[HN Gopher] Microsoft tests Windows account menu error badge whe...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Microsoft tests Windows account menu error badge when Microsoft
       Account not used
        
       Author : tech234a
       Score  : 105 points
       Date   : 2023-04-04 17:45 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (twitter.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (twitter.com)
        
       | Phelinofist wrote:
       | Totally unrelated, but why is the twitter logo the dog if
       | dogecoin?
        
         | samspenc wrote:
         | Some news reports on this:
         | https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/stock-market-news-today-04-...
         | 
         | https://www.engadget.com/twitter-is-covered-in-doge-for-no-d...
        
           | TobTobXX wrote:
           | > The Twitter press email, meanwhile, returned a poop emoji
           | when Engadget sent a comment request.
           | 
           | wild.
           | 
           | Though audacious, it completely lacks style and wit and thus
           | is just rude and abrasive.
        
             | theodric wrote:
             | That's automated, apparently
        
         | torh wrote:
         | I guess you have to ask Elon Musk...
        
         | butt____hugger wrote:
         | [flagged]
        
         | Rebelgecko wrote:
         | To commemorate Elon's attempt to dismiss the SEC lawsuit last
         | week (or at least try to out-SEO the news about it). Dogecoin
         | has also gone up a lot since the change.
        
       | xg15 wrote:
       | I can understand the outrage over dark patterns, but I think you
       | could also view this change from a different perspective:
       | Microsoft makes it clear that long/medium term they want to make
       | Microsoft accounts mandatory to use Windows and view local
       | accounts as a legacy exception which should be progressively
       | eliminated. If you follow that assumption, it's perfectly logical
       | to see a local account as an "error".
       | 
       | So if the roadmap is that clear, I think the better question is
       | why people go still along with it and keep using Windows.
       | 
       | Or alternatively: Why are software companies allowed to just make
       | those decisions, even it could potentially disrupt the work of
       | millions of users.
        
         | rurp wrote:
         | > I think the better question is why people go still along with
         | it and keep using Windows.
         | 
         | The reason investors and CEOs love monopolies and oligopolies
         | so much is that they don't have to care about users, they can
         | abuse them as much as they want.
         | 
         | Windows machines are the only affordable option for millions of
         | people so they have to keep using it, no matter how much they
         | hate Microsoft. Governments should be less tolerant of
         | important companies that abuse their power.
        
         | BitwiseFool wrote:
         | >"I think the better question is why people go still along with
         | it and keep using Windows."
         | 
         | I've been using Windows for almost 30 years now, and while I've
         | given different distros of Linux and MacOS an honest try, I am
         | never as comfortable or as fluent with them as I am with
         | Windows. I know there is an extensive amount of customization
         | that can be done with Linux to get it _really close_ but it
         | just isn 't the same.
         | 
         | I'm also at the level where I am comfortable enough with gpedit
         | and regedit that as long as there is a way to turn _most_ of
         | the annoying and onerous  "features" off, I can keep on
         | truckin'. For instance, disabling Cortana in the start menu.
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | citrin_ru wrote:
         | > I think the better question is why people go still along with
         | it and keep using Windows
         | 
         | A lot of non-open source desktop software available only for
         | Windows and MacOS. While I dislike MacOS less than Windows 10
         | or especially 11, MacBook is more expensive than Windows
         | notebook or mini-PC.
        
         | stronglikedan wrote:
         | > why people go still along with it and keep using Windows
         | 
         | Because it's often the _only_ option in the corporate world.
        
           | hdjjhhvvhga wrote:
           | And this is probably the fate of Windows in the long run: a
           | desktop operating system for corporations.
        
             | BizarroLand wrote:
             | Windows will be the reason for Linux overtaking the gaming
             | and home desktop market.
             | 
             | They'll pull a 180 right around Windows 13 when linux OS is
             | released that works by default with 95% of games and 95% of
             | hardware takes 20% of the desktop market.
        
           | dark-star wrote:
           | the funny thing is: In corporate editions of Windows, you can
           | easily disable all that crap via GPOs.
           | 
           | It's only the home-users that get hit by this....
        
         | Dalewyn wrote:
         | >why people go still along with it and keep using Windows.
         | 
         | Because Windows runs Win32.
        
