[HN Gopher] The 10 year old indie mobile app: what worked for th...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The 10 year old indie mobile app: what worked for the long haul
        
       Author : taylorhughes
       Score  : 100 points
       Date   : 2023-01-06 18:16 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (medium.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (medium.com)
        
       | ahstilde wrote:
       | Taylor, I really enjoyed this post, and I shared it with my
       | engineering team and also group chats.
       | 
       | At Wyndly, we're a software-enabled allergy immunotherapy
       | practice (https://www.wyndly.com/pages/immunotherapy). I have a
       | background in software engineering, and I had to learn that code
       | wasn't always the solution. Better code doesn't mean better
       | business outcomes for us! Sometimes I say "Every line of code is
       | a liability!", because it's now something a small team has to
       | support forever.
       | 
       | Your three bullets on how to build are something I agree with so
       | much! Arguably, this is something everyone outside of an at-scale
       | product should build while finding product-market fit and growth
       | channels:
       | 
       | - Focus on building simple solutions that solve real, urgent user
       | problems, in well-worn ways.
       | 
       | - Use battle-tested software and platforms that are stable and
       | don't change too much over time.
       | 
       | - Only integrate with third parties when it's absolutely
       | necessary for solving those real, urgent problems.
       | 
       | Thank you for sharing!
        
         | taylorhughes wrote:
         | Thank you! Glad you enjoyed it!
        
       | guessbest wrote:
       | I have over 50 ios apps that are over 10 years. It is amazing how
       | competitors come and go.
        
         | kilroy123 wrote:
         | I'm curious how profitable that has been over the decade?
        
       | mattlondon wrote:
       | Integration tests that fire up a local server are not that
       | unusual I find. I don't think there is anything unusual or
       | "wrong" about that.
       | 
       | ... But if you are counting how long integration tests take to
       | run in single-digit minutes then either your app is really
       | small/simple or your integration coverage is low! :)
       | 
       | I've worked on "state of the art" frontends at BigCos where
       | integration/end-to-end tests are sharded across perhaps 10 test
       | server instances ("local" in spirit, in reality technically not
       | on the workstation), and even then it takes 20+ minutes to
       | execute. They typically have to execute separately from the usual
       | unit tests etc (which run automatically as part of the pre-push
       | CD set up).
        
         | taylorhughes wrote:
         | It's fairly small, built by a team of 3 over the course of a
         | few years. Probably less than 100 endpoints. Good coverage for
         | the core, not for the rest. (Eg, zero tests for the main way
         | the app makes money, photo books. )
        
       | lordleft wrote:
       | >What's changed the least? The "boring" technology. Postgres and
       | Redis required zero hijinks to keep running. Even Django itself
       | caused very little trouble when I upgraded from Django 1.5 to
       | Django 4.0 in June 2022 -- I barely had to touch my Django views!
       | Most of the Django changes were in configuration and routing, and
       | the most difficult single thing was migrating ancient Django 1.5
       | session data to the modern Django 4.0 format so users wouldn't
       | get logged out during the migration.
       | 
       | The older I get, the more I appreciate the value of reliable and
       | relatively unchanging software components. Not that there isn't a
       | place for innovation, but there's also a place for good things
       | that endure.
        
       | jmathai wrote:
       | I have an 8 year old app that reminds me a lot of this article.
       | 
       | Something that's worked really well for me was that I created a
       | plugin feature and most new features are actually plugins. This
       | lets me add capabilities without touching or adding logic to the
       | core code.
       | 
       | Last night I added SQLite support as a plugin. 2 code files and
       | one is unit tests.
       | https://github.com/jmathai/elodie/pull/443/files
       | 
       | I don't know if this is the best approach but it's worked better
       | than others in my 20+ years of writing software.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | hobo_mark wrote:
       | What do you mean with running App Engine locally? There used to
       | be a local development server, but that did not survive the 2to3
       | transition. GCP does ship a Datastore and a PubSub emulator, but
       | no Cloud Storage for example (someone wrote this one [1], which
       | sort-of works but it does not behave 1:1 like GCS, so ironically
       | my tests have to work around bugs in the emulator...).
       | 
       | [1] https://github.com/oittaa/gcp-storage-emulator
        
         | taylorhughes wrote:
         | I'm using dev_appserver.py, installed via brew somehow, which
         | seems to still do the trick (I don't quite remember doing this,
         | but something like
         | https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40065497/cant-find-
         | dev-a...)
        
       | jmathai wrote:
       | > Novelty and optimization are the enemy of durable, long term
       | code.
       | 
       | This sums up so much of what makes software rot in seemingly
       | short time horizons.
       | 
       | Oh, and 3rd party SDKs that he mentioned.
       | 
       | Limit complexity and 3rd party SDKs like the plague.
        
         | rpdillon wrote:
         | Alan Perlis' version:
         | 
         | > Optimization hinders evolution.
         | 
         | Still my favorite of all his epigrams.
        
       | giantg2 wrote:
       | I have 10 year old android apps. Granted mine have few users and
       | were never successful.
        
       | smikhanov wrote:
       | What a great article. When he mentions that Facebook and Dropbox
       | were launching their own similar apps, it would be fun if in the
       | end he would end up acquiring all of them, Pinboard style.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-01-07 23:01 UTC)