[HN Gopher] The roots of Japan's Indian curry
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The roots of Japan's Indian curry
        
       Author : kizunajp
       Score  : 134 points
       Date   : 2023-04-01 13:44 UTC (9 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (one-from-nippon.ghost.io)
 (TXT) w3m dump (one-from-nippon.ghost.io)
        
       | johnwalkr wrote:
       | The bit about ubiquitous Nepali-owned restaurants makes me
       | nostalgic for living in Japan. They may not be authentic but they
       | are great for lunch. Typically, at lunchtime, 2 small curries,
       | naan, salad and a soft drink bar is Y=800-Y=1000. And it's served
       | instantly.
        
       | fsckboy wrote:
       | > _The surprising roots of Japan 's Indian curry_
       | 
       | Vermont?
       | https://www.reddit.com/r/vermont/comments/bejqjj/yeah_vermon...
       | 
       | https://www.sevendaysvt.com/vermont/why-is-japans-most-popul...
        
       | hans0l074 wrote:
       | Interestingly, the Nepali entrepreneurs also run a lot of
       | restaurants here in Finland - along side Indian ones. Though I
       | feel that there are more Nepalese ones. The cuisine is almost
       | indistinguishable from North Indian cuisine, and I have heard
       | from some folks who have visited Nepal, that authentic dishes
       | from Nepal are missing from these restaurants. Though I suspect
       | that might not entirely be true.
        
         | snowman5678 wrote:
         | Interesting! I wonder how much of the indistinguishabilty is
         | just them catering to their audience looking for North Indian
         | recipes. There are definitely a lot of Nepali recipes that are
         | very far from Indian cuisine.
        
           | scheme271 wrote:
           | It's almost all catering to local taste and what's expected.
           | Nepali food is good but it's not as rich as what you'd get in
           | a restaurant. Daal baht (rice with a thin lentil soup) is not
           | what people expect if they pay $10-20. Hell, most northern
           | indian restaurants feature foods that are way richer than
           | you'd see in real home cooked cuisine. The restaurant
           | versions invariably have way more heavy cream and butter than
           | would ever be used in a typical home.
        
           | j45 wrote:
           | North Indian cuisine is more established globally because
           | North Indians were either forced to seek economic opportunity
           | abroad. It wasn't then alone, but the numbers in many areas
           | of the world make it clear off the early waves to the Middle
           | East, Africa, England, canada, the us, and beyond.
           | 
           | Partition uprooted and scattered many families from the
           | generally 1900's Indian subcontinent across the world in
           | waves.
        
         | stevekemp wrote:
         | I moved from the UK, where Chicken tikka masala is famously the
         | most popular food, and I am surprised that most of the Indian
         | restaurants here are Nepalese.
         | 
         | Unfortunately the local Nepalese restaurants seem to have very
         | very similar menus, and themed decor, along with a poor record
         | of treating their workers fairly.
         | 
         | I do miss UK-styled curries, and Indian food, I think even
         | though the foods have obviously been adjusted for the UK tastes
         | there is a lot more variety available than in Finland. (Which I
         | guess makes sense given the relative populations, and
         | differences in terms of the number of Indian people who've
         | integrated to both countries over recent decades.)
        
       | brigandish wrote:
       | > So if you are craving for spice in Japan, try one of the two
       | thousand "Indian" restaurants and you will not be disappointed.
       | 
       | Erm, if you've had a proper curry recently then you probably will
       | be. Like everywhere else, foreign foods get tailored to their
       | locality or they die. If you fancy a naan filled with sugar and
       | some pretty bland dishes then try an "Indian" restaurant in
       | Japan. Which should come as no surprise, because plenty of other
       | so-called spicy foods here are a) not spicy, and b)
       | surprisingly/sadly, overly sweet.
       | 
       | That's not to say that you can't get a decent curry here, but
       | you'll have to try harder than just walking into a random curry
       | house. And this...
       | 
       | > Indian restaurants outnumber the top 3 pizza chains of the
       | country put together!
       | 
       | I think the only food more maligned by localisation in Japan than
       | pizza could be Mexican food, which leads us back to spice and
       | sugar. I'm not sure what having more curry houses than pizza huts
       | _in Japan_ proves. It would mean something in the US or Italy,
       | but in Japan?
       | 
       | Tastes differ.
        
         | sho wrote:
         | > spicy foods here are a) not spicy
         | 
         | Ha. Can confirm. Lived there 2 years and while I love the food,
         | as far as I can tell there is no food available anywhere in
         | Japan, at all, that the average south east asian would
         | recognise as even mildly spicy. And outside the home islands I
         | have observed Japanese people reacting hilariously to the
         | actually spicy local food. My favourite was a co-worker who
         | literally collapsed to the floor in the foetal position moaning
         | after eating a mala hotpot which was, at best, medium heat.
         | 
         | Love the people, love the country, but Golden Curry's bright
         | warning red "EXTRA HOT" is not bloody hot at all.
        
           | grogenaut wrote:
           | It took months to convince my family that the extra hot was
           | mildy warm.
           | 
           | But also at a wagamamas in London I had them do double extra
           | hot on their hottest dish and could barely tell. I'm American
           | from the Midwest living in Seattle.
           | 
           | I refer to many spicy thing like that golden extra spicy as
           | "spicy as katsup"
        
             | xboxnolifes wrote:
             | This is my problem with a lot of spiciness advertising
             | around me (in America). When I order something advertised
             | as "hot" or "very hot", 90% of the time it's either
             | medium/mild at best, or just packed with spicy peppers to
             | the point of just tasting bad.
             | 
             | But it can be hard to communicate to some people when their
             | upper level of spice tolerance is banana peppers.
        
               | grogenaut wrote:
               | I think the UK levels of spice are much lower than the US
               | having been both places. Throw the pineapple chutney that
               | I had at an Indian restaurant Bombay style in London plus
               | summer was quite warm and delicious.
        
               | genocidicbunny wrote:
               | > This is my problem with a lot of spiciness advertising
               | around me (in America).
               | 
               | It might just be a thing around here, but a lot of Indian
               | or Thai restaurants have two separate heat scales, the
               | 'normal' one, and the Indian or Thai one. One of the Thai
               | restaurants that I used to frequent, for example, had a
               | scale where 'spicy' was the same as 'Thai mild' and 'Thai
               | spicy' would genuinely make your hair stand on end.
        
