[HN Gopher] Modern Mono
___________________________________________________________________
Modern Mono
Author : zdw
Score : 122 points
Date : 2023-02-13 17:55 UTC (5 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.tbray.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.tbray.org)
| vbernat wrote:
| In the Emacs screenshots, I am curious what "Combined " means.
| deevus wrote:
| I thought this was going to be about C#. I was a little
| disappointed that it was about fonts, heh.
| tbolt wrote:
| If you're on MacOS, SF Mono is available out-of-the-box pretty
| sure. I use it in Terminal.app and text editors (mostly Nova.app)
| and it looks great.
| daneel_w wrote:
| I've completely fallen for Cascadia Code -
| https://github.com/microsoft/cascadia-code - which I think
| deserves a mention.
| fernandotakai wrote:
| i've been using dejavu sans mono for... so long that whenever i
| see other fonts i get weird out.
|
| i totally get people that don't like it, but fonts are so
| personal that i don't really care.
| macrael wrote:
| I don't know why this gets me so hot but you really don't need to
| be using a monospaced font for code anymore. Monospaced fonts are
| an abomination created because it made programming early
| terminals easier, we've long since outgrown our use for them and
| yet they are entrenched in programming culture because we still
| use terminal emulators based on those same standards to this day.
| Give your eyes a rest and look at your code in a variable width
| font. I've been using Avenir for years and it is so nice.
| ricardobeat wrote:
| What about alignment? The space character is much narrower in
| most fonts, making code have a terrible rythm.
| Stratoscope wrote:
| The key to using a proportional font is to give up alignment
| completely, and only use indentation.
|
| Once you do that, it no longer matters whether you use a
| proportional or monospaced font.
|
| The Black formatter for Python is an interesting example. It
| strictly uses indentation only and never uses alignment.
|
| As a result, Black-formatted code is equally readable in any
| font, monospaced or proportional. I use my own customized
| proportional font called Trebuchet++, and Black code looks
| great in it.
|
| If you didn't know I was using a proportional font, you might
| not even notice that it wasn't monospaced.
|
| As you may guess, Trebuchet++ started out as Trebuchet MS,
| which I found I really enjoy reading on a high-DPI display.
| Then I started tweaking things in FontForge:
|
| Trebuchet MS has a terrible tilde character that looks too
| much like a minus sign. So I put in a better defined glyph
| for that.
|
| One problem in a proportional font if you use
| names_with_underscores as required by too many coding
| standards: the underscore character is much too wide compared
| to a period. This gives a visual grouping that is the
| opposite of what you want, for example in foo_bar.moo_car(),
| "bar" and "moo" are closer together than "foo" and "bar" or
| "moo" and "car". This is misleading visually.
|
| So I used FontForge to add a bit of space on each side of the
| dot, and add _negative_ space on each side of the underscore.
| In the example above, this pulls the "foo" and "bar" in
| "foo_bar" closer to each other, and similary for "moo_car".
| At the same time, it adds some separation between "bar" and
| "moo".
|
| The difference is subtle, but in terms of visual grouping it
| avoids having the code read like this: foo
| bar moo car
|
| and more like this: foo bar moo car
|
| I have a couple of other tweaks I haven't gotten to yet. In
| particular I want to add a bit of margin on the inside of
| parentheses and square brackets. In my own code where I get
| to choose the style, I've always uses a space inside those. I
| find this offers a real improvement in readability. But if I
| can't do that, at least I can fix it with some font tweaks!
| macrael wrote:
| I've found I don't miss the ability to carefully align stuff
| outside of the initial indentation. I actually use a slightly
| modified Avenir that prints a wider space if it's the first
| thing in a line, making the indentation stand out more. The
| rhythm of a general line of code I think is improved because
| it reads like regular text.
| Narishma wrote:
| That's what tabs are for.
| Freedom2 wrote:
| [dead]
| whalesalad wrote:
| A buddy of mine uses Lucida Grande as his programming font and
| it makes me cry every time I see it.
| durandal1 wrote:
| If you had asked me 1 year ago whether I would pay $75 for a
| coding font I would have laughed at you. And yet, here we are, my
| font of choice is Berkeley Mono any day, everyday.
| brundolf wrote:
| It's weird to see the author talk about "information density"
| with monospace fonts. Am I missing something, maybe
| misinterpreting what he means by it?
