[HN Gopher] Going full time on my SaaS after 13 years
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Going full time on my SaaS after 13 years
        
       Author : matt1
       Score  : 498 points
       Date   : 2023-01-04 15:23 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (mattmazur.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (mattmazur.com)
        
       | intelVISA wrote:
       | Nice one Matt, grats and hope it goes well!
        
       | Brajeshwar wrote:
       | Hey Matt,
       | 
       | This is awesome. Congratulations and best of luck. I remember
       | using it and we communicated (email), about your time in Iraq and
       | how your built[1] Preceden. You upgraded my account while I was
       | toying with few ideas and using it to plan timelines.
       | 
       | Nice stumbling on it again there.
       | 
       | 1. https://mattmazur.com/2016/01/04/building-a-startup-
       | in-45-mi...
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | I still have our email exchange from back in 2016 - I hope you
         | were able to successfully leverage the eCommerce boom in India
         | that you mentioned. Thanks for saying hey!
        
           | squishy47 wrote:
           | now that's how community engagement is done. bloody good
           | marketing.
        
       | ravivyas wrote:
       | Best of luck
        
       | andsoitis wrote:
       | Congratulations!
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | Thanks!
        
       | noname123 wrote:
       | Hi Matt, thanks for sharing. Just a proof of my staying power, I
       | saw your Preceden post on HN; and paid for a license 13 years ago
       | promptly your v0.1 and I am still here.
       | https://i.imgur.com/ejUm3Gh.png
       | 
       | I had bought a license purely on a whim as I was browsing HN on
       | company-time. I was in 20's, bored and ambitious with no concrete
       | plans and I proceeded to play on company-time in my cubicle the
       | rest of the day and planned out my life plan on Preceden instead
       | of working, like the timeline for when I should get my next
       | promotion (maybe in 2 years for at least 10K, rite??), when I
       | should buy my 1st house etc (maybe a fix upper? duplex so I can
       | rent it out?), when I should get married etc (in 5 years). I
       | showed my entire life plan to my co-workers whom all laughed at
       | me b/c (a) I planned everything out in my life, and (b) I paid
       | for a $19 license to plot out my life plan.
       | 
       | To get to the bottom-line, I never got that promotion, am still
       | renting and still haven't gotten married! So definitely you who
       | got my $19 license fees and my co-workers got the last laugh!
       | 
       | (But like you I kept on and off workin' my side-hustles since
       | 2010 even when it seemed entire hopeless - which was building a
       | trading bot; and like anything in life after so many false
       | starts, it eventually started becoming consistent and compounded;
       | and my capital gains from trading has been significantly greater
       | than my W-2 as a SWE for the last 3 years. So much has changed on
       | HN since 2010: crypto, Web3, new JS frameworks that pop up every
       | year, unicorns; but the only thing that has paid off at least for
       | me - it seems is sticking to something and showing up for it
       | every day for 13 years and counting... thanks again for sharing!)
        
         | jwmoz wrote:
         | Can you talk more about your trading bot? I've also done
         | something similar the last year, mainly systematic trading and
         | cross-sectional system.
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | Wow, you got on one of those $19 for life plans that I
         | initially offered, that's wild!
         | 
         | It's great to hear you got some use out of the tool and
         | hopefully continue to do so. I look forward to your next life
         | update in 13 years when Preceden makes the HackerNews homepage
         | again :).
         | 
         | PS for any aspiring entrepreneurs: don't offer lifetime plans,
         | and definitely not for $19, lol.
        
           | hermitcrab wrote:
           | Congrats on 13 years. I started selling my (desktop) software
           | in 2005 and am still going.
           | 
           | >don't offer lifetime plans
           | 
           | Yep! https://successfulsoftware.net/2008/09/08/should-i-give-
           | free...
        
       | rwalling wrote:
       | Congrats, Matt. I've enjoyed watching your journey for the past
       | decade and am very excited that you're able to go FT on Preceden.
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | Thanks Rob! I have you, Mike, Sherry, and the Microconf
         | community to thank in large part for showing me that this route
         | is possible. I also have a copy of Start Small Stay Small, The
         | Single Founder, and Keeping Your Sh*t Together on my bookshelf
         | next to me (all highly recommended for anyone here interested
         | in this approach to building a software business).
        
