[HN Gopher] Chronophoto
___________________________________________________________________
Chronophoto
Author : jmduke
Score : 1009 points
Date : 2023-01-28 18:05 UTC (1 days ago)
(HTM) web link (www.chronophoto.app)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.chronophoto.app)
| [deleted]
| tobr wrote:
| Simple and fun game. I just wish the score was more forgiving the
| older the photo was. It's a lot harder to tell 1905 and 1910
| apart than 2015 and 2020, from the perspective of 2023.
| intrasight wrote:
| I was finding that I had a harder time with very recent photos.
| Fashion has become a bit static perhaps.
| pavon wrote:
| Actually I've been doing consistently worse in the years I
| lived through than the rest of the timeline. Apparently the
| older I get the more styles blur together. I tend to estimate
| ~5 years too early for the 1980-2000, and ~10 years too early
| for 2010 to present.
| thinking4real wrote:
| Disagree, it's just a matter of analyzing each decade precisely
|
| Thought often the pictures are not a great representation of
| the time they convey :/
| charles_f wrote:
| Interesting, unless there was a major clue, I've had as much
| pain in both cases.
| moffkalast wrote:
| I always got the most points when I just did a completely
| random guess haha. Taking the actively misleading part out of
| the equation.
| yieldcrv wrote:
| I found 1973-1997 looking very similar in color film quality,
| and cars on the street. maybe if I was more familiar with
| models, maybe.
|
| it was only obvious it was 80s or 90s if something silly was
| going on.
|
| my top score is 2900 right now
| ipaddr wrote:
| First time 2200.. what a fun game. I'll use your 2900 as a
| goal
| thechao wrote:
| I got a bunch of Edwardian--WW2 photos in one go, and netted
| 3190. I might be able to get higher than that, but only if
| the photos predate 2000.
|
| I think styles changed a lot from 1900--1970. After that,
| things are pretty hard to distinguish; retroactive clothing
| styles muddyvthe waters.
| yieldcrv wrote:
| got 3632! and now my watch has ended
| blauditore wrote:
| Changes in consumer-grade photo quality between 70s/80s/90s
| are actually quite visible if you've looked at many of them.
| It's subtle, but e.g. newer ones have better range in
| brightness, i.e. less overly bright or dark areas in high-
| contrast images.
| washadjeffmad wrote:
| One of the photos was labeled with the year, and the game
| identified it differently. It's all in fun.
| klabb3 wrote:
| It's incredible to see how quickly things changed ~1910-1930 in
| terms of infrastructure and technology. You're going from horses
| and cobblestone to almost modern cars and pavement, within just
| 20 years or so.
| stjo wrote:
| Same thing with smartphones. If the photos is of a crowd, it is
| immediately obvious if it is after 2012 by the fact that
| everybody is watching their hands.
| hammock wrote:
| Awesome.
|
| The first photo I got was some guy in a cartoonish space suit
| talking with a kid at a festival. I guessed 1966 and got it on
| the nose. That heartened me.
|
| After 3 rounds my high score was 3154
| PerryCox wrote:
| As my last image in round 5 I got a photo of WWF where Mankind
| was on top of the hell in a cell. I guessed 1998 because of the
| meme and got it correct! It was the only image I hit dead on.
| imiric wrote:
| Same for me with Musk on stage with the Cybertruck (2019).
|
| It would be more interesting if these popular photos were
| removed, and guessing would be based only on knowledge about
| clothing and hair styles, film type, car design, etc.
|
| Great game!
| valdect wrote:
| Nice to see an unique game!
| fideli0 wrote:
| That's fun :-) What's the source of the photos?
| dbosch wrote:
| Great game ! Thanks for sharing.
|
| Small suggestion: it would be great to get some information about
| the picture (location, context, people) in addition to the year,
| after we tried to guess the date.
| airstrike wrote:
| I feel like this would work even better as a daily game like
| Wordle with the same 5 pics for everyone to play so you can
| (lightly) compete with friends.
|
| And at the end, you could get some trivia for each of the photos
| IndySun wrote:
| Why would this work better as a daily game like wordle?
|
| I ask because I disagree. Visuals are far more infinite than
| guessing a 5 letter word with restricted choices. Chrono and
| Wordle are not comparable.
| gojomo wrote:
| People like to compete: seeing the same questions makes the
| scores comparable. Having common context of the same "daily
| pics" also creates opportunities for discussion & debate
| which don't exist otherwise.