| Etheryte wrote:
| I'd wager the context in which it is used gives a clue:
|
| > More compact than this overview's average but so graceful
| that I'll take that and welcome the information density.
|
| My guess is they mean how wide or narrow one character is in a
| given monospace font.
| brundolf wrote:
| Yeah, that was my best guess too: _visual_ density
|
| "Information density" normally means "how much information
| can fit in a piece of the screen", which is going to be the
| same for all monospace fonts (at the same font size, anyway)
| xrayarx wrote:
| TFA looks for the perfect monospaced font in the Mac OS terminal,
| long article
| huhtenberg wrote:
| Obligatory mention of Mensch -
| https://robey.lag.net/2010/06/21/mensch-font.html
|
| Don't know if it counts as "modern" being 13 years old, but it's
| the best there is.
| W0lf wrote:
| I have switched to Operator Mono about 10 years ago. This font is
| not free though. However it was the only font (at the time I was
| looking at at least) that had a monospaced italic version which I
| found looked slick. So I ended up buying that font and used it
| ever since.
| yes_but_no wrote:
| Few more fonts that lesser known, but worth to take a look imo -
| Basically a Mono https://experi.mentallydesigned.com/type/bam/ -
| Messina Sans https://www.luzi-type.ch/messina-sans - PP Fraktion
| Mono https://experi.mentallydesigned.com/type/bam/
| acuozzo wrote:
| It's not mentioned in TFA, but I really love "Monofur".
|
| DAE know of a more complete lookalike with more glyphs?
| mcguire wrote:
| Monofur has been my goto text font for a long time.
| stronglikedan wrote:
| That's a nice font. Thanks for the link. And thankfully, I hate
| glyphs.
| AceJohnny2 wrote:
| Everyone plugging their favorite font, but here's an easy way to
| compare them side-by-side to help you choose:
|
| https://www.codingfont.com
|
| (featured on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29010443)
|
| Also this site to view a wide collection of programming fonts:
| https://www.programmingfonts.org
| cormullion wrote:
| Another good comparison site:
|
| https://devfonts.gafi.dev
| Night_Thastus wrote:
| Thanks for the send. I'm new to choosing a font for my editors,
| and just went through the tournament. I've got to say,
| Inconsolata is quite a finessed font for coding. It definitely
| seems to work well for me.
|
| I do wish that site let you "exclude" certain options so they
| never appear in the tournament at all. It would have saved
| time, one or two are so awful they aren't work doing
| comparisons on.
| dimator wrote:
| i love the tournament idea!
|
| i downloaded my winner, installed it, changed my editor... and
| immediately went back to Monaco :) there's a lot of cognitive
| momentum to overcome in switching fonts.
| Mindless2112 wrote:
| The problem with codingfont.com is that it overrides the line
| height, so you won't see what the line height will actually
| look like in your editor, which is something that I care about.
| AlanYx wrote:
| If your editor doesn't allow you to override the font's
| default line height (to whatever you like), there's a nice
| little tool you can use to do this to the font file itself:
| https://github.com/source-foundry/font-line
|
| This is also useful for mixing and matching fonts. Nicolas
| Rougier uses this in NANO Emacs to hack the Victor Mono
| italic to have the same line height as Roboto Mono.
| amanzi wrote:
| Playing the font tournament is fun, especially with the font
| names turned off. I ended up with Fira Code (my current
| preference) vs Fira Mono in the final round.
| AceJohnny2 wrote:
| Also, because people tend to be nitpicky about particular font
| features, such as:
|
| - g with a curve or loop at the bottom?
|
| - 0s barred, dotted or _gasp_ nothing?
|
| - $ with full-length bar or just top/bottom pins?
|
| - etc
|
| There are some fonts families out there that let you select
| just the right set for you, for example Input:
| https://input.djr.com/info/
| fallat wrote:
| Why would he miss the best of all? DejaVu Sans Mono. This font is
| the only thing I come back to decade after decade. There's too
| much good to say about it.
| __mharrison__ wrote:
| I used Envy Code R for a long time and switched to Iosevka a few
| years back. Most mono fonts feel too spread out. (From the looks
| of the fonts, most folks probably feel the opposite of me...)
| replwoacause wrote:
| Love Envy Code R.
