[HN Gopher] How to send a photo around the world in 1926 (2013)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       How to send a photo around the world in 1926 (2013)
        
       Author : _Microft
       Score  : 45 points
       Date   : 2023-03-16 17:10 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (gizmodo.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (gizmodo.com)
        
       | causi wrote:
       | It's very interesting to compare this method with its
       | contemporary, the wirephoto:
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLUD_NGE370
        
       | dang wrote:
       | We changed the url from https://petapixel.com/2013/07/01/how-
       | they-sent-photos-across... to the article it's cribbed from.
       | 
       | Submitters: " _Please submit the original source. If a post
       | reports on something found on another site, submit the latter._ "
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
        
         | madaxe_again wrote:
         | There's no diagram or copy of the photo on the gizmodo article,
         | unfortunately, which makes it less informative than the re-
         | post.
        
           | dang wrote:
           | Yes, sorry. I've added links to those at the top of the
           | thread.
        
         | _Microft wrote:
         | My bad. Here's the actual source, would you mind updating?
         | 
         | https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-Electrical-Experimente...
        
           | dang wrote:
           | It's ok! these things aren't always obvious.
           | 
           | That's a great link but the blog post adds quite a bit of
           | context so I'll pin it to the top but not change the URL. I
           | hope that works!
        
       | brk wrote:
       | A sort of low tech precursor to the fax machine.
        
         | sidewndr46 wrote:
         | To me it is actually a digitization of an analog process, then
         | back to analog. The tape with the holes punched appears to be
         | digital (holes are either punched or not).
        
           | justsomehnguy wrote:
           | Then a carpet loom is digital too, because it is punch card
           | operated.
        
             | ElfinTrousers wrote:
             | You are correct. We're used to thinking of "digital" as
             | implying "electronic", but that's only because our world
             | contains huge numbers of digital electronic systems.
        
         | jonsen wrote:
         | For some interpretation of "low".
        
         | tokai wrote:
         | Isn't the fax machine from the mid 1800s?
        
           | jonsen wrote:
           | "...first commercial telefax service between Paris and Lyon
           | in 1865, some 11 years before the invention of the
           | telephone":
           | 
           | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fax#Wire_transmission
        
       | dang wrote:
       | The pictures aren't showing up for me but they're here:
       | https://web.archive.org/web/20130704062401/http://paleofutur...
       | 
       | also the main one is here:
       | https://petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2013/07/pIqE68N.jpg
       | 
       | Edit: and here's the original context:
       | https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-Electrical-Experimente... -
       | thanks _Microft!
        
       | teeray wrote:
       | So it looks like they used an enlarger to basically create a
       | bracketed exposure of the image. There must have been some means
       | to make a raster pattern across all N exposures, and if light
       | could pass through a given exposure it made a puncture in the
       | tape. Playing this backwards, if you have a light shining through
       | 1-N holes in a strip and concentrated through a lens to a point
       | moving in the same raster pattern, it should reproduce the image.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | proee wrote:
       | It would be very interesting to see a timeline of all these sorts
       | of communication technologies leading up to present day (latest
       | being SpaceX starlink).
       | 
       | Does anyone have any idea how long this was in use, and what
       | technology replaced it? What is the formal name of this
       | technology?
        
         | marricks wrote:
         | A bit presumptuous to say the latest way to transmit photos is
         | by a specific company. Pretty sure most news papers don't use
         | starlink.
        
         | greenyoda wrote:
         | This article has some history of photo transmission:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wirephoto
         | 
         | Here's the 1970s version:
         | https://petapixel.com/2015/07/26/this-is-how-press-photos-we...
        
       | shrx wrote:
       | Why were 5 different exposures needed?
        
         | watmough wrote:
         | My reading of the diagram says that 5 different exposures were
         | needed to establish a 5+1 level gray scale.
         | 
         | Note that each picture is scanned simultaneously, and
         | contributes to whether 0 - 5 holes are made in the tape.
         | 
         | At the receiving end, the number of holes controls the
         | brightness of the beam reconstructing the image.
        
           | shrx wrote:
           | This makes sense, but I guess you could still achieve the
           | same effect with only one exposure + a configurable readout
           | offset with a variable resistor or something along these
           | lines?
        
         | RC_ITR wrote:
         | I think the tape just had 5 channels and each channel related
         | to one level of grayscale.
         | 
         | If the tape had more or less channels, there would be more/less
         | exposures.
        
       | anonu wrote:
       | Love this. I had no idea this machine existed. In an abstract way
       | this was early "digitization". Its incredible how many iterations
       | we had to go through to get to where we are today. But that is
       | the very basis of progress... constant and rapid iteration and
       | refinement.
        
       | WalterBright wrote:
       | The first internet was really the telegraphy network. It even had
       | chat rooms.
       | 
       | https://www.amazon.com/Victorian-Internet-Remarkable-Ninetee...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-03-16 23:02 UTC)