|
| Trickling out synchronized games may create more durable
| entertainment, because otherwise many tend to play intensely
| until they bore of it, considering it "done" - never checking
| back.
|
| Returning back each day may generate more 'fun' per game, as
| the satiation of repeated play is minimized. It also
| cultivates a reliable audience for incremental
| changes/experiments that take time to implement & evaluate -
| assiting iterative improvement.
| jayknight wrote:
| Framed is pretty popular with some of my daily game friends,
| and it's visual.
|
| https://framed.wtf/
| dirtyid wrote:
| This is great
| cush wrote:
| Well I want to play it again
| satvikpendem wrote:
| If it gets popular by going viral, the creator could sell it
| for 7 figures to the New York Times too.
| candlemas wrote:
| I wish it had a seed that you could specify.
| 3dfx wrote:
| The trivia thing was asked for at reddit too, but i looked into
| the file storage of the server and it seems that the photos are
| just plainly stolen from all over the internet with file names
| like chronophoto.app/years/1963/ap630629032-02fcaf4ca7736109b99
| 8d760283a3a9ba7bceda7-s900-c85.webp or
| chronophoto.app/years/2017/ed-jones-north-korea-
| top-100-photos-2017.jpg No credit is given anywhere too. This
| is probably illegal and the author will get in a lot of trouble
| if he does not do something about that soon.
| [deleted]
| softfalcon wrote:
| Wow... for the first time in my life, knowing intricate
| information about film development colouring paid off
| swyx wrote:
| do geoguessr style livestreaming but for old photos and talk
| thru your process, people will love it
| whoibrar wrote:
| yes, I would 100 percentage watch it
| amelius wrote:
| People still use old film sometimes ...
| NikolaNovak wrote:
| It's tricky. I got one that was full bright standard colour...
| from 1912. Normal contrast and hue and saturation, no noise. I
| assume recoloured later?
|
| There are bw photos from 70s and colour photos from 50s.
| Contrast and noise and hue can give clues, but nothing stops a
| photographer from using old film in new times. I ended up going
| for cars and styles more when possible.
| kxrm wrote:
| > I assume recoloured later?
|
| Color capable film has been around since the late 19th
| century.
|
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_color_film_systems
| function_seven wrote:
| Sure, but the character of the saturations and hues is
| different. I think that's what parent is talking about.
| softfalcon wrote:
| Fair point! Maybe I just got lucky and my 5 or so photos were
| all time accurate to their development methods!
| OtherwiseBenign wrote:
| A bit like the car meta in Geoguessr
| vander_elst wrote:
| Love it! Nice job.
|
| It would be nice to have a link with more information about the
| single photos, at least the exact time and place where it was
| shot, i can then look for the related events myself.
| _HMCB_ wrote:
| Is Top Score highest everyone has gotten because I just got 3063
| which shows top.
| system2 wrote:
| That's yours. I got 4500~. If you score 800ish every round you
| get around 4000 already.
| earthbee wrote:
| I feel I'd be doing better at this game if I was a car person.
| The only time I've got the year spot on was with a photo of the
| toppling of a statue of Saddam Hussein. The worst I did was guess
| 1960 on a black and white photo taken almost directly above of
| some cars on a road, it was actually 1980.
|
| Fun but tricky
| anthomtb wrote:
| I was a cat nut in middle school. The four photos with cars?
| All guessed within 5 years. The one without a car? Off by 30
| years.
| wizofaus wrote:
| First two games I tried I did pretty well on (~3000 score?), then
| had some shockers (at least 2 or 3 I'd need some convincing on,
| photos dated in the 30s that were in full high resolution
| colour?), then got lucky with 3 photos clearly in the early
| 1900s, one with a cinema listing a film I knew the release year
| for and one with a somewhat iconic pre-war coca cola ad that I
| managed to pick the exact year for, scored just over 4400 (I
| guess 5k's the max?). Willing to bet a suitably trained AI would
| whoop any human's ass though, even ensuring none of the photos
| were explicitly part of the training data.
| PeterisP wrote:
| Why would photos dated in the 30s that were in full high
| resolution colour be surprising?
|
| Resolution has never been a problem for early color photos, the
| actual coloring was, and the expense/difficulty of the process.
|
| This - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Prokudin-
| Gorsky#/media/... and this
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Prokudin-Gorsky#/media/...