| davidy123 wrote:
| I like ligatures, little quirks (relative to ordinary fonts) make
| output more interesting.
|
| I wanted to get a portable monitor with a high hz rate for VR
| applications, and separately text test output. The best I could
| find, without spending too much on something that'll be better in
| the near future, is 16" 2560x1600. So not very high PPD. Anyone
| have any suggestions for a font that won't look grainy? I use it
| in portrait.
| cosmotic wrote:
| The last thing I want is for my text to look interesting. I
| want it to be boring and instantly recognizable. I want text
| editors showing it to work predictably. Two characters should
| show as two glyphs with the background showing through the
| middle. All glyphs should be the same width. Ligatures break
| these universal consistencies and stick out, screaming for
| attention. I want my text to be absolutely silent.
| nmeofthestate wrote:
| I recently started using a font that has ligatures - they
| don't break alignment of mono-spaced text, for example a two-
| character ligature takes up the space of two characters. I am
| not thrown by != showing up as an equals sign with a slash
| through it, because I can remember that this is in fact "!=".
| It's easier to read than the "raw" version. All in all I'm
| sold.
| cosmotic wrote:
| I can remember that the inequality symbol means != but I'd
| prefer the lower cognitive load of not having to recall
| anything at all.
|
| I like that Typing "!=" results in "!=" being printed to
| the screen. I like that pressing backspace only affects the
| single preceding character/glyph instead of converting the
| ligature back into its constituent parts.
|
| It's a consistency thing. I'm _never_ reading math
| textbooks written with latex and all the fancy ligatures
| and symbols. I spend my entire day reading and writing
| code, so consistency there is paramount.
| DwnVoteHoneyPot wrote:
| I find ligatures makes certain symbols instantly
| recognizable. Two characters, such as "=>" or "<-" look like
| math symbols, but then it takes one more step to realize no
| it's an arrow.
| oltmang wrote:
| Why no Comic Mono? https://dtinth.github.io/comic-mono-font/
| panda88888 wrote:
| I like iA Writer Duospace. It is not a strictly monospaced font,
| but imo the additional half width really makes m/w much more
| readable.
| _boffin_ wrote:
| Tossing this one in here as it's a combination of Isoveska &
| PragmataPro: https://github.com/shytikov/pragmasevka
|
| Been using it for a bit and I've really fallen in love with it.
| globalreset wrote:
| In my experience on every setup: different OS version, different
| screen, etc. the rendering of fonts gives slightly different
| results, to the point, I just choose whatever works best at a
| given moment, and don't get too attached to it.
| graypegg wrote:
| I've stuck with Victor Mono for a while now, since I like having
| comments in cursive. I know that's not for everyone. I just seem
| to parse prose a little easier with joined up letters.
|
| https://rubjo.github.io/victor-mono/
| bigbottomenergy wrote:
| Wow screenshots of text rendered on a notoriously bad text
| renderer, then downscaled and posted in a blog. A text-based
| description of the fonts might be worse, but only barely.
|
| Yeah, man, so much effort and every screenshot looks identical in
| context in the blog post.
|
| Iosevka and Iosevka-Comfy for the win.
| rzzzt wrote:
| Click on the images to embiggen.
| CyberDildonics wrote:
| You probably meant 'enlarge'. "Embiggen" was made up by the
| simpsons as a joke.
| timbray wrote:
| Anyone can embiggen me any time they want.
| emptybits wrote:
| All words in use today were made up at some point and then
| accepted through popular use. Merriam-Webster accepted this
| one into their dictionary some years ago.[1]
|
| And Dictionary.com acknowledges it may have been published
| previously in 1884 by C.A. Ward as an example of a
| barbarous verb.[2][3]
|
| [1] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/embiggen
|
| [2] https://www.dictionary.com/browse/embiggen
|
| [3] https://academic.oup.com/nq/article-
| abstract/s6-X/242/135/43...
| chungy wrote:
| You understood the meaning well enough, which is the
| purpose of a word. Perhaps you need to embiggen your
| perspective.
| throwanem wrote:
| It's a perfectly cromulent word.
| sorokod wrote:
| In the _same_ episode as that other word - amazing
| rzzzt wrote:
| Me fail English? That's unpossible!
| TimTheTinker wrote:
| I tried Iosevka but it felt too much like the bitmap ROM fonts
| on old computers and terminals. All those fonts were a little
| too pixel-dense.
