[HN Gopher] Byte Magazine 1975-1995
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Byte Magazine 1975-1995
        
       Author : belter
       Score  : 192 points
       Date   : 2023-01-16 05:44 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (worldradiohistory.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (worldradiohistory.com)
        
       | UI_at_80x24 wrote:
       | The single best inspiration for me to become a 'hacker' of sorts
       | was BYTE.
       | 
       | Back in the DOS5/Win3.11 days there was an article about
       | modifying command.com & io.sys so that you could customize the
       | files that were used to load the system.
       | 
       | config.sys & autoexec.bat became (on my system) ipl.sys & ipl.bat
       | (Inital Program Load)
       | 
       | It made the system immune to any virus* [except TSRs] (keeping a
       | dummy config.sys & autoexec.bat let me see programs that tried to
       | modify those files, and generally scored a TONNE of cool points
       | in my mind. It also taught me about "security through obscurity".
       | 
       | This taught me that _MY_ hardware was mine to modify how I
       | wanted. It gave me an incredible sense of power, and capability.
       | 
       | * = well at the time I thought it did. =)
        
         | jandrese wrote:
         | The computer viruses that were the worst in those days were the
         | boot sector viruses. Stoned Empire Monkey and the like. They
         | were so hard to remove from machines and spread like wildfire
         | in computer labs.
        
           | sobkas wrote:
           | > The computer viruses that were the worst in those days were
           | the boot sector viruses. Stoned Empire Monkey and the like.
           | They were so hard to remove from machines and spread like
           | wildfire in computer labs.
           | 
           | Someone left disk in floppy drive and you turned computer on?
           | Have a nice bootsector virus for free(and then we had
           | Chernobyl, it was fun). It only got worse with pendrives and
           | autorun functionality in Windows. Even today corpo that owns
           | me, blocks them from being mounted on dev machines.
        
           | [deleted]
        
       | manv1 wrote:
       | Jerry Pournelle's column wouldn't have existed if he had owned an
       | Apple Computer.
        
         | pklausler wrote:
         | I found his columns fun, but I have to admit that this
         | hypothetical might have been a net win in technical accuracy.
        
       | richardjam73 wrote:
       | The scans from here differ from the ones on the Internet Archive.
       | These are lower quality (Marks on pages, yellower, compression
       | artifacts, bleed through, inconsistant page sizes) but as a
       | result are much smaller. They are watermarked on each page. This
       | archive also seems more complete than the IA one.
        
         | JKCalhoun wrote:
         | The site (worldradiohistory.com) was just featured on the front
         | page yesterday with TAB books, and is an all around amazing
         | resource.
         | 
         | I have scraped hundreds now of hobbyist electronics magazines
         | going back roughly 100 years.
         | 
         | From time to time, when offline, I'll pull up these old
         | electronics hobbyist magazines that I've culled and skim
         | through them. Occasionally an old circuit like a theremin will
         | catch my eye and I'll make a note of which issue I found it in
         | in a file that I keep.
         | 
         | Otherwise I think I like suffusing myself in the periodicals of
         | those earlier decades (I think the 70's are one of my
         | favorites).
         | 
         | It is rather telling how prevalent the ads are though that show
         | men being browbeaten by wives or bosses -- these men are
         | encouraged then to take some kind of correspondence course in
         | electronics to _make the big bucks_ and _be their own boss!_
         | Apparently selling a product that trades on a reader 's
         | feelings of inadequacy has always been a reliable business
         | plan.
        
           | richardjam73 wrote:
           | I also have a large collection I have downloaded over the
           | years, primarily ones that I read when I was younger. I used
           | an ipad to read them as that has the best screen resolution
           | for such material for a portable device. The ipad
           | unfortunatley broke last year and I haven't had enough money
           | to replace it.
           | 
           | It is interesting to read things like letters to the editor
           | to see what people of the day thought.
        
       | nanna wrote:
       | Related, EXE magazine (1988-2000) full scans.
       | 
       | https://gizmonaut.net/exe/#scans
        
         | kichimi wrote:
         | These are hilarious and written in a very tongue-in-cheek
         | manner.
         | 
         | Some favourite quotes:
         | 
         | "XMLDeveloper seeks validation"
         | 
         | "Hang on a minute, this is a 32-bit development environment.
         | What will I do with all my 16-bit code?" "Having seen your
         | code, dump it. However, with Visual C++ 2.0 and MFC, most
         | developers can just recompile"
        
       | JoeAltmaier wrote:
       | I think I have an entire collection of Byte magazine in my shed.
       | If the mice and weather have not ruined them.
        
