[HN Gopher] PC keyboard hides an interesting secret
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       PC keyboard hides an interesting secret
        
       Author : jandeboevrie
       Score  : 104 points
       Date   : 2023-04-01 05:31 UTC (17 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (linuxjedi.co.uk)
 (TXT) w3m dump (linuxjedi.co.uk)
        
       | HPsquared wrote:
       | Modern version of this would be nice, using WiFi Direct and a VNC
       | server for using phone as a screen.
        
       | bdcravens wrote:
       | > The one glaring issue here, is that this machine's hard drive
       | has not been cleaned out. I bought it from a computer recycling
       | company so I would have expected the hard drive to been erased.
       | But a quick skim of the drive and I can find documents, emails
       | and unfortunately even porn.
       | 
       | This is probably pretty common, and there's so much opportunity
       | for abuse. I can only assume that for all of the security out
       | there, a trip to thrift stores and garage sales would keep your
       | average identity thief busy for very little money.
        
         | h2odragon wrote:
         | People throw their PCs away. Many places gather "e-waste" in
         | special piles for recycling. Just digging through that pile
         | will get you more than you wanted.
        
         | fortran77 wrote:
         | Not that _I_ ever have anything untoward on my computers, but
         | this is why I sledgehammer all my PC drives before recycling
         | them. (My biggest fear is there 's enough information to get
         | access to a bank account, or otherwise impersonate me.)
         | 
         | Today, I use whole-disk-encryption on everything, but I still
         | wonder if there's ever a hidden partition or unallocated space
         | with something on it, and it's not worth worrying about it.
        
           | NikolaNovak wrote:
           | I assume whole disk encryption is no longer the ssd killer it
           | used to be?
        
             | matja wrote:
             | It was ever?
        
               | NikolaNovak wrote:
               | It was my understanding that yes.
               | 
               | OS encryption would prevent controller from understanding
               | what's on the drive and managing it correctly, up to and
               | including effectively disabling trim command as
               | controller would never see blocks as empty.
               | 
               | This is back in days of ocz vertex. It wasn't like
               | advertised / warned on the box, it would _work_... Just
               | like western digital didn 't warn about wd red becoming
               | SMR drive while being advertised for Nas. But it would
               | eventually kill performance and drive. You'd have to read
               | Tom's hardware and anadtech etc to learn about it. I
               | don't really follow anymore so I don't know how nicely os
               | full drive encryption and ssds play today.
        
               | matja wrote:
               | FDE doesn't prevent TRIM, but the dm-crypt implementation
               | defaults to disabling TRIM because it has theoretical
               | security consequences. The option to enable it was
               | introduced in Linux 3.1 (2011)
        
             | flaviut wrote:
             | No, definitely not. You can either use the SSD's built-in
             | firmware encryption, which is always on anyways (to allow
             | for fast erase), or you can configure your system to send
             | TRIM commands.
        
           | makapuf wrote:
           | This seems unneeded waste, maybe 10 random complete writes
           | (or/and usage of paranoid safe deletion utilities) would be
           | sufficient to erase the disk effectively?
        
             | bombcar wrote:
             | Physical destruction is "for sure" but a simple full wipe
             | and reinstall is fine for most people.
             | 
             | But most people don't even bother. And with browsers saving
             | passwords it's probably even a worse idea now.
        
             | maxerickson wrote:
             | If it was used for very long it will be old enough to not
             | really be worth much anyway.
        
             | Dalewyn wrote:
             | The first rule of erasing a drive is you can't erase a
             | drive, whether it's a solid state or hard drive.
             | 
             | If you want or need to render the data on a drive
             | inaccessible by any and all means, there really is no
             | option other than physical destruction of the drive.
        
               | crazygringo wrote:
               | If you use full disk encryption, all you have to do is
               | throw away the key. Works for solid state and hard
               | drives.
        
             | fbdab103 wrote:
             | Single pass disk encryption or zeroing is fine if you are
             | not facing a nation state actor.
             | 
             | I do not think I have seen any credible threats that over-
             | written data extraction works on modern drives. Maybe there
             | are tricks where the SSD knows better and allocates blocks
             | off to the side where it is not getting wiped, but those
             | are supposedly addressed by TRIM (with dubious vendor
             | support)
             | 
             | If someone comes across a drive that is zeroed or
             | randomized, who is going to attempt some forensic
             | investigation to retrieve the contents?
        