               | grogenaut wrote:
               | It takes so much buy in to get them to take you seriously
               | on spice sometimes.
        
               | [deleted]
        
             | yakubin wrote:
             | In my experience, "spicy ketchup" is almost never spicy,
             | even in the least. What distinguishes it from other
             | ketchups is that it's less sweet (but still very sweet).
             | The only actually spicy ketchup I found is "Kotlin Extra
             | Hot", but I'm not sure if it's a thing outside of Poland.
        
               | grogenaut wrote:
               | You mistake what I'm saying. Katsup is not spicy. I'm
               | saying "you must think katsup is spicy"... it's more
               | funny to people than saying "as spicy as water", "Man
               | this catsup shore is spicy" just works better for a joke.
               | 
               | I'll have to try and find the Kotlin extra hot at the
               | Eastern European grocery by my house.
        
               | yakubin wrote:
               | Yeah, I got that. Just wanted to expand on the weirdness
               | of what "spicy ketchup" seems to mean in practice.
               | 
               | Fair warning: "Kotlin Extra Hot", although a bit spicy,
               | still doesn't hold a candle to what Indian cuisine can
               | offer (or Japanese -- e.g. wasabi).
        
               | grogenaut wrote:
               | yes but then I can talk sh*t to my polish coworker who
               | loves any polish cultural references. Anyway thanks for
               | the referral.
        
           | bobthepanda wrote:
           | How is the Korean food in Japan? Korean food is pretty up
           | there in spice level.
        
             | rippercushions wrote:
             | Not by Thai or Sichuan standards it isn't. But to answer
             | your question, denatured Korean food (esp. yakiniku BBQ) is
             | widely available, and more authentic versions can be found
             | if you head to the Koreatowns found in every major city
             | (Okubo in Tokyo, Tsuruhashi in Osaka, etc).
        
               | rawicki wrote:
               | Okubo is great. I'd say it's easier to find (if you
               | sample random restaurants in Japan) good Korean than good
               | Indian or good Thai.
        
           | Rebelgecko wrote:
           | That's surprising, when I get Coco Ichibanya I think level
           | 4-6 is already fairly spicy
        
             | johnwalkr wrote:
             | Yeah I was gonna say this. Coco (and also smaller competing
             | chain gogo) is Japanese curry that you can find in every
             | city and can be ordered extremely spicy. And it's not by
             | default but any of the Indian curry places will make it
             | very spicy if you ask. I've also gone out of my way to look
             | up the most authentic places for a specific dish, and been
             | able to order something so spicy I could barely finish it.
             | 
             | All of that being said, mild is definitely what to expect
             | unless you ask for spicy or go out of your way for a
             | specific dish.
        
           | metaphor wrote:
           | > _Love the people, love the country, but Golden Curry 's
           | bright warning red "EXTRA HOT" is not bloody hot at all._
           | 
           | I chuckled at the basis of your comparison being a globally
           | commercialized instant product.
        
       | kizunajp wrote:
       | The post title was changed to drop the "surprising". Not sure
       | why?
        
       | anuraj wrote:
       | "Now to be clear, India has no such dish as a curry. No self-
       | respecting Indian restaurant has a "curry" on their menu. They
       | would have a Palak Paneer or a Malai Kofta or a Murgh Makhani -
       | all of which we lump into "curry" - but no "curry"
       | 
       | - This is patently wrong. Curry is a South Indian word referring
       | to vegetables originally (Malakkarry means vegetables). Come to
       | Kerala - you have Moru Curry (Butter Milk Curry) , Erachi Curry
       | (Beef Curry), Tharavu Curry (Duck Curry) etc. The author is a
       | North Indian oblivious of curry history.
       | 
       | "krri veppaanentullllt kaatttti[?], virrkin maatrN
       | muttttillivitte"
       | 
       | [kari veppaanenthullathu kaattil, virakinu maathram muttillivide]
       | 
       | "What is there to make curry in the forest? Only firewood is
       | available here" - Kiraatham Thullal by Kunchan Nambiar, Malayalam
       | poet Circa 1750 AD.
        
         | techaqua wrote:
         | website is called "one-from-nippon"
         | 
         | op's name is japanese
         | 
         | > The author is a North Indian oblivious of curry history.
        
         | tkadur wrote:
         | > Curry is a South Indian word referring to vegetables
         | originally (Malakkarry means vegetables)
         | 
         | FWIW, Kannada has no such word. kribeevu ("karibevu") refers
         | specifically to the curry plant and (as far as I know) there is
         | no word "kari" which refers to curries in general.
         | 
         | My parents had always told me that "curry" was, therefore, a
         | generalization and anglicization of various dishes containing
         | curry leaves. But seeing as "kari" is a word in several other
         | South Indian languages, perhaps Kannada is just the odd one
         | out.
        
         | kizunajp wrote:
         | As I clarified in another comment, I was trying to make the
         | point that curry is a genre of foods (as your examples
         | illustrate).
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35400253#35400453
        
           | whitemary wrote:
           | With all due respect, you failed at making that point, but
           | now at least your intentions are understood.
        
             | kizunajp wrote:
             | I agree. Half the comments are about that one statement.
             | You might be on to something here..
        
               | dfxm12 wrote:
               | FWIW, I understood exactly what you meant on first
               | reading.
               | 
               |  _Now to be clear, India has no such dish as a curry._
               | 
               | The wording "no such dish as a curry" is a little
               | ambiguous here as to if you mean a single menu item
               | called "curry" or items from the genre of curry. This
               | might be were people are tripping up. _However_ , you
               | make yourself crystal clear with the following sentences:
               | 
               |  _No self-respecting Indian restaurant has a "curry" on
               | their menu. They would have a Palak Paneer or a Malai
               | Kofta or a Murgh Makhani - all of which we lump into
               | "curry" - but no "curry"._
               | 
               | If someone is saying you failed at making this point, I'm
               | not sure they read the whole paragraph, or are just
               | willfully ignoring the context and are looking for an
               | argument.
        
