[HN Gopher] When Will AI Take Your Job?
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       When Will AI Take Your Job?
        
       Author : JSeymourATL
       Score  : 61 points
       Date   : 2023-03-26 22:02 UTC (58 minutes ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (unchartedterritories.tomaspueyo.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (unchartedterritories.tomaspueyo.com)
        
       | onion2k wrote:
       | I think my job is reasonably safe simply because "AI" is never
       | going to be as effective at it as "me + AI". Someone has to be
       | there to understand the problem in human terms in order to know
       | what to tell the AI to do. I've recently started pushing myself
       | to take a more Systems Thinking approach to solving problems, and
       | to start using AI in my work, precisely because I see this as a
       | change that's coming. It is inevitable. I might as well embrace
       | it.
       | 
       | Also, and maybe this is selfish, I suspect fewer people are going
       | to see tech as a good career option in the very long term (10+
       | years). The experience I have now puts me ahead right now, but if
       | there are fewer devs entering the industry in a decade it'll keep
       | me in work for a long time. I'm think (hope!) I'm going to be OK.
       | 
       | If I was a junior right now, or a student, I would see AI as a
       | _much_ greater threat.
        
         | eutectic wrote:
         | "never" is a long time.
        
         | dudul wrote:
         | > "AI" is never going to be as effective at it as "me + AI"
         | 
         | Yeah, but which one will be cheaper?
        
         | theLiminator wrote:
         | "AI" is never going to be as effective at it as "me + AI".
         | 
         | That's what people said about chess ai.
        
           | lisasays wrote:
           | Not comparable - that's a very limited slice of AI we're
           | talking about.
        
           | User23 wrote:
           | Has Magnus or a similarly good player ever played against an
           | AI using an AI to assist him? That sounds like it could be
           | interesting.
        
             | williadc wrote:
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlsen%E2%80%93Niemann_contr
             | o...
             | 
             | This is not exactly what you asked, but it shows that high-
             | level players are using AI to play better chess.
        
           | ZephyrBlu wrote:
           | Chess is not a team sport.
        
         | RyEgswuCsn wrote:
         | As AI grows stronger, the "me" part is going to matter less and
         | less.
         | 
         | A "graduate + AI" might be nearly as effective as "you + AI",
         | while being significantly more... cost-efficient.
        
         | brandall10 wrote:
         | I think the better question to ask in the here and now is - is
         | 1 developer + AI as effective as 2 developers without? What
         | about 3, 5, etc?
        
         | retinaros wrote:
         | well if they pay you for you and suddenly you are only 50% of
         | the equation guess what will be your shareholder next move
        
         | Vespasian wrote:
         | Warning: speculation incoming.
         | 
         | Yeah that's me. I'm hoping that if I keep up to speed as much
         | as possible I'm employable for the next 20-30 years until
         | (early) retirement.
         | 
         | I started transitioning away from programming before that (for
         | unrelated reasons) but I'm starting to think that it was a good
         | call. If I am to become the COBOL guy of the future I'd
         | consider that a win.
         | 
         | We'll see I guess.
        
         | luxurytent wrote:
         | My hope (as a mid 30s developer) is that I can effectively use
         | AI to become a Me+ version of myself, and this helps me level
         | up my career enough that I appropriately ride the AI wave, pick
         | the right engineering positions/companies, and am able to
         | effectively retire in ~5-10 years.
         | 
         | I really do feel that I have like 5 years left of my currently
         | high income before I am making what my plumber friend makes.
         | I'm OK with that, as I'll be out of the early child rearing
         | years, but also, phew, it's scary!
        
       | darod wrote:
       | If AI is solving everything and ultimately phasing workers out,
       | then what exactly would you be educating your kids in? Human's
       | limiting factor is the time that it takes them to learn something
       | (18-27 years of education depending on the field). What job would
       | be worth striving for? They'd be training for jobs that a future
       | AI would be trying to phase out. This whole article just
       | described how most of the the highest paid workers (doctors,
       | lawyers, driving, logistics, film, music, radio, etc etc) would
       | be automated. I don't know what you'd need a person for at that
       | point. Feels like a race to the bottom.
        
