[HN Gopher] 5k-year-old tavern with food still inside discovered...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       5k-year-old tavern with food still inside discovered in iraq
        
       Author : rntn
       Score  : 259 points
       Date   : 2023-03-02 05:05 UTC (17 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.smithsonianmag.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.smithsonianmag.com)
        
       | photochemsyn wrote:
       | Internet Archive Scholar has some interesting results for
       | "Lagash", it's a nice resource. See this from 1956:
       | 
       | https://archive.org/details/sim_transactions-of-the-american...
       | 
       | > "This is the dream contained in the famous Cylinder A of Gudea
       | (published in TCL VIII), the ensi of the Sumerian city of Lagash,
       | whose floruit falls about the very beginning of the second
       | millennium B.C. Gudea, ruler of Lagash, desired to build a
       | fitting temple for his god, NinGirsu, and, as was customary
       | throughout the entire span of existence of the Mesopotamian
       | civilization, the latter sent a dream..."
       | 
       | These kinds of modern excavations reveal a lot more about
       | ordinary daily life than the older translation of temple
       | documents and royal inscriptions do, however.
        
         | namaria wrote:
         | >These kinds of modern excavations reveal a lot more about
         | ordinary daily life than the older translation of temple
         | documents and royal inscriptions do, however.
         | 
         | I don't think these are separate things. Excavating is a blind
         | effort, there is no 'modern excavation', we just find more
         | interesting things now because we excavate a hell lot more then
         | we used to decades ago. And these boring translations of temple
         | documents and royal inscriptions is how we get context for the
         | objects and layers we find.
        
           | nick123567 wrote:
           | >there is no 'modern excavation'
           | 
           | They describe the modern technique in the UPenn
           | announcement...
           | 
           | Rather than digging according to architectural construction
           | phases, the Lagash Archaeological Project is using an
           | approach championed by Pisa's Pizzimenti, who excavates by
           | microstratigraphic layers, thin lens by thin lens
           | horizontally, across a wide swath, "like doing very careful
           | surgery," Pittman says. "Just 50 centimeters down, we were
           | able to capture all of this. We were happily astounded."
        
             | namaria wrote:
             | That's a refinement of practices that are decades old.
             | Comment I responded to seemed to imply we got evidence of
             | this tavern due to some recent breakthrough, while before
             | we'd be doing mostly work on temples and translation. Which
             | is false, we have slice of life findings since the
             | beginning of archeology, and ongoing efforts on prominent
             | buildings and bodies of text.
        
       | nunodonato wrote:
       | how can food last for 5k years? doesn't it decompose during such
       | a long period?
        
         | RugnirViking wrote:
         | they mentioned they found the "remains" of fish, presumably
         | liquefied along with possibly some bones
        
         | thrill wrote:
         | 5000 year old fish would probably be excellent fish sauce by
         | now
        
         | indy wrote:
         | The article didn't imply that the food was still edible.
        
           | nunodonato wrote:
           | I wasn't implying that either. But how can you recognize
           | organic food after 5k years? In my compost bin it lasts only
           | a few weeks :)
        
             | myth_drannon wrote:
             | You can't compost food in the desert, it's to dry.
        
               | [deleted]
        
             | ceejayoz wrote:
             | Composting is a process specifically intended to break down
             | organics. A closed tavern in the desert isn't likely to
             | have the same conditions, and I'd imagine the remnants of
             | the fish are largely bones and scales of the sort you
             | wouldn't put in home compost.
        
         | fartsucker69 wrote:
         | maybe they found it in a sumerian freezer
        
         | penguinvondoom wrote:
         | bones, seeds etc. can fossilize
        
           | AlotOfReading wrote:
           | They can, but usually not on the relatively short timescales
           | we use in archaeology. It's not what happened here, for
           | example.
        
         | bluedino wrote:
         | You've never found McDonalds of unknown age under the seat of
         | your car?
        
         | lm28469 wrote:
         | Depends on the conditions, see mummies for examples. Don't
         | expect fresh looking food though, it probably amounts to super
         | dry rock looking objects
        
           | Thlom wrote:
           | Reminds me of this article[0] about a guy that revitalized
           | 4500 years old Egyptian yeast and baked bread using old
           | grains.
           | 
           | [0] https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/bread-was-made-
           | usi...
        
