[HN Gopher] North Korea Imposes Lockdown on Pyongyang to Fight '...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       North Korea Imposes Lockdown on Pyongyang to Fight 'Recurrent Flu'
        
       Author : bookofjoe
       Score  : 36 points
       Date   : 2023-01-27 19:24 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.nytimes.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.nytimes.com)
        
       | abracadaniel wrote:
       | I assumed that they'd had multiple waves of covid already, but I
       | suppose being so isolated to everyone but China, it's possible
       | they could only just now be getting the first substantial wave.
        
         | IMSAI8080 wrote:
         | They generally had traders bribing their way backwards and
         | forwards to China all the time and at least a steady trickle of
         | foreign tourists, so it seemed unlikely they wouldn't get it.
         | But it does say in the article they had shut their border in
         | the pandemic so maybe they clamped down hard on unofficial
         | China visits. I hear it's easier to get over to China in the
         | winter as the river separating the countries freezes over.
         | Maybe traders have been making it over in more recent months
         | and brought the latest covid back.
        
       | lmedinas wrote:
       | i guess its not hard to do taking into account how the regime
       | works. Also having people sick and not having medicine available
       | can lead to lots of deaths.
        
         | Guthur wrote:
         | [flagged]
        
           | NotYourLawyer wrote:
           | That's not what gene therapy is.
        
             | Guthur wrote:
             | Call it what you will.
        
           | ChrisClark wrote:
           | You need to actually start listening to scientists, not
           | crackpots. :D
        
             | Guthur wrote:
             | The scientists all paid for by the very companies that
             | stand to make billions, I'll stick to the crackpots.
             | 
             | But to each his own, you can follow who you like, I will
             | try to find the truth.
        
               | AnimalMuppet wrote:
               | If you're actually trying to find the truth, the
               | crackpots are not a very good guide.
               | 
               | And _some_ scientists are paid for by the companies. Not
               | all. It 's something you have to watch out for,
               | certainly...
        
       | schimmy_changa wrote:
       | This is not very relevant to tech / hacking, but is instead just
       | world news... Let's keep HN focused, and not let it end up like
       | the front page of reddit, etc
        
         | dqpb wrote:
         | Everything is a system
        
         | Enginerrrd wrote:
         | I emphatically disagree. HN is one of the best places I've
         | found on the entire internet to get a pulse on the future. You
         | have SME's on almost every subject imaginable that populate
         | this sub. I've seen things coming down the pipe anywhere from a
         | week to 2-4 months before the news really broke by reading
         | through the comments here. That's INVALUABLE to me.
         | 
         | From the guidelines for acceptable posts: >"Anything that good
         | hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking
         | and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer
         | might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual
         | curiosity."
         | 
         | I'm not sure why you think world news / geopolitics /
         | epidemiology / public interventions is something unworthy of
         | inspiring intellectual curiosity?
        
           | gerdesj wrote:
           | I agree with you. HN has a certain degree of self control
           | built in and dang's all seeing eye helps bring people back
           | in-line. Only recently, Dan hauled me up for being a bit of a
           | tosser and I apologised.
           | 
           | There are world renowned experts on many subjects that hang
           | around here and the likes of me who aren't. I too have a wide
           | range of interests and they extend way beyond IT. It's great
           | when a big hitter sidles on in and gives some insights from
           | the front lines.
           | 
           | This is probably the only forum that I have seen discussion
           | relating to SARS-CoV-2 that has been close to useful or at
           | least somewhat civil, err not a complete flamewar, OK
           | slightly civil.
        
         | jonny_eh wrote:
         | The top article at the moment is about D&D rules. Is that ok?
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/#:~:text=%7C%20hide%20%7C-,37%C...
         | .
        
           | bayindirh wrote:
           | Yes.
        
         | VWWHFSfQ wrote:
         | where does HN have a rule that requires submissions to be about
         | tech or hacking
        
           | jrockway wrote:
           | There isn't a rule. The comment you're replying to just
           | shares the author's preferences. If you like their way of
           | thinking, then maybe you'll think about that when you're
           | about to hit the submit button on something not related to
           | tech or hacking. If you don't like their way of thinking,
           | then maybe you'll submit the top post from r/politics every
           | morning. It's up to you.
           | 
           | I will say that I haven't enjoyed the political discussions
           | on HN. They get too heated, too quickly. But, I simply don't
           | participate much in those. I'm not upset if other people
           | enjoy them.
        
           | jonas-w wrote:
           | > Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or
           | sports, unless they're evidence of some interesting new
           | phenomenon. Videos of pratfalls or disasters, or cute animal
           | pictures. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-
           | topic.
           | 
           | They are probably referring to the off-topic part of the
           | guidelines. This article is something that will be very
           | likely in the TV news.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-01-27 23:01 UTC)