[HN Gopher] St Scholastica Day Riot
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       St Scholastica Day Riot
        
       Author : brudgers
       Score  : 130 points
       Date   : 2023-03-16 16:29 UTC (3 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (en.wikipedia.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (en.wikipedia.org)
        
       | dredmorbius wrote:
       | Town & gown strife goes _way_ back.
       | 
       | (I'd stumbled across the SSDR a few years back, it's a
       | fascinating bit of academic & cultural history.)
        
       | akiselev wrote:
       | _> Around 30 townsfolk were killed, as were up to 63 members of
       | the university.
       | 
       | > Violent disagreements between townspeople and students had
       | arisen several times previously, and 12 of the 29 coroners'
       | courts held in Oxford between 1297 and 1322 concerned murders by
       | students. The University of Cambridge was established in 1209 by
       | scholars who left Oxford following the lynching of two students
       | by the town's citizens._
       | 
       | Man, college towns used to be so much more violent!
       | 
       | I never knew about the connection between a saint and the
       | word/concept of scholastics, nor that a university as notable as
       | Cambridge was started because the locals lynched students. That's
       | pretty cool, TIL!
       | 
       | Edit: Sidenote, why does the graduation ceremony at Cambridge
       | look like they're going to drown a witch? [1]
       | 
       | [1]
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Town_and_gown#/media/File:Punt...
        
         | simonh wrote:
         | Not just college towns. Schools also.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1797_Rugby_School_rebellion
        
         | DeathArrow wrote:
         | >Man, college towns used to be so much more violent!
         | 
         | I was expecting they riot on diversity grounds, not for such
         | prosaic reasons. Those ancient students were so little
         | politically and morally evolved!
        
           | pjc50 wrote:
           | Oxbridge has never been especially diverse or progressive;
           | there were riots against the admission of women:
           | https://www.varsity.co.uk/features/15985
           | 
           | By 1988 this had diminished to resentful grumbling from
           | Magdalene.
           | 
           | (I'm not sure if there's even a UK counterpart to "absurdly
           | progressive US university that gets mentioned by conservative
           | culture war campaigners" all the time?)
        
             | DubiousPusher wrote:
             | LoL, which one? Probably Evergreen State College in
             | Washington or UC Berkeley? These are like catnip for
             | conservative pundits.
        
         | gigfkb wrote:
         | That is not a photo of the graduation ceremony. It shows a
         | student punting. He is wearing the gown needed for the
         | ceremony.
        
           | edgineer wrote:
           | I had to look up "punting." It means boating in a punt (which
           | is a small boat).
        
             | spatulon wrote:
             | Importantly, the punt is propelled by having someone stand
             | at the back and push a pole against the river bed. It's
             | popular with students and tourists in both Oxford and
             | Cambridge, although the two cities disagree over which end
             | of a punt is the back.
        
         | RRWagner wrote:
         | And why do we recognize graduates of higher education in the
         | 21st century by making them wear clothes from 500 years ago?? I
         | know "why" but somehow it would be more forward-looking if they
         | were even wearing Starfleet uniforms.
        
           | barry-cotter wrote:
           | Some people believe that things from the past have value, and
           | that continuing traditions is good in itself, providing a
           | sense of meaning and community.
        
           | aaron695 wrote:
           | [dead]
        
           | pjc50 wrote:
           | It's from 500 years ago, but it's also from 50 years ago and
           | from 5 years ago; that is, it's continuous and has not really
           | had a specific occasion to change. Although the fur is
           | usually no longer real.
           | 
           | Oxbridge are not called "the dreaming spires" for nothing;
           | there's a timelessness to the place that all the antique
           | surroundings and rituals accentuate. The 20th century has
           | largely got rid of formalwear as an important concept, but
           | (at least while I was there) the gown wasn't just for
           | graduation, it was for formal dinners, which would be held on
           | various occasions or up to several times a week in the larger
           | colleges for the sake of having a nice dinner.
        