               | dEnigma wrote:
               | I don't agree that this point is crystal clear. If they'd
               | written "They would have a Palak Paneer, or a Moru Curry,
               | or...." and at least included one dish with "curry" in
               | the name, then there would've been no such confusion. But
               | as it stands it sounds to me like it's claiming there is
               | no actual Indian dish that contains the word "curry".
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | anuraj wrote:
           | Curry refers to vegetable originally and dishes made out of
           | that. Curry Koottu means Masala. We have been using this word
           | from time immemorial.
        
         | user- wrote:
         | > Now to be clear, India has no such dish as a curry
         | 
         | Shit, gotta go ask my mom what shes been calling curry my whole
         | life then.
        
         | joshuaissac wrote:
         | > Curry is a South Indian word referring to vegetables
         | originally
         | 
         | Not exclusively to vegetables. It originally comes from 'kari',
         | meaning 'blackened' or 'burnt', and referred to cooked
         | vegetables and meat.
         | 
         | 1. https://www.etymonline.com/word/curry#etymonline_v_491
        
           | kelipso wrote:
           | That etymology might actually be wrong. The kari for
           | blackened, burnt, etc comes from kri where the r sound is a
           | dental flap type r sound, while the kari for curry comes from
           | krri where the r sound is the typical r sound. So it's more
           | likely the etymology is from malakkarry, which means
           | vegetables, meaning than kari from the blackened, burnt, etc
           | meaning.
        
             | joshuaissac wrote:
             | Perhaps, but the difference is pronunciation is not
             | definitive evidence.
             | 
             | For example, curry veppu (curry tree) is pronounced with
             | the regular r sound in the standard dialect, but in some
             | dialects, it is instead kariyaappu with the dental flap r
             | sound (the 't' in American English 'atom').
             | 
             | The kari for 'burnt', 'blackened' is also related to
             | 'karuppu' for 'black', which is pronounced with the regular
             | 'r' (like curry) instead of the dental one.
        
           | anuraj wrote:
           | That etymology is probably wrong. I posit - it comes from
           | 'Kant/rikkuka' means to cut and cook. Kari vs KaRi.
        
       | discordance wrote:
       | Bose's original Nakamuraya original restaurant is still open and
       | running, located in a passenger tunnel between shinjuku-sanchome
       | and shinjuku station.
       | 
       | I found it a quite odd spot and configuration, considering the
       | history.
       | 
       | More detail here:
       | 
       | https://wattention.com/restaurant-review-shinjuku-nakamuraya...
        
         | flyaway123 wrote:
         | Thanks for sharing.
         | 
         | On a side note, I find it quite curious how the resolution on
         | this image from WAttention [1] mismatches. From the OP, the
         | couple portrait attributed to Wikipedia, which is the latest
         | 2018 retouched version [2], has a much higher resolution and
         | specifies @Press as the source. The 2016 original version [3]
         | matches the couple portrait on @Press [4], which has the same
         | blueish hue and the additional artifacts. This links back to
         | Nakamuraya's website itself [5], which has the same food photo
         | combination as [1], but in consistent resolution.
         | 
         | At first, it seems to me that the couple portrait on [1] was
         | (intentionally?) degraded because of the different lighting
         | than [5], and the food photo is simply another version that was
         | available during the retrieval (notice the crop). On second
         | thought, it could have simply been another version that was
         | available from Nakamuraya's. TIL images uploaded to Wikipedia
         | are encouraged to be enhanced [6].
         | 
         | I wonder, as AI tools getting more pervasive, how many
         | variations with artificial details will exist due to constant
         | upscaling/downsizing? (Accurate replication might not be
         | important in certain contexts, but I imagine artificial details
         | will eventually leak into the chain of reference)
         | 
         | Of course, old photos like this are scanned/photographed into
         | digital format in the first place.
         | 
         | [1]: https://wattention.com/wp-
         | content/uploads/2015/07/Shinjuku-N...
         | 
         | [2]:
         | https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/Rash_Beh...
         | 
         | [3]:
         | https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/f/f5/...
         | 
         | [4]: https://www.atpress.ne.jp/releases/104283/img_104283_8.jpg
         | 
         | [5]:
         | https://www.nakamuraya.co.jp/common/img/top/pavilion_img07.p...
         | 
         | [6]:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:How_to_improve_image...
        
       | thesalsabear wrote:
       | Why are Indians getting taught about Indian food?
        
         | _shantaram wrote:
         | I doubt it's as deep as you think it is. The author found an
         | interesting story to tell and told it.
        
           | thesalsabear wrote:
           | I was talking about the comment section.
        
             | _shantaram wrote:
             | Ah, well, even in that case there's still a lot of things
             | Indian people don't know about Indian food. Just by virtue
             | of being Indian we do not learn everything there is to know
             | about Indian people / food / culture.
        
               | thesalsabear wrote:
               | @_shantaram Maybe. I recommend that you find something
               | other an online chat section to learn about Indian food!
        
             | [deleted]
        
         | rawicki wrote:
         | From experience of traveling to many countries and talking with
         | people about food - not everyone is interested in it. I've
         | heard many bad recommendations or people surprised I know the
         | dishes they have never tried. And that's okay.
        
       | BozeWolf wrote:
       | Ahh, I absolutely love this. I frequently prepare this for
       | dinner. This is how you do it: https://youtu.be/QhsrBz9Cceg
       | (nope, see edit.)
       | 
       | Fun thing is, my mom sort of makes this... she learned from my
       | grandma. Almost the same recipe, except for the spring onion and
       | other topings. When i saw this in a japanese cookbook and then
       | the video from Kenji, i was totally amazed. Like if my grandma
       | learned this from Kenji.
       | 
       | But we are as Dutch as Heineken. Where did my grandma got this
       | recipe from... 50+ years ago? Probably some magazine and then an
       | indian curry recipe from the uk? Who knows :-)
       | 
       | Edit: the image on top does look different from what I mean
       | though. Interesting. Apparently there also is a different style
       | of japanese curry.
        