       | dark-star wrote:
       | There's a large collection of BYTE magazines on IA:
       | https://archive.org/details/byte-magazine
       | 
       | Some are not in that collection yet, so if you search for "BYTE
       | magazine" you might find some more.
       | 
       | Also check out the collection of other computer magazines
       | https://archive.org/details/computermagazines
       | 
       | Even more magazines here:
       | https://archive.org/details/additional_collections
       | https://archive.org/details/magazine_rack
        
       | retrocryptid wrote:
       | I'm having a "you kids get off my lawn" senior moment here...
       | When Byte was in it's heyday, micro-computing was (largely) the
       | domain of weirdo hobbyists. And sure, there was the nascent
       | internet and plenty of BBSes, but most of what I learned came
       | from user groups. MANY people bought early Apple ][s, Commodore
       | PETs or TRS-80s to scratch some personal engineering itch. The
       | HOWTO articles in Byte cater to this community. It had the same
       | feel to me as the modern "maker" community. Most microcomputers
       | of the era came with BASIC in ROM so you could train the computer
       | to do what you wanted it to do. The idea that computer software
       | was "media" wasn't really well developed. Or rather, everyone was
       | making their own media.
       | 
       | BYTE was originally the magazine of people who made their own
       | computers. Quickly became the magazine of people who bought Apple
       | ]['s or TRS-80s or assembled their own computers from parts so
       | they could write their own software. And then morphed into the
       | magazine for people who had a clear idea for a business (or
       | personal) data processing problem and were looking for ideas from
       | "experts" for how to solve it (usually in the form of a product
       | review.)
       | 
       | They re-launched Byte a decade ago, but I think it's time had
       | passed. Maybe it should have been a review of various web sites
       | and apps (like "How I organized my record collection with Air-
       | Table" or "How I ripped all my CDs with iTunes" or "How I ditched
       | my local music collection with Spotify.")
       | 
       | Compared to modern times, few people were using microcomputers
       | and we were all (from necessity) very interested in a few of the
       | same topics (programming, buying affordable systems and how to
       | make an Epson FX-80 print properly.) Byte could run an article
       | about BNF meta-syntax or "how to do a mailing list" and a huge
       | percentage of the readership was actually interested. More than
       | just an ur-wikipedia, Byte let you know what was important to
       | know by running articles about it.
       | 
       | By the mid-80s it had sort of lost that, certainly by the early
       | 90s. Not so much because the quality declined, but because the
       | readership expanded and like all good businesses, they followed
       | the money. It's core readership in 1977 was a niche in 1987, and
       | probably not as profitable.
       | 
       | BYTE was awesome. But it was awesome because it fit the times so
       | perfectly. (Actually it changed a couple times to keep fitting
       | the times as the times changed.) And then one day it didn't. The
       | community of people I knew had moved on to Dr. Dobbs for
       | interesting software stuff and Computer Shopper for product
       | reviews.
       | 
       | Alas, poor BYTE! I knew it, Horatio -- a magazine of infinite
       | jest.
        
       | loph wrote:
       | The same site has a complete archive of "Ham Radio" magazine.
       | 
       | Wayne Green was the publisher of Byte magazine, which he started
       | when he recognized hobby computing that the hams that read his
       | "73" magazine were doing.
       | 
       | I thought it was interesting that the first edition of Byte had
       | an article about hobby computing with a LSI-11, which is a PDP-11
       | variant.
        
       | asplake wrote:
       | I remember the Smalltalk edition blowing my mind:
       | https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-Byte/80s/Byte-1981-08....
        
         | phoyd wrote:
         | Yes, this was awesome. They explained the VM and everything.
        
         | lsllc wrote:
         | My fav was Lossless Data Compression, a really well written
         | article describing how the algorithms behind PKZIP worked;
         | Huffman & LZW coding.
         | 
         | https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-Byte/90s/1991/Byte-199...
         | (page 309)
        
       | y-curious wrote:
       | I work in the health tech space and the last 1994 article talks
       | about how "Computerized Patient Records" might revolutionize the
       | field.
       | 
       | "Plans call for an increase in storage capacity to 30 or 60 GB
       | (supporting one to two months of patient image data) and an
       | increase in the number of supporting workstations from three in
       | the radiology department to 10 or 15 stations distributed
       | throughout the hospital."
       | 
       | How very nostalgic. Thank you for posting.
        