           | rwalling wrote:
           | Awesome!
        
       | amalgamated_inc wrote:
       | Very cool!
        
       | tr33house wrote:
       | Congratulations Matt! How did you arrive at the threshold for
       | working on this full-time? Are you sharing ARR/MRR values at this
       | time?
        
         | nhance wrote:
         | Could you share this information as a percentage of your
         | monthly expenses?
         | 
         | I'm pulling the trigger on this after 17 years in business and
         | our ARR covered 50% of our anticipated annual expenses last
         | year.
         | 
         | We also grew by 100% last year, all while on coast with $0
         | spent in marketing.
         | 
         | The time we spend on the products, when added up over time, the
         | most valuable time we spend, so we have cut expenses and plowed
         | away revenue to help us make this launch this year.
         | 
         | The goal is to meet 100% of anticipated annual expenses in net
         | ARR by the end of this year and it feels very doable.
         | 
         | After 17 years, I'm also shy to discuss details because it's
         | taken dozens, if not hundreds of attempts to find something
         | that worked. Started in 2005.
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | Here's a similar thread about my decision to go full time:
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34248481
         | 
         | I'm not and don't plan to share revenue numbers. Not much
         | benefit.
        
       | md8 wrote:
       | Hey, I am a leandomainsearch user. Thanks for building.
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | You bet!
        
       | ultrasounder wrote:
       | Very inspiring! Not a hint of survivor bias.Long ramp of SAAS
       | death ramp beckons!
        
       | gossamer wrote:
       | I was just looking the Preceden site today. It looks like a nice
       | timeline program. Good luck!
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | Appreciate it!
        
       | dutchbrit wrote:
       | Congratulations Matt! I love reading blog posts like this, did
       | you do all the marketing yourself?
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | Mostly, yes, though I've worked with a few contractors over the
         | years to help with specific things.
         | 
         | Preceden has been sitting at the top of page 2 for "timeline
         | maker" and related terms on Google for about a decade which
         | is... fun.
        
       | soobinrho wrote:
       | The moment I clicked your article and saw Preceden, I realized
       | this is exactly what, I didn't know, I needed because some online
       | coding competitions require you to submit a timeline.
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | Hope it's a good fit for the competitions! You can create
         | timelines with up to 10 events for free, so it should be more
         | than enough for that purpose.
        
       | username_my1 wrote:
       | Hey Matt, Your product fits perfectly a feature we're building
       | and we'd love to use it.
       | 
       | But it needs to be programmatically accessible in react (js lib)
       | and of course it needs to function very smoothly with large
       | number of events.
       | 
       | Good luck going full time I see a need in this exact space !
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | There's no API at the moment to programmatically build your
         | timeline, but that might be something I add down the road.
         | 
         | Here's the relevant post on Preceden's public roadmap if you
         | care to give it an upvote:
         | https://roadmap.preceden.com/b/y0ge5xve/feature-ideas/api
         | 
         | Hope it winds up being a good fit even without an API.
        
           | username_my1 wrote:
           | already upvoted it.
           | 
           | unfortunately it won't work without the APIs because it needs
           | to be part of our product and there the data is constantly
           | being updated dynamically by different actors / processes .
        
             | matt1 wrote:
             | Noted - thanks for the nudge to work on it!
        
               | jimnotgym wrote:
               | Hey Matt, I can't develop cool looking apps like this.
               | I'm envious.
               | 
               | What I can tell you is that sales people at big software
               | companies never say 'No it can't do that' as an initial
               | conversation. They would say something like, 'I'm sure it
               | _could_ do that. Let 's set up a call to get your
               | requirements straight'. He might only need a subset of
               | your features, and the api needed could be trivial. He
               | might have a $moneyisnoobject Corp waiting to pay.
               | 
               | I mean you are completely within your rights to push away
               | non-core users if you want.... but you know when a saas
               | price page has Free, Basic and Enterprise teirs, and the
               | Enterprise one has 'please call' next to it? That is
               | because the price for customization is too embarrassing
               | for both parties to make public!
        
