[HN Gopher] Microsoft held an invite-only concert for execs, 1 d...
___________________________________________________________________
Microsoft held an invite-only concert for execs, 1 day before
announcing layoffs
Author : underscoreSpace
Score : 57 points
Date : 2023-01-20 19:45 UTC (3 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.businessinsider.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.businessinsider.com)
| metadat wrote:
| What does this say about the current headspace of the executive
| team at Microsoft? "Detached from reality" would be an
| understatement.
| StrictDabbler wrote:
| Holly: The economic downturn has been difficult recently,
| forcing the closures of both Camden and Yonkers, to be followed
| soon by what other branch? For five-hundred thousand dollars,
| is it A.) Scranton, B.) Buffalo, C.) Utica, or D.) toothbrush!
|
| Michael Scott: I will say B, Buffalo! Final answer!
|
| Holly: That is correct!
| kps wrote:
| I'm a bit more cynical. I think it's perfectly in line with
| reality.
| landemva wrote:
| While it looks wasteful, the exec's travel costs for Davos were
| likely higher. I wonder why shareholders pay for MS execs to
| attend the Davos holiday week.
| Swenrekcah wrote:
| Well, perhaps not all conferences are worth the money
| companies spend on sending their employees there, but I'd
| guess Davos probably is.
| COGlory wrote:
| This is the kind of stuff I don't understand.
|
| On one hand: "Corporations are bound by fiduciary responsibility
| to maximize profit"
|
| On the other hand...private concerts. Could an argument REALLY be
| made that Microsoft execs are _so valuable_ that if they didn 't
| have this concert, the execs would leave and the company would
| suffer more losses than it spent on the concert? Why does it seem
| like executives are the only areas that aren't ever subject to
| cost cutting? Shouldn't the march to profit necessitate a steady
| downward trend in CEO salaries? Do I just not understand what
| fiduciary responsibility is? Why can't shareholders sue over this
| concert?
|
| I was never a fan of the "corporation maximize profit legal
| responsibility" argument, but it doesn't even seem consistent
| with itself...
| pjerem wrote:
| > Why does it seem like executives are the only areas that
| aren't ever subject to cost cutting?
|
| It's deceptively as simple as the fact that they are the one
| cutting costs. Who would fire himself ?
| COGlory wrote:
| The board?
| jbverschoor wrote:
| They clearly had something to celebrate
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-01-20 23:01 UTC)