[HN Gopher] I Bought a CO2 Monitor, and It Broke Me
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       I Bought a CO2 Monitor, and It Broke Me
        
       Author : robomartin
       Score  : 45 points
       Date   : 2023-02-03 21:34 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.theatlantic.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.theatlantic.com)
        
       | jandrese wrote:
       | I wonder if his apartment has gas heat and when opening the
       | window to air it out he was causing the furnace to kick on and
       | pump out loads more CO2? That would also explain the spikes
       | during the cold overnight hours.
        
         | nanna wrote:
         | Her apartment.
        
         | bentley wrote:
         | Does a furnace put out enough CO2 to worry about? The main
         | concern is usually CO.
        
           | kesslern wrote:
           | A furnace shouldn't be adding CO2 or CO to your air. Those
           | combustion products should all be exhausted out of the house.
        
             | jandrese wrote:
             | Maybe this is something to have the landlord check? In
             | practice I don't think most gas furnaces are as well sealed
             | as advertised. Many years ago when I lived in a house with
             | gas heat with a dodgy pilot light I got a pretty good feel
             | for how the thing was put together and it was absolutely
             | not hermetically sealed.
        
               | Brian_K_White wrote:
               | It's not supposed to be sealed, it's just supposed to
               | have draft. (the flue always vacumming from convection)
        
               | throw0101c wrote:
               | > _It 's not supposed to be sealed, it's just supposed to
               | have draft._
               | 
               | It depends on the model. High (>90%) efficiency,
               | condensing furnaces are completely sealed off from the
               | house: they take in air from the outside (via PVC pipe),
               | combust, extract the heat, and exhaust the results (via
               | PVC pipes).
               | 
               | * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBVvnDfW2Xo
               | 
               | Older lower efficiency (<85-90%) furnaces suck in air
               | from the house, exhaust into metal pipes (PVC would melt
               | because not as much heat is extracted from the fumes),
               | can be back-drafted and you have to worry about CO.
               | 
               | Basically: if the furnace has vents in which you can see
               | a pilot light, it's the older style.
        
         | symlinkk wrote:
         | AFAIK with gas furnaces the air touching the flame never
         | touches the air that goes into the house, they run them past
         | each other on top of a thin filter to exchange heat. So the CO2
         | produced from the flame should not affect CO2 in the house,
         | provided the system is not malfunctioning.
        
       | strstr wrote:
       | In 2020 I bought a Netatmo CO2 sensor, since it was cheaper than
       | the alternatives. Not sure how accurate it was, but it seemed
       | accurate enough (450-500 outside).
       | 
       | Live in the PNW with only electric heating/stove/oven. Cracking
       | the window very slightly was enough to keep CO2 relatively low
       | (600-800). Had to crack the window more when the temp is around
       | 70 outside, less when the temp delta is higher (cold or warm).
       | 
       | Eventually ditched the device once I understood how to keep CO2
       | low. The cloud integration was creepy. I could tell when my wife
       | or I went to bed based on CO2 spiking near the sensor.
        
       | 60secs wrote:
       | If your co2 is high why not just some houseplants?
       | 
       | Seems like a few snake plants would easily handle that level.
       | 
       | https://balconygardenweb.com/most-effective-co2-absorbing-ho...
        
         | etrautmann wrote:
         | From that article you linked:
         | 
         | "In a study at Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand, the
         | snake plant can absorb CO2 at 0.49 ppm/m3 in the closed
         | system."
         | 
         | That would require an enormous number of snake plants to do
         | anything. A tiny apartment is 50m^2 * 3m = 150 cubic meters, so
         | it requires 300 snake plants just to bring down by 1ppm (though
         | not sure over what timescale or other assumptions in the work
         | cited)
        
       | pmw wrote:
       | Can anyone recommend a quality CO2 monitor for personal/home use?
        
         | stuaxo wrote:
         | The Aranet 4 is good, not cheap - but I got one eventually.
        
         | post_break wrote:
         | qingping makes one, I have it at home. You can track it on your
         | phone and export the data as well. $140 on Amazon and it looks
         | very nice on a desk.
        