               | fortran77 wrote:
               | I'm not worried about a nation state spending a billion
               | dollars. I'm worried about someone looking at an
               | unalloated section of the drive, or in the sectors that
               | the drive marked "bad", etc.
               | 
               | A low-level 0 write just takes a long time on a drive of
               | even 1TB. So I sledge. And then I can look at the drive
               | and know it's OK to toss.
        
               | Gordonjcp wrote:
               | Zeroing it is fine no matter who you're facing, to be
               | honest.
               | 
               | The NSA don't have some big magic machine that can
               | recover data that's been overwritten. It's gone.
               | 
               | The idea of using some latent amount of data on the disk
               | and somehow averaging it all out to get the old data
               | might maybe have worked a tiny bit on old MFM drives in
               | the 1980s.
        
             | fortran77 wrote:
             | That requires connecting the drive to a working computer
             | and hours of time. Compared to several quick blows. The
             | metals in the drive can still be recycled even if the glass
             | platters are shattered.
        
               | BenjiWiebe wrote:
               | Since when are the platters glass?
        
               | fortran77 wrote:
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_disk_drive_platter
        
               | crazygringo wrote:
               | I had no idea, but it turns out they're a mix:
               | 
               | > _Platters are typically made using an aluminium, glass
               | or ceramic substrate. As of 2015, laptop hard drive
               | platters are made from glass while aluminum platters are
               | often found in desktop computers._
               | 
               | > _In 1990, Toshiba released the MK1122FC, the first hard
               | drive to use a glass substrate... It was originally
               | designed for laptops, for which the greater shock
               | resistance of glass substrates are more suitable._
        
               | roughly wrote:
               | Huh, TIL. And a link from there to explain why:
               | 
               | https://books.google.com/books?id=BjoEAAAAMBAJ&dq=hard+di
               | sk+...
        
               | [deleted]
        
           | tenebrisalietum wrote:
           | Zeroing the hard drive is sufficient; e.g. with Linux dd
           | command. Old spinning rust is great for encrypted backups (I
           | treat them like tapes).
        
           | bdcravens wrote:
           | Even a simple reformat (which isn't very secure) would be
           | worlds better than what happened here.
        
         | sushiburps wrote:
         | At the height of bitcoin I wonder if the value of e-waste
         | magnetic storage should have technically been higher due to the
         | possibility of salvaging a lost wallet. Like ore mining, but
         | for data.
        
           | harvey9 wrote:
           | Like this
           | 
           | "Newport man's plea to find PS210m hard drive in tip"
           | 
           | https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-55658942
        
         | indymike wrote:
         | When I need to destroy a hard drive, I use 1TBSP of Thermite
         | (or stump remover if you go to the local ag supply store). Of
         | course, the drive isn't very useful after, but it's so much
         | fun.
        
       | macintux wrote:
       | Reminds me of the Coleco Adam, which was a computer combined with
       | a printer. My college roommate owned one, which I took shameless
       | advantage of.
        
         | jonstewart wrote:
         | My first computer! And: sort of. There was a separate box for
         | the CPU, but the power switch was located on the daisywheel
         | printer.
         | 
         | The word processor was in ROM, it had a slot for playing Coleco
         | game cartridges, with two game controllers, and then there was
         | its tape deck. It came with tapes for Buck Rogers and the BASIC
         | interpreter. Once BASIC had been loaded, then you could swap in
         | your own tapes for saving and restoring programs. It generally
         | took a couple of minutes to use the tape drive.
        
         | anonymouskimmer wrote:
         | My dad's first computer before the C64 (portable!). I vaguely
         | remember playing a space shooter game on it.
        
       | amelius wrote:
       | Modern, more powerful, more compact, equivalent:
       | 
       | https://www.raspberrypi.com/products/raspberry-pi-400/
       | 
       | By the way, people say it's a great learning tool for kids but
       | when I search for "kid using pi400" on youtube there are zero
       | results.
        
         | tgv wrote:
         | Is it more powerful? Well, more memory, better video, but in
         | terms of OP/s?
         | 
         | But I don't think it's such a great thing for kids per se. It
         | depends on the experimentation environment they get. The
         | hardware is almost irrelevant. Something as direct as a
         | Commodore 64 looks more appealing to me than VSCode on a
         | Raspberry.
        
           | amiga-workbench wrote:
           | Its a Pentium 4, its going to spend half of its clock cycles
           | with a stalled pipeline.
        
