[HN Gopher] Why do modern pop songs have so many writers?
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Why do modern pop songs have so many writers?
        
       Author : bookofjoe
       Score  : 48 points
       Date   : 2023-02-20 19:31 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (tedium.co)
 (TXT) w3m dump (tedium.co)
        
       | bodhiandphysics wrote:
       | So there's an interesting prehistory to all this. The us music
       | industry began in the late 19th century... and this is before the
       | record! music publishing and songwriting was literally
       | publishing... of the sheet music. The standard form of this was
       | as a piano score, and that's the form that songwriters generally
       | had copywrite on. Now if you were to perform this you would
       | obviously need an orchestration, and this was subject to
       | copywrite as well, but orchestrations were generally not
       | published. An important thing to consider is that orchestration
       | is a technical skill, and many great songwriters had limited
       | formal training in music. So orchestration was almost always
       | separate from songwriting. It still is on broadway; almost all
       | great broadway composers outsourced orchestration (including
       | composers like Richard Rogers, Gershwin, or Sondheim who were
       | perfectly capable of writing it).
        
       | ergonaught wrote:
       | Because everything great and worthwhile has always been designed
       | by committees.
        
       | genewitch wrote:
       | The answer to the question the article poses, FTA: Because the
       | definition of "songwriting" has changed since the 1960s, and not
       | just due to "sampling."
       | 
       | It's still a decent read, but if you want to argue the nuance,
       | this is what the article says.
        
         | yamtaddle wrote:
         | Can't pull the tricks from The KLF's _The Manual: How to Have a
         | Number 1 the Easy Way_ to get free and uncredited songwriting
         | work out of people anymore, then?
        
         | whstl wrote:
         | I assume you're talking about crediting beat makers, arrangers
         | and producers rather than just the "traditional" way of
         | crediting the people who come up with the melody and lyrics?
         | 
         | If so, I agree with an addendum: I think it's more about the
         | "culture" around songwriting credits rather than the definition
         | itself, as this was kind of always possible to do, and some
         | people today still do the "old way". For example, back in the
         | 60s/70s some bands like The Doors and Deep Purple would credit
         | the whole band. And sometimes producers would also get credit,
         | like Brian Eno with Talking Heads from the top of my head.
        
       | VoodooJuJu wrote:
       | So my brother, my cousin, my uncle, his friend, and his son can
       | all get paid. EZ money EZ life.
        
       | Tycho wrote:
       | It's funny how many contributions to classic records are
       | uncredited, eg. the opening riff of _My Girl_.
        
       | droptablemain wrote:
       | Modern pop music is a more refined commercial industry than it
       | was in the past. It's been sliding further and further away from
       | art and toward the commercial. It is what it is.
        
         | manachar wrote:
         | "Art that doesn't sell is just a storage problem."
         | 
         | Had an artist tell me this once and it stuck with me ever
         | since. He was referring to paintings, but has generally held
         | for every other artistic endeavor.
         | 
         | Looking through history art has always been commercial - it's
         | just the audience that changes.
         | 
         | For music, musicians who got paid used to be focused on the
         | tastes of just the wealthiest folks who liked to go and be seen
         | at symphonies. Nowadays, it's the artists who can fill stadiums
         | (and get fans to buy lots of merch) that make the most bank. As
         | such, it is often those musicians who provide a sellable brand
         | that do best. To many, this can feel fake and plastic. But like
         | any product designed for mass consumption, it's essential.
         | 
         | Looking at the symbiotic dance between artist and
         | viewer/reader/listener is really something special, and helps
         | to provide context for changes in trends.
         | 
         | You could be the best guitar player in the world, writing the
         | best guitar solos of all time, but if you can't get people to
         | pay for it, it's just a storage problem for your guitar.
        
         | lordfrito wrote:
         | Same reason movie credits are now 20 minutes long
        
           | bazoom42 wrote:
           | No, because you dont get royalties from a movie just because
           | you are in the credits.
        
           | zwieback wrote:
           | Except on re-run channels where they speed up the credits
           | 100x to get them over with. Kind of like the drug
           | interactions or terms and conditions at the end of ads.
        