       | sys32768 wrote:
       | I support a Windows site and am wishing I could retire before the
       | Windows 10 end of support in Q4 2025. My only hope is that
       | Windows 11 becomes 12 by then and resembles something like
       | Windows 9 might have been.
       | 
       | I understand goat farming done right can provide a living, but I
       | also understand there's not a restart button on goats.
        
       | badrabbit wrote:
       | You know, I with most of you on being against this. I will always
       | use offline accounts myself but for regular folks there is a
       | security advantage to having an MS monitored and access
       | controlled account, especially for people that reuse passwords.
       | But then again an online account is easy to phish and then
       | pathways open up to control the windows device.
        
       | chinathrow wrote:
       | If this shit persists, I'm going to convert the three last
       | systems I support to Linux - enough is enough.
        
         | ok_dad wrote:
         | My wife couldn't get along with Linux, but I'm trying to get
         | her to at least get an Apple computer next time. At least Apple
         | is a half-decade behind the other companies that are shoving
         | ad-filled crapware into their OSes (MS, Google) and hopefully
         | by the time iOS/OSX are merged and start getting ads and stuff
         | in them and disallowing you from installing unapproved
         | binaries, I can have trained her to use a Linux-like software
         | and then move her onto Linux and never have to deal with that
         | shit again. My son will use nothing but Linux on his computers
         | once he's older.
        
       | hbn wrote:
       | It should make a buzzing noise every 5 minutes and pop up an
       | alert window over the center of the screen, some people might not
       | see that.
        
       | zokier wrote:
       | Huh, I didn't know you even could run Win11 without MS account.
        
       | simse wrote:
       | I'm annoyed that Windows named my user account hello.. because my
       | email is hello@simse.io.
        
         | hbn wrote:
         | For a while now they've made the default user account name by
         | truncating the first 5 letters of your email (so if your email
         | starts with 'robert' your username will be 'rober'), and to
         | stop this you need to do a weird workaround where you dodge
         | some UI tricks that get you to login with your Microsoft
         | account so you can create a local user account with a name of
         | your choice.
         | 
         | I believe when I setup my recent machine I had to be
         | disconnected from the internet to be able to complete setup
         | without a Microsoft account.
        
       | donmcronald wrote:
       | I hate it. I _always_ set up my Windows PCs with an offline admin
       | account and normal user accounts for day-to-day work. Some of
       | those I log in with my Microsoft account(s). Some I don't. It
       | depends on what _my needs_ are.
       | 
       | Encouraging everyone to use one administrator, do everything
       | account just because it makes it easier for Microsoft to push
       | their services seems pretty pathetic to me. Toss in the per-
       | profile licensing and activation for Office, etc. and it's
       | obvious Microsoft doesn't care about security if it gets in the
       | way of sales.
        
         | imran-iq wrote:
         | > It depends on what my needs are.
         | 
         | Unfortunately Microsoft/windows does not care what your needs
         | are, it only cares about data collection and ads.
         | 
         | I recently had to install windows in a vm because I could not
         | get adobe reader working through wine. The install process was
         | awful:
         | 
         | * Dark pattern to try and force me to login with a MS account
         | during setup
         | 
         | * Majority of setup steps pertain to data collection and/or ads
         | 
         | After setting it up, I had to open up edge to download and
         | install adobe reader, once again
         | 
         | * Nags me to login to an account
         | 
         | * Most if not all setup steps are about ads and data collection
         | 
         | All for the sake of filling out some pdfs. I am truly grateful
         | that Valve is pushing proton as it makes me (almost never) have
         | to leave linux.
        
           | chankstein38 wrote:
           | Oh yeah, go try to install Chrome through edge on that new
           | setup. Windows alerts like 3-4 times during the process that
           | Edge IS Chromium and stuff trying to keep you using their
           | browser. I am not about to start using a browser that has
           | special backdoors to annoy me when I try to do things that it
           | doesn't approve of...
        
             | Dalewyn wrote:
             | To be fair to Microsoft, Edge _is_ Chromium.
             | 
             | The only difference between Edge and Chrome is choosing who
             | you want your data to go to and your ads to come from:
             | Microsoft or Google.
        
