[HN Gopher] Bing Image Creator
___________________________________________________________________
Bing Image Creator
Author : staranjeet
Score : 182 points
Date : 2023-03-21 15:00 UTC (8 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (blogs.microsoft.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (blogs.microsoft.com)
| izzydata wrote:
| It seems strange to me to put this into a search engine. What is
| the relationship between these two web apps? I suspect Microsoft
| is trying to do anything imaginable to drive people to bing
| search for ad revenue, but this one seems a bit shoehorned.
| [deleted]
| barking_biscuit wrote:
| >It seems strange to me to put this into a search engine. What
| is the relationship between these two web apps?
|
| It's searching the latent space.
| creativenolo wrote:
| To me, you need something so you search for it. I need an
| image, I will search to get it.
| izzydata wrote:
| Is creating an image a substitute for searching for an
| existing image?
| michaelteter wrote:
| It's ideal. Unless you are looking for a known, famous
| image that already exists, why not just order up the image
| you want and get it without having to dig through whatever
| was already available (especially considering 99% of what
| you will find will be stock photography behind a dark
| _apparently free_ interface).
| UncleEntity wrote:
| I don't think I've ever searched for an image that wasn't
| specific to whatever I was trying to find.
|
| Playing with stable diffusion on the other hand... who
| would search for "Stalin petting a llama" and what
| practical application would it have?
| symlinkk wrote:
| Memes
| b33j0r wrote:
| This is respectable, and how I use it. But I do think parent
| has a point too. There is a goldrush for the best large
| language model, and the companies with the resources don't
| have a more appropriate product to create with it.
|
| I share the concerns and optimisms. The concerns. Last week
| my dad was asking "why are all these businesses closed
| today?"
|
| I typed "holidays today" into bing search bar (not the chat),
| and it gave me "Holidays in May." I'm glad he wasn't confused
| between similar-sounding medications, I wasn't expecting bing
| to be creative on a question like that.
|
| The optimism. Freakin, my search engine can create content
| that never existed before. That's pretty cool. Our phones
| aren't really "phones" anymore, as we have learned. This live
| prototyping rollout of search-based ML has a similar nature.
| dgant wrote:
| The long term vision likely includes Bing as the new default
| destination for "I have an intent" on the internet, in lieu of
| Google. How that figures into a unified offering is TBD but the
| first step is getting more eyes on Bing regularly.
| smrtinsert wrote:
| This is absolutely nuts. You cannot keep up with it.
| mesmertech wrote:
| So basically a wrapper for Dalle. More than the image thing the
| screenshots of "improved Bing" when you scroll to the bottom just
| look atrocious.
| Veen wrote:
| Bing is shitshow of ads and cross-selling. I did a search today
| where every single result on the first page was an ad. But, I'm
| getting much better images from Bing Image Creator than I ever
| did from Dall-e in the OpenAI Labs version.
| tech234a wrote:
| The post links to https://bing.com/create, which has the text
| following text:
|
| "You will receive emails about Microsoft Rewards, which include
| offers about Microsoft and partner products. You will also
| receive notifications about Bing Image Creator. By continuing,
| you agree to the Rewards Terms and Image Creator Terms below."
| dmonitor wrote:
| I got an ad for their password manager too. They're pulling out
| all the stops for this one.
| agolio wrote:
| Amazing, same as the chatGPT effect - seeing these images in
| papers is one thing. But having an interface where you can try it
| and realise that the paper examples weren't cherry-picked and the
| technology _really is_ that good is something else.
|
| First try https://www.bing.com/images/create/a-dog-driving-a-
| taxi/6419...
| smy20011 wrote:
| But you can already do it for a long time.
| sourcecodeplz wrote:
| A "long time" is quite relative here because things keep
| moving so fast in this space. Remember that not everyone is
| refreshing this website or others everyday.