       | klelatti wrote:
       | Does anyone know of a similar archive for Personal Computer World
       | which was (sort of) the UK equivalent to Byte? The Internet
       | Archive has a quite a few but is also missing a lot too.
        
         | HarHarVeryFunny wrote:
         | I used to buy PCW religiously every month, starting with the
         | 1st issue which had the NASCOM-1 (kit computer) on the cover,
         | which was my first computer.
         | 
         | I'm not sure you can really compare PCW to BYTE. From what I
         | recall PCW didn't really get into the more abstract computing
         | topics that BYTE did - it was more more focused on products.
         | 
         | Another good magazine from same era was Dr. Dobb's Journal.
         | 
         | Shame that all these geeky magazines have disappeared.
         | 
         | It's interesting watching some of the old c.1980 BBC computer
         | education TV shows that have been uploaded to YouTube. It's
         | funny watching them trying to earnestly explain to TV viewers
         | the difference between a 16-bit computer with a 16-bit bus vs
         | one with an 8-bit bus, etc... I guess back then there was a
         | thought that the general public would be brought up to speed on
         | the nuances of such things!
        
           | klelatti wrote:
           | Likewise re buying but from a bit later.
           | 
           | You're absolutely right that PCW was more focused on
           | products. They did sometimes have a go at some of the more
           | conceptual stuff though and I remember learning Z80 assembly
           | from the regular column on assembly language.
           | 
           | I always thought it was a bit more edgy and entertaining than
           | Byte, in some ways like a print version of the Register.
           | 
           | I always liked Guy Kewney (RIP) who will always be famous now
           | for this - the greatest case of mistaken identity in TV
           | history.
           | 
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6Y2uQn_wvc
        
         | Tor3 wrote:
         | At least a few scans exist by now.. but very few, compared to
         | American magazines. It could be that scanning initiatives were
         | punched on quickly by the (at that time) passive owners. I used
         | to look everywhere for scans, but could only find one or two,
         | or just an article extracted from an issue. I had at that time
         | thrown out all my years of physical magazines because of
         | absolutely no space to keep them. I used to have all of them
         | from issue 1 until the magazine degraded into the typical
         | "application reviews only" mode, as happened to nearly all of
         | the magazines (Byte included).
         | 
         | Update: That site (see other comment) has quite a few more
         | issues up than when I last checked. That's good to see.
        
         | JKCalhoun wrote:
         | Same (amazing) site:
         | https://worldradiohistory.com/Personal_Computer_World.htm
         | 
         | Also:
         | https://archive.org/details/PersonalComputerWorldMagazine/PC...
        
           | klelatti wrote:
           | Wow - great site indeed. Many thanks!
        
       | Starwatcher2001 wrote:
       | Wonderful resource. I may well get around to clearing my
       | collection from my loft.
        
       | artie_effim wrote:
       | I randomly clicked 2 issues, and there were articles on AI and
       | neural net implementations - 35 years ago!
        
         | dark-star wrote:
         | AI and neural nets are nothing "new". AI research started in
         | the 60s
        
         | vidarh wrote:
         | Backpropagation was popularised and named in 1986 (though it
         | was likely a rediscovery, with prior art going back to the
         | 60's), so neural nets got a new wave of interest around then
         | coinciding with home computers fast enough to at least achieve
         | mildly interesting results.
        
         | uxp100 wrote:
         | Yeah, AI is a perennial topic and neural nets are an old school
         | approach. When I was in school (not really that long ago) the
         | NN textbook taught as an old fashioned approach that never
         | produced good results, and the professor (from the EE
         | department) would occasionally remark that we are seeing a
         | resurgence of this technique and you never know, it could
         | become popular again. I think at that point it already
         | producing impressive results, but none of us were fully aware
         | of where it was going.
        
         | timbit42 wrote:
         | Even the January 1990 issue of COMPUTE!'s Gazette has a three
         | page neural net article starting on page 23.
         | 
         | Source:
         | https://issuu.com/zetmoon/docs/compute_gazette_issue_79_1990...
        