| - come from 1910s.
|
| And in 1935-1936 effectively modern color film was mass-
| released, so starting from late 30s nothing should be
| surprising.
| wizofaus wrote:
| Perhaps, but this particular one (looked like some dignitary
| inspecting an army, assuming an Asian country but couldn't
| say which) was especially crisp with high colour saturation
| that didn't match that of other photos from that period,
| indeed I assumed it was from the 70s or 80s.
| cinntaile wrote:
| The slider was incredibly frustrating to use on (Android) mobile.
| The game itself was fun though.
| blinding-streak wrote:
| Works fine for me on Android. Perhaps a fix was made in the 4
| hours since you posted your comment and me trying it.
| cinntaile wrote:
| It's fixed now. It wasnt't finely grained enough before, so
| you'd try to select 1978 and end up with e.g. 1979 or 1980.
| basseed wrote:
| it's fun! Would be good if each set had a unique id so that you
| coul send the same set to a friend and compare scores
| graypegg wrote:
| This is really fun! Never really thought about how nice some very
| old film photos can look, took me by surprise on a few ones!
| swalling wrote:
| Addictively fun. I'd love to see a leaderboard for this or at
| least what the score distribution is.
| jeremyis wrote:
| 3244! The first photo was hard because it was recent but had an
| old car in it.
| fceruti wrote:
| I feel proud and eager to share my 3150 score point.
|
| PS: No such sharable gold nugget was presented.
| rukuu001 wrote:
| Lol I took a screenshot. Endorphin hit from getting 2 in a row
| exactly right was ridiculous
| fceruti wrote:
| that's the good stuff
| msurekci wrote:
| Fun game, thanks!
| Matheus28 wrote:
| I love this. The summary at the end could be a bit more compact.
| Scrolling all the way to the bottom to start a new page is a bit
| inconvenient.
|
| Maybe full points for scoring within 5 years? Some photos are
| very hard to place in an exact year.
| system2 wrote:
| Use stylebot (chrome) for these type of sites. 1 min or so the
| site would to your taste.
| jb1991 wrote:
| Trying to use this on mobile sure is frustrating. I pinch zoom to
| look at the photo and somehow I end up changing photos when I
| zoom back out to click the buttons.
| vagabund wrote:
| Very fun, almost wish there were less overt cultural clues
| though. I got 3912 on the first go but it was mostly because I
| recognized Bowie and Le Corbusier, and got a theater marquee with
| Happy Gilmore playing.
|
| I enjoyed the pics where you needed to analyze hair/clothing
| styles and car models more.
| 13of40 wrote:
| One of mine had a picture of JFK giving a speech.
| paxys wrote:
| Love it! I got some terrible scores but then realized a good
| strategy is to judge a photo by its quality and aesthetics rather
| than the content.
| atoav wrote:
| Except when you don't do it. My first (and best) guess was one
| year off, because I guessed based on a specific war with a
| specific way of building trenches.
| tasuki wrote:
| Yes, the war photos are way easier to place than like the
| lady looking at the jewelry.
| cpp_frog wrote:
| 4409. Amazing how can you tell the approximate year by how the
| women are dressed, an exercise I hadn't done conscientiously
| before. Thanks!
| tcmb wrote:
| Would be interesting if all pictures were black and white,
| irrespective of when they were taken.
|
| Or the other way round, have some AI colorize the older pictures.
| kowlo wrote:
| It said Clinton Shaking Kennedy's hand was 1962... thought it was
| 63
| kristopolous wrote:
| Well it certainly wasn't 1964
| kortilla wrote:
| Definitely no later than 65
| sammalloy wrote:
| Finally! A game I enjoy and am somewhat good at.
| WatchDog wrote:
| At least one of the photos is mislabeled.
|
| This one[0] shows time square with an ad for a UFC fight that
| happens in 2009, but it's labelled as 2007.
|
| [0]:https://i.imgur.com/9wJZhI0.png
| macintux wrote:
| The "About" page includes a request to send an email if you
| find an inaccuracy.
|
| support@chronophoto.app
| googlryas wrote:
| Wow, that's quite the lead up.
| Quarrelsome wrote:
| Extremely enjoyable, thank you!
| ddejohn wrote:
| Absolutely love these types of games. Geoguessr is another
| classic.
|
| EDIT: oof, just got the Columbine High School class photo.