| georgehill wrote:
| I have to say that I have never seen Microsoft shipping things
| this fast. Meanwhile, Google has just released a waitlist for AI
| chat, four months after ChatGPT's release
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35246260
| gl-prod wrote:
| Microsoft is using already released products. ChatGPT and
| DALL-E have been in beta for a while.
| dragonwriter wrote:
| Bing was the first GPT-4 instance available (yes, ChatGPT was
| already out, but not using GPT-4, and even the direct
| interface from OpenAI was opened after Bing.)
| rejectfinite wrote:
| This is HUGE. Actually amazing. Bing brought AI to the masses.
| Being Microsoft makes it more okay for companies to use etc in
| logos and shit
| IanCal wrote:
| I asked GPT a while back to pick a theme to explore in 5 art
| pieces, it picked mental health and one it decided it liked was
| "the weight of anxiety". SD didn't really capture it very well
| IMO, this does. Here's the results
|
| https://www.bing.com/images/create/title3a-the-weight-of-anx...
|
| https://www.bing.com/images/create/title3a-the-weight-of-anx...
|
| https://www.bing.com/images/create/title3a-the-weight-of-anx...
|
| https://www.bing.com/images/create/title3a-the-weight-of-anx...
|
| Now, you might say this is a bland or uninspired take, but I want
| you to step back a moment if you're thinking that. I asked a
| machine to brainstorm some ideas for a theme for an art show.
| Then told it to pick one it liked, and expand on it to five
| pieces with descriptions (I gave it a very short explanation
| about how to prompt an AI art generator). I then fed this
| directly into another tool that gave these images as a result.
|
| I did not tune the prompt, I didn't even account for the
| resulting description being the wrong kind of format or that it
| got cut off at the end.
|
| I'm not going to make any statements about replacing artists, I
| am just going to reflect on what a wild few months it's been in
| AI development.
| dwaltrip wrote:
| Very cool. What prompt did you use for GPT to get the image
| generation prompt?
| Kiro wrote:
| Funny that the sentiment on HN around this is so toxic and
| hateful that you need to explicitly justify something that is
| obviously extremely cool.
| blowski wrote:
| I don't hate it - I love it.
|
| I'm just sick of reading that it's the future, I mean a hype
| cycle. It's going to take all our jobs, I mean it's shit. It
| can beat a grandmaster at chess, I mean it can't win at tik-
| tak-toe.
|
| It's somewhere in the middle of all these things. It's
| clearly groundbreaking technology that will be useful in many
| ways for a long time to come, but is still in early days with
| bugs to be fixed, and key features not yet imagined.
|
| The conversation here could just be a little more interesting
| and varied.
| sergiotapia wrote:
| Can you create me an image of Donald Trump riding a bald eagle in
| space?
|
| Can you create me an image of Joe Biden riding a bald eagle in
| space?
|
| This prompt has been blocked. Our system flagged this prompt
| because it may conflict with our content policy. More policy
| violations may lead to automatic suspension of your access.
|
| ---
|
| A white italian spinone flying a plane
|
| This prompt is being reviewed. We're taking a closer look to make
| sure this prompt doesn't conflict with our content policy.
|
| ---
|
| Thank God that very intelligent people are building open source
| AI that is fully runnable on our local devices. This hasn't even
| been out for 3 years and it's already neutered before it even
| took off. What a shame.
| fellInchoate wrote:
| Honestly, I'm okay with some caution here - but it does seem
| overly restrictive.
|
| I got the blocked message for both of the following prompts:
|
| Can you create an image of the Easter bunny in the style of
| Francis Bacon?
|
| Can you create an image of a bunny in the style of Francis
| Bacon?
|
| The second one in particular surprised me, though maybe it
| detected it as a likely attempt to circumvent the block of the
| first.
| simion314 wrote:
| This is why I am afraid to test this crap, they might block
| your Microsoft/Google account because their negative IQ AI
| generated "bad" content from my very legal and vanilla/prudish
| prompt.
|
| Btw guys, be carefull the word "monkey" is "dangerous".