           | bombcar wrote:
           | Unless they're following a particular course based on a
           | specific thing like a Pi they'll probably be better off with
           | some older repurposed hardware, an old desktop PC with some
           | sort of Linux perhaps.
           | 
           | The Pi shines when you're interfacing with relays and sensors
           | and stuff, for software alone a PC or laptop will be fine.
        
         | speedgoose wrote:
         | Are the raspberry pi still produced? They are always out of
         | stock unless for very brief periods on some random stores,
         | which makes me believe some may purchase some old stock once in
         | a while but nothing is getting out of a factory.
        
           | pclmulqdq wrote:
           | The original pis were made to sell some chips that Broadcom
           | had a ton of excess inventory for, and needed to move (hence
           | why the price was so low compared to other SBCs at the time -
           | the main SoCs were free). The modern version is now competing
           | for a chip that's in demand, and can't offer the same price
           | that other people can. They are still being produced since
           | Broadcom doesn't want to cut them off completely, but not
           | nearly as available.
        
             | mazurnification wrote:
             | Do you have source for the claims? I doubt especially of
             | free parts. As of rumors I have heard about Broadcom it is
             | extremely "capitalistic" company. If you move a lot of
             | chips price can go down a lot (due the fact that NRE
             | divides to more units). The cost of chip manufacturing
             | alone is not that big - example Apple A14 bionic chip was
             | estimated to cost 17$ to manufacture [0] and it should be
             | waaaaay more expensive than anything in RPI.
             | 
             | [0]
             | https://www.idownloadblog.com/2021/01/07/iphone-12-bill-
             | of-m...
        
         | squarefoot wrote:
         | Unobtanium as everything Raspberry Pi today.
         | 
         | So Why not this one which is roughly the same thing but is
         | available for purchase in hundreds?
         | 
         | http://www.orangepi.org/html/hardWare/computerAndMicrocontro...
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJyRGnLPBe8
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IS7qhKF8wGE
         | 
         | I know the Raspberry Pi has that huge community behind, but
         | alternatives like this one can spark the interest of kids who
         | need incentives to grow, and this one offers well above the
         | minimum necessary without serving them the whole dinner ready
         | to eat. When I cut my teeth with M68k asm in the early 90s all
         | I had was a terrible book poorly translated in Italian whose
         | code examples were written half in German and half in English,
         | a local BBS and no Internet; they can do a lot more with
         | today's tools without any need of a huge community.
        
           | LeoPanthera wrote:
           | > Unobtanium as everything Raspberry Pi today.
           | 
           | You picked a bad time to complain about this, because a whole
           | bunch of Pi 400s have been popping up in stock over the past
           | few days.
           | 
           | rpilocator doesn't track the 400, but they do tweet when they
           | see them in stock: https://twitter.com/rpilocator
           | 
           | As for "why not" the alternatives, it's because they get no
           | ongoing support, and don't run mainline Linux, so you're
           | stuck with what they ship with, and can never update them.
        
           | cout wrote:
           | One problem with this for kids is if it is connected to the
           | monitor with a cable, kids used to wireless keyboard may try
           | to grab it and get a surprise when it gets disconnected or
           | pulls the monitor down with the keyboard.
        
             | RobotToaster wrote:
             | That would certainly be an important lesson.
        
           | fbdab103 wrote:
           | $136 on Amazon ($99 from AliExpress). Color me very
           | impressed. Given the modern web, probably too under-powered
           | to be a great experience for a daily driver, but probably not
           | terrible if you are not a tab addict like myself.
           | 
           | My problem is the ARM chip and how likely I am going to have
           | problems running a non-blessed OS on the thing. A year from
           | now, will it be able to install a new kernel?
           | 
           | I also have to face reality in that I have zero real
           | applications for the thing other than a cute novelty. I think
           | almost everyone would be better served by a NUC ($400+) or
           | refurbished SFF PC ($100-200 can be very competitive
           | hardware).
        
             | justeleblanc wrote:
             | Even Microsoft is going full steam ahead on arm64. It's
             | here to stay.
        
