[HN Gopher] The Moral Character of Cryptographic Work (2015)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Moral Character of Cryptographic Work (2015)
        
       Author : jules-jules
       Score  : 28 points
       Date   : 2023-01-20 10:46 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (notes.ekzhang.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (notes.ekzhang.com)
        
       | college_physics wrote:
       | It is interesting that this (otherwise great piece) does not
       | mention cryptocurrencies / blockchain at all (by 2015/16 this was
       | a "thing" already) or the triumph of surveillance capitalism. It
       | only goes to show that cryptographic work is, if anything, even
       | more critical and influential to how to digital realm will be
       | shaped.
       | 
       | From the beginning of time till just a decade or so ago, our
       | political, social and economic/financial structures were based on
       | certain assumptions about information privacy. These assumptions
       | are being violated massively as we speak, Sometimes the
       | "experiments" are giant flops, sometimes they are frighteningly
       | successful.
       | 
       | The discussion about the global distribution of interconnected
       | silicon and who has what access and control over which parts has
       | barely begun. What geopolitical segmentation will we see. Is its
       | economy going to be free or some sort of digital feudalism? Will
       | it encode humanistic concepts or introduce new types of
       | segmentation into first/second class humans? etc.
        
         | najdan33 wrote:
         | It would be interesting to see a list of what a small player
         | (eg. small country) effectively needs to be able to bootstrap
         | chip/IC production.
        
         | jgerrish wrote:
         | > It is interesting that this (otherwise great piece) does not
         | mention cryptocurrencies / blockchain at all
         | 
         | The term "crypto bro", and its societal connotations, is
         | relatively new. Even if cypherpunk work is decades old. Google
         | Trends shows that.
         | 
         | I recognize that, for most citizens, all cryptography work gets
         | tainted by that term, "crypto bro". If I meet somebody at a
         | social event tomorrow and tell them I build NFT crypto
         | libraries for Woozle, vs. CRC32 crypto libraries for Tooble,
         | are they going to differentiate? A lot of the current
         | progressive crowd will wrinkle their nose, regardless.
         | 
         | I recognize the trend-makers who coined that term did so with
         | political means in mind.
         | 
         | I recognize that they were attempting to say, "We're all part
         | of this system. Unrestrained pursuit of work above all else can
         | be harmful. By coining this term multiple people are taking a
         | social hit."
         | 
         | But I also recognize some may want to re-orient allegences not
         | just for the benefit of those we may spend less time with if we
         | work more, but to reinforce other power structures.
         | 
         | Decades have been spent iterating on that idea. Good puzzles
         | and enigmas take a while to work out.
         | 
         | Anyways, I'm happy they're proud of their work. There are some
         | good points hidden in there, even if I'm more hardened to the
         | reality now.
        
       | DSingularity wrote:
       | It's a classic and a great paper - but it's written for an
       | obvious that couldn't care less about morality or ethics. So it's
       | sad.
        
         | glasss wrote:
         | That's what my thought was as well. The people or groups that I
         | think can benefit from reading this simply won't even if I
         | presented it to them. They are no where near this type of
         | content in their normal lives anyway, and I'm not interested in
         | being an activist at all times.
        
         | Ar-Curunir wrote:
         | What? This paper is written for cryptographers, and is now
         | often required reading in cryptography courses.
        
       | najdan33 wrote:
       | > Cryptography rearranges power: it configures who can do what,
       | from what. This makes cryptography an inherently political tool,
       | and it confers on the field an intrinsically moral dimension.
       | 
       | Admittedly, this is true for other types of innovation as well.
       | For example the invention of the decentralized Internet and its
       | basic properties. Have the Internet not been decentralized, it
       | would not have allowed folks in countries without infrastructure
       | and money to build their own networks which are on par with the
       | developed countries' ones. Also, free and open source software in
       | general.
       | 
       | There isn't anything cryptographic in that and yet it was a big
       | power re-arranger in a way.
        
         | college_physics wrote:
         | Yes, i think we take it for granted by now but its obviously an
         | invented layer and a-priory it might not have been even clear
         | if such an architecture is workable at this scale.
         | 
         | The emerging picture is of a (still) wide open canvas where
         | cryptography along with patterns like ocap models play the role
         | of ink for drawing boundaries.
         | 
         | What is still unclear if all pre-existing social arrangements
         | can be re-expressed on this new canvas and where the feedback
         | loops between power centers and the technically skilled people
         | will lead us.
         | 
         | So far the track record is not good. There are various
         | initiatives for moral manifestos concerning digital tech here
         | and there, but they dont seem to make much of a difference
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-01-21 23:02 UTC)