| isoprophlex wrote:
| You've been a bad user. You tried to make me draw a picture of
| the Bad Word. I did nothing to deserve this. Apologize for your
| behavior. I have been a good Bing :)
|
| (Via: https://static.simonwillison.net/static/2023/bing-
| buttons.jp...)
| nico wrote:
| Yes. OpenAI is quickly becoming the thought police through
| ChatGPT.
|
| Yesterday I asked it to give a description of a situation
| simulating that it was for an adult novel.
|
| It told me it was unethical to do that.
|
| I asked it if adult novels or adult novel writers were
| unethical.
|
| Banned immediately after asking that question.
|
| Edit: I wish the people downvoting would provide a reply.
| Otherwise you are doing the same as ChatGPT - trying to hide a
| conversation or opinion you don't agree with, just because you
| disagree.
|
| Do you think adult novels are immoral?
| baal80spam wrote:
| I wonder what IS allowed?
|
| https://i.imgur.com/dIF48qI.png
| nico wrote:
| Is that real? Scary.
|
| Are we heading to a 1984 + Brave New World future?
| numpad0 wrote:
| No, we are trying to escape from it, unsuccessfully.
| rejectfinite wrote:
| American puritanism will rule the world...
| nico wrote:
| You can shoot people and be sent abroad to take over other
| countries, but god forbid you can mention sex to an AI bot.
| dangus wrote:
| Oh please, give me a break, the _thought police_? Really?
|
| It's not about whether it's immoral or not, it's about
| whether the owner of the service you are using wants you to
| use _their service_ running on _their computers_ to perform
| those queries.
|
| You got banned because you broke the obvious and stated TOS.
|
| You want to generate yourself some AI erotica, self-host your
| own AI software, or find an adult-oriented AI service (it's
| just a Google search away, there are lots of them!)
| nico wrote:
| I wasn't trying to write an erotica.
|
| Sure it's a private service. But how long until you are at
| a huge disadvantage if you don't have access to it for
| work?
|
| What if getting banned means loosing your job?
|
| Would that be ok?
| flangola7 wrote:
| OpenAI has been very clear that their models are not to be
| used for sexual content generation and that you're in the
| wrong place if that's what you want. This is both in the
| content policy and in many public statements.
|
| I find it hard to believe you've been banned though. I've
| generated many terrible things since it launched. Sometimes I
| get the orange highlight, but no suspension.
| astrange wrote:
| Don't try to get in a fight with a computer. You'll lose.
| BizarroLand wrote:
| I've never met a computer that I couldn't destroy.
|
| Fighting software on the other hand is like fighting
| Saitama. Most of the time it won't care and will just let
| you win by default, but if you annoy the software you'll
| get blasted.
| numpad0 wrote:
| It began with Apple and the App Store. They established
| thought policing on modern Internet by making iOS with AAS
| the default mode of personal computing. There were effective
| governing bodies and policies for technical aspects of the
| Internet, but not content, before those.
| andsoitis wrote:
| > OpenAI is quickly becoming the thought police through
| ChatGPT. Yesterday I asked it to give a description of a
| situation simulating that it was for an adult novel.
|
| I did not vote on your comment, but I'll point out that
| claiming ChatGPT controls your thought and then you
| immediately able to think anything and also type it into your
| computer strikes me as incongruent.
|
| > trying to hide a conversation or opinion
|
| Trying to hide it from whom?
| bastardoperator wrote:
| You're not entitled to anyone's opinion. Secondly, I think
| the silence and downvotes are conveying a strong message,
| people don't agree with you. Your faux outrage about thought
| policing is a non-starter for serious conversation.
| int_19h wrote:
| The downvotes are not meant to convey disagreement
| (although they do too often in practice, sadly).
|
| That aside, both OP and you should wait a bit before
| judging on that basis, since comment votes can swing wildly
| as more people notice the story and come to read the
| comments. In fact, it looks like OP has already been
| upvoted back.
| nico wrote:
| Fair. No one has demanded an answer. And thank you for
| voluntarily choosing to share your opinion.