         | rjh29 wrote:
         | Two different types of curry.
         | 
         | The article/image are about Indian restaurants in Japan, which
         | tend to have a large naan and a few small metal bowls of curry.
         | 
         | The one you're talking about is usually known as 'curry rice'
         | (kareraisu) or 'Japanese curry' and has its roots in English
         | beef stew, but with spice powder added. It is eaten over
         | regular sticky white rice, often with a pork or chicken cutlet
         | on top. I personally love it.
        
           | sowbug wrote:
           | Co Co Curry in Japan is my favorite of the second kind. It's
           | easy to come close at home, as dole says, but the restaurant
           | lets you pick the exact spice level, and they always get the
           | rice just right: sticky enough to carve out with a spoon, but
           | still porous enough that it absorbs the curry sauce.
           | 
           | Go Go Curry is also worth a visit, and their US franchises
           | are reasonably authentic. But it's a slightly different
           | style: darker sauce that's more tangy than umami.
        
             | johnwalkr wrote:
             | Co Co is great in how much you can customize it. I always
             | go for very spicy curry with potatoes and fried chicken on
             | top.
             | 
             | Go Go is funny in that they list the calories of each meal
             | in terms of rice balls. And some are like 10 rice balls!
             | They used to have a world champion curry, limited to a few
             | orders per day per store [1]. 2.5kg!
             | 
             | [1] https://14fourteen.jp/wp-
             | content/uploads/2019/08/b3bb8c6af2d...
        
               | rawicki wrote:
               | For me, my neighbourhood Co Co had completely broken
               | spicyness scale - 3 was not spicy enough, 4 was the most
               | I could eat (and it goes to 10!).
        
           | bigyikes wrote:
           | I tried Japanese curry for the first time in San Francisco a
           | couple of weeks ago. Absolutely delicious.
           | 
           | I definitely noticed the English vibes. Actually, it reminded
           | me a lot of Southern US homestyle food. Swap the rice for
           | some potatoes and you could've fooled me.
        
           | kizunajp wrote:
           | You're right! While I was doing the research for this article
           | I found this to be an interesting read on Japanese curry aka
           | kareraisu: https://metropolisjapan.com/the-origins-of-
           | japanese-curry/
        
             | BozeWolf wrote:
             | This is great! Thanks!
        
           | dole wrote:
           | S&B Golden Curry (Mild, orange box) is what I grew up on as
           | "curry rice."
           | 
           | Onions, potatoes, carrots, beef stew meat, super easy.
           | 
           | https://www.sbfoods-worldwide.com/lp/us/golden-curry/
        
       | Brajeshwar wrote:
       | I'm not much into food. I'm kinda the "I eat because I have to."
       | My disclaimer is that I'm not an expert but here are a few
       | interesting stories that might be relevant to this story.
       | 
       | I come from a place where there is a huge influence of the
       | Japanese and grew up in folklores punctuated with Japanese
       | stories. I got to know a tad more, when one of my school-friend
       | took a keen interest in digging up British and Japanese soldiers
       | remains from the World War, built a museum, and is regularly
       | invited as a diplomat by both the Japanese and the British.
       | 
       | I grew up visiting many Japanese monuments, including the last
       | stand of the INA's holding place in India where Subhas Chandra
       | Bose worked with the Japanese.
       | 
       | For the food, from the story, I'm of the believe that the curry
       | is more Bengal-ish than further mainland India. The food from my
       | place are a major blend of our olden recipes spiced up with the
       | Bengali recipe, with an additional dose of East Asia.
       | 
       | Also, most Indian Restaurants in India, if not owned, are pretty
       | much run (cooks, etc.) by Nepalese. And most "Chinese"
       | restaurants by Bengalis. Of course, the "Chinese" food in India
       | are, well, very very Indian-ised.
       | 
       | I also grow up memorizing most scenes from "Bridge on the River
       | Kwai" as that bridge, after crossing, goes through my home-stage
       | to advance into India during the war.
        
         | gumby wrote:
         | > I grew up visiting many Japanese monuments, including the
         | last stand of the INA's holding place in India where Subhas
         | Chandra Bose worked with the Japanese.
         | 
         | Rash Behari Bose (the subject of the article) and Subhas
         | Chandra Bose were entirely different people from different
         | generations.
        
         | hzay wrote:
         | I appreciate your account but
         | 
         | > Also, most Indian Restaurants in India, if not owned, are
         | pretty much run (cooks, etc.) by Nepalese.
         | 
         | Nope. Never seen a Nepalese cook in Chennai or bangalore?
        
           | _shantaram wrote:
           | Yeah, here in Chennai, Odia and Bihari cooks are much more
           | common :P
        
         | rayiner wrote:
         | > Also, most Indian Restaurants in India, if not owned, are
         | pretty much run (cooks, etc.) by Nepalese. And most "Chinese"
         | restaurants by Bengalis. Of course, the "Chinese" food in India
         | are, well, very very Indian-ised.
         | 
         | A great many Indian restaurants in the US are also owned by
         | Bengalis. I visited a Bangladeshi restaurant in Atlanta that
         | was advertised as such. The owner mentioned that most of the
         | Indian restaurants in the city were owned by Bengalis, so he
         | decided to be open about it when he started his own.
        
           | nerdponx wrote:
           | I used to live above a very conventional Indian restaurant in
           | New York, and once in conversation the owner mentioned to me
           | that he was from Bangladesh. I asked him if were any
           | interesting special dishes from Bangladesh that we don't
           | normally see on Indian restaurant menus in America, and he
           | just shrugged and said something to the effect of "meh, it's
           | all the same anyway." I thought that was kind of interesting.
           | The food also wasn't particularly good, so maybe he just
           | isn't really a food guy and came into owning the business
           | somehow other than a passion for the culinary arts.
        
             | gumby wrote:
             | Had a friend who ran a restaurant in Palo Alto. He had been
             | trained in a three Michelin star restaurant in Burgundy.
             | When they opened they had rabbit, squab, and other great
             | dishes, but hardly anyone would order them. Steak and
             | salmon were the most commonly ordered. It wasn't worth
             | buying what is considered more "exotic" by the clientele --
             | they just couldn't sell enough.
             | 
             | But when they threw a party at home...!
        