| bitwize wrote:
| That may be why it -- and Envy Code R -- are the only
| "modern" monospace fonts I can stand for very long.
| Everything else just looks like IBM Letter Gothic, or some
| other typewriter vendor's substitute for Letter Gothic. Hence
| why I use bitmap or bitmap-like fonts for terminals.
| samwillis wrote:
| I really don't get the current trend of font ligatures for things
| such as !=. It seems to me you loose the fundamental structure of
| the code. I get it looks good in screen shots on Twitter but when
| I tried a font with them it just seems to make me have to pause
| and think more.
|
| What have others experience been?
| twblalock wrote:
| The ligatures are hipsterism and it needs to stop. I've never
| seen it happen in a professional setting.
| capableweb wrote:
| Agree with you, tried it a couple of times and found it more
| distracting than anything. One gripe is seeing one character,
| hitting backspace and instead of removing one character, it
| changes to another character rather than deletes it ("[?]" ->
| hitting backspace expecting "" but instead seeing "!" now).
| mmgutz wrote:
| '===' and '==' in JavaScript code were too similar. Maybe
| that's been addressed by different glyphs in other fonts, but
| that was enough to say no.
| masklinn wrote:
| I love ligatures. I find that well crafted ones make code look
| more coherent without detracting in any way from the structure
| (unlike proportional fonts which I abhor).
|
| They're also very useful for languages which have operators
| which are easy to confuse, like the triple equal of PHP and JS
| (in which case having a ligature that's really distinct from
| the double equal is very convenient).
| capableweb wrote:
| Monospace font on HN seems to do good enough, at least for
| me, or you think these are too similar as well?
| ==
|
| vs ===
|
| On my machine(s), the difference is quite obvious, with the
| space in-between each equal sign and all.
| neilpanchal wrote:
| We wrote extensively about ligatures, pros and cons:
| https://berkeleygraphics.com/public-affairs/bulletins/BT-001...
|
| Personally, I generally agree with you - ligatures add a layer
| of ambiguity. Toyed around with the idea of "precision
| ligatures", but it only works a subset of ligatures.
|
| It's important to keep in mind that ligatures are at the
| presentation layer, i.e. when the glyphs are drawn. You can
| still copy and paste the text, underlying representation is
| still individual chars. Also, ligatures are optional, so why
| not; a lot of people _love_ them.
| [deleted]
| c0l0 wrote:
| Yes!! I would _so_ like to have a fontconfig option to just
| disable ligatures altogether, but afaik, one would have to
| enumerate ALL fonts that one would like to disable them for in
| the config file - and that 's not feasible. So I mostly live
| with it, and shake my fist in helpless anger whenever
| somethings f_cks up my otherwise beautifully monospaced flow
| with this most damned misfeature of digital typesetting.
| Finnucane wrote:
| It seems like a little bit weird to have ligatures in a
| monospaced font. The whole reason ligatures exist is so that
| bits of letterforms in closely-spaced type don't crash. That
| shouldn't happen in a monospace font. If you're just changing
| the space so that two characters are grouped as a kind of unit,
| that to me defeats the purpose of using monospace to begin
| with.
| okramcivokram wrote:
| I love them and use them everywhere I can, mostly with JS/TS. I
| find the code displayed with ligatures more readable, and the
| only time I notice any overhead is when modifying === to !== or
| back, when I have to remember that I have to change only the
| initial character. Having => as arrows instead of `equals+more
| than` is enough of improvement, for me, that I keep using them,
| even without all other tiny tweaks that they give you.
|
| I used to use "Fira Code", but then I've migrated to "JetBrains
| Mono" everywhere.
| amelius wrote:
| You really have to use a font for a few days before you can judge
| it.
|
| I personally use Iosevka, but it took some time to get used to.
| rwalle wrote:
| > I've just finished setting up a new Mac (14" MBP, M2 Pro, 32G,
| 4T)
|
| I am curious what processor, RAM or storage size have anything to
| do with this article.
| satysin wrote:
| It isn't important to the article but whenever someone writes
| an article about doing something new/different because "I got a
| new computer" the first comment is always "what computer did
| you get?"
|
| I guess the author knows this and so pre-empted the question
| and decided to just answer it before anyone asks (although
| someone will no doubt still ask).