               | matt1 wrote:
               | Great points - thanks for suggesting that approach!
        
       | tayloramurphy wrote:
       | Very cool to see you on HN Matt!
       | 
       | I know Matt from the data world where his SQL Style Guide[0] was
       | always at odds with the one we maintained at GitLab[1]. :-D
       | 
       | Posts like this are great to show folks just how long it can take
       | to do things. I love his story and am eager to watch Preceden
       | grow!
       | 
       | [0] https://github.com/mattm/sql-style-guide [1]
       | https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/business-technology/data-t...
        
       | wdewind wrote:
       | Hey Matt,
       | 
       | Not sure if you remember me but we talked about Lean Designs many
       | years back (back then it was called jMockups). Excited to this
       | next step for you! Congrats and good luck!
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | jMockups... now that's a name I haven't heard in a while! And
         | one of those lesson learned: don't name products like that :).
         | 
         | More about that tool and other lessons learned for anyone
         | interested: https://mattmazur.com/2016/07/08/a-long-overdue-
         | lean-designs...
        
       | raheemm wrote:
       | Matt, Thanks for writing this. I've also had a long, slow ramp up
       | with my saas (8 years) and it's great to read stories/experiences
       | like this.
        
         | jacquesm wrote:
         | You should consider doing a 'Show HN', it would be very nice to
         | read how you got to where you are today.
        
       | winrid wrote:
       | Very inspiring! I hope to get there in a few years too!
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | Best of luck!
        
       | geph2021 wrote:
       | congrats, and a great story. Inspiring to see you stick with it
       | for so long while dealing with the competing priorities of a
       | young family.
       | 
       | If only there was a timeline tool that could easily create an
       | appealing, succinct graphic of the Preceden story. ;)
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | Missed opportunity right there :)
        
       | agentwiggles wrote:
       | This is super inspiring.
       | 
       | I just started working on a side project that I hope can one day
       | be worth something. I'm also the sole breadwinner of a household
       | with 2 (soon to be 3) kids and a wife depending on me, so it's
       | really inspiring to see that the dream really can happen, even if
       | it takes a decade plus to realize.
       | 
       | Even if my thing never takes off, it's a tool I've wanted for a
       | long time, so I'm motivated to keep going even if it never makes
       | a penny.
       | 
       | Congratulations, wishing you lots of continued success.
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | I should have said this in the post, but even if your startup
         | doesn't take off, the skills you learn along the way are very
         | valuable and will make you better at all of your future jobs.
         | 
         | I hope things work out for you and that they don't take as long
         | as they did for me :).
        
           | agentwiggles wrote:
           | Calling it a "startup" at this point feels like a wild
           | exaggeration, I have a user account system and a landing page
           | so far.
           | 
           | My current goal is to dedicate the same amount of time to the
           | idea that I spent playing Factorio last year (about 160 hours
           | by Steam's reckoning). At the end of that I will, if nothing
           | else, have learned a lot about Phoenix, which feels like a
           | good bet regardless of any wild dreams of sustaining an
           | income from the other.
           | 
           | Either way though, thanks for the encouragement!
        
       | yrgulation wrote:
       | Congratulations to sticking to it for such a long time. Given
       | sufficient time any startup can work. The more you know the more
       | competitive you are the better the product.
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | Thank you!
        
       | waprin wrote:
       | Congrats and thanks for sharing, as an aspiring SaaS bootstrapper
       | and father there's plenty of headwinds so nice to see people
       | sharing their stories piloting through them.
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | Thanks for saying so!
        
       | fnordpiglet wrote:
       | You are a hero.
        