               | ketralnis wrote:
               | "To be fair" these facts are 100% irrelevant to whether
               | my computer should do wtf I tell it to do.
               | 
               | You tell your car to drive to a cafe and it tells you
               | that caffiene is bad for you and you should go to
               | McDonald's instead. I give zero shits about whether it's
               | true or not, it's nobody's goddamn business where I want
               | to drive.
        
               | Dalewyn wrote:
               | Whether it's Edge or Chrome it's going to sell you their
               | respective vendor.
               | 
               | Meanwhile, both Edge and Chrome are Chromium.
        
           | HnUser12 wrote:
           | I was also trying to install windows 11 on a VM to do some
           | one off work. It was next to impossible to create a local
           | account with internet connection on. I had to restart my
           | installation process with Internet disconnected. And even
           | after I installed, I realized how many times it asks me to
           | login. Even desktop features like widgets need login.
        
             | imran-iq wrote:
             | > I had to restart my installation process with Internet
             | disconnected.
             | 
             | No way! Thankfully I went for windows 10 which did not need
             | me to unplug the internet (just a hidden option down to the
             | side), but that's just awful.
        
               | hdjjhhvvhga wrote:
               | It's even worse after you manage to install it: in
               | Windows 11 the remove the option to ungroup application
               | windows on the taskbar. So if you want find that specific
               | windows, you need to first hover with your mouse over the
               | single app tab, wait until it shows the windows, and pick
               | up the right one. People are getting mad about this.
        
               | crimsontech wrote:
               | Not to mention the massive taskbar taking up a huge chunk
               | of your monitor without a way to resize it. Why is it so
               | big?
        
             | codedokode wrote:
             | > It was next to impossible to create a local account with
             | internet connection on.
             | 
             | And without Internet connection you cannot even reach the
             | step to create an account.
        
             | fencepost wrote:
             | If you're using Windows Pro there should be an option for
             | "Domain Join." If you select that it'll have you create a
             | local account that's admin (so maybe don't make it your day
             | to day account) because domain join is not actually done
             | during the OOBE.
        
       | GartzenDeHaes wrote:
       | I guess Microsoft didn't learn anything from Internet Explorer.
       | When the thought leaders dump your product, no one else will want
       | it either.
        
         | BitwiseFool wrote:
         | It's a lot easier to switch browsers than it is to switch
         | operating systems.
        
         | donmcronald wrote:
         | I'd say Edge is a better comparison for that.
         | 
         | I used Edge (logged in) + Bing for 3+ years and recently
         | switched back to Firefox. When it was new, Edge was great. It
         | was a Google free Chromium browser that integrated with my MS
         | account and got out of my way.
         | 
         | Now Edge is a bloated piece of trash because Microsoft can't
         | stop jamming crap into it.
        
           | moogly wrote:
           | Firefox also bugs you about signing in to Firefox Sync or
           | Pocket or trying to upsell you their VPN.
        
             | ok_dad wrote:
             | I don't ever see any nagging by Firefox, except for the
             | first time I installed it and a few tabs popped up to tell
             | me about certain features or when a big new feature is
             | released and they pop a tab up for that feature. I think
             | those are pretty reasonable.
        
               | moogly wrote:
               | They do it on updates too. Not every time, but every few
               | ones.
        
           | vidanay wrote:
           | I jumped from Chrome to Edge ~3 years ago, and ever since it
           | has been a steady downward trend with each release. I
           | switched back to FF a couple weeks ago when the giant Bing
           | Button appeared and can't be easily removed.
        
       | CatWChainsaw wrote:
       | From the screenshot, it doesn't even look like there's a way to
       | get rid of the "error message"... short of doing what Microsoft
       | wants.
       | 
       | Anyone who works at Microsoft brave enough to comment...?
        
         | donmcronald wrote:
         | > Anyone who works at Microsoft brave enough to comment...?
         | 
         | What would they even say? "Yeah, we think our users are stupid
         | and we don't respect them, so we use dark patterns to dupe the
         | suckers into giving us PII and $$."? It's intentional deceit by
         | Microsoft IMO.
         | 
         | It's the same thing with OneDrive. If you don't set up OneDrive
         | you get nagged by the "security" center that your files are at
         | risk because they're not "backed up". However, OneDrive isn't a
         | backup. It's sync and, if you factor in files-on-demand, can
         | end up being the only copy of users' files. I wouldn't consider
         | the only copy of my files a "backup", but most users don't
         | understand, so Microsoft is happy to stretch the truth (aka
         | lie) to get people using OneDrive so they can convert them into
         | subscribers.
        
