[HN Gopher] FreeCAD Day 2023: Report and continued discussion
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       FreeCAD Day 2023: Report and continued discussion
        
       Author : app4soft
       Score  : 55 points
       Date   : 2023-02-05 19:19 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (forum.freecad.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (forum.freecad.org)
        
       | mitthrowaway2 wrote:
       | I didn't know that there was a FreeCAD Day! But I'll take this
       | opportunity to just give thanks to the FreeCAD developers for
       | creating and sustaining an amazing program. We all know it's not
       | perfect, but it's already incredibly powerful and I'm now using
       | it professionally in place of SolidWorks. Not only do I save a
       | ton of money, I feel way more in control of my work, and have
       | ownership of my hard-earned skills. I can write my own Python
       | routines to automate parametric modelling and use FreeCAD as a
       | back-end for doing geometric calculations. It's fantastic and I'm
       | grateful for it.
       | 
       | Thank you.
        
       | inamberclad wrote:
       | I really want to like FreeCAD, but the lack of a native assembly
       | system is the top killer for me. I know that plugins exist, but
       | they have too many steps involved. I want to be able to just
       | click on two holes on different bodies and immediately mate them
       | with a rotating joint. Other nits exist, and random crashes are a
       | huge problem for me, but until FreeCAD has better assemblies,
       | I'll sadly be stuck with the extremely user-hostile Fusion360.
        
         | khimaros wrote:
         | I recommend the assembly3 addon, written by one of the
         | developers responsible for solving the hierarchical naming
         | issue. the core of FreeCAD is capable of assembly based
         | workflows, it just isn't a built-in feature/workbench yet.
        
         | angry_moose wrote:
         | Yeah, it's unfortunate. At best they're still 20 years behind
         | the major players - I started working in Inventor in 05 and
         | Solidworks in 08 and I'd gladly take those out of date versions
         | over current FreeCAD.
         | 
         | Its impressive what they've managed to do (geometry kernels are
         | incredibly difficult) but its got a long way to go. I'm
         | begrudgingly using Solid Edge Community at the moment.
        
         | 2muchcoffeeman wrote:
         | I haven't had random crashes since 0.19.
         | 
         | 0.20.1 and 0.20.2 seem pretty solid so far but I'm not a pro
         | CAD user. Just designing things for my 3D printer.
         | 
         | The assembly situation does suck. But I've been using Assembly
         | 4 and that seems the easiest to understand.
         | 
         | But what's worse is that as a non-cad person. It's difficult to
         | get started still. The information is there but I've been using
         | FreeCAD for years, and often the best place to look is YouTube
         | for help.
         | 
         | I've also found the forum a bit hostile because I ask stupid
         | questions since I don't know how to ask in the right way with
         | the right words.
         | 
         | I didn't even realise why I might need an assembly workbench
         | until very recently and then that changed my perspective on how
         | I structured all my models. I wish there was a higher level
         | explanation of how to use FreeCAD for complete beginners.
        
           | bsder wrote:
           | The topological renumbering/renaming problem is _THE_ killer
           | bug that FreeCAD has got to fix. Until that bug is gone,
           | FreeCAD has no future.
           | 
           | Unfortunately, as I understand it, the only way to truly get
           | rid of that is to entirely rewrite the geometry kernel. :(
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-02-05 23:00 UTC)