[HN Gopher] Show HN: Planlike.pro - New Estimating Tool
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Show HN: Planlike.pro - New Estimating Tool
        
       Hey folks, want to share the project I've been working on for past
       few years. It's a project estimation tool which can be applied to
       pretty much any project, not only software development, but any
       where you'd want to know cost or time it takes.  Core features:  *
       Project resources such as engineer, or anybody/anything that you
       need to include into project  * PDF Export  * Easy features
       management including drag & drop  * Sorting/filtering/search  *
       Projects sharing(share with your client via link)
        
       Author : avdept
       Score  : 78 points
       Date   : 2023-02-21 11:54 UTC (11 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (planlike.pro)
 (TXT) w3m dump (planlike.pro)
        
       | hcaz wrote:
       | This looks great, I will check it out. A tool like this would
       | have been immensely useful for us in the early days.
        
         | avdept wrote:
         | Thanks bud. If you get any feedbacks - let me know. Looking for
         | all types of feedbacks
        
       | pbnjay wrote:
       | Scrolling is driving me nuts. Wtf do you need to hijack that for
        
         | avdept wrote:
         | Resolved!
        
       | sneakymichael wrote:
       | FYI: I just get redirected to an "Oops" (/not-found) page when I
       | try to sign-up. Tried twice
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | jerz wrote:
       | Great domain name
        
         | avdept wrote:
         | Thanks! It took a while to come up with this name
        
       | revskill wrote:
       | Poor customers don't have money to plan.
       | 
       | Rich ones just don't care about how to plan, they care about
       | earning more.
       | 
       | Useless stuff then ?
        
         | cfiggers wrote:
         | ...are you seriously arguing against _the very concept of
         | planning_ in order to take a shot at this solo engineer 's hard
         | work?
        
           | revskill wrote:
           | This could be a warning/alert for hard work ? You want a
           | praise ?
        
         | avdept wrote:
         | It's not about personal planning, it's about commercial
         | planning. Whether you want to provide a quote to client,
         | instead of spreadsheets you can use planlike.pro
        
           | revskill wrote:
           | Wait, why not spreadsheet ?
        
             | blowski wrote:
             | I've done a lot of estimating for plans in spreadsheets.
             | It's awful. I'm really happy someone's trying to innovate
             | with an alternative.
        
               | avdept wrote:
               | Thanks for support, reading this I understand I didn't
               | waste over a year of my life working on this.
        
         | vertis wrote:
         | In my experience, rich people are rich because they know how to
         | manage their money (in addition to earning it, building it).
         | It's only the people that care about status (i.e. appearing
         | rich) that flaunt their money around.
         | 
         | That's before you even add in customers like startups that need
         | to budget with other peoples money (burn rate).
        
           | revskill wrote:
           | For pricing plans, is spreadsheet best use case for ?
        
       | theusus wrote:
       | Privacy policy?
        
         | avdept wrote:
         | Sure - https://planlike.pro/privacy-and-terms
        
       | Zachsa999 wrote:
       | I think we hugged it.
        
       | disdi89 wrote:
       | Project looks great. Some feedbacks - 1. Some template that the
       | user can directly use would be great. 2. Also is there an option
       | to show the interdependency of tasks on each other ?
        
         | avdept wrote:
         | 1. Templates - that's in work already 2. No. Unfortunately I
         | didn't not aim for any project management features. However for
         | each card you can put a list of TODOs and sort of check status.
         | But I'll think if I could add something like that
        
       | egorfine wrote:
       | One important thing missing is the ability to specify approximate
       | numbers, just like we do in real life.
       | 
       | Let's say this item is going to cost me $90-120. I'd like to
       | write down just that. Also I'd like to say that there is a 80%
       | probability that I will be able to purchase the item for $90, 10%
       | probability of spending $100, etc.
       | 
       | Then you can calculate all those estimations and probabilities
       | and deliver a figure that is much more useful than just a =SUM()
       | from an Excel table.
       | 
       | (I have used this method of estimation in software dev project
       | management)
        
