[HN Gopher] ChatGPT should be considered a malevolent AI - and b...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       ChatGPT should be considered a malevolent AI - and be destroyed
        
       Author : rntn
       Score  : 11 points
       Date   : 2023-03-03 22:10 UTC (51 minutes ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.theregister.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.theregister.com)
        
       | david-gpu wrote:
       | I can't take seriously an article that begins by presenting a
       | screenshot from /r/ProgrammerHumor as a source. It's like quoting
       | The Onion.
        
       | j-pb wrote:
       | If it is malevolent, then it has ethics, if it has ethics it has
       | sentience, if it has sentience it has some rights, just like any
       | other sentient being has (e.g. even animals have laws protecting
       | them from unnessecary harm).
       | 
       | It's either that or "I hit my toe on my bed post, my bed should
       | be considered malevolent and be destroyed."
        
       | miles wrote:
       | The same link was 14 hours ago and garnered 16 comments:
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35007071
       | 
       | The dupe detector does not seem to work consistently.
        
       | resource0x wrote:
       | I'm trying to figure out why chatGPT was led to believe the
       | person is dead. There should have been _something_ that made it
       | think the person is dead  "by association". Tested a number of
       | conjectures, but none of them worked. There may not be a single
       | reason - it's just the interplay of "weights" of tokens that have
       | no direct relation to the author of his profession.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-03-03 23:01 UTC)