             | rippercushions wrote:
             | Bengali cuisine is definitely a thing. Lots of fish and
             | mustard oil.
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bengali_cuisine
        
         | n1b0m wrote:
         | Interestingly, most "Indian" restaurants in the UK are run by
         | Bengalis
        
           | danans wrote:
           | Indian when referring to the cuisine doesn't really refer to
           | the political entity of modern India. Most of those
           | restaurants serve a version of Punjabi food anyways.
        
         | TRiG_Ireland wrote:
         | In Ireland, I'm used to the idea that Indian restaurants are
         | run by Pakistani men, and Chinese restaurants are run by
         | Malaysian women.
        
           | mytailorisrich wrote:
           | There are a significant ethnic Chinese minority in Malaysia
           | and ethnic Chinese are the vast majority in Singapore.
           | 
           | So they can possibly be "Malaysian women" and also ethnic
           | Chinese.
        
         | MichaelZuo wrote:
         | > Also, most Indian Restaurants in India, if not owned, are
         | pretty much run (cooks, etc.) by Nepalese.
         | 
         | Really? There must be some odd social dynamics behind that
         | because it sounds so implausible going from demographics alone.
        
           | gumby wrote:
           | This kind of phenomenon is pretty common, basically due to
           | network effects. Consider how many small town motels in the
           | US are owned by Patels. Or those "Chinese" (definition and
           | style changes in every country) restaurants: regardless of
           | the cuisine written on the window (Sechuan, Hunan, Cantonese,
           | Shanghaiese...) what is the ethnicity of the owner likely to
           | be (depending on what country you live in)?
        
             | jrochkind1 wrote:
             | Or the USA "greek diner" phenomenon of the 20th century.
        
           | sthatipamala wrote:
           | Immigration. India is a bigger economy than Nepal and
           | Nepalese come there to do work like this.
        
             | bobthepanda wrote:
             | Also, restaurants are competitive, wages are low, and
             | barrier to entry is low (no required credentials), so they
             | naturally lean more immigrant heavy.
             | 
             | In the US a lot of professionals end up taking menial jobs
             | because their credentials do not transfer to the US.
        
           | fakedang wrote:
           | Cheaper, more diligent, less likely to cause issues.... Well
           | at least these are some of the reasons I've been told.
           | 
           | Also Nepalese isn't necessarily Nepali citizens. India and
           | Nepal are so intertwined, both countries citizens have free
           | passage across each other. A significant percentage of Indian
           | citizens in the very highly populated states of Uttar
           | Pradesh, Bihar and Bengal are of Nepalese origin. I would
           | assume the total number of Nepalese Indians would be at least
           | 30-50 million, considering that the collective population of
           | the above 3 states alone amounts to roughly 460 million.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | JoeAltmaier wrote:
       | Interesting!
       | 
       | I take issue with the common claim that 'curry' isn't a thing in
       | a 'real' Indian restaurant. I did a quick survey online and could
       | not find a single solitary Indian restaurant menu without curry
       | on it. From the fanciest to the common takeout joint. There are
       | even chains like 'Curry House'.
       | 
       | Let's tone down the virtue signaling in food reviews. It's silly.
       | There are 150 languages in India; there are as many cuisines. To
       | claim knowledge about the 'real Indian' food or culture is
       | transparent nonsense.
       | 
       | On another slant, it's a rampant issue in YouTube videos where
       | anybody with an Italian accent claim only they know how to make
       | real Italian food. Learn a little history, folks.
        
         | kizunajp wrote:
         | I was making the claim that if you went to a restaurant in
         | India, you wouldn't normally find any menu item called "curry",
         | because curry is a genre of foods and not one single item in
         | Indian cuisine.
        
           | unmole wrote:
           | If you went to a restaurant in Italy, would you find any item
           | called pasta?
        
           | boomboomsubban wrote:
           | Saying "No self-respecting restaurant in India" may be a
           | better way of putting it.
        
             | kizunajp wrote:
             | That makes sense. Thank you.
        
           | j45 wrote:
           | It is a fair claim.
           | 
           | The word rarely exists on its own.
           | 
           | It has roots in some Indian languages, but is not pervasive
           | like it is today across all Indian cuisines.
           | 
           | Part of this is interesting to learn the stories of the early
           | Indians who left India either as indentured servants which
           | turned out to be an updated form of slavery, or emigrating as
           | labourers from north India (and other areas) and how those
           | migrations played out across the colonized world.
        
           | jmillikin wrote:
           | This might be a language barrier issue, but I have never seen
           | an Indian-style restaurant advertise a dish as "curry" in any
           | country I've visited. Even in Japan (I live in Tokyo and have
           | several indoLiao Li  shops nearby), even if the shop itself
           | has kare in the name, the menu will say what each thing is
           | (keema, sagh paneer, etc).
           | 
           | Imagine sitting down and opening a menu and seeing something
           | labelled "soup" or "sandwich"!
        
             | j45 wrote:
             | North Indian dishes like da saag I keens might be evolving
             | to care less to use it. But I'd bet that's not just North
             | Indian Christine. Restaurant opened by todays emigrating
             | Indians are more aware of the choices than 30-50 years ago.
             | It was a very different world.
        
             | messe wrote:
             | I only know of one Indian restaurant locally here (Ireland)
             | that has a "house curry" listed, but the rest of the menu
             | is as you describe it.
        
               | Xelynega wrote:
               | In that case isn't "house curry" similar to "soup of the
               | day"?
        
               | messe wrote:
               | It's been a while since I've eaten there, so I can't
               | remember if it's that, or something along the lines of
               | their own signature recipe.
        
               | dfxm12 wrote:
               | I would guess it's an original recipe (with no
               | traditional name) and doesn't change daily.
        
         | dagmx wrote:
         | The point is that "curry" is a British generalization.
         | 
         | Indian restaurants were historically called curry houses as a
         | pejorative.
         | 
         | India has many dishes that one might consider a curry, but we
         | have no dish called curry. The only use of the word curry in
         | restaurants is to appeal to British nationals (and anyone they
         | spread their culture to).
         | 
         | It's an artifact of colonialism.
         | 
         | I also don't understand why you think it's virtue signalling.
         | If anything, your appeal to "150 languages in India" is virtue
         | signalling because you're trying to make a benevolent
         | justification for a word whose history you don't understand.
         | Also rich that you say "learn a little history folks" when you
         | yourself clearly didn't learn it in this instance.
         | 
         | Now, there is a word "Kari" in several South Indian languages
         | but it's used to mean spicy sauce or "kadipoda" which means
         | spice mix, both derived from "black" in reference to the use of
         | black peppercorns. The generalization into "curry" was one of
         | colonial misinterpretation.
         | 
         | https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2019/04/why-we-ca...
        
