[HN Gopher] Peter Thiel's fund wound down 8-year Bitcoin bet bef...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Peter Thiel's fund wound down 8-year Bitcoin bet before market
       crash
        
       Author : SirLJ
       Score  : 78 points
       Date   : 2023-01-19 20:10 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (worldnewsera.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (worldnewsera.com)
        
       | hristov wrote:
       | I would not put much weight on this article. The fund is entirely
       | private, it does not need to disclose its holdings in public
       | government submitted documents. This article does not cite any
       | sources.
       | 
       | It is always a good idea to use a heavy doze of skepticism when
       | confronted with statements about someone's brilliance at market
       | timing. Especially when those statements are not backed by any
       | evidence. Peter Thiel previously had to disclose more of his
       | trading and, other than his decision to put half a million in a
       | tiny startup called facebook made a long time ago, he has not
       | shown any brilliant market timing.
        
         | cft wrote:
         | The original source is two Financial Times San Francisco
         | journalists:
         | https://www.ft.com/content/0a1d5597-7145-4035-987b-ff033bba3...
        
           | hristov wrote:
           | Who do not site their source.
        
             | guywithahat wrote:
             | A blogger spamming their article.
             | 
             | Alternatively Hacker News only lets you post a link once.
             | So if someone posted the FT link at a bad time, you
             | wouldn't be able to post it again and it wouldn't get
             | exposure. This gives the link a second chance
        
           | Kareem71 wrote:
           | Someone needs to build a browser extension that flags news
           | links for which their main subject comes from an undisclosed
           | source
        
             | WJW wrote:
             | Go for it mate. Don't wait for someone else to do it.
        
         | rwmj wrote:
         | Isn't it all on the public blockchain somewhere?
        
         | hristov wrote:
         | Oh and by the way, Peter Thiel is an investor in Ycombinator
         | who runs Hacker News so it is pretty much a given that any
         | comment criticizing his brilliance will be downvoted
         | immediately.
        
           | rnk wrote:
           | Let's see if that is true. I don't think it is. Peter Thiel
           | and the dark enlightenment is a bad thing for the world. NYT
           | article. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/21/books/review/the-
           | contrari...
           | 
           | I'll never be a billionaire, but if I were, I hope I don't
           | think the solution to all problems is pushing for things that
           | benefit me personally.
        
             | WeylandYutani wrote:
             | I never believed in the "tech douchebags are going to make
             | the world better" hype but I can see the appeal for the
             | general HN audience. Those who fund big tech are no
             | different than those who fund big oil.
        
             | lordfrito wrote:
             | Your sacrifice will not be in vain, I will tell your story.
        
             | mrguyorama wrote:
             | Ten minutes later and multiple downvotes on your post. I
             | don't even know what could possibly be considered
             | controversial in your post.
        
