[HN Gopher] U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs: FreeCAD (2021)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs: FreeCAD (2021)
        
       Author : app4soft
       Score  : 68 points
       Date   : 2023-02-26 15:04 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.oit.va.gov)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.oit.va.gov)
        
       | bluedino wrote:
       | Does it need to be sold by a GSA-approved vendor? Is it CMMC-
       | approved?
        
       | boris-ning-usds wrote:
       | Interesting to see this popped up here. I used to submit a bunch
       | of tools through the internal Technical Reference Model (TRM)
       | portal where there's 40 or so questions to answer.
       | 
       | draw.io should be available too.
       | 
       | Back in 2018 when I joined, VA laptops were still running on hard
       | disk drives and the laptops were 6.5lbs. Procurement cycles for
       | it were likely once per decade, and VA was just going through
       | their last batch of shitty laptops; and I wrote all my bash
       | scripts on that running on cygwin.
        
       | andychase wrote:
       | Just for context, that system lists what might be approved for
       | installation on Government Furnished Equipment. It doesn't mean
       | anyone will use it.
        
         | themodelplumber wrote:
         | I like to think there's somebody watching this announcement
         | (based on their own request) and pouring themselves a cold one,
         | getting ready to train their whole department on some niche
         | aspect of FreeCAD that will save millions, with this approval
         | out of the way.
         | 
         | (Millions of dollars maybe, but also maybe just millions of
         | seconds, you never know)
         | 
         | Then step 2 of the plan is to direct some grant money toward
         | development of some $picky_CAD_folks_features[] which will also
         | prove beneficial for some kids somewhere,
         | 
         | ...who will go on to help create the next generation of really
         | awesome CAD tools and designs that benefit all kinds of people.
         | 
         | But, that's just one version that seems like it could happen,
         | to be sure.
        
       | Evidlo wrote:
       | I wonder what they use CAD for?
        
       | killjoywashere wrote:
       | The page cannot be displayed because an internal server error has
       | occurred.
       | 
       | So here's the way back link
       | 
       | https://web.archive.org/web/20210928110831/https://www.oit.v...
        
         | app4soft wrote:
         | > _The page cannot be displayed because an internal server
         | error has occurred._
         | 
         | HN effect.
        
       | sco1 wrote:
       | Am I missing something particularly exciting about this?
        
         | hadlock wrote:
         | Government employees can design basic stuff (and some not-so-
         | basic stuff) and 3d print it in their machine shop, or send the
         | design to a machine shop to be made, rather than sending in a
         | requisition for purchasing commercial CAD software, waiting
         | 6-12 months for purchasing and legal approval etc. to design
         | basic stuff. There are a million things that need pretty basic
         | brackets or adapters that break or rust and you could get a
         | machine up and running in a day or two by designing it
         | yourself, rather than going through a bidding process, purchase
         | order, invoice etc. Maybe the ABS 3D printed part will only
         | last a week, but at least your million dollar machine is up and
         | running while the metal part is on order. You can cut out a ton
         | of bureaucracy.
         | 
         | There are a lot of groups named "F*ck that, I'll just print it"
         | showing how they fixed or modify one simple part that doesn't
         | have a lot of stress (less than 100lbs) but they'd have to
         | throw out or stop using otherwise.
        
         | Jtsummers wrote:
         | Not really. It appears to be a database of approved (and
         | disapproved) software people can use for various activities.
         | The constraint on this one (and it seems to be on most of them,
         | doing a brief browse through) is that you have to inform/get
         | approval from the supervisor and others before downloading and
         | perform a virus scan on it before executing.
         | 
         | I guess the good thing is that it shows the VA has a central
         | repository of approved and disapproved software instead of
         | making every team go out and figure it out themselves.
        
         | s1artibartfast wrote:
         | That obviously depends on what excites you. I think it's cool
         | that more free software gaining acceptance and traction
        
           | sco1 wrote:
           | This is just a bureaucratic checkbox though. IT approvals are
           | "an employee asked if they could use this" not some kind of
           | broader endorsement.
        
             | pxmpxm wrote:
             | Yeah, also more to the point does the VA actually use any
             | sort cad at all?
        
               | kube-system wrote:
               | Any organization the size of the VA is going to have
               | people using CAD as a matter of just maintaining their
               | property.
               | 
               | Example: https://www.usajobs.gov/job/708941600
        
               | hadlock wrote:
               | Every government org has a building, and any larger
               | facility (20,000 sq ft) will have a "physical plant" with
               | various machinery. Any large facility will have a machine
               | shop of sorts to maintain HVAC equipment, utility
               | vehicles, repair things.
               | 
               | The VA maintains something like 30 hospitals nationwide,
               | in addition to various amphatheaters and storage depots,
               | it's a huge org. Someone somewhere will be designing
               | stuff with FreeCAD and 3D printing stuff within a week to
               | solve some problem, even if it's something as simple as a
               | shim to keep some HVAC flashing from vibrating.
        
             | s1artibartfast wrote:
             | Sure, I think that is clear. It is still better to be on
             | the list with a check than not!
        
             | thrwawy74 wrote:
             | At my corner, they license out Creative Suite and moan
             | about the cost every year. So many folks using it for basic
             | video cutting/transitions. I've recommended Blender - which
             | is approved - over and over, but it falls on deaf ears.
             | This is the same thing. Great open-source application that
             | does what people want. We don't just need "enterprise
             | support" for open-source applications, we also need
             | enterprise training. I wish a part of the gov were
             | dedicated to supporting open-source and acting as good
             | sumaritan liaisons to these projects.
        
             | Brian_K_White wrote:
             | It's a good thing. So what if there is not also a parade?
        
             | 1MachineElf wrote:
             | I used to work there and was delighted they had Vim listed.
             | I was allowed to install Vim on my workstation.
             | 
             | Emacs is not approved unfortunately. Not sure why. I wonder
             | if it has to do with that exploitable bug from decades ago
             | from Cliff Stoll's _The Cuckoo 's Egg_. Rationale for other
             | technology choices they make go back even farther in
             | history.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-02-26 23:02 UTC)