       | cleandreams wrote:
       | It's not just issues of tech and economics but perhaps more
       | importantly, of power. If workers have political representation
       | (power) than these productivity increases can feed into wage
       | increases and hour reductions. A big if. In USA, workers are
       | pretty powerless. That means it is most likely to result in
       | massive waves of unemployment and political instability.
       | 
       | When I first moved to the city in which I live there were NO
       | homeless. That was in 1980. Since then the working class economy
       | here crashed and the professionals took over. Now we step over
       | bodies in the streets.
       | 
       | I think it is likely that the AI wave will be this, but worse.
       | 
       | BTW my last job was at an AI company as a high level tech
       | contributor.
        
         | kortilla wrote:
         | >When I first moved to the city in which I live there were NO
         | homeless. That was in 1980.
         | 
         | The same people were still unemployed and on the fringe of
         | society. They just used to be rounded up and put in mental
         | institutions.
         | 
         | The labor statistics are pretty clear that the 80s weren't a
         | better time for employment.
         | 
         | Visible homelessness you are referring to is generally a drug
         | policy issue more than anything.
        
         | colordrops wrote:
         | There has to be a tipping point when enough jobs are done by
         | machines that there are not enough wage earners to buy products
         | and services created by these machines. At that point a choice
         | must be made, to either take the machines and lock them behind
         | secure walls to only be used by the privileged and leave
         | everyone else to squalor, or to fundamentally change the
         | structure of society where work and money are no longer core
         | elements. I've got my bets on which one will occur.
        
           | hammyhavoc wrote:
           | Which one do you think will occur?
        
             | colordrops wrote:
             | I think the movie Elysium makes a decent prediction for a
             | potential near term future.
        
           | mc32 wrote:
           | It looks like AI is more likely to render knowledge workers
           | less valuable rather than making low skill workers less
           | valuable.
           | 
           | Now if you get AI + Robots (with dense energy) to work
           | together, yeah we're all in trouble.
        
         | siftrics wrote:
         | I agree.
         | 
         | I should be forced to pay to keep all the arithmetic workers
         | employed, even though we now have calculators that make them
         | obsolete.
         | 
         | Why should arbitrary people be kept afloat in exchange for
         | doing nothing?
        
           | mitthrowaway2 wrote:
           | Okay, so, the year is 2036 and your second child has just
           | celebrated her first birthday. The economy is humming,
           | production of all goods and commodities are way up.
           | Unfortunately, you and your spouse are both unemployed at the
           | moment, because for any skill that you have to offer the
           | labor market, a machine is already available that does the
           | job better, faster, and more cheaply. Quicker fingers,
           | stronger arms, faster legs, and now a mind.
           | 
           | Your kid is hungry and your savings account is running low.
           | What do you do?
        
       | timeon wrote:
       | > The main winners of these trends will be all of us consumers,
       | with access to much better content. Also, the best creators, who
       | will use these tools to generate lots of great content and rake
       | in its benefits.
       | 
       | Maybe yes. But I wonder. Take that example with disappearing
       | local football leagues: what is impact for local communities?
       | When everything is "centralized" to very best providers... Is
       | best always best?
        
         | kkielhofner wrote:
         | Are you talking American Football or the "actually using your
         | feet" one (Soccer to us)?
         | 
         | Youth (American) Football is dying because the data on CTE and
         | other debilitating injuries is clear and parents are less
         | enthusiastic/willing to allow their kids to damage their
         | brains.
        
       | lordnacho wrote:
       | Tanks may have made cavalry obsolete (was is tanks? I don't
       | know), but they didn't make generals obsolete. When was there
       | ever a military engagement that was described in terms of
       | commanders facing off? It's been the story since the beginning of
       | war.
       | 
       | Likewise there are decision makers in civilian life. They decide
       | all sorts of things, sometimes relying on people to implement
       | their decisions, sometimes machines. Sometimes they use a machine
       | to replace a lower level decision maker. But there's always a
       | boss.
       | 
       | This is what will determine whether your job is automated away.
        
