[HN Gopher] Porsche's e-fuel burns just like the real thing
___________________________________________________________________
Porsche's e-fuel burns just like the real thing
Author : fortran77
Score : 24 points
Date : 2023-04-01 20:50 UTC (2 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.wired.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.wired.com)
| xnx wrote:
| I've never understood synthetic fuel. We've got plenty of
| petroleum in the ground, but too much carbon in the air. Better
| to come up with a good sequestration strategy to put some of that
| carbon back in the ground.
| jaycroft wrote:
| "Carbon is extracted from the air in the form of CO2 and
| combined with the hydrogen in a process called synthesis."
|
| It seems like at least re-burning the carbon that's already in
| the air is better than burning new dug up carbon? This is at
| least not net atmospheric carbon positive. You can do
| sequestration too...
| readthenotes1 wrote:
| trees?
|
| The marketing blurb for this fuel can say: we only kill birds!
| (Because wind turbines)
| esteth wrote:
| Turbines kill fewer birds per kWh than a coal plant.
| nukeman wrote:
| Synthetic fuels are generally cleaner in that they have
| significantly less sulfur and a decent bit less aromatics.
| There's a great picture on Wikipedia that illustrates the
| difference.
| steponlego wrote:
| Is that the stuff that causes cancer?
| frazar0 wrote:
| https://web.archive.org/web/20230401205313/https://www.wired...
| eminence32 wrote:
| Ignoring questions about if this is makes economical or
| environmental sense, this just seems plain _cool_ -- it appears
| to be a fairly standalone industrial complex that just needs
| water as input, and produces fuel plus three useful byproducts.
|
| This seems like something you might build in Surviving Mars, or
| something.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-04-01 23:01 UTC)