         | avdept wrote:
         | Yeah this makes sense. I'll think how'd I add something like
         | that.
         | 
         | Meanwhile you can try our percentage type of cards - it allows
         | you to add % amount of all cards in current block
        
         | danenania wrote:
         | In my experience, I've found that plans and estimates (whether
         | in software or life stuff) are always more accurate if you just
         | use the higher number in the range. If anything, it still won't
         | be high enough, especially for software. And even if you
         | overshoot a bit this way, it's a lot better to miss high than
         | miss low.
        
       | rrgok wrote:
       | The dashed lines in the footer [0]. Why they are not continuous?
       | They start in the purple background thing but as soon as that
       | finishes, it starts another dashed segment, totally disconnected
       | from the previous one. I know it is a little thing, but it irks
       | me the wrong way.
       | 
       | I know it is a silly thing, but I felt the need to give this
       | feedback for some reason.
       | 
       | [0] https://imgur.com/a/132V96x
        
         | avdept wrote:
         | Thanks for sharing mate, I'll see how can I improve it.
        
       | no_time wrote:
       | Do people really drop 8 bucks every month for things like this?
       | I'm not trying to be hurtful or condescending to the authors.
       | 
       | I just feel like there is such a large disconnect between me and
       | the people I know vs these new SaaS products popping up
       | everywhere, each asking for 5-15 dollars each month. ~10 years
       | ago I was totally on board when these same products where a one
       | time AppStore purchase in the 1-5 dollar range. I wonder what
       | changed.
       | 
       | Maybe it has something to do with me earning 1/5th of the average
       | SV salary.
        
         | rglover wrote:
         | This attitude is incredibly destructive and leads to a
         | situation where the only options/solutions available are
         | mediocre, corporate drivel.
         | 
         | Even if it's not for you, people building stuff independently
         | (and charging for it so they can sustain effort) should be
         | celebrated, not scorned.
        
         | avdept wrote:
         | It depends on usage. If you use it once - then there's a free
         | plan for that. But if tool helps you to generate income and
         | makes if faster/easier - I think its fair to ask 8 bucks
        
       | emmanueloga_ wrote:
       | "Plan" makes me think of building/construction plans, even you
       | describe it as a new "estimating" tool, so why not
       | estimatelike.pro? (or any alternative that more closely connects
       | the tool to the concept of "estimating").
       | 
       | For any given problem, I always think that the model (or
       | "business logic") comes first, and then the GUI. I have no idea
       | from you website what's the underlying model for your tool.
       | 
       | From browsing the home page it makes me think it this tool works
       | kind of like "a frontend for a spreadsheet" ... but I'm just
       | using my imagination, since you don't explain how it works or
       | what it looks like.
       | 
       | Hope this doesn't sound too negative. Congrats on launching!
       | 
       | P.S.: the slideshow has to be the most cryptic I've seen in a
       | long time... I can see tiny lil arrows left and right that are
       | hard to click, next to "mysterious" integers that change every
       | time I click the arrows. I'm guessing it may describe how many
       | slides are to the left and right? Why not using the "de facto
       | std" of showing one dot per slide, and highlight the current one?
        
         | emmanueloga_ wrote:
         | Addendum 1: I found an (open source! [1]) app that I think does
         | a better job of explaining the underlying model and showing how
         | it works, maybe it could work as inspiration? (or at least to
         | compare/contrast).
         | 
         | Addendum 2: My preference would be a DSL to describe this kinds
         | of problems, rather than a drag-and-drop, GUI interface.
         | Advanced users could do away with the mouse completely, or even
         | run the models from the command line or embedded in another
         | app. Any given "fixed GUI" will always have limitations, but if
         | you want to make it easier for non-power-users, you can also
         | build a simple GUI on top of the DSL.
         | 
         | 1: https://github.com/getguesstimate/guesstimate-app
        