       | Thoreandan wrote:
       | The mid-'84 ads for is unexpectedly reacquainted me with (through
       | the ads for the Computer Innovations C Compiler) the Coronado
       | Enterprises C Tutorial by Gordon Dodrill.
       | 
       | I got some of my first insight into what could be done with one
       | of these $400 "compilers" to make my own software, which was an
       | innate part of my 8-bit computing experience, but was locked away
       | for quite some time.
        
       | simplegeek wrote:
       | Thank you for making these available.
       | 
       | What's the alternative for "Byte" magazine today? Where do you go
       | to read similar stuff?
        
         | dark-star wrote:
         | In Germany, c't and ix by "heise Verlag" are still pretty
         | popular.
         | 
         | That's the same "heise" where the somewhat-famous h2testw (for
         | testing counterfeit USB sticks etc.), windows-offlineupdate
         | (wsusoffline.net, now not very useful anymore) and umbpci (for
         | those who remember the DOS days ;-) came from
        
           | janandonly wrote:
           | I can second this. In Holland, we get a translated C'T which
           | is the only high-quality general "computer magazine" still
           | existing.
        
         | TheOtherHobbes wrote:
         | HN, a few subreddits, and a few specialised sites.
         | 
         | There isn't a lot of long-form technical journalism happening
         | in print today. Web distribution is cheaper and simpler.
         | 
         | With print you have to lay out a page by hand - and I have no
         | idea what they used before Quark/InDesign, but it can't have
         | been easy to work with - get it printed to film for litho,
         | sometimes with a few iterations, handed over to a trad printer,
         | then distributed physically.
         | 
         | With the web you can upload text and images to a CMS and the
         | layout can be handled automatically. And you're done. Ad
         | revenue can also be automated, with manual exceptions for
         | sponsorship deals.
         | 
         | Ironically producing videos for YT is a much more labour-
         | intensive process, and therefore more like print, than plain
         | web content.
        
         | JKCalhoun wrote:
         | Perhaps the field has become too fragmented. The MagPi Magazine
         | [1] comes to mind, it focuses on hobbyist uses of the Raspberry
         | Pi with articles on programming, projects. But as I say, m
         | that's pretty niche.
         | 
         | And even then I feel like any sort of magazine is anachronistic
         | in this day and age. Too bad too because unlike the various far
         | flung forums, slack channels, or subreddits, a magazine was a
         | nice centralized melting pot where even the cover of the
         | magazine could ignite an entire electronics revolution (and
         | here I'm thinking of course about the Popular Electronics cover
         | [2] that featured the Altair 8800). We've lost our "pulp
         | watercoolers".
         | 
         | [1] https://magpi.raspberrypi.com
         | 
         | [2]
         | http://www.computinghistory.org.uk/userdata/images/large/13/...
        
       | dingosity wrote:
       | I think about how the "computing world" has changed over the last
       | 40 years. When I was a kid, everything was new. Every couple
       | months a new type of computer, CPU or peripheral was released:
       | Commodore 64, inexpensive floppy drive, affordable 4-color
       | plotter, (this crazy thing called) a mouse, etc. BYTE captured
       | the crazy zeitgeist of the age. The content was a crazy mix of
       | how-to articles and what-to-buy product reviews (and the 1/9 page
       | ads in the back.) The covers by Tinny were always witty and well
       | executed. You can't judge a book by it's cover, but Tinny covers
       | definitely grabbed your attention. When they replaced his covers
       | with pictures of products it was definitely an indication times
       | were changing.
       | 
       | The first BYTE issue I remember was the one with the Star Trek
       | cover (December 77) -- I had just recently seen a Spock ASCII art
       | print out at the local academic computing center and burned most
       | of my DEC-10 time playing the Star Trek game online. TREK and
       | computing and BYTE magazine were all linked in my mind. We were
       | living in the future, no doubt about it...
        
         | WeAddValue wrote:
         | I recall one of the computing magazines of that era, possibly
         | the Dec 77 issue of BYTE you mentioned, published the entire
         | code in BASIC for a space-oriented game. Inputs were simple
         | letter or letter+number commands and outputs were an ASCII
         | drawing of a sector of outer space (complete with * for stars).
         | You would shoot at an alien then skip to another sector before
         | getting counterattacked.
         | 
         | My high school buddies and I desperately wanted to play this
         | game but ... none of us had a computer! So, sitting in the
         | cafeteria at lunch/breaks in our bell bottom pants, we walked
         | thru the code line by line recording the values of variables
         | with pencil on paper. This was when BASIC only allowed 1 or 2
         | character variable names and only had GOSUBs instead of proper
         | functions. It was slow going at first but we eventually got to
         | understand what sections of the code was doing and could
         | replace line by line with, oh, its doing this again.
         | 
         | I'll have to look for that Dec 77 BYTE so see it that was the
         | magazine. I didn't know it at the time but it was probably very
         | formative for my future IT career.
        