       | dkrich wrote:
       | This episode from beginning to end is extremely interesting to
       | me. Admittedly one of my areas of interest for the past several
       | years has been studying bubbles from various eras but I think
       | there is a lot to take from this story.
       | 
       | First, bubbles typically uncover something revolutionary but
       | because of the hype and hoopla, leverage, and endless promotion,
       | the markets overshoot what is possible currently to a ridiculous
       | extent and most lose huge sums of money. In the aftermath where
       | once the sky was the limit everyone swears the idea off and
       | leaves it for dead.
       | 
       | An example: the Florida land boom of the 1920's. This is one of
       | the wildest stories that many people who live in Florida don't
       | even know about. They don't realize that nearly all of Florida
       | was developed within the past 100 years and that major cities
       | like Miami, Boca Raton, West Palm Beach, and on up the coast were
       | created during this boom basically out of thin air by
       | speculators. Throughout there were shameless promotions including
       | one orchestrated by Charles Ponzi after he was released from
       | prison as well as the creation of South Beach, the founder of
       | whom ended up losing everything after spending huge amounts on
       | land plots and promotional advertising. Anyone studying that era
       | will see amazing similarities to the crypto bubble.
       | 
       | But the interesting part of that story is that those who were
       | engaged in land speculation in Florida were absolutely correct in
       | seeing the potential for the area as were the rest of the
       | promoters and speculators of which there were many. But the
       | population and development of the time just wasn't enough to keep
       | up with the spend at the time. Essentially they were early.
       | 
       | With crypto, it was pretty much ignored until it wasn't. Then it
       | hit a critical mass and the promoters seeing an opportunity to
       | grift, came out of the woodwork. Once it hit a critical mass in
       | price, people started to believe the hype and retrofitted use
       | cases to it. Then after it crashed, most said "see I knew it was
       | a stupid idea." Jamie Dimon was saying this as recently as this
       | morning on CNBC.
       | 
       | This is the second part of the story that's interesting. Many
       | people argue "crypto has no tangible value, it's just fake
       | money." Well, that may be true but those same people take as self
       | evident that things like gold, Monet and Van Gogh paintings, and
       | tons of other things that arguably have no tangible value are
       | worth vast sums of money. It's all subjective.
       | 
       | The bottom line is that things are worth what groups of people
       | believe they are worth at a given time. This is a very difficult
       | concept for most to wrap their minds around because it seems
       | counterintuitive. Amazon stock is clearly worth $2 trillion
       | because it's a massive company built by a forward-thinking
       | genius. But when it was worth a few billion most thought it was
       | too expensive. At each point in time the price wasn't right or
       | wrong, it just reflected what people agreed it was worth.
       | 
       | With cryptos they aren't inherently valuable or worthless, they
       | are worth something if there is at least one person who is
       | willing to pay for it, regardless of how stupid you think it is.
       | 
       | So I would not be that surprised to one day see cryptos reemerge
       | with new and better and clearer use cases which in hindsight will
       | seem obvious but still very few will have capitalized on them.
       | I'm not inherently bullish on crypto either. I've never owned
       | any. But I also have been around enough to know that the crowd is
       | smarter than I am and just because it seems stupid that something
       | is happening in the market does not make it wrong. The fact that
       | even now the price is over $20k is somewhat telling that the
       | popular narrative is in complete disagreement with the
       | fundamentals.
        
       | neilv wrote:
       | This article seems to be suggesting that Thiel was pumping while
       | the fund was dumping.
        
         | moloch-hai wrote:
         | That is the inference to draw.
         | 
         | Actually saying in print that Thiel was doing that might be
         | risky.
        
       | hiq wrote:
       | https://archive.ph/ec2Pp
        
       | HorizonXP wrote:
       | About 4-5 months too late IMO, but smart move. Cash is king for
       | the foreseeable future.
        
         | jandrese wrote:
         | I like to think he saw the FTX commercial during the Superbowl
         | and realized it was time to sell.
        
         | logifail wrote:
         | As they say on Wall Street, "Nobody rings a bell at the top or
         | the bottom of a market".
         | 
         | Timing their exit to lock in $1.8bn of paper gains does look
         | great ... with the benefit of hindsight. If the valuations had
         | gone in the other direction, presumably there would be plenty
         | of people saying what a stupid move it was to sell.
        
           | thaumasiotes wrote:
           | > As they say on Wall Street, "Nobody rings a bell at the top
           | or the bottom of a market".
           | 
           | Completely untrue. There are uncountable numbers of people
           | ringing both of those bells at the top and bottom of the
           | market.
           | 
           | It's just hard to notice, because the bells ring at every
           | other position of the market too.
        
           | rcme wrote:
           | "Their decision looks great in hindsight. If something
           | totally different happened they would look stupid" sounds
           | like an amazing compliment, but the tone of your comment
           | sounds like you didn't mean to compliment them?
        
       | nbardy wrote:
       | Site is down.
       | 
       | Here's the google cache:
       | 
       | https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:8E9sp-...
        
       | endymi0n wrote:
       | This wasn't the market crash. The real one is still to come.
        
         | mi_lk wrote:
         | ok. How do we capitalize it?
        
           | rcme wrote:
           | Take out Tether-denominated loans.
        
       | kyleyeats wrote:
       | I've been reading a lot of the Coinfessions account on Twitter.
       | It's where people post crypto horror stories anonymously.
       | 
       | It's weird to think that they "generated" 1.8bn. If I made 1.8bn
       | selling sandwiches, you could probably find evidence of it
       | somewhere, like in product packaging in dumps. But here the only
       | thing left behind is a bunch of guys going "Yeah I left my
       | position open and drained my life savings by accident."
       | 
       | Like, every bit of that money represents money that someone else
       | lost, and basically nothing else. I can't wrap my head around it.
        