           | akiselev wrote:
           | I'm guessing for one of the same reasons they were used
           | originally. From that town and gown wiki article [1]:
           | 
           |  _> The gown also served as a social symbol, as it was
           | impractical for physical manual work._
           | 
           | The gowns symbolize that graduates are now above physical
           | manual labor and are destined for greater things (Starbucks
           | barista)
           | 
           | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Town_and_gown
        
             | thinkingemote wrote:
             | I wonder what today's version of the gown would be.
             | Something that would be impractical for both service work
             | (barista) and brain work (prompt engineer).
             | 
             | Maybe ski gloves or a sling or maybe a respirator with
             | sunglasses.
        
               | williamdclt wrote:
               | Simply a suit and tie, maybe?
        
           | jrumbut wrote:
           | I think it's so important to keep universities connected to
           | the tradition they arose out of in small ways like a gown.
           | 
           | It's amazing, when you read the history, how much of today's
           | discourse about the value of a university education, the
           | conduct of students, and the antagonism between university
           | faculty and intellectuals who exist outside the walls of the
           | university is a replay of stuff that happened in the 14th
           | century and every century in between.
        
       | __MatrixMan__ wrote:
       | > The ... riot took place in ... 1355 ... complained about the
       | quality of wine served to them in the Swindlestock Tavern
       | 
       | > this was the site of the swindlestock tavern 1250-1709
       | (http://www.oxfordhistory.org.uk/streets/inscriptions/central...)
       | 
       | > swindler (n.) 1774 (https://www.etymonline.com/word/swindler)
       | 
       | Hmmm
        
         | defrost wrote:
         | You might want to look to the use of _Swind_ and _Swynde_ in
         | English texts from the centuries before, eg: _Historia
         | ecclesiastica gentis Anglorum_ [1]
         | 
         | [1]
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecclesiastical_History_of_the_...
         | 
         | which the OED gives as
         | 
         | "To waste away, languish; to dwindle, decrease; to vanish,
         | disappear."
         | 
         | and then Swindle Stock would be the site of a place of
         | punishment - stocks on which people are put to waste away and
         | diminish.
         | 
         | Of course, language being plastic, it _might_ also be the pub
         | in which farm workers drank after listening to the sound of
         | Sycthes while cutting sheaves to _Stuck_ (or Stock) (placed
         | uprtight to air and dry); but that 's a stretch.
         | 
         |  _I drank with the harvesters, who sang me songs about rural
         | life, such as--'Sitting in the swale; and listening to the
         | swindle of the flail, as it sounds dub-a-dub on the corn, from
         | the neighbouring barn.'_
        
           | throwaway4533 wrote:
           | As with many other archaic words in English, I'm guessing
           | that "Swind" and "Swynde" came from Scandinavia and Germany
           | where they've kept their old meaning to this day:
           | 
           | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/schwinden#German
           | 
           | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/svinde#Danish
           | 
           | A modern example is "oxygen depletion" or "hypoxia" in
           | English/Latin which, in Danish, is called "iltsvind" ("ilt" =
           | oxygen, "svind" = depletion):
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypoxia_(environmental)
           | 
           | https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iltsvind
           | 
           | It is indeed related to swindle/svindle/schwindeln but I
           | don't know when the two words "diverged":
           | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/schwindeln#German
           | 
           | If you go back far enough, swind/svind/schwinden may also
           | share a common ancestor with "dwindle":
           | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Reconstruction:Proto-
           | Germanic...
        
             | defrost wrote:
             | Indeed - the Vikings (Danes) brought their language to the
             | north of the British Isles and it spread and persisted to
             | today.
             | 
             | As I can no longer edit my comment above I should mention
             | that the original text by Bede was written by him in Latin
             | circa AD 731, but the O.E.D. references version translated
             | in early | middle English by other authors in the centuries
             | that followed.
             | 
             | It's from one of those that the OED quotes the first
             | written use of Swind | Swynde in <cough> "English"
             | </cough>.
             | 
             | ( _not so much a language as a kitchen sink full of dregs_
             | )
        
       | shaftoe444 wrote:
       | See also, https://thehistoryteamblog.wordpress.com/the-riots-
       | of-1272/
        
       | DeathArrow wrote:
       | One doesn't simply mess with one man's booze without
       | consequences.
        