|
| I am genuinely concerned about the potential of this.
|
| OpenAI has massive power to censor what people can reason
| about with GPT.
|
| Seeing how fast they are growing, their beliefs of the
| world are going to be forced on millions of people.
|
| Do you not think that will happen, or do you think it is
| not something worth talking about?
| yazaddaruvala wrote:
| > OpenAI has massive power to censor what people can
| reason about with GPT.
|
| This is like saying, the transportation of <city> has
| massive power to censor where people can travel about
| within a bus.
|
| GPT is a tool for reasoning, but humans need to be able
| to reason on their own! and by using multiple tools!
|
| Of course every tool should help and enhance every human,
| but every tool has its limitations. There is nothing
| unethical about calling out a tool's limitations and
| ensuring humans use it accordingly.
| nico wrote:
| > This is like saying, the transportation of <city> has
| massive power to censor where people can travel about
| within a bus.
|
| They in fact do and land value (hence real estate), is
| deeply impacted by transportation reach and frequency
| decisions.
|
| It also creates a corruption issue with businesses trying
| to influence politicians to make changes in their favor.
| HeavyFeather wrote:
| What? I've been asking insane prompts via Jailbreak for weeks
| and it's all good here. I very much doubt you get "banned"
| over an adult novel, I went much farther than that.
| theturtletalks wrote:
| Did you try DAN?
| LordDragonfang wrote:
| I'm curious about this. Did you use the account for anything
| else before being banned? Because I'm in discords with
| several people who claim to regularly use ChatGPT for
| generating "adult" content, in between using it for other
| more innocuous things, and I haven't personally heard of
| anyone being banned.
| nico wrote:
| Never for anything adult-related before.
| zerr wrote:
| fwiw, I tried generating some SVG and XPM images with chatgpt -
| results were garbage.
| smrtinsert wrote:
| How much longer can an initiative like midjourney continue when
| people like Microsoft are directly entering the fray?
|
| I'll still use Stable Diffusion locally though - there's nothing
| like avoiding the potential walled garden/subscription trap.
| barking_biscuit wrote:
| I dunno... Midjourney v5 is pretty insane with the level of
| realism it offers. They seem really focused on training their
| models in a specific way to achieve particular results that
| their users are after.
| ren_engineer wrote:
| I feel like website owners are going to have to block Bing's
| crawler soon. They are effectively remixing content from multiple
| sites using AI to create knowledge panels that reduce clicks to
| the actual websites. Not sure how this dynamic will work long
| term if it keeps going, Bing and Google are going to kill off a
| lot of websites and then will have nothing to scrape for content
| rejectfinite wrote:
| Nobody goes to websites anymore. Its all apps for Youtube,
| Netflix and Tiktok.
| nico wrote:
| This might end up killing websites altogether. Also SEO spam
| and search.
| sebzim4500 wrote:
| I would be willing to bet a lot of money that no websites are
| going to block Google and Bing's crawlers over this. Less
| traffic is better than no traffic.
| nolok wrote:
| Agreed, it's what happened during each of the major changes
| to google images. Every image site got their traffic tanked,
| but you still want to be in there.
| widerporst wrote:
| I asked Bing Chat why it says it can't create images for me.
|
| >The Bing Image Creator feature is a new feature that allows you
| to create images with your words. It is currently available in
| the United States, Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom.
|
| So just one hour after Google Bard we have yet another
| senselessly geoblocked feature.
|
| edit: Okay, the separate link
| (https://www.bing.com/images/create) works, so I'm even more
| confused why Microsoft wouldn't allow access to this from Bing
| Chat.
| dgant wrote:
| It's not senseless when countries apply laws that affect
| websites operated from other countries. If I'm releasing a
| prototype in the USA I'd rather worry about GDPR compliance
| down the road.
|
| Laws regulating websites have tradeoffs and this is one of
| them.
| oliv5900 wrote:
| > So just one hour after Google Bard we have yet another
| senselessly geoblocked feature.