         | theragra wrote:
         | Strictly speaking, this is not true. Crypto is used by many
         | countries with tight/problematic banking regimes to
         | send/exchange money. Ironically, both by Ukrainians and
         | russians, for example. Another thing is buying drugs on the
         | darknet. Whatever your opinion of that is, the fact is crypto
         | has some usages, though not a lot rn.
        
           | colordrops wrote:
           | Those are pretty big use cases but not "authorized".
           | Nevertheless, they are real use cases.
        
         | badrabbit wrote:
         | You ever heard of the lottery? Guess what? Every bit of it is
         | money someone lost and half of it funds your government. Wait
         | till you hear about options trading and people committing
         | suicide over bad trades.
        
           | brianwawok wrote:
           | You aren't wrong, but people have very different mindsets.
           | 
           | People play the lotto for fun. They think hey maybe I'll get
           | lucky and win. Sure there are addicts , but I don't think
           | default behavior is "if I play this I'll be rich "
           | 
           | Crypto is literally "if I trade this I'll get rich".
           | 
           | But, both are roughly 0 sum games in the end as you rightly
           | pointed out.
        
         | klyrs wrote:
         | First off, I'd like to commend you for using landfill volume as
         | a proxy for productivity. It's refreshingly honest and I wish
         | economists would take note.
         | 
         | That said, there _are_ last-gen GPUs and ASICs going to
         | landfills. Some people are actually getting paid to make the
         | inputs to the otherwise-ephemeral pseudocurrency. Not to
         | mention all of the CO2 released into the atmosphere... you can
         | 't see it but that $1.8B put it there.
        
           | dougmwne wrote:
           | And the paper clip factories churn on.
        
             | samwillis wrote:
             | Do not click this link, you will loose at least 6hrs of
             | your life:
             | 
             | https://www.decisionproblem.com/paperclips/index2.html
        
           | honkler wrote:
           | some use freight activity as a measure of economy, atleast
           | "real economy".
        
             | RC_ITR wrote:
             | And therefore completely ignore the 50% of the global
             | economy that is services.
        
               | honkler wrote:
               | aka fake economy.
        
               | RC_ITR wrote:
               | Yeah, the _illusion_ of electricity and the Internet...
        
               | Tostino wrote:
               | Not entirely, most services require some products as
               | inputs, so they are still measured in some way.
        
               | RC_ITR wrote:
               | What about electricity generation requires a shipping
               | container?
        
               | honkler wrote:
               | freight in this context generally includes commercial
               | rail freight.
        
               | brg wrote:
               | Energy production is kit a self contained endeavor.
               | Transformers, steel, copper, pipe, valves, digital
               | equipment for monitoring and control systems are just
               | some of the necessary inputs for construction and
               | maintenance.
               | 
               | Beyond that, efficient use energy production requires
               | some place for it to be used, Generally home and industry
               | appliances.
        
               | canadianfella wrote:
               | [dead]
        
           | WeylandYutani wrote:
           | All of the crypto companies have had layoffs since the crash.
           | The big exchanges are downsizing- but obviously there's still
           | some money in it.
        
           | dsfyu404ed wrote:
           | People doing "economist things" but with money at stake (i.e.
           | financial analysts) already do that stuff.
        
           | samwillis wrote:
           | My pet theory is that the massive excess in GPUs from the
           | crypto explosion are being fed back into the AI explosion we
           | are seeing now.
           | 
           | In reality I wander how many former mining GPU farms are now
           | doing AI training...
        
             | [deleted]
        
         | a4isms wrote:
         | In the movie "Quicksilver," Kevin Bacon plays some kind of
         | (commodities) trader who lost an enormous amount of money
         | betting the wrong way and retires from trading to become a bike
         | courier.
         | 
         | He has a friend over at his loft, and while looking at pictures
         | from his finance days, she asks, "What happened to all the
         | money?"
         | 
         | His reply is a classic:
         | 
         | "It's still there, it's just in other people's pockets."
         | 
         | ----
         | 
         | That's all I see in crypto speculation. It's a game that
         | involves shuffling money between players, without actually
         | creating new wealth.
         | 
         | (Also, the casino is betting against you and sometimes isn't
         | satisfied with their rake, so they "rug pull" and leave
         | everyone holding worthless chips. But that is another issue.)
         | 
         | This is very different from, say, selling software that runs a
         | business. Your software is not just transferring money from
         | your customer to you, it's literally creating new wealth by
         | making your customer more productive.
        