       | ExMachina73 wrote:
       | I feel like there's a script for a movie here, no? Has this event
       | been dramatized in anyway? Reads like "Gangs of New York (2002)."
        
         | groestl wrote:
         | "according to those sympathetic to the university, de
         | Chesterfield threw his wooden drinking vessel at de Croydon's
         | head; those sympathetic to the townsfolk say the student beat
         | him around the head with the pot."
         | 
         | This is 6 centuries ago.. Amazing
        
       | podgib wrote:
       | I was a tour guide in Oxford while I was doing my PhD there. This
       | was always my favourite story to tell. It's a part of history
       | that is simultaneously so foreign and yet so relatable today.
        
       | swapsCAPS wrote:
       | Just. Wow. This has piqued my interest, is there any background
       | information as to why this happened (so often)? There must have
       | been underlying tentions, wondering what those were, but can
       | imagine it's just lost to history
        
         | pnut wrote:
         | The article explained it?
         | 
         | Oxford scholars were literally above the law, and used their
         | protected status to abuse and demean the townspeople, up to and
         | including the mayor.
         | 
         | After the riot, the king cracked down and reasserted the
         | arrangement, which apparently continued in some forms for
         | another 500 years.
        
         | jonstewart wrote:
         | There's some important context that's also not covered by the
         | Wikipedia article: the Black Death swept through Europe from
         | 1347-1350. England's population declined by almost half and
         | would not recover to the same level until the 1600s. As we've
         | seen with covid, but just as a shadow, the population decline
         | led to a huge labor shortage and high inflation. So, 1355
         | wasn't a happy time.
        
       | Simon_O_Rourke wrote:
       | Things back in the day seemed to escalate quickly.
       | 
       | If the local college kids here in upstate New York complained of
       | the quality of the wine in my local tavern, I'd definitely...
       | *checks notes* incite the local townsfolk to extrajudicialy kill
       | 63 of their campus colleagues.
        
       | christophilus wrote:
       | Ah, for those halcyon days. They were simpler times.
        
       | chasil wrote:
       | If forever the moment was to buy a fellow bar patron a drink,
       | that was it.
        
       | DubiousPusher wrote:
       | The petty incitement of this immediately reminded me of The Straw
       | Hat Riot.
       | 
       | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_Hat_Riot
       | 
       | It's hard for people today to understand just how sudden,
       | frequent and destructive mass violence was in the past. Up to our
       | very recent history. As recently as the 70s there were fairly
       | regular riots in America that would make most of what you saw in
       | 2020 look pretty pedestrian.
        
         | joenot443 wrote:
         | Pedestrian? Didn't like 19 people die during the protests in
         | 2020?
         | 
         | I don't see any deaths listed for the Straw Hat Riot, I don't
         | see any mention of lootings or arson either. On the other hand,
         | I was in Seattle during the worst of the 2020 riots, I'd never
         | seen such anger and destruction in my life.
        
           | heywhatupboys wrote:
           | This comment reeks of racism, I hadn't thought I would have
           | to read these absurdist takes on HN. Would you write the same
           | thing about the civil rights demonstrations?
        
             | hackeraccount wrote:
             | You've made me feel completely alienated from the world.
        
             | joenot443 wrote:
             | This comment reeks of low effort finger pointing, I hadn't
             | thought I would have to read these juvenile takes on HN.
             | Would you feel the same way if 200 people had died? 2000?
             | For the record, I have nothing but support for the cause
             | they were protesting, policing in America is hugely broken
             | and there are well-documented racial elements to that
             | failure, but I don't think I'm alone in wishing
             | demonstrations themselves hadn't been so destructive.
             | 
             | Try making this comment again without using the R word. Are
             | you of the opinion that the protests in Seattle are immune
             | from criticism? I had a friend who closed her store after
             | it was looted twice. Where does she fit into your
             | distressingly simple model?
             | 
             | I was living next to CHOP during the whole ordeal. If you
             | don't have on the ground experience, I genuinely don't
             | think your opinion is worth anything here, I'm sorry.
        