           | unmole wrote:
           | > The only use of the word curry in restaurants is to appeal
           | to British nationals (and anyone they spread their culture
           | to).
           | 
           | So, the Curry Points that dot Hyderabad are artefacts of
           | British colonialism?
           | 
           | > The generalization into "curry" was one of colonial
           | misinterpretation.
           | 
           | Yeah, no. The Telugu _kura_ which is obviously cognate with
           | _kari_ is used to mean, well _curry_. How about you tone down
           | the misinterpretation and false generalization?
        
             | dagmx wrote:
             | Telugu Kari doesn't mean curry in the sense that British
             | people understand it. Please actually look up the history
             | of what kari is.
             | 
             | The use of curry in Indian restaurants in Hyderabad are an
             | artifact of colonialism. Hyderabad in particular caters a
             | lot to foreign nationals due to the proliferation of the
             | tech sector there.
             | 
             | Anyway What curry dishes are they serving there?
             | "Hyderabadi chicken curry"? What is it called natively?
        
               | j45 wrote:
               | Probably just chicken something. Well said.
        
               | unmole wrote:
               | I assure you, if you ask for chicken curry in any
               | restaurant in Hyderabad, they'll know exactly what you
               | mean. They might not necessarily serve it though.
        
               | dagmx wrote:
               | Of course they know it. They don't exist in a vacuum.
               | 
               | That doesn't mean the dish is "curry".
               | 
               | Just like how many Indians will call it Butter Chicken
               | Curry colloquially but the dish is Murgh Makhani.
        
               | unmole wrote:
               | > That doesn't mean the dish is "curry".
               | 
               | Is this supposed to be some metaphysical argument? The
               | dish is literally chicken curry i.e. _kodi kura_.
        
               | unmole wrote:
               | > Telugu Kari doesn't mean curry in the sense that
               | British people understand it.
               | 
               | As a native Telugu speaker, I use _kura_ in the same
               | sense as the English _curry_ to refer to a diverse class
               | of dishes.
               | 
               | > look up the history
               | 
               | Here's some history: Hyderabad was never colonized by the
               | British. My grandparents who grew up in Hyderabad State
               | and didn't speak any English used _kura_ in the same
               | sense that I do.
               | 
               | > Hyderabad in particular caters a lot to foreign
               | nationals due to the proliferation of the tech sector
               | there.
               | 
               | You don't have the faintest idea of what you're talking
               | about. The Curry Points I mentioned are little hole-in-
               | the-wall takeaway places that you see in every other
               | street corner. They are almost exclusively patronised by
               | Telugus. Forget foreigners, even migrants from other
               | states usually find the spice levels too high.
               | 
               | > Anyway What curry dishes are they serving there?
               | "Hyderabadi chicken curry"? What is it called natively?
               | 
               | I haven't heard of a distinctive Hyderabadi variant but
               | they obviously serve chiken curry which in Telugu would
               | be called _kodi kura_. Google Maps is your friend: https:
               | //www.google.com/maps/search/curry+point/@17.5057149,7...
        
               | dagmx wrote:
               | India was colonized. Whether they specifically colonized
               | an area or not is irrelevant. Indian regions don't exist
               | in isolation.
               | 
               | Kari in telugu is not the same as curry. The colloquial
               | use of it as such is an artifact of British rule. You
               | dont exist in a bubble.
               | 
               | Kura is not the same as a generic curry. Not all things
               | that are considered a "curry" are Kura or Kari
        
               | unmole wrote:
               | > Indian regions don't exist in isolation.
               | 
               | Hyderabad existed as a politically and culturally
               | separate entity. The ramifications of these historical
               | distinctions play out in politics to this day. See
               | Telangana statehood for an example.
               | 
               | > Kari in telugu
               | 
               | You keep bringing it up but to the best of my knowledge
               | there's no _kari_ in Telugu.
               | 
               | > The colloquial use of it as such is an artifact of
               | British rule.
               | 
               | Do you have a source that isn't your ass?
               | 
               | > Kura is not the same as a generic curry.
               | 
               | Oh knowledgeable one, please tell me more.
        
               | danans wrote:
               | > Hyderabad existed as a politically and culturally
               | separate entity
               | 
               | The only culturally separate population I know of on
               | earth anymore are the Sentinelese on the Andaman and
               | Nicobar islands.
               | 
               | Hyderabad's name itself is Arabic+Persian, and compared
               | to India overall, far more people speak English there. It
               | was a regional capital of South Asia. Cosmopolitan places
               | like that are always cultural crossroads. Practically
               | everyone/everyplace is a mutt, culturally and
               | biologically, the world over, except perhaps the
               | Sentinelese.
        
               | dagmx wrote:
               | Sorry I meant Tamil Not Telugu. But the point remains the
               | same. Curry in the British sense is not curry in any
               | Indian sense. Kari doesnt imply a specific gravy dish, it
               | implies a spiced sauce component. Saying you want a curry
               | dish is like saying you want a cream dish when you order
               | murgh makhani. It's incongruent and a conflation of
               | modern colloquial use vs the actual dish. Just like not
               | ever meat dish is a ragu in Italy.
               | 
               | And Hyderabad may have been politically separate. It's
               | not culturally separate. Unless you purposefully deny any
               | migration.
               | 
               | Hyderabad is not some unique snowflake among the Indian
               | diaspora.
        
               | notahacker wrote:
               | > Kari doesnt imply a specific gravy dish, it implies a
               | spiced sauce component
               | 
               | So a bit like how us Brits use "curry" then...
        