           | mcenedella wrote:
           | That's an amazing story. Thank you for sharing!!
        
           | acegopher wrote:
           | What a great story! I remember also "hand running" programs
           | at times.
           | 
           | While the Dec 77 issue of Byte[0] had Star Trek on the cover
           | it didn't contain a BASIC listing. Could it have been either
           | the May/June 1975 issue of Creative Computing[1] or one of
           | the compilations (BASIC Computer Games[3])?
           | 
           | [0] https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-
           | Byte/70s/Byte-1977-12....
           | 
           | [1] https://archive.org/details/CreativeComputingv01n04MayJun
           | e19...
           | 
           | [2] https://archive.org/details/Basic_Computer_Games_Microcom
           | put...
        
         | ajsnigrutin wrote:
         | Not just "everything was new" but also "everything was better"
         | (well.. except the stuff that wasn't and failed horribly soon
         | after launch). You bought a computer, and (if you had a money)
         | you bought a new one after a few years and the change in
         | performance, graphics etc. was HUGE. Kilobytes of ram went to
         | megabytes, cga, ega, vga all brought huge improvements, then
         | came many 3d variants, storage went from floppies, to a few
         | megabytes to gigabytes.
         | 
         | And now? Have a 5 year old mid-range computer? Buy some ram,
         | and you get basically the same specs as the new ones, but with
         | a slightly worse CPU. Everything (except the newest games)
         | still works, and the biggest resource hog (especially ram) is
         | the browser, which still shows sites with same amount of info
         | as it did in 1990s, but somehow that autoplaying video ad needs
         | a few more gigabytes of ram.
         | 
         | It's still great for my wallet... but I haven't opened a
         | computer magazine (or well.. a youtube clip in modern time) and
         | said "damn, I want this!" in quite a while now (at least not
         | regarding computers).
        
           | tinsmith wrote:
           | > but I haven't opened a computer magazine and said...
           | 
           | I feel this. In my opinion, we have not had a computing
           | magazine worth opening in two decades, at least in the US. I
           | know we can find news and articles relevant to our interests
           | with unparallelled ease on today's Internet, but a huge part
           | of me misses going to a bookseller and picking up that
           | month's selection of nerd rags.
           | 
           | I have always had trouble pinpointing exactly what it is I
           | miss about the magazines of old. Sometimes I feel that it had
           | more to do with how I fit into that world at the time, being
           | a curious teen who loved tinkering with tech, and the future
           | was wide open. Othertimes I think it had to do with the mags
           | being my window to that world, since I had nobody to guide
           | me.
        
             | erwan577 wrote:
             | Before the web and global geek culture, magazines were the
             | only way to get a feeling of "belonging" to some kind of
             | tech community, sometimes the community of some computer
             | brand owners, sharing the same interest for the compatible
             | software & hardware products. Heavily priced online board
             | systems then milked the same needs providing downloads
             | which replaced free disks offered with magazines.
        
           | ghaff wrote:
           | And for a lot of purposes, you're basically living in a
           | browser anyway. I do have a pretty new M1 MacBook Pro. But I
           | also have a 2015-vintage MacBook Pro and iMac and they're
           | perfectly fine for what I use them for.
        
       | bouvin wrote:
       | Something that fascinated me back in the day (and something that
       | I have not seen mentioned, whenever BYTE comes up here), when I
       | as a teenager read BYTE (initially borrowed from the local Danish
       | municipal library) was the transcripts from BIX [1]. It offered a
       | tantalising view into the world of BBS (and what would come later
       | through Usenet etc), before such things were widely accessible.
       | 
       | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byte_Information_Exchange
        
         | ghaff wrote:
         | Usenet and the pro-Internet/ARPANET in general was more of a
         | parallel Unix-centric universe than something that came later.
         | 
         | BIX, like Compuserve/Delphi/etc., was one of the big commercial
         | services--though possibly more hacker-oriented than some--which
         | was also somewhat separate from the TRS-80 in the bedroom
         | hobbyist BBSs (though some of the PC-based BBSs also became
         | fairly large and commercial latterly).
        
