[HN Gopher] MSFT Q2/2023 Earnings Release
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       MSFT Q2/2023 Earnings Release
        
       Author : ckastner
       Score  : 39 points
       Date   : 2023-01-24 21:03 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.microsoft.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.microsoft.com)
        
       | hbcondo714 wrote:
       | Revenue was $52.7 billion and increased 2%            Operating
       | income was $20.4 billion GAAP and $21.6 billion non-GAAP, and
       | decreased 8% and 3%, respectively            Net income was $16.4
       | billion GAAP and $17.4 billion non-GAAP, and decreased 12% and
       | 7%, respectively            Diluted earnings per share was $2.20
       | GAAP and $2.32 non-GAAP, and decreased 11% and 6%, respectively
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | didntreadarticl wrote:
       | In another thread recently I was wondering if Microsoft are the
       | most diversified of the current big players. What do you reckon?
        
       | dzonga wrote:
       | one thing I applaud MS for, even though I hate the OS they forced
       | on the world:
       | 
       | being able to grow revenues from acquired companies.
        
         | gigel82 wrote:
         | For every success story (Mojang) there are 3-4 horror stories
         | (Fast, Yammer, Nokia, aQuantive, etc.)
        
           | basch wrote:
           | Is aQuantive still around? Atlas was sold to Facebook in
           | 2013, and re-released in 2014.
           | 
           | https://www.cnbc.com/2014/09/23/facebook-to-introduce-new-
           | ad...
        
           | i_love_cookies wrote:
           | I do feel like some of those companies were doomed before
           | microsoft was involved at least
        
         | Kukumber wrote:
         | > being able to grow revenues from acquired companies.
         | 
         | correction:
         | 
         | being able to inflate and cover up their losses by acquiring
         | already successful companies
        
           | arcticbull wrote:
           | Doesn't matter what you call it, the system works apparently.
           | Not many companies can say that.
        
             | Kukumber wrote:
             | It is important when you want to draw conclusions; you
             | should use factual data, not your emotions
        
               | eightysixfour wrote:
               | Your response appears to be much more emotionally driven
               | than articbull's. He is simply acknowledging their
               | business model and the fact it is clearly a system that
               | works, you're assigning it some kind of value.
        
               | Kukumber wrote:
               | I read it again and i can see that, you are right, that
               | wasn't the intent, i felt the comment was trying to
               | downplay losses, so i felt the need to remind the
               | differences, even more so since they just announced
               | laying off 10k employees, including destroying the entire
               | AR/VR/MR team
        
               | arcticbull wrote:
               | Yeah sorry I didn't mean it to come across that way!
               | 
               | I see their core business as changing, and they're being
               | resourceful in leveraging acquisitions to continue to
               | deliver shareholder value into the future.
               | 
               | I think this is a strategy that many companies have
               | historically executed on very badly.
        
       | sremani wrote:
       | Any financial experts tease out the effect of strong dollar on
       | their overseas income and balance sheet ?
        
       | Kukumber wrote:
       | xbox hw/gaming: -13%
       | 
       | This one is the most embarrassing of all, i wonder how different
       | that would have been if they had a handheld instead of 2 console
       | with 2 different performance profile, that seems redundant
       | 
       | When you look at Nintendo, it's night and day the amount of
       | console they are about to sell, more than both Sony/MS combined
       | each quarter
        
         | krashidov wrote:
         | Anecdotal but I used to be a die hard Xbox guy. After the 360 I
         | got really lost on the naming scheme. I want to buy an Xbox but
         | I have no idea which one is the latest. Is it the Xbox Series X
         | One? Or the Xbox X Series X? no fucking clue
         | 
         | I know, I can do like 5 minutes of research and find out. But I
         | don't care THAT much. If I knew it was called an Xbox 5 I could
         | use that time researching on just going to Amazon and buying it
         | instead.
         | 
         | Also, my friends have all gotten older and they're no longer on
         | an Xbox and are using Nintendo switch/phones as their casual
         | gaming device.
        
         | NickC25 wrote:
         | I wonder if that accounts for the Activision purchase?
         | 
         | If it's just purely revenue, yeah, that's ugly. Sad because I
         | got the Xbox Game Pass maybe 3 months ago and while I rarely
         | game, I've really enjoyed it - the fact that I can just hop on
         | and play whatever I want in the cloud is really cool. The fact
         | that it comes bundled with all EA games too is great. Will suck
         | when they inevitably have to bump up prices, because right now
         | it's the best value in gaming hands down.
        
         | kcb wrote:
         | A pipeline of high quality, broad interest games is still
         | something Xbox is lacking. It's taking quite a while for the
         | Xbox Game Studios acquisitions to bear fruit.
        
           | Kukumber wrote:
           | Hence a handheld would have served well for small hit games,
           | including backward compatibility with XONE/360, it could have
           | also been a catalyzer for their cloud/online services and a
           | bridge with PC gaming (they own windows), Nintendo is
           | profiting from it since most of their catalog (except for
           | their 1st party) comes from PC ports
           | 
           | That's exactly Valve's strategy with the Steam Deck, they are
           | capitalizing on it, and it seems to be a good idea, that's
           | unfortunate for xbox, maybe for the next gen
        
             | lapetitejort wrote:
             | The Steam Deck relieves so much pressure on Xbox and Sony.
             | All they have to do is play nice with Proton and they are
             | handheld ready. If the Deck fails, there's no hit to their
             | bottom line. Sony has has fully embraced it with their push
             | to PC.
        
       | NotYourLawyer wrote:
       | Up 4% after hours.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-01-24 23:01 UTC)