           | ok_dad wrote:
           | Cloud storage is a de-facto backup for 95% of computer users.
           | Most of them have a versioning system or time-travel system
           | to see old versions for a few weeks or a year. I used
           | OneDrive for a while and they also have a nice system for
           | detecting encryption malware, and will notify you if it
           | detects that a ton of regular files were deleted and then a
           | bunch of new encrypted files were added. It's not the worst
           | service in the world, and it does act as an effective backup
           | for most cases for most users, especially considering that it
           | takes no time at all to setup. A super reliable backup system
           | is a hard thing to keep up with for most people, and you
           | can't usually just set it and forget it like you can with
           | cloud storage.
        
         | AnIdiotOnTheNet wrote:
         | Anyone at Microsoft with integrity left a long time ago. All
         | that are left are those willing to implement stuff like this
         | because it pays the bills and don't really care enough about
         | users to even bother with malicious compliance.
         | 
         | It's why Windows 10 will be my last Windows.
        
         | guessmyname wrote:
         | > _Anyone who works at Microsoft brave enough to comment...?_
         | 
         | Approximately 200,000 people work at Microsoft, and I can
         | assure you that the vast majority do not hold the authority to
         | make decisions like this. In reality, I suspect that many of
         | them view this kind of user interface/user experience as
         | unfriendly and express their concerns to higher-ups, but
         | without any influence, they may never see any improvements.
         | 
         | Given this fact, I would recommend rephrasing your request to
         | call for a Microsoft executive to clarify this decision.
         | However, you probably already know the answer to that question:
         | engagement, which leads to promotions, which leads to more
         | money.
        
           | theknocker wrote:
           | [dead]
        
           | CatWChainsaw wrote:
           | Yes. It would be nice to see one being honest behind the
           | protection of a pseudonym.... even nicer if they slip some
           | hints for how to toggle these nastygrams off.
        
             | msthrw153352 wrote:
             | The problem is most of us have enough clues on our primary
             | accounts that it wouldn't look great badmouthing our
             | employer to the degree I'm about to.
             | 
             | I regularly feel disgust at some of the decisions I see the
             | OS and other consumer product teams roll out. It makes the
             | company look bad, and I believe hurts our long term best
             | interest by cheapening our product and brand, let alone the
             | ethical perspective of dark pattern or depriving users
             | control over their own devices.
             | 
             | I know of no way to turn these off short of using an older
             | version of Windows. I think some of the enterprise releases
             | may have ways to create local accounts, but they may still
             | hit this, I'm not familiar with that side of the world. If
             | there is third party software to mitigate this I encourage
             | it. If this drives you to linux I encourage and am
             | encouraged by it. If you pirate out of protest I encourage
             | it. Consolidation and other related factors in the OS
             | marketplace have rendered consumers with very little real
             | leverage, and this is not a state of affairs I am happy
             | with.
             | 
             | To guess's point, I can also say that I know of no
             | coworkers happy with this or who have any power to impact
             | this state of affairs. I am not in the OS org, but I would
             | be surprised if it were any different there. To put it
             | crudely, incentives are a bitch.
        
               | CatWChainsaw wrote:
               | Thank you for going to the trouble of making a throwaway
               | for possibly just this comment. I'm aware that employees
               | currently don't have a lot of power, and of course
               | consumers being wrangled with dark patterns means they
               | don't have a lot of power either. Getting confirmation
               | that the unpopular decisions can be laid squarely at the
               | feet of executives does allow one to hold out hope for a
               | more equitable future for consumer electronics.
        
       | sieabahlpark wrote:
       | [dead]
        
       | r00fus wrote:
       | At this point, I struggle to understand who still uses Windows
       | for anything productive.
       | 
       | If it's only for games, MS is going to be very disappointed when
       | all of gaming moves to Linux/Wine/Proton.
       | 
       | Unless I don't understand what's going on, I feel MS is on thin
       | ice here (everything looks fine until it's simply not anymore).
        