             | srcreigh wrote:
             | The guy, Seamus Blackley, a game programmer who proposed
             | the original Xbox, no less. Also made Trespasser (1998)
             | realistic open world 3D game with physics engine [1]
             | 
             | [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSDa4VZbJzI
        
       | dr_dshiv wrote:
       | A dog walks into a bar. "I can't see anything!" He says. "I'll
       | take this one." --oldest joke in the book
        
       | tdiff wrote:
       | Why aren't inner wall orthogonal to outer walls?
        
         | kyteland wrote:
         | I believe what you're calling the "outer wall" is just the edge
         | of the excavation grid, not a wall in the original city. The
         | grid plan used by the archeologists won't necessarily align to
         | the city plan.
        
       | mothsonasloth wrote:
       | Another piece of evidence that Mesopotamia was the cradle of
       | civilisation.
        
         | speed_spread wrote:
         | Civilization might be much older than that but the traces in
         | Mesopotamia are the oldest ones we could find.
        
           | rbanffy wrote:
           | I find the concept of pre-human civilisations fascinating.
           | For how long would we be able to find our own civilisation's
           | remains and what would they look like in a million years, or
           | a 100 million?
        
             | speed_spread wrote:
             | I would expect plastic and radioactive waste to be our
             | longest lived tell-tale markers, along with stuff we've
             | left on the moon, if anybody ever makes it there again.
        
               | rbanffy wrote:
               | Millions of years from now, even the devices we left on
               | the moon will be under regolith or mowed down by incoming
               | micrometeorites.
               | 
               | You are probably right that the most obvious signs will
               | look like mineral deposits. Plastic will be back to oil
               | by then.
        
       | staplung wrote:
       | No word on whether any of the beers had coasters over their tops.
       | I mean maybe they still plan to come back and boy are they going
       | to be pissed if the archeologists have stolen their beers.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | imwillofficial wrote:
       | We missed it the first time around, quick, let's bomb it!
        
       | tiffanyh wrote:
       | I don't know what I was expecting, but those photos weren't it.
        
         | gwill wrote:
         | yea, i wanted to see this food.
        
       | 2rsf wrote:
       | > They also found a domestic dwelling that contained a toilet
       | 
       | A toilet?
        
         | apeescape wrote:
         | A toilet is a place where people go take a shit or piss.
        
           | ElfinTrousers wrote:
           | [writes that down]
        
           | credit_guy wrote:
           | Before the invention of flushing toilets, the place where
           | people were going to shit or piss was generally outside the
           | house, also known as an "outhouse". A "domestic dwelling that
           | contained a toilet and a kitchen" does sound unusual.
        
             | dghughes wrote:
             | The Indus Valley Civilization had toilets that could be
             | flushed using a pipe coming from a water source above it.
             | That's from about 6,000 years ago.
        
             | ztrww wrote:
             | The Romans had indoor toilets. They also existed in
             | medieval times but only the very rich had them. most
             | castles had a toilet or two. of course it was probably
             | reserved for the lord and other high ranking individuals.
        
             | prmoustache wrote:
             | Hell no. People have never been ok to stump on someone else
             | shit and feces have been used in the past as construction
             | material and fertilizer.
             | 
             | There are still old dry toilets in my grandparents old
             | farm. Basically a cabin with a toilet seat made of wood on
             | top of a big hole. Wood chips and saw dust was kept in a
             | bucket for the user to cover his shit with.
             | 
             | Mixed with compost the end result was used as fertilizer.
        
               | fahadkhan wrote:
               | Or as fuel for fire. (Once dired)
        
               | somedangedname wrote:
               | >...a cabin with a toilet seat made of wood on top of a
               | big hole.
               | 
               | In Australian slang this is called a 'long drop' after a
               | particular style of judicial hanging.
               | 
               | And yes, there are spiders.
        
               | speed_spread wrote:
               | I would have guessed long dropbears instead of spiders.
        
               | HeyLaughingBoy wrote:
               | I have never given outhouses a second thought before
               | this, but I wonder how often people fall in.
        
           | photochemsyn wrote:
           | Hmmm...
           | 
           | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/toilet
           | 
           | > "1917, Arthur Conan Doyle, "The Adventure of Wisteria
           | Lodge": "It is a quarter-past two," he said. "Your telegram
           | was dispatched about one. But no one can glance at your
           | toilet and attire without seeing that your disturbance dates
           | from the moment of your waking."
        
           | pbhjpbhj wrote:
           | It can be an item into which one deposits bodily waste, or an
           | area/room where one goes to defecate and/or micturate. The
           | earlier meaning, very occasionally still used, is a place for
           | dressing and/or grooming (eg powdering a wig).
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | jollyllama wrote:
       | Great, it used to be a nice, chill place to grab a drink and some
       | food but now it'll be swamped with tourists.
        