               | dagmx wrote:
               | No because there's no dish that's a curry. It's a
               | component of a dish. Furthermore it's a very specific
               | component historically pepper based.
               | 
               | This is the problem. You borrowed a word that you don't
               | understand the depth of and are now arguing that it
               | should be used in your way when people raise what it
               | actually means. It's a co-opting of a cultures word and
               | cuisines.
               | 
               | There is no dish that's "curry". The British generalized
               | it to be all spiced thick stews.
               | 
               | Would you call an eggs Benedict "a hollandaise"? Or roast
               | potato's as "chips"? No because there's specifics to a
               | dish that you afford it because you're familiar with it.
               | Calling them curries and expecting that to be the actual
               | term is ignorance.
        
               | vrc wrote:
               | Kodi kura was the exact example that popped into my mind.
               | Kura is a cognate/derivative from some Dravidian root
               | similar to Kari/Curry (I believe Malayalam and Tamil use
               | the kari form)
        
             | j45 wrote:
             | Agreed, and, using a word from one area of India might not
             | be suited for applying to all of it.
             | 
             | That cross pollination of words is something the English
             | language seems to do from time to time.
             | 
             | Every area of the Indian subcontinent was a rich area of
             | its own languages, music, food and more.
             | 
             | For me north, South Indian cuisine and everything in the
             | between is worth getting to know as and where it is.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | sampo wrote:
           | > Now, there is a word "Kari" in several South Indian
           | languages but it's used to mean spicy sauce or "kadipoda"
           | which means spice mix, both derived from "black" in reference
           | to the use of black peppercorns.
           | 
           | Is this the same word as "kara", black, in Turkic languages?
           | 
           | Apparently, speculatively, yes:
           | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Reconstruction:Proto-
           | Japonic/...
           | 
           | Also Japanese "kuro".
        
             | dagmx wrote:
             | Yes Turkish and Sanskrit have a lot of shared words or
             | similar ones due to various cultural sharing
        
         | 8ytecoder wrote:
         | Curry comes from the Tamil word (krri kari). The curry we have
         | today is a mix of different influences - Ancient Indian
         | (mustard, fennel, cumin, black pepper, curry leaves), Mughal,
         | and Portuguese (Chilli pepper, tomato). There are subtle but
         | important difference but they all share some similarities -
         | especially the spices. Although curry powder (turmeric,
         | coriander, fenugreek, cinnamon, cumin, black pepper, ginger,
         | and cardamom) - those are every day spices in South India which
         | was where most spices where exported from, historically. And we
         | use that exact combination to this day.
         | 
         | I see it frequently in British cooking shows - trying to lay
         | claim for curry. I'm sure curry has evolved like with any
         | cuisine. But it's absolute bonkers that even James May seems to
         | think that curry originated in Britain. Now, that's some fine
         | poppycock.
        
         | bakul wrote:
         | Supposedly curry comes from the tamil word (transliterated as)
         | "kaRi" which may be related to black pepper (native to India)
         | to spice things up. In all Indian languages the color black has
         | a very similar name (in Gujarati Kali (feminine) or kalo
         | (masculine) etc. -- also the goddess Kali -- the one who is
         | black or death!). More generally associated with something
         | burnt (blackened). Anyway, a spicy sauce would be kaRi. In
         | restaurants in South India you may find various dishes named
         | curry (such as kozhi curry or kozhi kari). But when most
         | everything is spicy, why even say that? Indians would rather
         | know _what_ is in a recipe than _how_ it tastes! [Lot of
         | speculation here: perhaps some knowledgeable Tamil will correct
         | this without getting all upset!]
         | 
         | I should also point out "curry leaves" -- not sure if there is
         | a connection with curry. They are not spicy but are put in many
         | Indian dishes to give them a certain flavor.
        
           | dagmx wrote:
           | To add to your point on curry leaves:
           | 
           | > Curry leaf" comes from the Tamil word "karu-vep-ilai"
           | ('black neem leaf'), leaves of the sweet neem plant Murraya
           | koenigii
        
             | bakul wrote:
             | Thanks! In Gujarati we call it "meettho limdo" or sweet
             | neem. It is dark green but not black (except when left in
             | the 'frig for a few days or on the plant when it is sick!).
        
               | dagmx wrote:
               | There's some possible history further back in our
               | languages where kala might have meant darker not just
               | black.
               | 
               | Similarly the etymology of Krishna (the deity) is both
               | considered "dark" or "black" depending on whom you ask.
               | 
               | I suspect it may be a case where our languages at the
               | time didn't need to delineate between black and a dark
               | colour. Tone/shade was a relative unlike hue.
        
             | vrc wrote:
             | Telugu is karivepaaku. Same stuff.
        
         | Avshalom wrote:
         | Well on the italian note calling 'curry' 'a thing' is like
         | calling 'pasta sauce' 'a thing'. Like sure in a very vague
         | sense but if you went into a restaurant and it had "Noodles
         | with pasta sauce" as a dish it would (I hope) make you pause at
         | least.
        
         | anon291 wrote:
         | I mean there is no dish that is curry similar to how sandwich
         | isn't a good. Sandwiches are a class of food with very
         | disparate things being called sandwiches. Same with curries.
         | The existence of sandwich shops does not mean there is a
         | singular dish called sandwich
        
         | j45 wrote:
         | Handy field reference guide:
         | 
         | - Is it possible Indian restaurants like other cuisine were
         | packaged for a non-Indian audience as much as an Indian
         | audience?
         | 
         | - Too many people faint at the sight of having to read and
         | pronounce an Indian name, how might it go with something that
         | isn't short like naan, cha? Even with naan (which means bread),
         | bread is added on to hear people say bread bread. Cha/chai is
         | tea, and Indians live to hear people say tea tea.
         | 
         | - In this way curry might be a common word added to dishes.
         | 
         | - Next time, at an Indian restaurant, see if you can over hear
         | any Indian guests who exclude the word curry from their
         | sentence when ordering.
         | 
         | - Maybe it's worth asking Indian mothers if the word curry was
         | used by them.
         | 
         | - The etymology of curry is readily available. At most it's a
         | style of cooking (like bbq).
         | 
         | - There's actually over 500 languages in India, but they might
         | have been all the same to the British, so let's just call it
         | all a curry.
         | 
         | The only dish I can think is kadhi which is made with cooked
         | yogurt. It's not spelled or pronounced like curry.
         | 
         | I hope that helps with the offence :)
        