       | oriettaxx wrote:
       | it's a good project: I'll try it out (we are doing something
       | similar, but it's pretty hard to have a general saas service ...
       | too often project are too different so you need a lot of
       | customization I think).
       | 
       | bwt
       | 
       | * this
       | https://securityheaders.com/?q=https%3A%2F%2Fplanlike.pro&fo...
       | can be easy to fix (I'll give you the settings for haproxy or
       | apache if you need)
       | 
       | * https://tools.pingdom.com/#619d161622000000 can be improved,
       | too
       | 
       | I would also disable TLS 1.0
       | (https://www.immuniweb.com/ssl/planlike.pro/72wS3s8G/ ) and
       | enable HTTP2 or have both HTTP2 and HTTP1
       | 
       | On the reset password you should not show us the world messages
       | like "This email is not registered" (security)
       | 
       | then maybe
       | 
       | * have https://www.planlike.pro redirect to https://planlike.pro
       | 
       | * populate https://planlike.pro/robots.txt
        
         | avdept wrote:
         | Thanks for suggesting on this. I used the default setup without
         | any extra configuring. Will add those missing headers
        
       | sbarre wrote:
       | This is totally in my wheelhouse, but I'd love to be able to
       | watch a quick demo before I commit to signing up for an account.
       | 
       | Whether it's a video or some kind of screenshot-based walk-
       | through.. Just something that will tell me if this is a fit for
       | me.
       | 
       | The abstract imagery on the site don't really convey the
       | experience of using your app, and that doesn't tell me enough.
       | 
       | Good luck!
        
         | vertis wrote:
         | Was going to say the same thing, the marketing website doesn't
         | convey enough about the product.
         | 
         | Congrats on launching though. Step 1 complete.
        
           | avdept wrote:
           | It seems it was the easiest.
        
         | TruthSHIFT wrote:
         | Exactly. I came to the comments to figure out what this is. I
         | was intrigued, though.
        
         | avdept wrote:
         | Hey and thanks for checking out our product. I'd like to run a
         | quick demo for you to show some cool features that we have. How
         | can I contact you?
        
           | mdekkers wrote:
           | > Hey and thanks for checking out our product. I'd like to
           | run a quick demo for you to show some cool features that we
           | have. How can I contact you?
           | 
           | Maybe just do the video like what they asked for, so we can
           | all make the assessment, instead of turning it into a greasy
           | sales pitch. Not going to lie, this response put me off
           | completely.
        
             | PeterBarrett wrote:
             | Responding to someone actively expressing interest in your
             | product by offering them a demo definitely doesn't qualify
             | as "turning it into a greasy sales pitch". They've clearly
             | built the product to be a low touch experience so offering
             | to run through it with someone is actually very pro-active
             | of them.
        
               | lucideer wrote:
               | > _Responding to someone actively expressing interest in
               | your product by offering them a demo definitely doesn 't
               | qualify as "turning it into a greasy sales pitch"_
               | 
               | Direct contact introduces social pressure into what was
               | previously a hands off window-shopping/product evaluation
               | experience. If a person is expressly looking for a sales
               | contact for 1-to-1 demos (e.g. after filling out a
               | contact form), then that may be ok, but outside of that
               | it certainly comes across pretty greasy.
               | 
               | The original comment was product & marketing feedback in
               | general (suggestion to improve onboarding for all
               | visitors), not a direct request for info solely for
               | themselves. Replying with an offer of solving for them
               | individually isn't in line with the intent of the
               | original comment: it comes across as ignoring product
               | feedback.
               | 
               | Fair enough the second reply stated the 1-to-1 demo would
               | be quicker than creating a video, but the first reply
               | gave no indication they'd take on board the video
               | suggestion at all.
               | 
               | > _They 've clearly built the product to be a low touch
               | experience_
               | 
               | What makes you say that? If it was as clearly low touch
               | as you say this thread would not exist.
        