         | 404mm wrote:
         | My expectations form the headline: Photos of dusty objects on
         | some clay or stone made benches.
         | 
         | Reality: photo of a large square sandbox
        
           | antihero wrote:
           | Excited for SandBox in Shoreditch that sells desert themed
           | craft beer for PS7/pint
        
         | throwaway1777 wrote:
         | Did you even read the article? It's an archaeological site...
         | not an operating tavern...
        
           | surge wrote:
           | Did you even read the comment? That was obvious humor.
           | 
           | "It used to be" - 5k years ago
           | 
           | "now it'll be swamped with tourists" - today now that its a
           | famous dig site, people will come to look.
           | 
           | All of it parodying a common refrain from locals when ever a
           | cool local spot gets media attention on the news or some
           | national TV show.
           | 
           | Much like dissecting a frog, explaining humor kills the joke.
           | 
           | To OP: I liked the joke.
        
             | samstave wrote:
             | You ever go to Turkish Laundry? Nobody goes there any more,
             | too many tourists.
        
             | soperj wrote:
             | It's interesting seeing a joke as a top comment and someone
             | downvoted for not getting the joke. I feel as though the
             | voting would have been the opposite on this site years ago.
        
               | Aicy wrote:
               | Yep, as much as I enjoy the occasional humour I don't
               | want HN to become reddit.
        
               | surge wrote:
               | They were down voted for the way they remarked on it.
               | "Did you even read the article", berating the OP for
               | missing something obvious (and also apparent just from
               | the headline, not just the article).
               | 
               | People make jokes sometimes on here, its not all serious
               | business, I don't think it would have been different
               | years ago. You should get down voted for being a bit rude
               | and simultaneously hypocritical because your criticism is
               | also based on also missing something fairly obvious. The
               | OP didn't deserve that comment, and the commenter should
               | be corrected and have it pointed out they're actually the
               | one making the embarrassing mistake.
        
               | serf wrote:
               | It's not about not getting the joke, "did you even read
               | the article?" is an explicitly against the rules
               | comment[0], and it's snide to boot.
               | 
               | [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
        
           | InvaderFizz wrote:
           | I think you missed the joke. It was quiet because literally
           | no one was there for thousands of years.
        
           | kome wrote:
           | ahahah
        
       | epberry wrote:
       | The archaeology content on HN is some of my favorite. I think
       | what this find is getting at is more evidence that Sumerian
       | civilization was more egalitarian than we may have thought if we
       | projected our understanding of feudal civilizations all the way
       | back.
        
         | kupopuffs wrote:
         | Interesting. I've always seen feudalism as the response to
         | civilization/empires collapsing (e.g. europe in the dark ages,
         | Japan), and Mesopotamia was a thriving civilization
        
           | TechBro8615 wrote:
           | Feudalism was not entirely new to the Middle Ages - it was
           | partially derived from the Ancient Roman system of Patronage
           | [0] between a Patron and Client. So this kind of hierarchical
           | social structure predates the civilizational collapses that
           | led to the Middle Ages. Of course, Mesopotamia predates
           | Ancient Rome, so perhaps it was even more egalitarian.
           | Although slavery has existed since pretty much day one of
           | civilization.
           | 
           | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patronage_in_ancient_Rome
        
             | ztrww wrote:
             | such a system more or less existed in every premodern
             | society. Some sort of a patron-slient to system is
             | absolutely inevitable in any complex non egalitarian
             | society unless there is a strong state that can protect the
             | rights of individuals.
        
       | londons_explore wrote:
       | For those wondering why people were living in the middle of a
       | desert 5k years ago...
       | 
       | It seems the global temperature then was much the same as today:
       | https://scitechdaily.com/images/Global-Average-Surface-Tempe...
       | 
       | Would there have perhaps been a locally different climate, for
       | example because the african and middle eastern rainforests hadn't
       | yet vanished after the global temperature rises 5k years earlier?
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | ftrobro wrote:
       | I wonder why the tavern was abandoned with food in it in 2700 BC
       | when the city itself was inhabitated far longer and according to
       | Wikipedia might have been "the largest city in the world from c.
       | 2075 to 2030 BC".
        
         | jcutrell wrote:
         | I was thinking exactly this.
         | 
         | It's not surprised it would be abandoned, but the story makes
         | it sound like it was _suddenly_ abandoned.
         | 
         | The simplest explanation to me is likely the untimely death of
         | the proprietor, but even that doesn't seem like a sufficient
         | answer.
        
