[HN Gopher] RFC: Organizations for Sourcehut
___________________________________________________________________
RFC: Organizations for Sourcehut
Author : mroche
Score : 43 points
Date : 2023-03-13 19:46 UTC (3 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (lists.sr.ht)
(TXT) w3m dump (lists.sr.ht)
| threatofrain wrote:
| > Up to some percentage of the membership of an organization
| (say, for the sake of argument, 50%) must have a paid SourceHut
| account, either directly or through financial aid. Users can form
| grassroots organizations on SourceHut so long as a sufficient
| number of them have paid accounts, with no further fanfare
| regarding billing.
|
| Interesting billing model, although I can imagine many orgs would
| rather have a simpler billing scenario even if it were more
| expensive.
| c7DJTLrn wrote:
| It sounds like a nightmare to manage. Do you hand 10 employees
| a business card? What if one of them forgets to update the
| billing info after it expires?
| thijsr wrote:
| The paragraph right after says
|
| > Additionally, organizations may have their own billing
| information associated with the org itself. They can use this
| to sponsor the accounts of their members, allowing the billing
| for a tightly coupled group of users (e.g. staff members at a
| company or organization) to have access to centralized billing.
| Through this they can meet the 50% requirement without having
| individual members pay up.
|
| Organizations can have centralized/simpler billing with this
| proposal
| kevincox wrote:
| Yeah, paying for accounts for half of your employees seems
| quite strange. I like that it allows otherwise paying users to
| create orgs but it creates weird politics like stated.
|
| What about just allowing paying users to create many (some high
| number) orgs for up to 5 people? Maybe scaling a bit if
| multiple paying users are inside. Then bigger orgs need to be
| paid.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-03-13 23:01 UTC)