               | blowski wrote:
               | I'd much prefer to talk directly with a founder than
               | watch a pre-recorded video.
        
               | avdept wrote:
               | You got my point. I can't make video demo right away,
               | will take some time, but gladly can demo it live and
               | answer the questions.
        
             | avdept wrote:
             | That's great idea. Unfortunately I did it all myself(solo
             | engineer) and didn't think of making demo video. But I will
             | definitely make one!
        
             | dang wrote:
             | Hey, I understand the reaction (I'm sure many of us do) but
             | can you please go easier on people who are sharing their
             | work? There's no need to call names and it's against both
             | the HN guidelines and the Show HN guidelines:
             | 
             | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
             | 
             | https://news.ycombinator.com/showhn.html
        
       | michaelmior wrote:
       | Looks like it has quite the set of features. Congrats on
       | launching!
       | 
       | It would really help to explain _somewhere_ what sections,
       | blocks, and cards are. The FAQ didn 't really explain this and
       | with no example to work from, I'm really not sure how I'm
       | supposed to use this.
       | 
       | As a minor piece of feedback, when I drag and drop to reorder
       | cards, the card I just dragged opens for editing. This is rather
       | atypical behavior and I think I would find it very annoying if I
       | was trying to rearrange a lot of cards.
        
         | avdept wrote:
         | I'm working on demo video to put on landing page. It seems like
         | project more complex to start with that I thought, so I will
         | provide guidance on core features and how to use them.
         | 
         | Thanks for checking out. I'll fix that issue you have!
        
       | jamesgill wrote:
       | Slick idea, thanks for sharing.
       | 
       | Two minor points:
       | 
       | 1.Some of the language on the site feels very 'translated to
       | English'. One example: "It's better try it once than read it many
       | times".
       | 
       | 2. The landing page says it's for "Simple cost estimation and
       | planning"; The Features page presents it as a project management
       | tool with client-sharing features. That feels like two
       | overlapping but different use cases/audiences.
        
         | avdept wrote:
         | Yeah its definitely not a project management tool, rather
         | project estimation with client sharing features, where your
         | client can enable/disable some features that he thinks he
         | needs/doesnt
         | 
         | PS: About being "too English" - yeah I'm from Ukraine, so
         | English is not my native, but I'll do best!
        
       | weakfish wrote:
       | Way to go! This looks cool.
        
         | avdept wrote:
         | Appreciate your words!
        
       | tomger wrote:
       | Scrolling the marketing website on iOS feels choppy. I'd prefer
       | native drag gesture.
        
         | theusus wrote:
         | Same for me on chromium
        
           | avdept wrote:
           | Resolved
        
         | avdept wrote:
         | Resolved
        
         | avdept wrote:
         | Thanks for sharing, will have a look into!
        
           | tomashubelbauer wrote:
           | "Fancy" scrolling often breaks my favorite way to scroll: by
           | clicking the middle mouse button and just dragging the mouse
           | relative to the anchor point to control the scroll speed. I'd
           | advise anyone who wants people to stay on their page to just
           | leave scrolling alone, but if you're gonna mess with it
           | anyway, at least consider all of the possible modes of
           | scrolling people use and how your new take on scrolling will
           | affect their experience on the site.
        
             | chrismorgan wrote:
             | It's impossible to reimplement scrolling in any way
             | acceptably on the web, because the web doesn't expose
             | several of the primitives you'd need. Therefore I say:
             | scrolljacking is _always_ bad.
        
             | avdept wrote:
             | Resolved
        
       | k33l0r wrote:
       | Pretty cool that all three of your customers[0] have also tried
       | their hand at modeling!
       | 
       | * https://pixabay.com/images/search/womanpower/
       | 
       | * https://pixabay.com/photos/old-man-people-pensioner-wrinkles...
       | 
       | * https://unsplash.com/photos/W7pk4FfrSY0
       | 
       | ---
       | 
       | [0]:
       | https://dropover.cloud/d018d9#ca9916e1-b91c-4818-a6c3-92a644...
        