             | squarefoot wrote:
             | > My problem is the ARM chip and how likely I am going to
             | have problems running a non-blessed OS on the thing.
             | 
             | ARM shouldn't be a problem for a long time; there's a huge
             | number of boards out there using that architecture and most
             | of them are well supported by Linux. Here are some Armbian
             | images: https://users.armbian.com/balbes150/opi800/ The
             | user is reliable and a regular Armbian
             | contributor/maintainer.
             | 
             | > zero real applications for the thing other than a cute
             | novelty
             | 
             | I think the main selling point of these devices is for kids
             | to carry them in their backpack when they study with their
             | friends, so that they have all their stuff in a single
             | device that is more usable and safe than a cellphone and
             | needs only a video connection, without messing with the
             | family computer. A relatively low cost independent device
             | with exposed gpio ports could also have some uses in a lab
             | to drive external hardware, microcontrollers programming,
             | etc. If I had one I would probably use it for such tasks,
             | including audio measurement by adding an external sound
             | card.
        
           | bioemerl wrote:
           | All the raspberry pi alternatives have some really Achilles
           | heel software problems where they don't properly support
           | everything the raspberry pi does. I will never buy one just
           | because I want to run software on these computers and 90% of
           | the time the thing I want to just doesn't support these
           | things natively.
        
         | gaudat wrote:
         | I think that is something YouTube rolled out a year or two ago
         | to isolate adult YouTube from kids. You know sometimes a video
         | gets marked with a YT kids banner and comments are disabled and
         | recommendations on the side bar replaced with generic videos.
        
         | FpUser wrote:
         | Pi4 shenanigans (availability and price) completely screwed up
         | one of my projects. I will not touch it ever again.
        
       | bigjimmyk3 wrote:
       | I can think of a pretty obvious reason why the hard drive wasn't
       | wiped: they didn't know it was there. A normal person processing
       | a pile of donations would probably look at this and think "huh a
       | strangely heavy keyboard," then move on to the next item.
        
         | canadapups wrote:
         | I didn't think of that. I guess a completely logical place to
         | stash your porn.
        
         | zirgs wrote:
         | But why would you donate your hw without wiping it?
        
           | StanislavPetrov wrote:
           | Maybe the previous owner was deceased and it was gathered in
           | an estate sale? Or left in a storage locker which the owner
           | missed a payment on? There are many reasons!
        
             | Gordonjcp wrote:
             | That was my first thought. Maybe there are personal photos
             | or messages that someone would like a copy of on it.
        
       | skhr0680 wrote:
       | The original owner must have liked using filters in Photoshop. I
       | can't think of another reason someone would pair a CPU like that
       | with modest(for 2002) 512MB RAM and 40GB HDD
        
         | stereolambda wrote:
         | Not sure about today, but there was a time PCs were sold on
         | overspecced CPUs. The consumer would look at the clock speed
         | and think he is getting a "fast" computer. The vendor would
         | pocket the savings on putting in weaker everything else.
        
           | anthk wrote:
           | AMD Athlon 2000, 1666 MHZ, just 256MB RAM, and a Geforce2 MX
           | of 32MB.
           | 
           | People with a Radeon 9700 64MB, 512MB of RAM and a PIII 1GHZ
           | did it better.
        
       | weinzierl wrote:
       | These keyboard PCs were quite popular in the late 90s. I think
       | because many home computers came in that format and manufacturers
       | worried that clunky PCs would not be accepted. Turned out that
       | wasn't the case.
        
       | kazinator wrote:
       | > _The built-in speakers are pretty much what you would expect
       | from 2002, pretty much no bass to them, very much akin to average
       | laptop speakers at the time._
       | 
       | Average laptop speakers have no bass today; I have no idea what
       | this person is on about.
        
       | mxmlnkn wrote:
       | I know the graphs but I still find it amazing to see that this
       | 20+ years old system runs with approximately the same CPU core
       | frequency as today's hardware. The amount of RAM wouldn't suffice
       | today, though.
        
         | kevin_thibedeau wrote:
         | It does half the work per clock cycle because of the marketing
         | driven design.
        
       | opless wrote:
       | Title missing the word "this"
        
       | NaN1352 wrote:
       | That's so cool. Like an Amiga, but with Intel Inside ;)
       | 
       | I would not have been impressed by the constant churning of the
       | HDD though (just a guess).
        
       | Kwpolska wrote:
       | The layout with the Windows sticker photo being the largest and
       | the most prominent made me think that "this is a keyboard with a
       | Windows license". Back in the day, this was a thing, at least in
       | Poland, with people selling OEM licenses of Windows attached to
       | mice and keyboards and claiming they were legitimate (which I
       | doubt, but I also doubt Microsoft cared).
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-04-01 23:03 UTC)