| pcthrowaway wrote:
| I prefer Explordle to Geoguessr
| maximumcomfy wrote:
| 3820 so far I like this
| [deleted]
| sheepscreek wrote:
| My scores are getting progressively better and I've reached 4481
| by the 5th game!
|
| I guessed better with photos that had telling elements such as
| hair styles, clothing, cars, beards - and preferably more than
| one instance of them. Bigger samples got to better results.
|
| Fun game overall. OP, thanks for sharing the link.
| Matheus28 wrote:
| My best over probably 50 games was 4261. It's really fun to play
| with other people too and make guesses together.
| snozolli wrote:
| So simple, yet a lot of fun!
|
| 2,889 on my first round, 4,4xx on my second. It's fun zooming in
| and looking for cars, logos, and clothing style for hints. It's
| also neat to see, say, a road with cars from Model T style
| through to swoopy 1930s sedans. Contrast that with most
| historical movies where, if it's set in 1955, every car is from
| 1950 - 1957.
| intrasight wrote:
| I improved with each round, so is clearly educational.
| fsargent wrote:
| I recently been going through all of my family photos. A lot of
| them are scanned and undated. I've been looking for some kind of
| machine learning library that will allow me to automatically date
| them. Approximates are fine, but an algorithm would do better
| than I would. Even just grouping photos of similar film stock and
| scene would be useful as they're all completely jumbled. Does
| anyone know if there's anything like that?
| graderjs wrote:
| That's an awesome app, I love that!
| srcnkcl wrote:
| This is a AI training job gamified isnt it?
| system2 wrote:
| What would be the help of this game to ai?
| gojomo wrote:
| Potentially, it might help find errors in the existing year-
| labeling - either via recognizing cases where guessers have
| wide divergences with a certain bias, or the explicit avenue
| via the about (email with errors).
|
| Or, help identify features of a photo that definitively place
| it at certain times, by human perception. That might help
| tune autogenerated content intended to reflect certain eras
| to avoid anachronisms, or more strongly hint specific years
| or vague ranges.
|
| Now, I don't think these are likely motivations for the game
| - the mere fun of playing seems enough to me. But it seems
| they _could_ be.
| system2 wrote:
| Pretty far fetched. The date of the photos are known so
| ai's only intention would be to find out if humans suck at
| guessing or not. Which would be a useless data to improve
| the systems.
| xoa wrote:
| Neat simple little trivia thing, but fun to think about each one
| and any clues. I got 1969, 1968, 1971, 1906 and 1904, score of
| 3435. First two were war related, for 1000 and 777. First was b&w
| but obvious forest clearing mid Vietnam war, so bit of a guess
| but on the dot, then the second was a color picture of a bus with
| "Saigon" on it that I underestimated but again, era was clearly
| Vietnam. Second one showed people in front of cricket scoreboard
| and with all the batters names and that was pure luck for me
| because only one possible famous match featured those players!
| (test #679, Australia v Sydney 1971). Utterly bombed the next, 83
| points, I agree with others that I found older photos tougher.
| Guess 1923, way off. Then I could guess at the final based on the
| period late 1800s/early 1900s dress at 1910 which was good for
| 575.
|
| Anyway, fun in terms of trying different strategies and it making
| one focus on the details whereas normally with photographs it's
| easy to just sort of look at it more abstractly without really
| _thinking_ about it. Could be a neat party game even as-is, but I
| also agree with a sibling poster that it 'd be easy to expand a
| touch to favor that (allow having n different guesses each with
| different colors, so everyone can take a shot for each image for
| some light competition maybe?).
| NKosmatos wrote:
| Very nice game, fast site, nice photos and likes the overall feel
| of it, well done!
| zxexz wrote:
| This is very fun, but I'm wondering why you haven't included
| source or some context for the photos? Also, you've disabled
| right click so reverse image searching them is painful.
| atahanacar wrote:
| >disabled right click
|
| Try Shift + Right click to bypass this.
| zxexz wrote:
| Unfortunately, that's not working for me on mac or linux :(
| atahanacar wrote:
| Maybe it is a Firefox only feature? Works fine for me on
| Linux.
| pricci wrote:
| Screenshot
| zxexz wrote:
| My issue is there being no credits or sources for the image.
| Screenshot and reverse image search is certainly a solution
| on my end to get to that info, but it should be present on
| the website, probably at the round summary.