         | avdept wrote:
         | Hey, you've got me! How about to try a product and let me know
         | your experience?
        
         | vertis wrote:
         | Honestly, it's a Show HN. They might not have customers yet,
         | and in which case SOMETHING has to go on the marketing site or
         | you'd be complaining about the lack of testimonials.
        
           | k33l0r wrote:
           | Lying about testimonials is worse than no testimonials.
           | 
           | FWIW, the quotes may be real but the photos not. Either way
           | dishonesty is not a good way to start a business
           | relationship...
        
           | sebzim4500 wrote:
           | Right, and now we're complaining about the fraud.
        
       | MattRix wrote:
       | Some feedback:
       | 
       | - I skimmed the whole page and screenshots and I still don't have
       | a clue how it actually works. You need a video/gif of the thing
       | being used.
       | 
       | - I hate the title font, it's too wide and doesn't fit the
       | aesthetic
       | 
       | - The info text below one of the carousel things kept changing
       | with the carousel, making it impossible to read.
       | 
       | - The quotes and photos are clearly fake, which makes the whole
       | thing feel kinda scammy
        
         | avdept wrote:
         | Heya, thanks for your feedback. I definitely make a demo video
         | showing how it works. I will look into UI as well, there's
         | surely a lot to make it better!
         | 
         | As for quotes I think that's really bad idea, probably remove
         | them until I get a real ones
        
       | vertis wrote:
       | Some actual feedback about the product instead of just the
       | marketing website:
       | 
       | - You need to make it possible to clone an existing template that
       | shows of the features, see Notion as an example of where you
       | almost always start from a template. (I see this is a paid
       | feature maybe, but if so then you need a trial because it's not
       | complete without it)
       | 
       | - When creating a project I'm not likely to know why I would want
       | a label text and color.
       | 
       | - There is a lot of functionality and that makes it hard to make
       | a path through the app (UX flow)
       | 
       | - For some cases, like Software Development estimating the
       | cost/time is hard. Part of the reason that we do Fibonacci story
       | points as a measure of complexity. This isn't going to apply to
       | every type of project, but if I'm modelling out a tech startup
       | using your tool then it's going to be an issue.
       | 
       | - Features, Pricing, Contact Us, How to's should not be in the
       | top menu after I'm in the app.
       | 
       | Overall I think you have a solid problem that you're trying to
       | tackle but it needs to be a lot easier to approach than it is
       | currently. That means making it much easier to add common types
       | of things (if it's a wedding the interface could look quite
       | different, to planning a trip), it's the same mechanics under the
       | hood but I'm not left drowning in options.
       | 
       | As I said in another comment. Congrats on launching.
        
         | avdept wrote:
         | Thanks for your feedbacks! We have something similar to
         | templates - you can clone any existing project and use it as
         | template. I wanted to provide more flexibility to user whether
         | they want to use existing project and adjust it, or just create
         | a project that will serve as template.
         | 
         | Generally speaking I want to add more hits and tips to help new
         | users get used to application.
        
           | vertis wrote:
           | Yes but you can't clone from something that doesn't exist.
           | YOU have to provide things to clone from.
        
             | avdept wrote:
             | What do you think should be the basic templates for? Like
             | software development project, travel planning. What else?
        
       | eisokant wrote:
       | I see a lot of negativity on this post, I just wanted to say,
       | "way to go!". Building and finally launching is an amazing
       | achievement on its own.
        
         | avdept wrote:
         | Thanks for your kind words. Turns out building so much easier
         | than launching
        
           | antoniojtorres wrote:
           | Ouch. Felt that one in my bones.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-02-21 23:01 UTC)