           | blacksmith_tb wrote:
           | I have the Qingping Lite[1] which is a well-made device (and
           | can run on batteries if you want to take it somewhere to
           | check things out). After updating the firmware and
           | calibrating it outside it seems pretty consistent - though I
           | was mostly interested in it for CO2, I have a Flow 2 which
           | doesn't agree on PM2.5 or PM10 with the Qingping, I suspect
           | that the particulate sensor in the QP is not the best, it
           | always seems to read low.
           | 
           | 1: https://breathesafeair.com/qingping-air-monitor-lite-
           | review/
        
         | jck wrote:
         | I got a xiaomi co2 monitor off AliExpress a while ago for about
         | 60PS :https://m.aliexpress.com/item/1005001768799038.html
         | 
         | It works well enough and home assistant integrates with it. I
         | cannot comment on it's accuracy since I've never owned another
         | CO2 monitor as a reference. However, it is very responsive to
         | the various things I've tried to manage CO2 in my bedroom -
         | such as opening the windows to differet degrees, position of my
         | curtains etc.
        
         | dilippkumar wrote:
         | I have an Airthings Wave. It does CO2 along with a couple of
         | other things.
         | 
         | I really like mine. It helped me discover that I was sensitive
         | to volatile organic compounds: every time I felt the air was
         | stuffy inside my apartment, it corresponded to a VOC peak that
         | was happening right then.
         | 
         | The one downside to the Airthings Wave is that it looks like
         | hospital equipment. Grey, lifeless plastic pill design that was
         | probably outdated even in the 1970s.
         | 
         | If you ignore how it looks, it works fantastic.
        
           | cypherpunks01 wrote:
           | I'd second the Airthings device, they have pretty high
           | quality sensors and include VOCs, CO2, pm2.5, radon, and a
           | few others. A little bit pricey is the only downside for me.
        
           | xnx wrote:
           | Love my Airthings Wave. It works exactly as advertised and is
           | very easy to export all the readings as CSV.
        
         | muxamilian wrote:
         | Have been using Netatmo for 4 years and can't complain.
        
       | dumpsterlid wrote:
       | [dead]
        
       | ladberg wrote:
       | I have a similar monitor and if I _never_ open a window for days
       | it can get up to 2000 but I feel like I can keep it at ~600 just
       | by always leaving a window slightly cracked open (not enough to
       | noticeably cool the apartment).
       | 
       | Using the stove or oven will definitely spike it though to scary
       | levels! I've made a habit of keeping the windows fully open when
       | I cook now.
        
       | spoils19 wrote:
       | This is definitely one of those situations where I find it's
       | better to trust your gut. That's where the truth lies, right down
       | here in the gut. Do you know you have more nerve endings in your
       | gut than you have in your head? I'm able to accurately detect the
       | CO2 level to within ~10ppm through training and experience.
        
       | bryceacc wrote:
       | i have massive conflict with co2 monitoring, just like this
       | article. I have monitored my air for years, mostly for PM levels
       | from fires but co2 came with it. I became obsessed with lowering
       | the co2 at the expense of cold temperatures, but I have never
       | noticed a "cognitive" difference between 2k ppm and outside.
       | instead I just feel physical unrest with seeing the high number,
       | like I am suffocating on this "clearly bad air". Yet I am certain
       | if I was completely unaware of it I would have no issues. Any
       | time friends come over and it's winter, ppm in an apartment would
       | be 2500+ and nobody cares
        
         | colechristensen wrote:
         | I can tell. I'm thinking there is a lot of individual variance
         | for co2 tolerance. I can feel 800+ ppm and after i have had the
         | sensor a while can tell what the concentration is within 25% or
         | so without looking. I also feel the cognitive effects, and
         | moreso the positive effects of opening a window.
         | 
         | Different places I've loved have had significantly different
         | characteristics for what co2 concentration defaults to.
         | 
         | I'm guessing a not so small proportion of mental health issues
         | and things like chronic fatigue are actually breathing issues
         | and sensitivity to higher co2 concentrations.
         | 
         | For me a big factor is I broke my nose long ago and don't
         | breathe as well as I should.
        
         | clairity wrote:
         | right, CO2 has become a (inter-)national psychosomatic
         | obsession of the privileged class, but no one should be
         | worrying about CO2 _at all_ , unless you work in some very
         | specific industries. you'd need a ppm of 50,000-100,000 to feel
         | any real effect from CO2, or to see noticeable greenhouse
         | effects from it. it's today's equivalent of fearing power lines
         | or MMR vaccines. it's fretting on something that feels tangible
         | and controllable, without delving deeper and examining the
         | (social and mass) media-driven presumptions underlying those
         | fears.
         | 
         | pollution, on the other hand, is a real concern. that's stuff
         | like radon, VOCs, methane, dioxins, and SO[?] emissions. as
         | such, one thing we should be doing with vigor and relentless
         | focus is phasing out coal plants (if we were actually putting
         | our priorities in the right place) rather than worrying about
         | the sideshow that is carbon emissions.
        