         | ggeorgovassilis wrote:
         | The article mentions that the city was surrounded by "fertile
         | lands", so maybe there was no need for scavenging?
        
           | Kye wrote:
           | Ancient times must have had some equivalent to urban
           | explorers.
           | 
           | edit: Bing Chat says...
           | 
           | >> _" That's an interesting question. I couldn't find any
           | direct evidence of ancient urban explorers, but there were
           | many ancient explorers who traveled to different lands and
           | cultures for various reasons123. Some of them may have
           | explored urban areas as well, but they didn't leave any
           | records of their adventures."_
           | 
           | >> _" One possible exception is Xuan Zang (602-664), a
           | Chinese Buddhist monk who traveled to India and visited many
           | ancient cities and temples along the way. He wrote a detailed
           | account of his journey, which is considered a valuable source
           | of information on the history and culture of India and
           | Central Asia1."_
        
             | speed_spread wrote:
             | That's not really urbex though. Not sure ancient times had
             | closed down industrial and commercial sites like the ones
             | we have now.
        
             | ralfd wrote:
             | He looks like a backpacker tourist:
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xuanzang
        
               | notahacker wrote:
               | I was going to say "but backpackers never wore clothes
               | that wild", but then I remembered backpacking in India!
        
               | thesuitonym wrote:
               | In hindsight, it's completely obvious, like of course it
               | would be this way, but it's still amazing how ancient
               | people were exactly the same as people are today.
        
         | pram wrote:
         | IIRC there's a lot of totally abandoned places around there
         | (like Babylon) because the Tigris and Euphrates changed course
         | quite a bit? So what might have been a riverside city soon was
         | just sitting in the middle of the desert.
         | 
         | Kinda like the fishing towns around the Aral Sea.
        
         | oh_sigh wrote:
         | One can think of a million reasons, but we will never know.
         | Maybe the owner died and the kids didn't want to take it over
         | and boarded it up.
         | 
         | Maybe someone was murdered there or everyone got food poisoning
         | and it was closed up because people were superstitious.
        
         | arp242 wrote:
         | I used to live across an abandoned building that was falling
         | apart; one day I forced the door to have a look inside (the
         | place was already beyond salvage) and there was all sorts of
         | stuff inside; some furniture, bunch of magazines and
         | newspapers, empty bottles. Today's refuse, tomorrow's
         | archaeology. Lots of boring mundane stuff gets interesting
         | hundreds of years in the future.
         | 
         | Or the owner burned the place down after a tourist from a
         | faraway land sold him a polly sea for some inn sewer ants.
        
         | notahacker wrote:
         | Plenty of abandoned taverns in inhabited cities in the modern
         | world. Owners die or suffer financial or social death,
         | businesses become too unprofitable to run in parts of cities
         | where the land also isn't worth much, structures start looking
         | alarmingly unstable and aren't worth repairing etc etc.
         | 
         | And regardless of how long bits of the food are preserved for
         | future archaeologists, a couple of days after the tavern's
         | closed most of it isn't really edible any more...
        
           | pbhjpbhj wrote:
           | You'd expect scavengers to get the food: rodents, insects,
           | etc.?
           | 
           | Buildings that fall into disrepair tend to be scavenged by
           | humans for materials too. Much moreso anywhere there's wealth
           | disparity or resource shortages.
        
             | AlotOfReading wrote:
             | You'd be surprised. It depends heavily on the prevailing
             | social mores. Besides, much of what archaeologists recover
             | is the stuff that survived, not the 99% that didn't.
        
             | nick123567 wrote:
             | In archaeological terms, they could be discovering stuff
             | like microscopic grain husks embedded into the clay of the
             | containers. Though they could have found whole chicken
             | skeletons or fossilized garlic or something else too... I
             | searched for a moment but couldn't find more details from
             | this dig about the food specifically.
        
             | einherjae wrote:
             | Presumably just the eras equivalent of Hakarl or
             | Surstromming was left, alongside the pizza-with-pineapple
             | equivalent and Dr. Pepper-equivalent.
        
             | giantg2 wrote:
             | Notice that they didn't find any beer or wine. It seems the
             | important stuff got scavenged.
        
         | forgotusername6 wrote:
         | Building falls or burns down perhaps? The ruins cover the site
         | and people just rebuild on top of it.
         | 
         | There's a site in the UK from slightly later (1000BC) that had
         | food still found in containers but that was the result of a
         | fire
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Must_Farm_Bronze_Age_settlemen...
        