       | dwighttk wrote:
       | In that first chart there is not a single test listed that people
       | start at a job based on their performance on the test.
        
       | lolinder wrote:
       | I don't worry about AI automated away my job not because I don't
       | think it's possible (though I do think it's much _much_ further
       | out than the hype would suggest), but because an AI automating
       | away software creation is the economic equivalent of nuclear war:
       | it would irrevocably alter everything about the way the world is
       | run and is therefore impossible to adequately prepare for on an
       | individual basis.
       | 
       | Most of us in software are automating other people's jobs: we
       | learn and understand requirements and build things that make
       | other people more productive or erase their jobs entirely. The
       | rate of automation is right now limited in large part by the
       | availability and cost of software engineers. If AGI can reduce
       | that cost to ~0, then a _massive_ percentage of the economy would
       | be wiped out in a matter of months. What is any individual
       | software developer supposed to do to prepare for that scenario?
        
         | kajumix wrote:
         | If AI automates software creation, which automates everybody
         | else's job, why does it follow that a "massive percentage of
         | the economy would be wiped out?" What is so undesirable about
         | productivity going up by a factor of a 100 or a 1000 and
         | everyone living like an aristocrat, because machines do all the
         | work? Why is full employment such an obsession?
        
           | lolinder wrote:
           | I didn't say it would be undesirable! Just that it would
           | completely alter the world in ways that we _cannot_ prepare
           | for on an individual basis.
           | 
           | Ideally, we move to UBI and, as you say, everyone lives like
           | an aristocrat. But we don't get there by trying to hedge
           | against AI taking over our individual jobs.
        
           | mostlysimilar wrote:
           | Because the benefits of these tools are not distributed
           | equally. The ultra wealthy will become even more wealthy and
           | the unwashed masses will starve.
           | 
           | Of course the ideal outcome is the Star Trek post-scarcity
           | utopia. But humans are not currently incentivized in a way
           | that I can see leading to that outcome in our lifetimes.
        
           | docheinestages wrote:
           | What exactly should people do if they're not employed?
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | thedonkeycometh wrote:
       | [dead]
        
       | ETH_start wrote:
       | This got me thinking: as more of what can be produced with
       | existing technology, is made trivial-to-produce through enhanced
       | automation (e.g. AI), one area that will still require labor, and
       | that people will still be willing to expend resources on to
       | procure, is the creation of new technology.
       | 
       | It would be in our interest to remove legal impediments to
       | raising capital for new ventures, so that more of the labor freed
       | up by automation of existing industries can be allocated to the
       | creation of new industries.
       | 
       | Such a world would see more kickstarters, equity crowdsales,
       | crypto token sales and DAOs for collaborative creation, and more
       | people employed in the ventures these capital raising projects
       | fund.
        
       | analog31 wrote:
       | Oddly enough half of my job is learning to get answers (from the
       | physical world), the other half finding out of those answers are
       | true. So far no human has come close to threatening my job if
       | they don't actually care about those things. So it will be when
       | AI learns to care about the truth.
        
       | impulser_ wrote:
       | It's really feeling like AI is the new crypto. Majority of the
       | people hyping up AI are directly benefited from the raise in AI.
       | The same way the people that were hyping up crypto either ran
       | blockchain, dapp, or were VC invested into it.
       | 
       | I don't know the writer of this blog post, but I'm willing to bet
       | he has posts about how crypto will replace the financial system.
        
         | lolinder wrote:
         | You'd win that bet:
         | https://unchartedterritories.tomaspueyo.com/about
         | 
         | > I believe Bitcoin will replace gold, cryptocurrencies will
         | replace fiat currencies, and smart contracts will upend how we
         | deal with each other.
         | 
         | https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aunchartedterritories....
        