       | chankstein38 wrote:
       | Ah, another thing to learn to ignore because everyone seems to
       | think my attention is owned by them. These companies don't seem
       | to realize that continuing to add these petty things will just
       | make us learn to ignore them more and more. It's like
       | notifications. My discord is always on no notifications and the
       | @heres and stuff make my icon badge always say 9+ or whatever. So
       | now I never see things people want to share because they've
       | overused the alerts.
       | 
       | Facebook was the same. I turned off notifications completely
       | because I couldn't disable specific ones I didn't need so they
       | started emailing me so I blocked them as spam. Sorry FB, your
       | loss. My life is better without your garbage product anyway.
        
         | jbj wrote:
         | If you are on an android phone what supports shelter[1], I can
         | recommend installing "social" apps inside the shelter, and just
         | sleep the apps when you don't use them.
         | 
         | In regards to windows, it feels to me as morphing into a
         | solution for large corporations if disregarding the tabloid
         | news while leaving private users just waiting for a friendly OS
         | to be presented for them.
         | 
         | [1] https://github.com/PeterCxy/Shelter
        
           | chankstein38 wrote:
           | I hadn't heard of Shelter before but this looks really neat!
        
           | nullfield wrote:
           | Not quite as good, but you can turn off background app
           | refresh on iOS to cripple their ability to do anything,
           | though I believe push notifications come via Apple's server
           | anyway.
        
         | s3p wrote:
         | This 100%. I turn off notifications every time an app abuses
         | them. Spotify wants to tell me about a random album I should
         | listen to? Notifications blocked. Twitter recommends an account
         | to follow? Notifs off. The pattern has continued to the point
         | where I now do not get any social media notifications and I
         | only see the app's content when I actively open it up and
         | check. They waste our time so we disable their functionality.
        
           | chankstein38 wrote:
           | Right? Or the pattern of opening Spotify to find/listen to
           | something, something pops up, I close it immediately without
           | reading it because it's In My Way and never find out about
           | what they were trying to tell me.
        
       | nerdjon wrote:
       | The more and more I see, the decision to finally install Windows
       | 10 LTSC is more and more justified for my gaming PC.
       | 
       | I have to wonder though how much of this stuff are they going to
       | try to shove into Windows 11 LTSC when that comes out or are they
       | going to continue the pattern of a lot of the shady stuff
       | magically being missing from LTSC?
        
         | shp0ngle wrote:
         | LTSC is a godsend. Too bad all the licenses are either pirated
         | or when real, crazy expensive.
        
           | nerdjon wrote:
           | There is a GitHub project that you may find valuable.
           | 
           | But yeah, and it make sense. I mean Microsoft doesn't want to
           | make it easy to strip out all of the crap they add in (or
           | really never have it in the first place).
           | 
           | Not that I am defending Microsoft since this is their own
           | doing, but I can understand why LTSC is not... easy isn't the
           | right word. Can't think of the word I am looking for.
           | 
           | Edit: The best part is I have not noticed any downsides. I
           | did have to install the Windows Store for the Xbox app but
           | that still leaves a TON of stuff that isn't there.
        
         | snazz wrote:
         | If you're affiliated with a university or high school (or know
         | a student who will help you out), you can get free Windows
         | Server licenses through their Azure student/educator deal. Also
         | includes all the fancy versions of Visual Studio, SQL Server,
         | and education versions of Windows 10 and 11 (which include
         | Group Policy).
        
       | Alifatisk wrote:
       | This is why I use Windows only for games, nothing else. They have
       | little to no respect to their users because they no we have
       | almost no other options (except macOS).
       | 
       | When the day I am able to play the majority of my steam games on
       | a Linux device, that's the day I say goodbye to Windows.
        
       | sdze wrote:
       | I wouldn't mind signing up if Microsoft Account was End to End
       | Encrypted.
        
         | solarkraft wrote:
         | I still would.
         | 
         | I would _accept it_ if providers other than Microsoft could
         | offer the service.
        
       | jeppester wrote:
       | It really is a testament to the power of the Windows monopoly
       | that MS can continously make the product worse without losing a
       | meaningful amount of customers.
       | 
       | Windows is more than ripe for disruption, but unfortunate the
       | monopoly is enforced by drivers, productivity software, habit,
       | gaming etc.
       | 
       | It's depressing to think about how much better our computers
       | could have worked if there had been real competition in the
       | market of PC OSs for the last 25 years.
        