           | ftrobro wrote:
           | I was mainly wondering why noone else claimed the tavern or
           | demolished it to make room for a new building considering
           | that the city was probably growing between 2700 BC and 2075
           | BC. Looking at the photo it seems the tavern was found in the
           | top soil layer with nothing above it. But perhaps the photo
           | looks like that because there have been several excavations
           | since 1887. Or maybe the photo just shows some random
           | building...
        
         | anonu wrote:
         | It's hard for humans to fathom timelines beyond our life span.
         | But over the course of 100s or 1000s of years, cities can be
         | abandoned and population migrates. Think about the Detroit
         | suburbs in recent years where entire neighborhoods were
         | abandoned. https://www.gettyimages.com/photos/abandoned-houses-
         | in-detro...
        
           | Mountain_Skies wrote:
           | That looks like the City of Detroit, not its suburbs, though
           | I'm sure some of them do suffer some decay, in general
           | Detroit's suburbs are pretty healthy.
        
             | jghn wrote:
             | The definition of 'suburb' has been changing over time. I
             | can't speak to Detroit but for instance with Boston the
             | original 'suburbs' would now be described as "the city of
             | Boston, not its suburbs". Likewise the town I grew up in as
             | a kid (mumble) years ago, I would have been laughed at for
             | calling it a 'suburb' of Boston as it was too far out of
             | the city. Now Wikipedia calls it a suburb of Boston.
        
               | gs17 wrote:
               | I can speak to Detroit, and it's the same. The areas
               | south of 8 Mile but not downtown would by definition be
               | "suburbs" (and structurally resemble the outside of the
               | city), but I'm used to people reserving the term for
               | outside city limits. Now that I'm in Nashville, "suburbs"
               | seem to usually still be inside the city, so I'm guessing
               | it changes as cities grow/decay.
        
               | Infernal wrote:
               | Nashville has experienced really rapid growth too over
               | the last 20 years, and I think it takes a while for
               | naming conventions to catch up. Given by the fact that
               | what people call suburbs appear to you (as I'm assuming,
               | a relative newcomer) to be "inside the city".
               | 
               | My own hometown has experienced rapid growth over the
               | same time span as Nashville, and has annexed large
               | portions of what were commonly known as the suburbs. So
               | there has been a literal change from what used to be
               | suburbs to now be within city limits, in the course of a
               | generation.
        
           | somenameforme wrote:
           | Japan is another great example as they're now seeing
           | population decline by the millions.
           | 
           | I think we often forget just how many of us there are on this
           | planet (or even in a given country). Each of those million
           | people all had their own homes, lives, businesses, and so on.
           | And as the country sees population decline, much of that just
           | gets left to rot. Homes that have been completely abandoned,
           | usually because the owner died and left no heir, even have a
           | term - akiya. Here's [1] an image search with all sorts of
           | them. They make up more than 13% of all homes in Japan now.
           | They have more homes than people to live in them!
           | 
           | And if things don't suddenly turn around in dramatic fashion,
           | soon there will be tens of millions of these sort of places.
           | In some you may even find the old owner. There's also a term
           | for that - kodokushi [2].
           | 
           | [1] -
           | https://search.brave.com/images?q=akiya%20houses&source=web
           | 
           | [2] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kodokushi
        
           | hackernewds wrote:
           | This seems like the impending future for San Francisco
        
       | eternalban wrote:
       | > the tyranny of kings
       | 
       | English had inns and pubs, when toiling under the "tyranny of
       | kings", right?
       | 
       | https://www.historic-uk.com/CultureUK/The-Great-British-Pub/
        
       | DeathArrow wrote:
       | And on the table a Big Mac with fries, looking as fresh as on its
       | first day.
        
         | euroderf wrote:
         | I was expecting ever-fresh spam & twinkies.
        
       | ElfinTrousers wrote:
       | These finds that teach us about everyday life are interesting to
       | me because they remind us that people are people. I remember
       | looking at an exhibit of Babylonian seal cylinders, which were a
       | kind of tool that a Babylonian would use to sign a document
       | written on a wet clay tablet. It suddenly occurred to me that
       | what I was looking at was not a work of art intended to be
       | displayed and enjoyed just for its aesthetic value: it was the
       | everyday tool of an ordinary clerk who lived and died thousands
       | of years ago. I pictured this ancient Babylonian at the office,
       | rolling the cylinder over wet tablets, looking forward to
       | quitting time when he could go home, maybe stop for a beer on the
       | way, play with the kids, kiss his wife. All of which would also
       | be normal behavior for a white-collar worker alive today.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-03-02 23:02 UTC)