               | throwbadubadu wrote:
               | It is maybe the cause you describe well:
               | 
               | > policing in America is hugely broken and there are
               | well-documented racial elements to that failure,
               | 
               | vs
               | 
               | > it spread due to men wearing straw hats past the
               | unofficial date that was deemed socially acceptable,
               | 
               | that made your comparison a bit triggering, and even if
               | you did not mean it, not totally incomprehensible?
               | 
               | Those two also fail to compare in other dimensions, e.g.
               | size, so not sure if worth it at all..
        
               | joenot443 wrote:
               | I'm not the one who originally made the comparison and I
               | completely agree; the two are so different they
               | _shouldn't_ be compared.
               | 
               | Regardless of how one feels about the motives or the
               | methods, I think it's safe to say it was a fairly
               | watershed moment for the US whose importance shouldn't be
               | downplayed.
        
               | DubiousPusher wrote:
               | Can I say that my goal was not to compare the two in an
               | absolutist way.
               | 
               | There is a narrative that developed about the 2020
               | protests that they were categorically different from the
               | America's past because some of them spilled over into
               | violent episodes. The talk was borderline existential
               | regarding them as something new in American society. They
               | were frequently unfavorably compared to the "peaceful"
               | civil rights protests of the 60s.
               | 
               | But those protests were only peaceful in the small
               | cherry-picked set that progressive historians and non-
               | violence aligned activists have succeeded in turning into
               | the canonical story of America. The civil rights movement
               | in fact did have episodes of ambiguous violence. Critics
               | at the time cited these incidents as reasons the protests
               | should stop or wait. King references these critics
               | directly in the Letter from the Birmingham Jail. It's
               | barely buried history.
               | 
               | What's more, the protests occured amongst a back drop of
               | constant deadly violence and struggle over all kinds of
               | grievance and issues. Forget the risk of an antifa
               | punching you in the jaw. There were people with deadly
               | weapons, ready to do deadly violence or at least
               | advocating it. From The Weather Underground to The Black
               | Panthers to MOVE to biker gangs and on.
               | 
               | But the popular narrative wishes to ignor all this. How
               | many times during 202 did I hear some boomer say, "look
               | what we got done with civil rights without violence." But
               | they have imbibed the Forest Gumpification of history.
               | This myth is used to create an impossible standard,
               | according to which, any incidental violence immediately
               | discredits change.
               | 
               | I point to The Straw Hats because the are the most
               | blatant tell to the law that America has a 'peaceful'
               | past. That people are now somehow more unreasonable,
               | easily triggered to violence and with thinner
               | justification for their demands.
        
           | DubiousPusher wrote:
           | I'll clarify because that was perhaps too flippant on my
           | part. There are episodes from the 2020 protests which match
           | the intensity of past American riots at times. But for how
           | widespread and recurring the protests were, they had a lower
           | density of and a lower conversion to violence.
           | 
           | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_incidents_of_civil_u.
           | ..
        
             | joenot443 wrote:
             | There certainly are a lot! I was only living in an affected
             | city during the '20 protests, so that's all I feel
             | confident commenting on.
        
               | joenot443 wrote:
               | Ah I see your edit now. I understand what you're getting
               | at, you're right.
        
       | ChrisMarshallNY wrote:
       | I remember reading an article that said, if the Inspector Morse
       | Mysteries were reflecting real life, Oxford would be one of the
       | most dangerous places on Earth.
       | 
       | Maybe they were just a few centuries off...
        