         | gred wrote:
         | It's all the little things. I just set up my first Linux /
         | Windows dual boot laptop to ease my way out of Windows, but my
         | day 1 experience with Linux involved disabling IPv6 so that I
         | could get onto WiFi + internet, disabling the HiDPI daemon so
         | that my screen resolution changes would persist across
         | restarts, and wearing headphones most of the day because the
         | laptop's external speakers don't work out of the box. The
         | Apple-like "everything-included" model might work well for
         | desktop Linux, but the Windows-like "BYO everything" model is
         | still quite rough... and I don't see that changing because it's
         | mostly hardware / driver-related, and there's a constant churn
         | of new devices, chips and accessories.
        
         | jiggawatts wrote:
         | It's a classic tragedy of the commons: individual managers at
         | Microsoft can abuse the reputation of their org for personal
         | gain.
         | 
         | All of these moves I call "KPI features", as in: "I have to
         | make this worse to meet my personal bonus criteria, sorry."
         | 
         | There are so many dark patterns in Windows now because of this.
         | 
         | Nobody at Microsoft cares about the products at all any more.
        
         | AlexandrB wrote:
         | The antitrust action against Microsoft in the 90s didn't go far
         | enough and should have split off the OS from the rest of the
         | business.
        
       | mlrubenews wrote:
       | [dead]
        
       | newaccount74 wrote:
       | Oh god just like Apple keeps showing these annoying "unread"
       | indicators to tell you to sign into iCloud or get one of their
       | subscriptions....
        
         | fatnoah wrote:
         | I was just thinking that as one popped up just now. "Some
         | account services will not be available until you sign in again"
         | all day every day. Whenever I try to close it, it (of course)
         | brings me to settings.
         | 
         | Guess what? If I haven't used those services over the past 6
         | years, I don't think I need them.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | phone_book wrote:
         | Yes! Incredibly annoying. Just checked my iPad and I had 2
         | notification markers or whatever they are called (the number on
         | the Settings app icon) telling me about "special offers" since
         | I recently purchased an iPhone and one to set up Apple Pay. On
         | my Mac when I wasn't signed into iCloud I would get occasional
         | popups telling me to sign in. Thanks Tim Apple
        
           | solarkraft wrote:
           | I'm not signed into iCloud on the main account on my mac. It
           | brings some annoyances but in general it works remarkably
           | fine.
           | 
           | One day I desperately needed something from the App store, so
           | I made another account to sign in there. Ever since then I've
           | been getting a "sign into you account" badge on my Settings
           | app prompting me to remove it from the dock.
        
       | dbg31415 wrote:
       | You get the same sort of "error" message in iOS when you don't
       | turn Siri on.
       | 
       | It's annoying that these companies are all starting to use
       | "error" messages like this.
        
         | mrtksn wrote:
         | You don't get an error message, you get a badge. The difference
         | is that the it acts as a reminder and doesn't pretend that
         | there's something wrong.
        
           | Timon3 wrote:
           | It probably depends a lot on the individual user. I know many
           | people don't have a problem with pending notification badges,
           | some colleagues literally always have a bunch. But personally
           | it's a big distraction, because for me a notification badge
           | means _I have something left to do_. At worst it is
           | dismissing the pending notification, but I always stay at 0
           | notifications in any apps or services that are running.
           | 
           | It's been distracting enough that I didn't use my previous
           | company iPhone, and it's distracting enough that I'll fully
           | switch off Windows.
        
           | wbkang wrote:
           | You get a badge for the "System Settings" app for both on
           | macOS & iOS. It's very distracting because there is no way to
           | dismiss it, I had to unpin them from the dock.
        
             | rewgs wrote:
             | Strange, I have Siri completely disabled on Ventura and
             | don't get a notification.
        
             | AlexandrB wrote:
             | You _can_ dismiss it by going to settings, tapping the
             | prompt to set up Siri, then saying you 'll "do it later"
             | (again). Annoying AF.
             | 
             | What's been bugging me is that a recent update (16.2?)
             | means there's no way to dismiss the "Set Up Cellular"
             | prompt in Settings anymore on an iPhone with no SIM.
             | 
             | All of this is, frankly, paternalistic bullshit that treats
             | the user like some kind of idiot or sometimes "mark".
        
       | stragies wrote:
       | Does this also happen with Active-Directory domain accounts?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-04-04 23:02 UTC)