[HN Gopher] Donkey Kong cheating case rocked by photos of illici...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Donkey Kong cheating case rocked by photos of illicit joystick
       modification
        
       Author : stalfosknight
       Score  : 76 points
       Date   : 2023-02-03 18:48 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (arstechnica.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (arstechnica.com)
        
       | Y_Y wrote:
       | > The photos in question were taken at the Florida Association of
       | Mortgage Brokers (FAMB) Convention, which hosted Mitchell as part
       | of its "80s Arcade Night" promotion in July 2007.
       | 
       | Seems like those guys had more money than they knew what to do
       | with. Hope it turned out ok for them.
        
       | nostromo wrote:
       | I'm just amused that there was an actual lawsuit filed for
       | defamation over Donkey Kong high scores.
        
         | CTDOCodebases wrote:
         | If you are interested there was a whole documentary made about
         | the competitive world of Donkey Kong some time ago called "King
         | of Kong".
        
       | Manuel_D wrote:
       | A similar debate exists in fighting games with all button
       | controllers. Interestingly, the control stick ultimately actuates
       | button contacts under the hood. But all button controllers can do
       | things like simultaneously supply left and right activated
       | inputs, or up and down and some games respond to these inputs in
       | a way that gives players an advantage. That said, it'd be trivial
       | to install electrical interlocks prohibiting such simultaneous
       | inputs.
        
         | bhickey wrote:
         | I built exactly this board for a homebrew (S)NES controller.
         | Simultaneous L+R inputs are converted to neutral and U+D are
         | converted to U.
         | 
         | Even with the interlock a player can gain an advantage by
         | buffering inputs.
        
       | tee_0 wrote:
       | [flagged]
        
         | pcwalton wrote:
         | Then flag or ignore them?
         | 
         | For me, the interesting story here isn't so much who got what
         | record in a 42 year old arcade game but rather how
         | frighteningly easy it remains to intimidate people over bogus
         | nonsense by abusing the legal system. If rich weirdos suing for
         | defamation over ancient video game scores doesn't motivate more
         | adoption of anti-SLAPP statutes, I don't know what will.
        
       | LocalH wrote:
       | Mitchell very much seems to be losing his reality distortion
       | field
        
       | Minor49er wrote:
       | Speedrunner Karl Jobst made a good overview video of this last
       | week. He is no stranger to Mitchell's shenanigans:
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHK0Jg2R7SQ
        
         | bak3y wrote:
         | He's also been sued by Mitchell - multiple times now I think?
        
         | bhickey wrote:
         | Karl is wrong in his claim that the stick appears to be an
         | 8-way stick. Directionality is determined by a restrictor plate
         | mounted on the underside of joystick assembly. Here's an
         | example: https://www.ultimarc.com/arcade-controls/joystick-
         | accessorie...
         | 
         | It's impossible to tell which plate is installed by looking at
         | the top of the panel.
         | 
         | Edit: He does get some things right. My point is that this is
         | surprisingly technical. Even some of the best players in the
         | world don't know how the game works.
        
       | sschueller wrote:
       | I still find it hilarious that every time I see Billy Mitchell I
       | think of Peter Dinklage's hilarious character in Pixels although
       | the movie itself wasn't that great.
        
         | jhbadger wrote:
         | I always think of Mitchell himself in 2007's "King of Kong" in
         | which Mitchell was viewed as the villain (perhaps unfairly at
         | the time) but he didn't do himself any favors in making himself
         | seem like a sympathetic character.
        
           | Waterluvian wrote:
           | I remember seeing that a long time ago. Is he the one who
           | came across as a pretty bad husband and father?
        
             | tootie wrote:
             | He was painted as the villain, but the filmmaker has been
             | accused of editing the story to make him look worse than he
             | was. He was definitely a hateable character, but a lot of
             | the details and timeline were messed with.
        
             | bhickey wrote:
             | > Is he the one who came across as a pretty bad husband and
             | father?
             | 
             | I don't think so. The film had footage of Steve Wiebe
             | telling his kid he couldn't help with the potty because he
             | was busy gaming.
        
               | Waterluvian wrote:
               | Ohh that rings a bell.
        
       | JustLurking2022 wrote:
       | Why are we still talking about this guy?
        
         | RamRodification wrote:
         | Because photos of illicit joystick modification rocked a Donkey
         | Kong cheating case he is involved in. It's a very unique and
         | interesting story.
        
       | hijinks wrote:
       | I have a feeling he's lived this lie so long he just believes it
       | as true at this point.
        
         | joezydeco wrote:
         | The Costanza Principle
        
         | JohnFen wrote:
         | The best conmen are the ones who earnestly believe their own
         | BS.
        
       | jrockway wrote:
       | This is one case that's warming me up to binding arbitration. I'd
       | say that in an ideal world, we'd spend $0 of taxes on court
       | disputes over video game cheating.
        
         | ketralnis wrote:
         | It's rough because while I agree that I don't want to see a
         | bunch of court time wasted on video game cheating, this isn't a
         | case about video game cheating. It's a case about defamation, a
         | defence to which is the accuracy of the claims (in some
         | countries), and then yes suddenly it's a case about video game
         | cheating.
         | 
         | I do think that you should have legal remedies to defamation,
         | and in most cases of defamation the two of you are unlikely to
         | have had a prior contract that could have included an
         | arbitration clause. (In this particular case they could
         | potentially have but I suspect that's uncommon.)
        
         | SQueeeeeL wrote:
         | I mean, we spend lots of time using the legal system to resolve
         | marital and land issues. Ultimately most legal issues are
         | interpersonal issues, I don't see why the perception of a
         | conflict as silly should preclude a judge from helping mediate
        
         | jfengel wrote:
         | This is a defamation case. There isn't really room for binding
         | arbitration; there's no contract to bind.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-02-03 23:01 UTC)