       | shusaku wrote:
       | > While the royal commission of inquiry was in place, John
       | Gynwell, the Bishop of Lincoln, imposed an interdict on the
       | townspeople, and banned all religious practices, including
       | services (except on key feast days), burials and marriages; only
       | baptisms of young children were allowed.
       | 
       | That is quite an interesting tidbit
        
       | duxup wrote:
       | I struggle to follow / understand a lot of things in the past.
       | 
       | We get history that understandably is written by the more
       | educated from those times. I really don't know that we know what
       | the local rando citizens thought or were thinking.
       | 
       | Heck even when we get history and information from the people at
       | the time sometimes it is confusing. The English Civil War is
       | completely confusing for me.
        
         | zone411 wrote:
         | The Pillars of the Earth and its follow-up by Ken Follet are
         | fun (but long) fiction novels set in Medieval England, which
         | help you envision living in that world. I'm not sure how
         | accurate they are when it comes to people's general attitudes,
         | though.
        
         | narrator wrote:
         | One thing I've learned about the ancient world is it was hyper-
         | violent. Some guys could come over the hill and kill everyone
         | in a tribe for stupid reasons.
        
         | tenpies wrote:
         | > We get history that understandably is written by the more
         | educated from those times. I really don't know that we know
         | what the local rando citizens thought or were thinking.
         | 
         | One of my favourite history series was HBO's Rome because it
         | tackled this directly.
         | 
         | Sure, you have all the important aristocratic characters, but
         | you also have all the no-name soldiers, slaves, and Roman
         | citizens.
         | 
         | At one point, a legionnaire gets into a bar fight with some
         | Romans. The next day, that same legionnaire is escorting Marc
         | Anthony and they get attacked by an angry mob. Marc Anthony
         | interprets it as an attack on himself, but the mob was actually
         | just pissed at the one legionnaire from the bar fight the night
         | before and forces the group to retreat.
         | 
         | The whole thing is interpreted by the aristocrats as an attack
         | by the Pompeiian mobs on tribune Marc Anthony. This in turn,
         | prevented Marc Anthony from exercising his office, and the
         | whole thing snow balls into Caesar being forced to cross the
         | Rubicon.
         | 
         | Entire history potentially made, because a legionnaire got into
         | a bar fight. Now this is fiction, but it's incredible to think
         | how many stories like this must exist outside of our records.
        
         | baryphonic wrote:
         | > The English Civil War is completely confusing for me.
         | 
         | That's interesting, because I see Cavaliers vs Roundheads as
         | the prototypical debate about the nature of Western culture
         | that we are still having today.
        
         | eru wrote:
         | > I really don't know that we know what the local rando
         | citizens thought or were thinking.
         | 
         | Yes, that's a big problem. That a big part of why finding
         | Pompeii was important: the volcanic eruption preserved
         | everything, including daily life and random graffiti.
         | 
         | In a more general sense, that's also why archaeologists love
         | digging up trash dumps. See
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midden
        
           | paganel wrote:
           | There's also this famous history book about life in the early
           | 1300s in a village located in the Northern Pyrenees:
           | _Montaillou, village occitan de 1294 a 1324_ [1]:
           | 
           | > _Montaillou_ examines the lives and beliefs of the
           | population of Montaillou, a small village in the Pyrenees
           | with only around 250 inhabitants, at the beginning of the
           | fourteenth century. It is largely based on the Fournier
           | Register, a set of records from the Inquisition which
           | investigated and attempted to suppress the spread of
           | Catharism in the Ariege region from 1318 to 1325, during the
           | reigns of Philip V  "the Tall" and Charles IV "the Fair".
           | 
           | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montaillou_(book)
        
       | idontwantthis wrote:
       | Reminds me of the "sacks" in Ananthem.
        
       | jeron wrote:
       | And we've had the Scholastic Book Faire every year since
        
         | JoBrad wrote:
         | And Carfax.
        
           | petesergeant wrote:
           | Hard to move a 12th century church tower, no?
        
             | bee_rider wrote:
             | And if you do, it really hurts the resale value.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-03-19 23:02 UTC)