| fredoliveira wrote:
| Not sure the obvious needs to be stated, but it feels totally
| up to the author to add any detail they like. And perhaps
| frequent readers are interested in the tools the author uses
| besides their programming font?
| montroser wrote:
| Of his existing incumbent choice, Inconsolata, the author says:
|
| > Unfortunately I am failing to find the words to explain why
| this pleases my eyes so much; a screenful of it makes me happy.
|
| One theory about why would be that he has been looking at it day
| in and day out for years, and we tend to think that things we are
| more familiar with are more beautiful.
|
| https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mere-exposure_effect
| markdoubleyou wrote:
| This describes me. Every couple of years I read an article like
| this, download a handful of monospaced fonts, and try to use
| each one for at least an hour. Inevitably, every one of them
| has some little problem that rubs me the wrong way, and I go
| back to my old standby: Consolas, the dad jeans of programming
| fonts. I've been using it for 15 years, and I think I'm doomed
| to use it for the rest of my career.
| sfpotter wrote:
| Monaco until the day I die.
| Arainach wrote:
| This is a nice overview. I don't share the author's intense
| distaste for serifs. In my search I ended up on Cascadia Code,
| which wasn't part of this comparison:
| https://github.com/microsoft/cascadia-code
| nwah1 wrote:
| Yes, this one is in the same top tier along with Fira, Hack,
| JetBrains, and Inconsolata.
| themadsens wrote:
| I swear by "Monaco Nerd Mono"
|
| It was a revelation to discover "Monaco" when I first got started
| on the mac. So casual yet stylish and refined.
| fuzzy2 wrote:
| And now for the comparison on 96(-ish) PPI screens...! I find
| that many more recent fonts simply do not look good on those.
| Some are even outright terrible, glitching all over the place
| with subpixel rendering.
| amake wrote:
| Oh boy time for this again:
|
| > To all the people complaining about how they don't like
| ligatures:
|
| > Nobody cares. If you don't like them, then don't use them. They
| are optional.
|
| > Lots of people like them. Let people like things.
|
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34589338
| frob wrote:
| Years ago I fell in love with Anonymous Pro. Everything seems to
| fit just right. I've never had an issue wondering which character
| is which nor have I run into missing common characters.
|
| https://www.marksimonson.com/fonts/view/anonymous-pro
| mortenjorck wrote:
| Like the author, I always thought IBM's Plex Mono had a bit too
| much character for a UI font, but I'm a big fan of IA's
| modifications: https://github.com/iaolo/iA-
| Fonts/tree/master/iA%20Writer%20...
|
| Part of the project are some interesting duospace and quad-space
| versions that I probably wouldn't use for code, but are great for
| editing general text.
| the_mitsuhiko wrote:
| If you are willing to entertain non free options: MonoLisa is a
| pretty good font and you can customize which ligatures you are
| willing to entertain. (I'm basically at zero)
| ilyagr wrote:
| I wish the article mentioned Fira Mono, which is the same as Fira
| Code but without the ligatures.
| mafuyu wrote:
| For my mono font, I converted the Atkinson Hyperlegible[0] font
| into mono, and have been using it as my terminal and editor font
| for over a year now. It's pretty janky, but it's surprisingly
| lasted longer than many of the other fonts I've tried over the
| years.
|
| If you want to try it: https://github.com/Hylian/atkinson-
| monolegible
|
| [0]: https://brailleinstitute.org/freefont
| jonhohle wrote:
| I'm still enamored with Monaco after all this time. It's fun and
| legible. It has bitmap and vector variants. Whenever I search for
| a new monospaced font, I always think: but it isn't Monaco!
| TheRealDunkirk wrote:
| You can pry Monaco out of my cold, dead hands. It reminds me of
| the old "rock" or "t" font on Linux, which someone helped me
| re-find here:
| https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/226593/where-
| can-i-....)
|
| Unfortunately, I've tried using a version of Monaco on Windows,
| and whatever version I downloaded just doesn't... quite...
| render just right. So I stick with Droid Sans Mono on that
| _other_ OS.
| amacbride wrote:
| As a traditionalist, I swear by good ol' X11 "fixed" (6x13) --
| great density and legibility, with pretty much any glyph one
| would want.