           | jmclnx wrote:
           | IIRC, BIX morphed into IRC.
        
             | ghaff wrote:
             | As far as I know, BIX just shut down.
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byte_Information_Exchange
        
               | jmclnx wrote:
               | Seems you are right, looks like IRC came out of something
               | call MUT. I wonder how I was thinking BIX was somehow
               | involved :)
        
       | volodarik_lemon wrote:
       | [dead]
        
       | mc32 wrote:
       | We're getting there:
       | 
       | >Could a Computer Take Over?
       | 
       | >Ed Rush, 1977
       | 
       | "Just how ridiculous IS the idea of a computer deciding to take
       | over the world and be its dictator? Upon hearing this question,
       | most people who are not computer oriented will laugh and say
       | "That's only in science fiction stories." They will be much more
       | likely to complain about "becoming a number," with everyone from
       | the grocery store to the government wanting their number instead
       | of their name.
       | 
       | Those who are more familiar with computers will laugh off the
       | concept and charge it to paranoia due to ignorance. "A computer
       | is little more than a lot of wires conducting currents here and
       | there," they will say. "Besides, if it-gets uppity you can always
       | pull the plug."
       | 
       | However, that group of people who are both computer knowledgeable
       | and fans of the art form known as science fiction, but more
       | properly called speculative fiction, might ask "Can you always
       | pull the plug? Could a computer really seize the reins of
       | government? And if so, how ?" In trying to answer these last
       | questions, let us first speculate on the capabilities the
       | computer itself would have to have. "
        
       | amacbride wrote:
       | I loved Jerry Pournelle's "Chaos Manor" columns, and Steve
       | Ciarcia's "Circuit Cellar" -- it was nice to have both software
       | and hardware represented. The articles on the Inmos Transputer
       | were fascinating, and sparked my interest in parallel and
       | distributed computing. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transputer
        
         | fastaguy88 wrote:
         | Jerry Pournelle's column was very entertaining and well
         | written, but it taught me an important lesson. I knew something
         | about the computers of the day (perhaps more than Pournelle),
         | and I often found him giving bizarre, if not incorrect, advice
         | (and sometimes, when he had a problem, he would just call his
         | bud Bill Gates). Reading the column, it was clear he was the
         | expert, even when he was not. So I learned that it is important
         | to distinguish between good writing as entertainment, and good
         | writing as expertise.
        
           | PacoLinux wrote:
           | and some sent by vendors for review, at his home office.
           | Because Pournelle was then, according to the magazine,
           | "virtually Byte's only writer who was a mere user--he didn't
           | create compilers and computers, he merely used them,"
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_Pournelle
        
         | ghaff wrote:
         | PC Magazine was almost certainly more routinely useful to me
         | than Byte. But Byte had this old-schooly eclectic vibe to it.
        
       | phoyd wrote:
       | I remember how I read about functional programming languages for
       | the first time in the August 1985 Byte issue, which I bought as a
       | teenager because it featured a technical rundown of the new Amiga
       | computer. For me in the early 80'e, Byte was a cornucopia of
       | interesting stuff, much like Hacker News today.
       | 
       | (For example there was a whole issue in 1981 on Smalltalk-80,
       | with an introduction by Adele Goldberg, where the Xerox Palo Alto
       | people from the Smalltalk-80 team explain the implementation, the
       | VM etc.)
       | 
       | https://vintageapple.org/byte/ has a (complete?) archive, albeit
       | with slightly lower resolution scans.
        
       | gstrike wrote:
       | I finally made an account to post this comment. But, I love BYTE
       | magazine! It was such an amazing resource during it's time. I
       | first dug into them for a project I've been working on
       | (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6m7vDhscGzU), and then I found
       | myself looking at more. It truly captured something special. I
       | wonder if there's anything that comes close these days.
       | 
       | If you spend the time to read through these older ones, you'll
       | see they were doing something special. They'd often share
       | programs and circuits in the magazine that others could recreate
       | at home. I wonder how difficult it was to learn about computers,
       | we have so many resources these days.
        
       | ubermonkey wrote:
       | My god, I loved Byte in that era. Well, for me, late 80s through
       | mid 90s. They were so FAT with interesting stuff!
        
       | winstonprivacy wrote:
       | I loved this magazine. I was actually in one of them (I was 11 at
       | the time). I'm going to have to find that.
        