       | jerlam wrote:
       | The idea that indoors air can be hazardous is an old idea, and
       | predates CO2 monitors and gas stoves. Following the 1918
       | Influenza Pandemic (aka Spanish Flu), apartments in NYC were
       | built with absurdly large heaters so that residents could be
       | comfortable while all the windows were open [0]. There's also the
       | German practice of luften [1], or ventilating a home at least
       | once per day; and the Scandinavian idea of having babies nap
       | outside [2].
       | 
       | I have a Hydrofarm Autopilot CO2 monitor and it pretty much stays
       | at 600-800 all day, but I leave a window cracked open and live in
       | a naturally windy area.
       | 
       | [0] <https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/apartment-radiator-
       | pandemi...>
       | 
       | [1] <https://blogs.transparent.com/german/luften-germanys-
       | airing-...>
       | 
       | [2] <https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-21537988>
        
         | leipert wrote:
         | Once a day? Multiple times a day!
         | 
         | Especially "Stossluften" (opening a window for a short period)
         | or "Querluften" (opening windows in opposite rooms to create a
         | draft).
         | 
         | First thing in the morning we luft, after cooking, we luft,
         | before going to bed...
         | 
         | It's especially important in newer or well renovated
         | houses/apartments, to get rid of excess humidity in order to
         | prevent mold. Really new apartments are so well insulated that
         | they have literal holes in the wall (Zwangsbeluftung) in order
         | have some airflow.
         | 
         | Edit: I was so enthusiastic to write a comment about luften,
         | that I didn't read your link which actually covers what I said.
        
       | rale00 wrote:
       | Sounds like the meter was broken or at least wasn't properly
       | calibrated. CO2 level should drop off quickly with a window open.
        
         | lstodd wrote:
         | Yeah, this. 1000ppm is very noticeable, true 2000 is
         | unbearable.
         | 
         | Living in a center of a city next to a 10-line highway opening
         | a window drops a properly calibrated sensor into 400s inside a
         | few minutes.
        
         | _Microft wrote:
         | She brought the meter outside where it measured 480ppm.
        
         | AlexandrB wrote:
         | I think so too. Use to work with a lot of CO2 sensors in a
         | previous job and it's very difficult to keep an elevated CO2
         | level going if there's any exchange of air with the outside.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | jpm_sd wrote:
       | https://archive.is/TwJ5A
        
       | stuaxo wrote:
       | I have an Aranet 4, mostly able to keep things around 600 with a
       | little bit of ventilation.
       | 
       | It goes up when we're together in a small room with no door open,
       | I'm planning on eventually retrofitting MVHR which should help
       | improve indoor air quality and allow me to insulate.
       | 
       | In the meantime the Aranet is good for getting a handle on
       | general air quality and how you can improve it.
        
       | fotta wrote:
       | If you want to DIY it, Aranet4 uses a Senseair Sunrise which can
       | be had for 1/4 of the price on Digikey [0]. Senseair has Arduino
       | samples on GitHub [1].
       | 
       | I personally have an SCD30 monitor which claims the same accuracy
       | and like it. The important thing is to calibrate them in outside
       | air to 400ppm.
       | 
       | [0]
       | https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/senseair/006-0-00...
       | 
       | [1] https://github.com/Senseair-AB/Sunrise-Examples---Arduino
        
         | icedchai wrote:
         | I'm going to check this out! I have a spare Arduino and sounds
         | like a good application.
        
         | chris_va wrote:
         | > 400ppm
         | 
         | The outside ppm changes quite a bit in cities. CO2 dome effects
         | can push it 2x higher.
        
         | sleepytimetea wrote:
         | Thank you...$250 sounds excessive. I can hook up an OLED screen
         | and ESP32 to the senseair and get the same ?
         | 
         | I could even send levels to my home IOT InfluxDB for historical
         | charting.
        
           | fotta wrote:
           | Yep. I do the exact same thing with my SCD30 and an ESP32
           | with HomeSpan to bridge it to HomeKit.
        
       | stavros wrote:
       | It's a bit weird to me that people get a sensor and _then_ worry
       | about the air. What are the symptoms of elevated CO2 levels? Why
       | can 't you feel them and need a monitor to tell you you are
       | unwell?
        
       | WalterBright wrote:
       | > an HVAC with ultra-high-quality filters and a continuously
       | running fan
       | 
       | That isn't going to do a thing about CO2.
        
