away from
       | political engagement and many other activities that root us in
       | the murk of life.
       | 
       | That being said, there are still many profound insights to be
       | gleaned from Epicurus' thought.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | zvmaz wrote:
         | I am sorry but I did not understand your comment. As for
         | Stoicism, it is a very hard philosophy to live by if one is not
         | temperamentally inclined to the "serenity to accept the things
         | [one] cannot change, Courage to change the things [one] can,
         | and Wisdom to know the difference".
        
           | seizethecheese wrote:
           | But the harder it is temperamentally, the more useful it is.
        
             | zvmaz wrote:
             | I don't know. It certainly is an interesting intellectual
             | movement. Bertrand Russell wrote scathingly of Stoicism in
             | his History of Western Philosophy [1], to which Massimo
             | Pigliucci, the author cited above in the comment, responded
             | [2]. I tend to be sympathetic to Russell's critique now, as
             | Stoicism did not "work" for me.
             | 
             | [1] https://archive.org/details/TheHistoryOfWesternPhilosop
             | hy/pa...
             | 
             | [2]
             | https://howtobeastoic.wordpress.com/2017/05/11/bertrand-
             | russ...
        
           | dashoffset wrote:
           | If one is already temperamentally inclined to the "serenity
           | to accept the things [one] cannot change, Courage to change
           | the things [one] can, and Wisdom to know the difference",
           | then they may not need Stoicism.
        
         | jschveibinz wrote:
         | I just watched a video on YT that suggests a way to harmonize
         | Stoic with Epicurean philosophies. It's worth watching, in my
         | opinion.
         | 
         | https://youtu.be/1hl4hBb4_y4
        
         | eimrine wrote:
         | 1. What is good about anxiety except of political engagement
         | point?
         | 
         | 2. Does a Wise Man (from a Stoicism's point of view) really
         | must to care about politics more than just learning? From my
         | understanding there are things that are way better than
         | politics, for example Math. Anyway we the small men are
         | compelled to go wherever the society goes and the more number
         | of big brains will care about this, the less really cool things
         | will we receive. Stupid men can not obtain mathematical
         | knowledge for us, so maybe they are better utilized by doing
         | politics? While wise men will do some really awesome things?
        
           | zdragnar wrote:
           | What is good about anything bad? Only what you learn from it.
           | 
           | Congenital insensitivity to pain and anhydrosis (CIPA) is a
           | condition where a person is incapable of feeling pain- the
           | pain sensing nerves aren't properly wired up into the brain.
           | 
           | On the one hand, wonderful! You'll never have to suffer the
           | effects of physical harm.
           | 
           | On the other hand, you'll never learn the motor control and
           | dexterity needed to interact with potentially dangerous
           | objects, and may go extended periods of time not realizing
           | that, for example, a fractured bone has become infected.
           | 
           | Experiencing anxiety is a primer for the brain to cope and
           | endure difficult situations. Without it, you are essentially
           | setting yourself up for failure when something out of your
           | control happens.
        
             | daniel_reetz wrote:
             | A very interesting question in philosophy is "Why do people
             | like scary movies?" - being scared is uncomfortable! A
             | related question might be "Why do people eat spicy food" -
             | I mean, it's painful!
             | 
             | When you explore the answers to these questions, you may
             | develop an appreciation for the magic of the dark, the
             | anxious, and the frightening.
        
       | 082349872349872 wrote:
       | > _yet how many of us believe that we must first learn the art of
       | friendship_
       | 
       | In (some) non-anglophone countries, _education_ includes not only
       | learning how to do, but also learning how to get along: not only
       | _savoir-faire_ , but also _savoir-etre_.
        
       | thenerdhead wrote:
       | > These Epicurean virtues are in short supply these days.
       | 
       | Philosophers also have their flaws. Hedonism as seen by Epicurus
       | has been taken to an extreme in this modern world and likely back
       | then too. People may live too much of a Kierkegaard "aesthetic"
       | life rather than an "ethical" one. This of course is the main
       | argument that they can choose either/or. We constantly hear of
       | people refer to this pursuit of happiness or aestheticism through
       | the hedonic treadmill that one can't get off. Instead their
       | happiness remains at a baseline regardless of accomplishments
       | throughout life.
       | 
       | Seeking pleasure and avoiding pain is not a realistic way to
       | live. The existentialists all argue this as quoted at the
       | beginning with perhaps a misunderstood Nietzsche idea of the last
       | man and the "overman" who overcomes the wasteland by rejecting
       | excess pleasure and embracing pain as a source of strength. The
       | last man being the end of man due to complacency who only seeks
       | pleasure.
       | 
       | Overall I quite enjoyed this article, it feels as if the author
       | is trying to defend Epicurus in the sense that he is wildly
       | misunderstood. He looks to have a book on literary gardens that
       | looks quite interesting. Will probably pick it up.
        
         | t8sr wrote:
         | I don't think Epicurus would recognize the hedonistic values
         | ascribed to him today. He was not a well man for the latter
         | part of his life, and his idea of a life without pain was one
         | where he is content with what he has and is surrounded by
         | friends. In his letters, this is the theme he always returns
         | to.
         | 
         | In fact, of the philosophers we know from that era, Epicurus
         | was the only one who wasn't an aristocrat. He came from a
         | middle class background and he at his most "hedonistic"
         | probably would have thrown a positively simple party compared
         | to an average evening at Plato's.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-04-06 23:01 UTC)