       | dugmartin wrote:
       | Last week while on a very long (18+ hour) drive I heard either a
       | podcast or a radio ad for a teeth alignment company and at the
       | end it mentioned their web address: byte.com. They even spelled
       | it out. I was curious and I just looked and it does look like
       | they bought the domain last year. Kind of weird and sad.
        
       | notorandit wrote:
       | https://vintageapple.org/byte/
       | 
       | Up to 1998
        
       | tyingq wrote:
       | Interesting juxtaposition to today, I bought Byte MOSTLY for the
       | ads. The computer scene was changing so fast in the 80's that the
       | ads were interesting and wanted.
        
         | moorg wrote:
         | Reading the ads, it's remarkable how many computer
         | manufacturers there were. Most of them look like pretty small
         | companies too, effectively showing how low the barrier to entry
         | was to start a computer company. Shouldn't it be possible
         | today, too? Why do we have so few manufacturers?
        
           | jandrese wrote:
           | There are still some Mom & Pop shops that will put together a
           | custom machine for you, but if you are talking about
           | completely new computer architectures that aren't compatible
           | with anything else the barriers to entry are so much higher.
           | The expectations are miles away from where they were in the
           | 80s. Back when everybody sucked it didn't matter that your
           | first product barely works and had few capabilities. Today
           | your competition is Intel, AMD, nVidia, Apple, etc... Trying
           | to stand out compared to the giants is much harder. Plus you
           | have to deal with the software. Making a DOS clone is no
           | problem. Making a Windows 11 clone is orders of magnitude
           | more work.
        
         | brk wrote:
         | Hell, in its prime Computer Shopper was a GIANT magazine of
         | just ads, that you paid for.
         | 
         | I remember ordering computer parts over the phone, delivered
         | COD, because I was 12, and didn't have a credit card or a
         | checking account.
        
           | Karunamon wrote:
           | That surfaced a memory... Mom buying one of those from Sam's
           | Club and me pouring over it at home.
           | 
           | If you're not familiar with Computer Shopper, imagine
           | something the size of a 2 x 2 grid of phonebooks and just as
           | thick. They were impressively sized.
        
             | antx wrote:
             | I spent a good chunk of my money back then buying the
             | monthly issues, drooling over them. Unfortunatelly, it
             | seems not many archivists have kept the 1990s editions...
             | or didn't care to share them to the public, at least. I
             | would have liked to get a copy in some kind of digital
             | format.
        
           | kwanbix wrote:
           | Computer Shopper had LOTS of ads, but it was not just ads.
           | 
           | I loved it, but preferred Byte and PC Magazine.
           | 
           | I remember the Gateway 2000 ads. Crazy.
        
             | brk wrote:
             | In the early days (80's) it was primarily just ads and some
             | reviews. Later they moved to mixing in some non-advertising
             | content.
        
               | kwanbix wrote:
               | I don't recall, i think I have started reading it in 88.
               | So it could be then.
        
         | AnimalMuppet wrote:
         | Yeah. The ads had a different feel, because things were moving
         | so _fast_. The ads (often) were telling you something new was
         | available, or something improved was available, or something
         | was less expensive. They (often) weren 't just trying to
         | manipulate you into buying the same old stuff that you didn't
         | need.
         | 
         | I remember looking through the latest issue, and at least once
         | or twice an issue thinking "Huh, I never even thought of trying
         | to have a computer do that." Issue after issue, month after
         | month, there was brand new stuff that exceeded what I thought
         | computers could do. I read the ads to learn what was happening.
        
         | jfk13 wrote:
         | It's interesting to recognise that the ads in these magazines
         | were something many of us positively appreciated. Yet today, we
         | go out of our way to try and suppress ads all over the web.
         | 
         | I guess this is because the advertising industry is no longer
         | satisfied with providing ads related to the content of a
         | publication, in places where people deliberately seek them out
         | because they're interested. Back then, the ad industry could
         | have made a plausible claim that it was providing a useful and
         | valued service to readers.
         | 
         | That'd be a tough claim to support today.
        
         | jonasmerlin wrote:
         | I actually wondered about this on Twitter recently[1]. Do you
         | remember caring about/recognizing the aesthetics of some of
         | these ads at the time, or is that more of a modern perspective?
         | 
         | [1]:
         | https://twitter.com/jonasmerlin1/status/1582278969671397377
        
           | tyingq wrote:
           | Aside from the aesthetics, the content of the ads was
           | different than today. There was lots of advertising aimed
           | directly at hobbyists. Today, you mostly have to go to
           | specific niche places like tindie.com to find something
           | similar. Or basically, a significant portion of the market
           | was people with engineering skills.
        