       | 8note wrote:
       | There's an anti-productivity link round the front page that
       | answers this well - the amount of useless work to be done is
       | infinite, and growing productivity on useless work only lets you
       | do more useless work.
       | 
       | The more useless work ai is able to do, the more useless work
       | will be asked of it. The ai doesn't have opinions about what it
       | should be doing, so without people to push it into doing the
       | right thing, it's going to be answering a lot of emails
        
       | Temporary_31337 wrote:
       | This, just like many other takes, confirms that there will be a
       | short term boom in applying AI to everything. If you are in your
       | 30s or 40s and surf this wave correctly, this may very well be
       | the last job you will ever do. So my plan is to learn how to plug
       | GPT to excel, databases etc and provide AI for the smaller
       | companies that can't integrate AI like Salesforce and big
       | companies like Azure Professional Services will not find them
       | profitable enough to deal with.
        
         | kkielhofner wrote:
         | This is a good strategy.
         | 
         | In the early days of widespread internet connectivity (dial-up)
         | it generally went two ways:
         | 
         | 1) You lived in a big city and AOL/Compuserve/Prodigy/etc was a
         | local call. Practically everyone had it.
         | 
         | 2) You lived "somewhere else" and some random guy you could pay
         | had a T1 and a bunch of modems in a garage (this was me).
         | 
         | Eventually it became worth it and technology advanced enough
         | (with demand) for cable cos to deploy cable modems. At first
         | only in dense metro areas, then slowly out to more rural areas.
         | 
         | Point is - there's a TON of opportunity for "guy with a T1 and
         | modems in a garage" in this space. There is a huge market of
         | ignored and underserved
         | businesses/customers/applications/integrations/etc that (like
         | AOL/Cable Cos) the big AI guys don't care about (yet).
        
         | robopsychology wrote:
         | What do you mean by last job? As in making money off of this
         | wave by lucrative contract gigs or an acquisition?
        
           | nonbirithm wrote:
           | Even if all the jobs creating CRUD apps are automated away,
           | there will probably still be an interest in automating them
           | even faster. LLMs are currently the state of the art
           | technique for doing so, hence there will be a continual need
           | for more AI engineers/researchers.
           | 
           | And if something that performs better than current LLMs comes
           | around, all those engineers will shift over to whatever field
           | develops them.
        
           | iamflimflam1 wrote:
           | As in there won't be any more jobs for you to do...
        
           | rnk wrote:
           | I'd see it as a last job. In terms of you can do it for 20
           | years and then retire. Not as jobs won't exist anymore.
        
         | aarong11 wrote:
         | Right now seems like the right time to be doing this for sure.
         | There are also a lot of potential applications for GPT to be
         | used to solve problems that were previously too expensive or
         | infeasible to be done by humans at scale. It definitely doesn't
         | hurt for you to hedge your bets and try to learn how the tech
         | works at the bare minimum.
        
       | rcpt wrote:
       | Seems like landlord continues to be the only secure career path.
        
         | colordrops wrote:
         | Until an AI corners the real estate market.
        
       | blhack wrote:
       | Squarespace was supposed to take away the jobs of people who make
       | websites, but it didn't. The same people who you used to hire to
       | make a website for you are still doing that, but now they just
       | use squarespace for it.
       | 
       | I saw a recent quote for a _very_ basic, static website that was
       | greater than $10k. This would be about a day of work to put
       | together in squarespace.
       | 
       | AI is not going to take away jobs, it's just going to make the
       | people already doing them more efficient.
        