| dinkleberg wrote:
| This is a fun little game. It is interesting to see what the
| tells are for the time periods. The reliable ones for me so far
| are military uniforms, cars, and computers. Hairstyles and
| clothes for some time periods are a give away, but some of those
| have thrown me off too.
| ghayes wrote:
| Helped for me that I am in one of the photos (NHL game played
| at Lake Tahoe during the pandemic).
| dinkleberg wrote:
| That is fantastic. Gotta wonder what the chance of that is.
| darkerside wrote:
| 4625! One was obvious (Biden inauguration), and another I got
| lucky with a dead on guess.
| Diapason wrote:
| Was fun. Got 2 perfect out of the 5 on my first try :) Score 3098
| total
| uptownfunk wrote:
| Wow cool idea, fun.
| nickdothutton wrote:
| 3 rounds and 3502. Well done to the creator!
| photoGrant wrote:
| This was ridiculously fun for me!
|
| I got 2827 as a score which isn't that great, but I nailed the
| year perfectly on 2/5. Super interesting!
| BHSPitMonkey wrote:
| Also nailed 2 out of 5, but managed a 4154 on my first go :D
|
| It's interesting to think about the epochal details our minds
| use to produce these guesses. Technology like the
| cars/cameras/phones present (or missing), the fashion styles on
| the people, the quality/sharpness of the image overall, face
| masks in post-2019 photos, etc.
| interestica wrote:
| This would be fun as a team or on a stream. Theres a lot to
| learn from the "speak aloud" aspect of the reasoning here.
| Film grain. Colour. Hair. Clothes. Cultural clues. Etcetc
| wazzer wrote:
| Nice, I always thought I'm pretty good in guessing the production
| years of movies, photos, and music, so this game is a lot of fun
| for me.
|
| My first try gave me a score of 4125. I'm curious if I can
| replicate that result or if I just got lucky!
|
| Edit: Nope... second try: 2728
|
| Edit: 3rd round: 3823
| robertpohl wrote:
| score 3203!
| XCSme wrote:
| I love how there are no instructions, and yet it's pretty obvious
| what the goal is and how to achieve it, good UX.
| intrasight wrote:
| Yes. Is a great example of "less is more"
| bongoman37 wrote:
| [dead]
| chairmanwow1 wrote:
| Fun game! Wish the UI would stay static when going between
| rounds. The scroll down was jarring.
| orlp wrote:
| This is very similar to Wikitrivia:
| https://wikitrivia.tomjwatson.com/ , which asks you to place
| general historical concepts/events on a timeline.
| tasuki wrote:
| Not sure how similar it is, but hey Wikitrivia is great!
| williamDafoe wrote:
| Score: 2358. In general I was within 5 years except for the first
| one where I was off by 12.
| acyou wrote:
| These photos are gorgeous. Love the photos that were selected.
| Are you willing to share the source for the photos?
| dougdonohoe wrote:
| Reminds me of the Timeline (I think this is the name) card game
| where every player has a bunch of cards, each of which represents
| a historical event (e.g., moon landing, or sinking of Titanic,
| discovery of Radium, etc. Each player has to put down the card in
| the proper order, with respect to previous cards played. It gets
| harder as more cards are "on the timeline". Fun game.
| macintux wrote:
| In the U.S. we have Chronology, sounds like the same game.
|
| This link (grabbed from another thread here) is similar.
|
| https://wikitrivia.tomjwatson.com/
| Daegalus wrote:
| Timeline is easily found in the US. I bought a copy a couple
| months ago.
| RicoElectrico wrote:
| Yeah, it's called Timeline. At work we took Armenian colleagues
| to a pub which had it available. It was funny to play with the
| Polish localization, they understood more than we assumed
| (Armenians know Russian). But the replay value is dubious. The
| guy who won turned out to have this game at home. Kinda
| cheating ;)
| achairapart wrote:
| Like others, I wish there was some info about the photos like
| context, location or source (Wikipedia?).
|
| Anyway, here's the complete dataset (funny way to store it):
|
| https://www.chronophoto.app/badSneakers.txt
|
| Also, I couldn't resist and cheated a bit to see if you'ld get
| something special for 5000, but nothing :(
|
| https://imgur.com/a/aEUMZlJ
| antihipocrat wrote:
| This is great! I'd love to see some stats on the distribution of
| all guesses for each photo
| grodin wrote:
| It's a shame, but its privacy policy[1] is pretty clearly
| contravening the GDPR. There's a link on the top of the privacy
| page which seems to be supposed to show you a consent modal, but
| it doesn't work on my Chromebook, and their claimed
| justifications for using the user's data are clearly not actually
| justified.