         | canadianfella wrote:
         | [dead]
        
         | at-fates-hands wrote:
         | One can make this argument based on the fact Tom McDonald's _"
         | Ghost"_ went to number 1 and he was the sole writer, producer
         | and musician on the song.
         | 
         | Love him or hate him, he's still an anomaly as a 100% top to
         | bottom independent artist. He often makes light of this in many
         | of his video shorts.
        
         | scarface74 wrote:
         | The "Motown Machine" was a thing since the 60s where the
         | artists didn't matter as much as the writers, producers,
         | choreographers, marketers etc
        
         | zwieback wrote:
         | For sure, but the trend for some teenager on TikTok
         | skyrocketing to fame with a 100% homemade song is also a trend.
         | A welcome one, in my opinion.
        
         | JKCalhoun wrote:
         | If there's been an indie/garage wave of music since grunge
         | swept hair-metal out of the top 10 I guess I missed it. I had
         | come to enjoy the reactionary waves of music like folk, punk,
         | college-rock, grunge: the music that often started in small
         | venues or at parties, that somehow broke through to find an
         | large audience that were sick of the commercial dreck that
         | studios and labels were pushing.
        
         | bazoom42 wrote:
         | When was pop music not commercial? Isn't this basically the
         | definition of pop music?
        
           | msla wrote:
           | Exactly. That's what differentiates it from folk: Both are
           | music of the people, but pop music was explicitly written for
           | a commercial purpose, and it's existed in that form since
           | before audio recording existed, as another poster mentioned.
        
       | bsder wrote:
       | It's a simple answer: remuneration.
       | 
       | Songwriters get paid mechanical royalties, performance royalties,
       | and synch fees anytime the song is used. Bands, for example, only
       | get paid when _their specific recording_ gets played.
       | 
       | Therefore, if something gets remixed, covered, etc. you want to
       | be the _songwriter_ , not the _band_.
        
         | echelon wrote:
         | Maybe this is how AI will work. Every contributor to the data
         | set gets micropennies per inference century (a reasonable
         | measure).
         | 
         | Of course future industrial foundational models will be bought
         | and paid for (and royalty free) for the companies that assemble
         | them.
        
           | bombolo wrote:
           | The entire point of AI currently is to NOT remunerate.
        
             | solarmist wrote:
             | Sure, but once it becomes commercially useful in creative
             | works that will likely change.
        
               | dragonwriter wrote:
               | > Sure, but once it becomes commercially useful in
               | creative works
               | 
               | It probably already is; the controversies make it likely
               | people aren't going to be overly forthcoming about their
               | use of it, though.
        
               | delecti wrote:
               | I suspect the mechanism of that will be that Disney
               | lawyers and/or lobbyists will start throwing their weight
               | around once AI trained on Disney media is making money
               | for someone other than Disney.
        
               | clouddrover wrote:
               | Getty Images is suing Stability AI for copyright
               | infringement:
               | 
               | https://www.theverge.com/2023/2/6/23587393/ai-art-
               | copyright-...
               | 
               | It's a bit hard to argue against. Stable Diffusion was
               | trained on Getty images and it does reproduce them,
               | watermark included.
               | 
               | Getty Images will win.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | rock_hard wrote:
         | You are spot on
         | 
         | Another factor here is that you never know which one of your or
         | your teams songs will be a hit...and so many have a agreement
         | to include eachother in their work
         | 
         | Little bit how VC funds work
        
         | consumer451 wrote:
         | Simon Cowell is known to have played (and written the part for)
         | instruments like the triangle on many of his associated bands'
         | tracks so that he got an undeserved cut of the songwriting
         | royalties.
        
         | Buildstarted wrote:
         | Reminds me of a story about Gene Roddenberry. (of Star Trek
         | fame) Apparently he wrote lyrics to the original series theme
         | song so that he'd get half the royalties every time it was
         | played even though the lyrics weren't used. (Inside Star Trek:
         | The Real Story, 1997, pp 178, 185)
        
           | plastic3169 wrote:
           | Also Danny Elfman has joked that it turned out financially
           | very important that he sang the words The Simpsons in the
           | theme song.
        
             | leovander wrote:
             | Bryan Cranston on Malcolm in the Middle[0].
             | 
             | [0] https://youtu.be/yuGjVKOQc98?t=22
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-02-20 23:00 UTC)