       | riffraff wrote:
       | I see your curry imported by British, and I raise you Spaghetti
       | Naporitan[0], pasta with ketchup and american bacon invented by a
       | Japanese who was inspired by US army rations.
       | 
       | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naporitan
        
         | abudabi123 wrote:
         | Amex celebrity chef Jack Chaplin does a quick chicken curry in
         | five minutes.
         | 
         | + https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nW6BwqVKtsU
        
         | Rebelgecko wrote:
         | Interesting to compare/contrast with how in the Philippines
         | it's popular to eat spaghetti with ketchup (or a ketchup-y
         | sweet tomato sauce) and chopped up hot dog
        
         | JumpCrisscross wrote:
         | And "carbonara is an American recipe" [1]. ( _Budae-jjigae_ is
         | closer to your example [2].)
         | 
         | [1]
         | https://www.ft.com/content/6ac009d5-dbfd-4a86-839e-28bb44b2b...
         | 
         | [2] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budae-jjigae
        
       | sandGorgon wrote:
       | this is a beautiful story, thank you for writing it.
       | 
       | Curry is much like India - you believe in it, thats why it
       | exists. And you will curry controversy no matter what you write
       | ;)
       | 
       | also, in case you didnt know - Ras Behari Bose and Subhash
       | Chandra Bose are the most mysterious of Indian freedom fighters.
       | With the exact history unknown to this day. Ras Behari Bose
       | created the INA and adopted the resolution that made Subhash
       | Chandra Bose as the leader, while he was living in Japan.
       | 
       | Even today, the Indian parliament is rocked with demands that the
       | "secret files" be opened. The Netaji papers were recently
       | declassified - https://nationalarchives.nic.in/content/netaji-
       | papers - but the papers are not complete.
       | 
       | Japan has consistently REFUSED to declassify some of the Bose
       | files (https://thewire.in/history/japan-netaji-death-files)
       | 
       | So you see, the Japanese curry is far far more mysterious than
       | you think !
        
       | throw0101c wrote:
       | _Tempura_ also has foreign origins:
       | 
       | > Tempura _(Tian pura or Tian Fu Luo ,_ tenpura, _[tempWra]) is a
       | typical Japanese dish usually consisting of seafood, meat and
       | vegetables that have been battered and deep fried. The dish was
       | introduced by the Portuguese in Nagasaki through fritter-cooking
       | techniques in the 16th century. The word_ tempura _comes from the
       | Latin word_ tempora, _a term referring to times of fasting when
       | the church dictated that Catholics go meatless.[1]_
       | 
       | * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempura
        
         | dagmx wrote:
         | A lot of Japanese dishes that are popular today have foreign
         | origins.
         | 
         | Tempura, curry, ramen, and salmon for sushi.
         | 
         | It's why I find it hilarious when some people obsess over the
         | authenticity of Japanese food and deride fusion cuisine.
         | 
         | It (much like most great cuisines) is the result of intermixing
         | and interpretations of dishes.
         | 
         | Many Indian dishes too wouldn't have existed without foreign
         | interaction. Potato dishes obviously (which are very prevalent)
         | but even things like Butter chicken or many Mughal based
         | dishes.
         | 
         | The origin of food is in many ways just as as interesting as
         | the etymology of words.
        
           | ipqk wrote:
           | One of my favorite Indian dishes is Poori Masala (eaten with
           | Poori obviously), which is mostly potatoes & tomatoes, both
           | of which come from the New World.
        
             | dagmx wrote:
             | I was trying to think of which of my childhood dishes could
             | have existed without the new world imports.
             | 
             | So much of Indian cuisine today is so heavily influenced by
             | the new world.
             | 
             | I found this Reddit thread that went into it a bit which I
             | found quite fascinating.
             | 
             | https://reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/4rwri1/what_was
             | _...
             | 
             | Even the lentil dishes, where lentils were native, now have
             | a lot of new world additions to enhance them.
        
           | Taywee wrote:
           | Very many dishes in nearly every cuisine have at least some
           | foreign origins. The majority of spices and seasonings used
           | in most countries originate from many places all over the
           | world.
           | 
           | The idea of any pure culture (locally, ethnically,
           | linguistically, or culinarily) is a complete myth, unless
           | that culture has been entirely isolated from every other
           | culture for its entire development.
        
             | j45 wrote:
             | A lot of Indian dishes have Persian, Mughal influences.
        
               | danans wrote:
               | And it goes way beyond Persian influence.
               | 
               | vindaloo ~= Portuguese vinhalo (wine/vinegar flavored)
               | 
               | Southeast asian ingredients introduced via trading
               | empires based in South India (i.e. nutmeg).
               | 
               | Tomatoes, chilies, potatoes, all pre-Columbian American
               | products introduced to India by the Portuguese.
               | 
               | Tea (from China by way of the British)
               | 
               | Coffee (introduced even earlier than tea via the Arab
               | trading networks via Yemen during the Ottoman empire).
               | 
               | Some things are actually bidirectional. Biryani, the
               | Mughal/Persian rice dish emerged after rice was
               | introduced to the middle east in ancient times, probably
               | via India, and it came back in the form of Biryani.
        
               | cuteboy19 wrote:
               | Tea in India came by way of land, before the British
        
           | vrc wrote:
           | Potato, tomato, chili.
           | https://contingentmagazine.org/2020/06/25/curry-before-
           | colum...
        
           | franciscop wrote:
           | Salmon for sushi seems not to be the famous story that was
           | going around. Like, it has all the tenets of a nice fake
           | story, talking about Japan and how a foreign more familiar
           | power outsmarted them, but apparently salmon was popular way
           | before Norway theoretically started marketing it:
           | 
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1k4x9FrD5k4
        
             | dagmx wrote:
             | That video isn't the refutation I think he thinks it is.
             | I'm sure there's more nuance than "Norway invented salmon
             | sushi" but his argument is a little flakey imho.
             | 
             | His premise is based on American documents of sushi, but
             | salmon was already a popular fish in the west by then. So
             | it stands to reason that they'd use local fish for this
             | dish that depends on good quality protein.
             | 
             | I'm not saying he's necessarily wrong but his process of
             | arriving at the result is weird, so I don't think he's
             | necessarily right either.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-04-01 23:03 UTC)