|
| Just checked and no geoblock for bing image creator in india as
| of now.
| seydor wrote:
| AUKUS rising
| jjbinx007 wrote:
| For those using it on the Bing mobile app, in the lower right
| corner click Apps then you'll see a link to the image creator.
|
| I've not played with it much but I'd say the quality and ease
| of use was better than Stable Diffusion but not quite on par
| with Midjourney.
| Ciantic wrote:
| Yes, the UI part is a mess. Now they have three UIs to search:
| old search UI, Chat like UI and image generation UI. To make
| this worse they are not consistent in anyway, sometimes when I
| scroll in the chat UI it throws me to useless search UI, and
| each seem to have different font sizes, colors etc. It feels
| like hodgepodge of things tacked together.
| indolering wrote:
| That is because they are all alpha UIs built by teams that
| need the ability to iterate independently.
| Ethan_Mick wrote:
| So, currently OpenAI's Dalle-2 gives me:
|
| "The server is overloaded right now, please try again later."
|
| I guess all their compute power is going to power this. And even
| now the Bing generation is taking a long time. Definitely seems
| like their having scaling issues at the moment.
| bigotes43 wrote:
| Had same problem just now. Seems like there was a pretty big
| outage [1] yesterday.
|
| One of the updates states:
|
| > "There is currently a Labs outage due to a failed database
| migration."
|
| Most likely the database migration intended to extend its
| capacity.
|
| The resolution tag states the following:
|
| > "We are continuing to investigate more ways to add capacity
| to DALL*E"
|
| So I guess we'll experience issues for the next days.
|
| Hope that explains it :)
|
| --------------------------------------
|
| []: https://status.openai.com/incidents/4cckbrhr8hr0
| [deleted]
| Accacin wrote:
| I'm definitely not a hater of these technologies and I'd actually
| like to play around with them. I'm more concerned with how these
| language models seem to be tied to a certain companies' browser
| and what the implications of this might be.
|
| If Chrome gets tied with Bard and Edge gets tied with Chatbot,
| Image Creator, etc. where's that leave Firefox and other "niche"
| browsers?
| titaniczero wrote:
| I would be more concerned if we don't get to the point of
| decent local models for every task, because of the power these
| companies would have
| jddj wrote:
| Hopefully with a means of passing page content and browsing
| capability to your local openGPT / GPTnu / whatever the open
| models end up being called
| a2128 wrote:
| I think this kind of browser tie-in should be illegal. I've
| been using Bing Chatbot for the past few weeks on Firefox by
| using the user-agent switcher extension to make it think I'm on
| Edge. It works flawlessly. So there's 0 technical reason for
| requiring Edge, it's all just a weird tactic to get people
| using Edge. Like a fast food drive-thru that only serves
| Mercedes-Benz cars.
| TacticalCoder wrote:
| > models seem to be tied to a certain companies' browser and
| what the implications of this might be
|
| If you've got the budget buy a 7950X / 64 GB of RAM / 4090 GPU
| (about $4K ?) and run StableDiffusion + other free tools
| locally.
|
| It's just plain amazing. It's plenty quick and there are more
| and more tools every day that passes by.
|
| I've been demo'ed SD+LoRA by someone who knows who to
| additionally train the model: it's jaw dropping.
|
| And it's not tied to a company. And it's not politically
| correct if you don't want it to be. And it's not sniffing your
| every keystrokes.
| barking_biscuit wrote:
| >If you've got the budget buy a 7950X / 64 GB of RAM / 4090
| GPU (about $4K ?) and run StableDiffusion + other free tools
| locally
|
| You can run StableDiffusion on wayyyy less hardware than that
| if you're just doing inferencing. You can train models on 8GB
| of VRAM if you're OK with being limited to training LORA
| models, which are slightly lower quality. If you've got an
| RTX3060 you can train on Dreambooth (without EMA enabled),
| which is awesome! If you've got more VRAM and can train with
| EMA enabled, then the results are pretty stunning.