|
| [1]: https://www.chronophoto.app/privacy.html
| muglug wrote:
| Love it!
|
| You can tell a crowd photo wasn't taken in the last 10 years
| because nobody's looking at their phones.
| tazjin wrote:
| * 15 years. 10 years ago is already 5 years after the iPhone.
| muglug wrote:
| Yeah, but it took a while for looking at your phone while
| walking to become normalised.
| pwenzel wrote:
| This is really fun. My only wish is that I could see some
| information about the photos in the summary screen. Maybe a
| photographer credit or link to a Wikipedia?
| system2 wrote:
| I came back to play again after 10 hours and noticed some of the
| 1950's photos are fake colored and fooled me. I think those
| photos make this game less authentic.
| EGreg wrote:
| Ooh I got the high score it seems! On the first try! First three
| I did exceptionally well:
|
| I said 1942 Photo was taken in 1943 924 points
|
| I said 1925 Photo was taken in 1927 849 points
|
| I said 1985 Photo was taken in 1986 924 points
|
| I said 1957 Photo was taken in 1942 117 points
|
| I said 1931 Photo was taken in 1923 453 points
|
| NYEH NYEH!
|
| Final Total: 3267 High Score: 3267
| darreninthenet wrote:
| Would be interesting to train an AI on another dataset and then
| see how it does on this
| tomcam wrote:
| I fancy myself to be much more historically than most people and
| yeah... no. Consistently off by 5 years or so.
| Aeolun wrote:
| In a range of 120 years that's pretty good I'd say. At least, I
| was pretty proud of myself for doing the same.
| anigbrowl wrote:
| Amusing. Summary screen is hard to read and kinda redundant,
| needs a leaderboard.
| netsharc wrote:
| Don't these always end up getting spammed by script kiddies
| submitting the best scores?
| chaboud wrote:
| I'd love to see trends and stats on the photos across regions and
| collaboratively filtered (e.g., someone who accurately predicts
| photo XX is more likely to accurately predict photo YY).
|
| Also, it's a super curious dataset, photos with year metadata.
| ekianjo wrote:
| A good game for kids to show them how to recognize different
| eras. Many clues in each pic, including the colors that are
| representative of the film/tech used.
| pentagrama wrote:
| So fun! Have some friends courious about culture and history that
| will love this.
|
| I think the UX can improve a bit:
|
| - Would like that after a submit show both the correct date and
| the player guess, now only shows the correct date on screen (and
| the guess in the slider but not with numbers, just a visual gap)
|
| - The slider is a bit hard to interact on phones.
| intrasight wrote:
| Also, it should show public info about public photos. If you
| photo search, you can easily find - and see some interesting
| information that the app could include. Example:
| https://www.prints-online.com/cub-scouts-taking-operation-sh...
| [deleted]
| bluSCALE4 wrote:
| I played this with my 8 y.o. son. I called it a social studies
| activity, was that accurate?
| macintux wrote:
| Absolutely. It would help if the results included some context
| for the photo, but that seems like a great way to spend
| educational & fun time with your son.
| peeters wrote:
| Just beware there seems to be little content filtering, one of
| the images I got was pictures of war casualties tossed on the
| side of the road from 2015.
| jug wrote:
| This reminds me of some TV show games here in Sweden. :)
|
| Got a perfect 1000 points on a pretty gruesome WW2 photo with
| jews around a train. Sort of a pyrrhic victory there... :|
|
| ~2200 on my first try, a lot obviously thanks to That Photo.
| klabb3 wrote:
| Pa sparet :)
| sdflhasjd wrote:
| Fun game. Does stutter a lot in Firefox on my phone for some
| reason.
| guilamu wrote:
| No problem here, latest ff, s10e.
| crossingTime wrote:
| I got a 1976 and a 1992 correct on my only attempt. What are the
| odds of that? You can narrow a picture down to roughly a 20 yr
| span. Is that 1 in 400 for just those two? Worst case would be
| 100 x 100?
| ztratar wrote:
| This was a lot of fun. Very unique game. Congratulations on
| making it! :)
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-01-29 23:02 UTC)