           | jaywalk wrote:
           | And the "new wealth" being "created" for your customer comes
           | from... other people's pockets.
        
             | eldritch_4ier wrote:
             | This is obviously not true. If there was no new wealth in
             | the world than there was 50 years ago, we wouldn't be so
             | much more well off despite have billions more people.
        
               | wmf wrote:
               | New wealth is being created in the world but not by
               | crypto.
        
               | darepublic wrote:
               | It's definitely subjective. I.e. if we harm the
               | livability of the earth to create new tech saying there
               | is more wealth is not false per se but based on your pov
        
               | WeylandYutani wrote:
               | That's just humanity being parasites. Apparently the only
               | possible growth we can come up with is population
               | increase.
        
               | [deleted]
        
           | diegocerdan wrote:
           | The function of Store of Value (SoV) of any money is acquired
           | by common belief of it's worth. It happened with gold in a
           | very long time-span. People holding gold would not benefit of
           | the increase of price as it took too long.
           | 
           | Gold... what if this common belief can be upgraded to a
           | better form of money?
           | 
           | Bitcoin is energy quite energy intense and slow in the number
           | of transactions but gold has many drawbacks too! It's a heavy
           | rock, can't be easily split for payments, you have to spend
           | efforts in custody and can't be transferred digitally.
           | 
           | Bitcoin... what if this common belief can be upgraded to a
           | better form of money?
           | 
           | Ethereum is way more complex than Bitcoin but solves through
           | clever engineering most of it's drawbacks. Let the Market
           | decide which form of money is best.
        
             | a4isms wrote:
             | I spoke about crypto _speculation_ , and I was explicit
             | about that. I choose not to debate speculative claims about
             | crypto's potential for becoming a useful "store of value"
             | or "currency for commerce" at this time and in this place.
             | 
             | As to letting the market decide things, I lived through the
             | Bre-X scandal, where the market decided to invest in a fake
             | mine, and real lives were ruined. I believe in regulated
             | marketplaces.
        
             | [deleted]
        
           | ElectricalUnion wrote:
           | > That's all I see in crypto speculation. It's a game that
           | involves shuffling money between players, without actually
           | creating new wealth.
           | 
           | Just shuffling money between players is downplaying it.
           | 
           | "Crypto" often just sends "value" to the bitbucket either
           | intentionally or because of operational errors.
        
         | kumarvvr wrote:
         | As long as crypto is touted as "investment", this is bound to
         | happen.
         | 
         | Crypto isn't about mining anymore.
        
         | FatActor wrote:
         | I get tired of hearing day after day about billionaires making
         | not just billions, but 10's and 100's of billions without doing
         | much of anything except having impeccable timing... and a lot
         | of money to invest.
        
           | rcme wrote:
           | Timing is everything, as they say.
        
       | 323 wrote:
       | How legit is this site? There is this blub in their About which
       | is not very reassuring (I never heard of them):
       | 
       | > _World News Era is the world leader in online news and
       | information and seeks to inform, engage and empower the common
       | men and all age groups. World News Era has millions of daily
       | readers._
       | 
       | https://worldnewsera.com/about-us/
        
         | wmf wrote:
         | This is blogspam. FT is the original "source" for this rumor.
        
           | cft wrote:
           | https://archive.ph/8XLr6 original
        
       | RcouF1uZ4gsC wrote:
       | > Founders Fund sold out of the vast majority of its entire
       | cryptocurrency portfolio by the end of March 2022
       | 
       | In Feb 2022, when I saw crypto ads during the Super Bowl, it
       | seemed like a warning sign that something was about to go bad and
       | the existing players were looking for suckers.
        
         | gpderetta wrote:
         | On the London tube there were self referential ads saying "when
         | you see crypto ads in the tube it is time to buy". /Facepalm
        
           | neilv wrote:
           | That might be brilliant evil, if they preempted the catchy
           | old sayings about when to get out of the market.
        
           | wmf wrote:
           | That reminds me of the old sayings "those who do not
           | understand history--screw it, it's time to buy" and "fortune
           | favors the people who buy things from Superbowl ads".
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-01-19 23:02 UTC)