         | prawn wrote:
         | A few points on this from someone who's been building websites
         | for 25 years (I started around when images were added to HTML)
         | -
         | 
         | The web designers don't hear from many of these previous
         | prospects who now go straight to Squarespace.
         | 
         | When people come to me for a Shopify site, it's usually because
         | they've done all but the hardest 10%. Then they want to pay me
         | a tiny amount to do the most unpredictable and difficult 10%.
         | Usually something custom/difficult within the parts of the
         | platform that are locked down.
         | 
         | I've seen budgets from local brand-name companies go from $20k
         | for a build to $2k.
         | 
         | Often, the people charging $10k for a Squarespace site are
         | justifying the majority of that with related services
         | (copywriting, photography, content, marketing, etc). Many
         | surviving web companies needed to become agencies. Shopify has
         | some automated marketing options now. Copywriting is
         | increasingly done with ChatGPT/similar.
         | 
         | Don't get me wrong - this is all very liberating for the client
         | side and a boon for platforms like Squarespace and Shopify, but
         | don't underestimate the upheaval for web designers.
        
         | Joeboy wrote:
         | > AI is not going to take away jobs, it's just going to make
         | the people already doing them more efficient
         | 
         | In the same sort of way that wordprocessing just made typists
         | more efficient.
        
           | ModernMech wrote:
           | Or if you want to make a more direct comparison, it's like
           | high level languages and compilers making punch card writers
           | more efficient.
        
         | tyingq wrote:
         | It's hard to predict. Consider bank tellers. ATMs initially
         | allowed banks to run more local branches, resulting in more
         | jobs. But now that ATMs, especially the ones inside, are VERY
         | full function, the job numbers are reducing fast.
         | 
         | https://www.vox.com/2017/5/8/15584268/eric-schmidt-alphabet-...
        
           | lisasays wrote:
           | _The job numbers are reducing fast._
           | 
           | Are they? That piece is from 2017, and I still see bank
           | tellers everywhere.
           | 
           | It seems the increased efficiency of ATMs caused _some_
           | reduction in the count of teller jobs - but their number has
           | again stabilized.
           | 
           | ATMs meanwhile seem pretty much maxed out with their current
           | feature set.
        
           | 13of40 wrote:
           | Even that one's a little bit meta, since fewer people are
           | using cash now.
        
           | chrisan wrote:
           | I don't think its because ATMs are so good/functional as much
           | as it is people just don't use cash and deposite checks like
           | they once did.
           | 
           | > "because of industry consolidation and technological
           | change,"
        
         | nemo44x wrote:
         | Right. But now Squarespace can integrate a prompt that has a
         | conversation with you and build a site and continues to iterate
         | on it until you're happy. This adds very little cost to
         | Squarespace. Maybe it gets most people to 80%. The last 20%
         | will be a service provided by a human.
        
           | flax wrote:
           | Then the last 20% was the only interesting part in the first
           | place.
        
           | colordrops wrote:
           | Until gpt-5 shaves away 17% more, then gpt-6 erases that
           | final 3%.
        
         | spookybones wrote:
         | Where do you see quotes like this?
        
         | ehnto wrote:
         | This is an interesting example, because they probably don't use
         | squarespace for it as they are likely more effective with other
         | types of tooling. Whilst squarespace is a great general purpose
         | tool for people who don't know specialized tools, a specialist
         | will be more effective with different tools.
         | 
         | That's where I see the difference in AI as well. A specialist
         | is probably faster using their own tooling rather than muddling
         | through an AI interaction. But the AI gives non specialists the
         | ability to muddle through tasks they can't do on their own, or
         | don't have specialized knowledge for.
        
       | chiefalchemist wrote:
       | What I find interesting is what professions are concerned about
       | AI. For the most part they appear to be better paying white
       | collar need-a-college-degree type of jobs. Tech, copywriters,
       | marketing, designers, lawyers, accountants, etc. All feeling the
       | heat.
       | 
       | The person pumping gas? Cutting hair? Janitors? Nurses? They, for
       | now, seem to be immune.
       | 
       | As a side note, anecdotally, productive gains have a ceiling.
       | Sure Copilot and ChatGPT free me up to focus on the heavy
       | lifting. But my brain can't run that relentlessly all day. It
       | seems to need to catch its breath.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-03-26 23:00 UTC)