         | kevstev wrote:
         | In the mid 90s to early 00s, I loved looking at the ads in the
         | Sunday newspaper from computer stores, and month by month you
         | could see prices coming down for all components, if not week by
         | week.
         | 
         | The pace was so torrid. They stopped even advertising the RAM
         | for my ~3 year old Pentium 100 I had with 8MB of RAM. I was
         | expecting to pay hundreds of dollars for an upgrade, but in the
         | end an upgrade to 72MB was only about $70.
        
         | greenbit wrote:
         | The ads are still fascinating. Makes you appreciate 32G of RAM
         | when you see 16K _on sale!_ for $150
        
           | HarHarVeryFunny wrote:
           | 16KB ? You were lucky! (channeling my best Monty Python
           | impression)
           | 
           | My first computer was a NASCOM-1 with 1KB available to the
           | user, and didn't even have an assembler. You programmed it by
           | entering hex op codes directly into memory! And we liked it
           | that way!
           | 
           | Still, at least the NASCOM-1 had a keyboard, not like MIT's
           | Altair 8800 of a few years prior where you only had binary
           | toggle switches to setup the address and data bus to program
           | each byte!
        
           | melling wrote:
           | Someone should compare the price drops in RAM.
           | 
           | Prices dropped quickly back then.
           | 
           | More recently, I bought a 16GB MacBook Pro in 2013. 10 years
           | later I would expect my next to be 64GB.
        
             | speed_spread wrote:
             | For a while we ran out of useful stuff to do with more RAM.
             | We tried to fill the gap with micro-service development but
             | the pain/ego ratio is not as good as having one big app
             | chunking up the whole place. I assume the new AI stuff will
             | pick up the slack and we'll soon have much more RAM hooked
             | up to our NPUs than to our CPUs.
        
             | bcrl wrote:
             | Except for the trade war when tariffs were slapped on DRAM
             | imports from Japan because of dumping. The prices listed in
             | the ads by Jameco and other companies in the back of Byte
             | tell some interesting stories.
        
         | fatnoah wrote:
         | That's a great observation. Back in the day, I'd buy many
         | magazines for the ads almost as much as the content.
        
       | abrugsch wrote:
       | My dad wrote a few articles for Byte around assistive computing
       | technologies (usually speech synthesis systems for Apple II) back
       | around 1983 or so, as well as reviewing a (1200 baud IIRC) modem
       | with photos taken by my mom... time to go looking for them!
        
       | tluyben2 wrote:
       | On page 8 of magazine [0] (from 1977) they are talking about
       | computers taking over the world. The same things people are still
       | talking about still. There are also stories about no-code being
       | the end of programmer jobs etc. The only thing that's not in
       | there is blockchain.
       | 
       | [0] https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-Byte/Best-of-
       | Byte-1977...
        
       | daneel_w wrote:
       | Computer magazine/book art from the 70s and 80s is almost an
       | artistic style of its own. I love browsing old issues of Byte,
       | COMPUTE!'s Gazette etc. just to see the imaginative graphical
       | work.
        
         | nielsbot wrote:
         | "The truly epic BYTE magazine covers by Robert Tinney"
         | https://lunduke.substack.com/p/the-truly-epic-byte-magazine-...
        
         | DoingIsLearning wrote:
         | I don't know why but the aesthetics kind of reminds of the
         | soviet space program propaganda posters. Probably because they
         | are of the same time period but not sure.
        
           | daneel_w wrote:
           | To me there's a sense of pioneering in the pictures.
        
       | PacoLinux wrote:
       | For me, the best magazines : Byte & Dr Dobbs Journal. (And for
       | electronics, Elektor). Its a shame no more paper magazines now
       | available like those.
        
       | ngc248 wrote:
       | I love these old magazines. Byte, Omni, Computer Gaming World, Oh
       | Boy's life. Magazines used to be so amazing, until they got
       | hijacked by ads. The ads earlier were actually helpful, But post
       | 2000s the ads were well just a nuisance.
        
       | pulse7 wrote:
       | Cover title of the last issue: "Object-oriented computing has
       | failed. But component software, such as Visual Basic's custom
       | controls, is succeeding. Here's why." :)
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-01-17 23:02 UTC)