[HN Gopher] Learning Physics With Ringworld (2010)
___________________________________________________________________
Learning Physics With Ringworld (2010)
Author : optimalsolver
Score : 11 points
Date : 2023-01-15 18:59 UTC (2 days ago)
(HTM) web link (www.tor.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.tor.com)
| greenbit wrote:
| Wondering about the calculation for stability, whether solar
| radiation pressure was factored in. Surely something of that
| scale would behave partly like a solar sail. If the center was
| off the sun by, say, half an AU it'd seem like gravitational
| effects would have to dominate, but what about if the center were
| off by only some small amount? There could be a threshold under
| which radiation pressure would dominate and tend to stabilize the
| ring.
|
| But then I suppose even if that were the case, it'd only take a
| well aimed flare to put a wrench in that.
| sliken wrote:
| Sure, it might stay centered on the star if it started
| centered. Any mild disturbances would cause the closer parts of
| the ring to receive more solar wind and light pressure while
| the more distant parts of the ring would receive less. However
| I expect that the momentum in the ring is many orders of
| magnitude higher than the light pressure, so it might well just
| destabilize anyways.
|
| However it's a 3D system, what if the plane of the ring didn't
| perfectly bisect the center of gravity of the star? The
| feedback loop would cause things to get worse, since there's no
| counter pressure.
| optimalsolver wrote:
| The scale of Ringworld:
|
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sR2296df-bc
| jmyeet wrote:
| Weird. The key physics you should learn is that Niven's Ringworld
| would require a material so strong we can't even theorize about
| it.
|
| A Ringworld around our Sun at Earth's distance with Earthlike
| gravity would rotate at (IIRC) 1.5 million kmh. The centrifugal
| forces would tear our apart.
|
| A Dyson Swarm remains the most promising megastructure for
| creating efficient living area (per unit mass).
| WalterBright wrote:
| > The centrifugal forces would tear our apart.
|
| I'm not so sure about that. Consider slicing the ring into
| sections. If the ring is at the same radius and velocity of an
| object in orbit, then the slices will (mostly) stay put. They
| aren't going to fly off radially. So connecting them will not
| put undue stress on them.
|
| I say mostly because they'll be tugs from the other planets,
| etc.
| sliken wrote:
| I think you are missing that the gravity comes from the
| centrifugal forces. Said gravity is for humans to be able to
| walk around, as well as keeping air and water from being lost
| to space.
|
| So sure you could make a non-spinning ring that minimizes the
| tension, velocity, and centrifugal force, but it would not
| provide a large living area like the ringworld does.
| WalterBright wrote:
| You're right, I missed that. Oops!
| sliken wrote:
| So maybe it would work with a red dwarf with much less gravity
| and brightness. As a bonus the star would last 10-1000 times
| longer.
| nosianu wrote:
| It's also terrible for failure modes. Planets are independent
| of one another, this ring is one fragile entity. The largest
| destruction of life by a single unfortunate event in the entire
| universe made possible by one design decision.
|
| We know it's not indestructible (and can't be unless it's a
| fantasy novel with "magic"), I only read the first book and
| there were two large holes even in the tiny section they
| explored.
|
| Whatever happens to that hole in the ring that they find when
| they first encounter and land - crash - on the ring? Air is
| constantly lost through it. Not the one with the ultra-high
| "mountain" near where they crashed, the other one further along
| their route with the weather pattern caused by this air-loss
| storm. How is that sustainable - given the ultra-long time
| horizon, surely billions of years, that such a structure should
| be able to support life for (if a planet can do that much)?
| greenbit wrote:
| Iirc the Ring was made of 'scrith', which was probably
| Protector for what we now call unobtanium.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-01-17 23:00 UTC)