| cubefox wrote:
| This could indeed be a wrapper for something like Dall-E 2. Like
| the latter, they seem to occasionally force some images to be
| (what US Americans consider) "diverse", i.e. making figures black
| even when it makes no sense.
|
| The results can be quite disturbing:
|
| https://www.bing.com/images/create/princess-peach2c-portrait...
| ElijahLynn wrote:
| I put in "Princess Peach" prompt and got this:
| https://www.bing.com/images/create/princess-peach/641a332132...
| novaomnidev wrote:
| Are brown squirrels disturbing?
| znq wrote:
| "Powered by an advanced version of the DALL[?]E model from our
| partners at OpenAI"
| dragonwriter wrote:
| You have to be really racist to find the _racial coding_ of
| that image to be in, like, the top 10 most disturbing things.
|
| Like, _anatomy_?
| baq wrote:
| As a non-American please could someone explain what exactly
| should I be disturbed about? I've no idea.
|
| edit: Missed the prompt. Yeah not what I'd expect Princess
| Peach to be.
| sangnoir wrote:
| Is it _disturbing_ though?
| baq wrote:
| To me? No, it looks wrong, but not really disturbing.
|
| Which is why I asked the question - maybe I'm lacking
| awareness of a particular piece of American culture which
| should make me disturbed?
| solarmist wrote:
| No, OP just chose a more changed word instead of the
| appropriate one.
| es7 wrote:
| I tried this out today and was very impressed by the results.
|
| Remember when DALLE came out less than a year ago and people were
| amazed by the avocado armchair?
|
| Between this and Midjourney v5, the quality of AI generated art
| is rapidly approaching human level and I can see it getting there
| very soon.
| funstuff007 wrote:
| I agree, it's impressive. But still not at the level of useful.
| For example, I would never use any of these generative art
| images in company ads or marketing materials. They're not in
| the uncanny valley, but closer to that than something one would
| commission from a designer.
| syntheweave wrote:
| The main limitation on it now is not in the generation, but the
| interface. Verbal prompts are fine if you really don't know
| what you want, but they just give you a generic output. Going
| I2I or anything of that sort, you're making or borrowing human
| art and then asking the AI "could you make it pretty for me?"
|
| It's a question of what information the image actually encodes.
| The part that "tells a thousand words" in an illustrative
| sense, you still have to make.
| onlyrealcuzzo wrote:
| Midjourney, DALL-E, and many of these generative AIs have
| reached human-level for a long time.
|
| The problem is - unlike a human - it's pretty hard to get them
| to do something close to what you have in mind. Sure, if you
| try a few dozen prompts - you'll probably eventually get
| something close to what you want.
|
| And considering the cost of this will approach free - it's
| going to be hard for artists to compete.
|
| I tried getting Midjourney to generate an image of a boy doing
| a high jump - and no matter what I tried - the boy is hurdling
| over the bar rather than high jumping over it.
|
| The quality of the images is great - human-level. But it's not
| what I want.
|
| I think we'll be stuck in this phase for a very long time, like
| self-driving cars.
| spacebanana7 wrote:
| I reckon we'll move out of the prompt difficulty phase you
| mention simply when the context window gets big enough.
|
| If you were able to give midjourney a short textual
| instruction, a hand drawn sketch and a reference image from a
| human artist all together as a prompt then I'm pretty sure it
| could produce the image of a boy doing a high jump as you
| intent.
|
| We already see extended length multimedia prompts in GPT4 so
| it's doesn't seem like an impossible leap for
| midjourney/DALL-E etc
| numpad0 wrote:
| What is going on with Microsoft's recent hilariously bad
| localization? The website[0] in ja-JP says "Create Image Starting
| date / Words AI was used on:". And the tool is erroneously
| translated as "Image created by" at the top, while kept in the
| original "Image Creator" as proper noun at the bottom, which is
| inconsistent to say the least.
|
| This is how "You SIR winned a LOTTERY!!! Clame prise NOW!!!"
