[HN Gopher] Wilson's 3D-printed basketball is full of holes but ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Wilson's 3D-printed basketball is full of holes but never goes flat
        
       Author : sohkamyung
       Score  : 18 points
       Date   : 2023-02-21 22:09 UTC (51 minutes ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (gizmodo.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (gizmodo.com)
        
       | bentt wrote:
       | It would have meant a lot for them to bounce that ball
        
         | skeeter2020 wrote:
         | oh god no, you can't actually bounce _this_ version. This is
         | the display model. Plus none of them look like they could
         | successfully dribble a basketball without shanking it off a
         | foot.
        
       | grenoire wrote:
       | Any videos of a game with this ball?
        
         | smoldesu wrote:
         | Not a game, but this was linked in the comments:
         | https://youtu.be/JC02e5dcvZw
         | 
         | It bounces fairly high and clearly has a bit of heft to the
         | design. IANABBP, but looks good to me!
        
           | skeeter2020 wrote:
           | IANABBP
           | 
           | I am not a basketball... player? person?
           | 
           | IANA NBPA M(ember)
        
           | sen wrote:
           | For those people hitting a geo-block on the above link, this
           | one worked for me in AU:
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRoHKpmcRS0
           | 
           | It's hard to tell from the limited actual bouncing/etc in the
           | clip, but it looks like it's lighter and has less bounce than
           | a regulation ball. Still seems to bounce crazily well for
           | something 3D printed and without air pressure inside it.
           | 
           | I'd be very excited to see this become a thing for balls in
           | general if they can make them even close to existing
           | basketball/soccer/etc balls. I doubt we'd ever see them in
           | professional sports for tradition-reasons but for
           | amateur/home fun I think it makes a lot of sense and for that
           | market they don't need to be "perfect".
        
       | NKosmatos wrote:
       | Great tech and interesting design but the really nice thing would
       | be if it was something we could buy today.
        
       | dfxm12 wrote:
       | _How many times has a game of basketball been thwarted by a ball
       | that was too flat to bounce? An air pump with a properly sized
       | needle isn't something most people carry around with them all the
       | time_
       | 
       | I'm racking my brain trying to think of one. Organized games
       | always have the pump and extra balls laying around. Every pick up
       | game I've played involved a few people who happened to bring a
       | ball, and a pump wasn't far away (car trunk, or house in the
       | neighborhood), even if no one had one on them.
       | 
       | I'm all for new tech for its own sake, but if you're going to try
       | to convince me this is going to be useful, give me some real
       | reasons why this is better than a regular ball. Is it cheaper?
       | Will it last longer either outdoors or indoors? Is it better for
       | the environment?
        
         | vosper wrote:
         | > Organized games always have the pump and extra balls laying
         | around. Every pick up game I've played involved a few people
         | who happened to bring a ball, and a pump wasn't far away (car
         | trunk, or house in the neighborhood), even if no one had one on
         | them.
         | 
         | > I'm all for new tech for its own sake, but if you're going to
         | try to convince me this is going to be useful, give me some
         | real reasons why this is better than a regular ball.
         | 
         | Well the answer is convenience, right? Which shouldn't be
         | underrated. Now you don't need spare balls, don't need to find
         | a pump, and there's no more interruptions because of that.
         | 
         | It's also reducing the organization / forethought that's
         | required, even if right now it's so commonplace that it's faded
         | into the background.
        
       | Jarmsy wrote:
       | I wonder how much the openings affect the drag.
        
         | cjbgkagh wrote:
         | Plus less (no?) Magnus effect.
        
         | gkfasdfasdf wrote:
         | I was wondering the same...does it shoot the same or will it
         | curve like a wiffle ball?
         | 
         | Regardless it'd be great to not have to pump... especially on
         | cold days.
        
       | PaulKeeble wrote:
       | I wonder if this could be made on at least one of the larger
       | domestic filament printers out of TPU. I imagine a design around
       | TPU 95 might work well. Certainly gives me the idea to try and
       | make a ball that is hollow and pliant enough to bounce well.
       | 
       | Certainly looks like some people have tried it and got reasonable
       | results for solid balls
       | (https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:4358673)
        
       | syntheweave wrote:
       | The last time there was an attempt to make a major change to the
       | NBA regulation basketball, in 2006, it went poorly because the
       | ball they came up with was too hard, and left players with
       | chafed, scratched-up fingers by the end of the game. (Some
       | reported it softened up with use, but the reputation was set by
       | that first impression.)
       | 
       | I don't think basketball needs to be very high tech, but I guess
       | manufacturers aren't going to sit still either.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-02-21 23:01 UTC)