         | simondotau wrote:
         | Even if you're referring to a HVAC with an entirely internal
         | airflow, this isn't necessarily correct. For a long time I used
         | the fan mode of my ducted AC to distribute air around my house,
         | which dramatically reduced the level of bedroom CO2
         | concentration while asleep from well above 1500 ppm to below
         | 800 ppm.
        
         | dragonwriter wrote:
         | > That isn't going to do a thing about CO2.
         | 
         | It _should_ , because of the V in HVAC.
        
           | jms703 wrote:
           | Most residential implementations don't pull in fresh air.
        
             | leipert wrote:
             | But in a larger apartment or house it could mean that if
             | you occupy one room, like the bedroom, you get air with
             | less CO2 from other rooms. If you have no ventilation on
             | and no airflow, it must be worse.
        
       | mindslight wrote:
       | Am I reading this wrong, or does the author really keep
       | mentioning "attempts" at things that will do absolutely nothing
       | to CO2 levels? Non-venting range hood? Box fan with filter? These
       | will do nothing for CO2.
       | 
       | The only way you're going to bring down CO2 levels in your
       | dwelling is to bring in outside air. The best way would be
       | installing a heat recovery vent that will save some energy. The
       | simple way would be to open two windows and stick the fan in one
       | for a short time (blowing in for turbulence to clear out the
       | corners of the room).
       | 
       | Leaving your windows open with passive circulation for a longer
       | time is going to cool down all the stuff inside, wasting much
       | more heat.
        
         | xnx wrote:
         | The article is a little mixed up, but the author does seem to
         | understand this. I don't think the author knows she needs to
         | try and set up distinct air intakes and outputs with her
         | windows and fans.
        
       | twawaaay wrote:
       | I bought Aranet4 and it taught me a lot about how CO2 accumulates
       | in my apartment, how and frequently to change air and so on.
       | 
       | The worst thing you can do is to close yourself in your room for
       | the night. Always have either door or window open. If it is cold
       | outside, just buy a goose down duvet. You will sleep much better
       | in a cold room than in a warm with stuffy air.
       | 
       | I am looking into putting heat exchanger in my apartment so that
       | I can change air with less energy waste.
       | 
       | I also changed some of my habits. I try to use less of the gas
       | stove and more of electric grill, Instant Pot, etc. If I need to
       | use gas then I always change air afterwards.
        
         | flandish wrote:
         | Hey so - closed doors are important. They stop smoke and fire
         | from filling the bedroom giving you time to either escape or
         | prepare to die. Sleep with your door closed and with smoke / CO
         | (I know this is an article abt CO2) detectors.
         | 
         | Source: am firefighter, sleeps in bedroom.
        
           | jandrese wrote:
           | You're making me choose between dying from CO2 asphyxiation
           | and smoke inhalation...
           | 
           | I'm not sure why it's such a problem to have a possible 15%
           | cognitive decline while I'm sleeping. I'm already an idiot in
           | my dreams.
        
           | twawaaay wrote:
           | Say what you want, I would prefer to get woken up by smoke
           | earlier to have time to attend to my family.
           | 
           | My doctor is constantly asking me to do a surgery on my
           | temporomandibular joint to prevent my teeth going out of
           | whack constantly and my face to look better. And I am
           | constantly telling him I would prefer to keep fixing my teeth
           | every so often than go through an extremely invasive
           | operation and risk possible problems.
        
             | qbasic_forever wrote:
             | Your smoke detectors are what should alert you of fire, not
             | smoke getting so thick and dense that it chokes you
             | awake... at that point you have seconds to react and live.
        
       | brendangregg wrote:
       | I've had a few CO2 meters, and learned not to trust any <$100 as
       | they don't really work. I look for meters that use non-dispersive
       | infrared diffusion sensors (NDIRs), like the Aranet4. I've found
       | the TIM10 desktop model from co2meter.com to be accurate
       | (AFAICT), uses NDIRs, and only US$139.
       | 
       | I also have other air quality meters. (I collect measuring
       | devices.) I wish there was a do-it-all air meter.
        
       | robomartin wrote:
       | I have posted about this on HN in the past, suggesting everyone
       | truly interested in understanding the general reality of CO2
       | concentration needsto buy a CO2 meter and understand the world
       | around them first.
        
         | amalgamated_inc wrote:
         | Or just do it to find out your bedroom/office/kitchen is
         | unhealthy.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-02-03 23:01 UTC)