|
| https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs-fonts.html
| fictorial wrote:
| I fell in love with Recursive (Casual Mono). To me, it's the
| perfect blend of slightly casual, slightly serif-ish, and not too
| skinny. https://recursive.design Screenshot:
| https://freeimage.host/i/HE6AFfV
| qbasic_forever wrote:
| I thought it would be silly or I would hate it, but the comic
| sans like nature of Fantasque Sans Mono really surprised me and
| worked well for coding/IDE use (especially in Python):
| https://github.com/belluzj/fantasque-sans
| otterpro wrote:
| Yes, my favorite font for text editing. Not too unprofessional
| like comics-san but not dull/sterile like most mono fonts. Not
| sure why, but it has sort of an artistic personality, if I
| could describe it. Only thing I dislike is the "k" so I use the
| non-loop version.
| ricardobeat wrote:
| Looks similar to Monaco (Mac OS's default for monospace). The
| slight irregularities make it more comfortable to read vs more
| geometrical shapes.
| numbsafari wrote:
| Our terminals in college were configured with monofur, and it's
| whimsical nature is something I've always been partial to:
|
| https://www.dafont.com/monofur.font
| rizenfrmtheash wrote:
| I tried a couple Mono Fonts and found them all kinda samey.
|
| I ended up seeing a post here for Berkeley Mono, a paid font, and
| I noticed in particular that it was incredibly readable compared
| to other mono fonts I was using, so much so that I've zoomed out
| one level on VS Code and iTerm and have similar readability as
| before.
|
| It was the first font I paid for, and I was quite happy with it.
|
| https://berkeleygraphics.com/typefaces/berkeley-mono/
| replwoacause wrote:
| I too have been following the Berkeley Mono font, and I think
| their website and promo materials are all very well designed.
| However, I tried the trial version of the font and found the
| kerning odd and unnatural seeming.
| systemvoltage wrote:
| Concept of kerning doesn't make sense in monospaced fonts.
| You can't adjust side bearings and create kerning pairs.
| [deleted]
| steve_adams_86 wrote:
| I felt weird buying Berkeley but I'm very happy with it as
| well. I knew I liked it when I got the trial and yet I felt
| this aversion to paying for a font for several weeks. Then it
| dawned on me: I was depriving myself of enjoying someone's hard
| work because I didn't want to spend a fairly small amount of
| money for a thing I'd use for my work every day. Sort of an
| everyone loses situation. I can be bizarrely cheap, and it's
| kind of embarrassing when I break it down. I lose time and
| money to my irrational cheapness.
|
| Berkeley's sharpness and legibility has been unmatched for me
| and I think that's what draws me to it so much. I know others
| will say it's not sharp or legible, and it's a totally personal
| thing. We get good at reading on different screens with
| different characters, and we're gradually trained to see in
| different ways. For me, Berkeley absolutely nails it.
| macintux wrote:
| I switched to Iosevka for both iTerm and Emacs several years ago
| and have been pretty happy with the added horizontal density. My
| only real complaint is that Emacs behaves a bit weirdly when
| lines exceed the buffer width, but I haven't tried switching back
| to a "normal" typeface to confirm that it's Iosevka's fault.
| deckard1 wrote:
| > Uh, no, it smells of mainframes. Look at some of those 90deg
| serifs, right out of the 1950's.
|
| maybe that's why I like IBM Plex Mono so much. My go-to font has
| always been DejaVu Sans and before that Bitstream Vera Sans,
| which are pretty much the same font. But I like IBM Plex after
| using it for awhile.
|
| I'm not that anal about serifs or whatnot. But a font has to
| "feel" right with a page of code open. And the very minimum they
| have to get the O (letter "O") vs. 0 (number zero) right as well
| as I (letter "I") vs. 1 (number one). If you can't get that right
| then it's a useless coding font.
| WatchDog wrote:
| The screenshots look really poorly compressed and noisy, not
| great for comparing fonts.
| Narishma wrote:
| You can click them to get the full version.
| latchkey wrote:
| JetBrains Mono is my choice. I tried switching between a bunch of
| them and always came back to it. They've done a great job.
| seanw444 wrote:
| It looks good, and is surprisingly readable when shrunk down a
| bunch. It's a fantastic quick-setup font. I only don't use it
| as my main font anymore because I have a very personalized
| Iosevka build. But that takes time and motivation to do (and a
| mind-blowing amount of RAM).
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-02-13 23:00 UTC)