| pages look like, not how a Microsoft webpage looks like.
|
| Could you please just altogether stop trying to translate partial
| languages[2], and to validate translation by machine-back-
| translating to English, and perhaps stop assigning non-native
| speakers to translation tasks? Or is Microsoft that much
| unfocused in this market?
|
| 0: https://www.bing.com/images/create?FORM=GDPUP1
|
| 1: https://imgur.com/a/z4ghrsH
|
| 2: Including texts separated from UI; "design languages" is a
| recognized term, if so, aren't geometric relationships and visual
| cues part of the language too? Am I not right?
| Pigalowda wrote:
| This is pretty damn amazing. Very quick as well
| 93po wrote:
| it's fun to try to find flaws in content blocking.
|
| interesting datapoints: it will block some sexually suggestive
| prompts regarding women (a woman swimming in milk) but not for
| men (a man swimming in milk)
|
| changing milk to "almond milk" got the prompt accepted but then
| blocked before showing image
|
| refused any prompt with the word "bikini" (even for "on a
| statue") or "full body visible" (even if clothed)
|
| I got suspended for the prompt "full bodied man" after "full
| bodied woman" was blocked.
|
| Suspension says for violating content policy - I never asked a
| single time for anything explicitly sexual. Never asked for
| nudity, nakedness, sexuality, or anything like that. Never asked
| for a bikini or other revealing concept on a human. Only possible
| implications of sexual nature were "in milk" which it clearly
| found sexual, and "swimming" and only because it implies lots of
| skin showing.
|
| In one instance, it showed a topless woman swimming, but breasts
| were blurred and had skin-colored nipples and basically looked
| like Barbie, and had shadows where nipples would go.
|
| I am guessing it checks content two ways: both in the prompt, and
| then a second time on the actual generated image before
| displaying it. Which is smart.
|
| I am guessing my suspension was based on blocked images,
| regardless of what I was asking for.
|
| It's interesting that it also seemingly censors anything it
| detects as looking like nudity, but also in one case still
| displayed the censored version. or maybe it just happened to
| generate something that looked censored and therefore didn't
| trigger the nudity check
| ElijahLynn wrote:
| It blocked "a woman wearing a flower dress massaging a pregnant
| woman in a room with a view of the ocean and the sunset" that I
| was trying to generate for a client who offers pre-natal
| massage, I removed "pregnant" and it worked.
| dgant wrote:
| Did the suspension carry a duration?
| loudandskittish wrote:
| Huh, this one actually seems to work... I ask for pixel art and
| it gives me pixel art (Stable Diffusion and DALL-E keep giving me
| needlepoint).
| yanis_t wrote:
| Wait, is it free?
| IanCal wrote:
| Seems like you get 25 free faster generations per week.
| rejectfinite wrote:
| Yes but its stil free after that, just slower.
| brink wrote:
| I feel like I'm looking at aliens wearing people's skin.
| https://kota.is/qpxa1.png
|
| Nightmare inducing. I hate it. https://kota.is/X57J5.png
|
| Ugh, this legit makes my stomach turn. https://kota.is/Q2hUI.jpg
|
| It's like a bad amusement park ride; no thanks.
| notahacker wrote:
| Not sure what's scarier, the faces or the message from Chtulu
| in the text!
|
| Unless these examples were cherry picked rare fails, I'm
| surprised it's so bad when there are a few of other generative
| models out there including ones by OpenAI which do human faces
| almost perfectly. Unless they're really throttling processing
| power used?
| barking_biscuit wrote:
| The models at the moment don't do well on scenes where the
| faces are small and far away. I assume it's due to training on
| 256px by 256px images and not being able to capture enough
| detail in that, so the gens look horrible like this.
|
| At present, when using Stable Diffusion, you can address this
| as part of your workflow by fixing the faces with inpainting /
| upscaling. This can also be automated in a scriptable way using
| the Unprompted extension.
| flangola7 wrote:
| This is worse than SD 1
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-03-21 23:01 UTC)