       | sails wrote:
       | Congrats Matt! Very cool to see.
       | 
       | A question. I'm trying to find a tool to visualise and document
       | the evolution of obscure sports (purely because I find the
       | interactions fascinating). It seems that your tool might be the
       | perfect fit, especially the "writing" examples. I was wondering
       | if it would be possible to visualise something along the lines of
       | a quasi-directed graph. Nodes being specific instances of the
       | inception of a "new" sport (hence the date requirement), and
       | edges being the influence on other spots. Multiple edges for each
       | node are possible, and all sports will have a start date and some
       | an end date. I tried[2] with a basic POC but it seems the issue
       | is that the nodes run without an end date, which breaks the
       | dependency visualisation.
       | 
       | One comment. Once logged in I wasn't easily able to get back to
       | the landing page, which had some useful info around visualisation
       | types that I wanted to review.
       | 
       | And a note. I've apologised to a few people who I subjected to a
       | variation on your SQL screener interview question [2], which
       | contained far too much fiddling with SQLite time functions,
       | entirely my mistake in ruining an otherwise great basic SQL test!
       | 
       | [1] https://www.preceden.com/timelines/868890-obscure-
       | sports?s=e... [2]
       | https://mattmazur.com/2018/11/12/analyzing-89-responses-to-a...
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | Glad you found that SQL screener interview question helpful and
         | sorry if the date/time manipulation made it more complex than
         | it needed to be :).
         | 
         | Regarding the visualization capabilities: I would change the
         | shape of the events from a line to a solid bar. When you
         | combine that with the connections (which you're already using)
         | it will look more like a directed graph like you're interested
         | in. End dates are optional for events, so you should be able to
         | get by with or without it. Happy to discuss more over email:
         | help@preceden.com. Regardless, good luck with your
         | visualization, it's a fascinating use case.
        
       | mustafabisic1 wrote:
       | I love this story and I wish you all the best. It goes to show
       | that everybody has their own pace and journey.
       | 
       | I feel like a lot of people are happy in their work even without
       | a side gig, but it's kind of not cool to say.
       | 
       | I'm totally happy with my role and couldn't be happier and more
       | committed to my current job.
       | 
       | The beautiful thing is that I have my own pace as well on a side
       | gig. After 10 years of thinking and planning I just started on
       | one faithful day with a HN comment 23 weeks ago.
       | 
       | Today my weekly newsletter for remote working parents has 23
       | newsletter sends and over 100 subscribers (muscle)
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | [dead]
        
       | randall wrote:
       | Awesome!! Good luck. I hope this makes you even happier and have
       | a higher quality of life!
        
       | user3939382 wrote:
       | This is pretty inspiring. I had a startup and system in 2005 that
       | was so ahead of its time that many of its features still haven't
       | been implemented by its contemporary competitors, it's tough when
       | I think about it.
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | It's never to late to start something new. In a decade you'll
         | wish you did.
        
       | tchock23 wrote:
       | LeanDomainSearch has found me so many good product/domain names
       | over the years. Thank you so much for creating it, and best of
       | luck to you with going full time!
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | Kudos to Automattic and Matt Mullenweg for keeping it running
         | 10 years after its acquisition!
        
       | princevegeta89 wrote:
       | Love it when I hear stories like this one. Love Microstartups at
       | the same time as well. No mess no fuss, no funding drama. Good
       | luck OP!
        
       | jacquesm wrote:
       | That's absolutely amazing to see you stick with it for such a
       | long time to get to the point of being self supporting. Very
       | nice, and heartfelt congratulations.
       | 
       | It would be great to see a write-up of the lessons learned over
       | the years, especially those early ones that limited your growth
       | and also of interest would be your views around the long term
       | effect of eco-system and language choices.
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | > see a write-up of the lessons learned over the years
         | 
         | It would make for a long blog post and no doubt one I'd have to
         | continue updating, hah. I will write it at some point though,
         | thanks for suggesting it.
         | 
         | And thank you for all your thoughtful comments on HackerNews
         | over its history as well as the posts on your blog. You're
         | brilliant and this community is a better place because of your
         | participation in it.
        
           | jacquesm wrote:
           | Blush.
           | 
           | Looking forward to seeing that blog post and if you want a
           | proofreader count me in, email in profile. For every fifty
           | fly-by-night and gone again operations there is one of yours
           | and those are much more valuable lessons than most.
        
       | apurvak wrote:
       | Congrats. It's very inspiring story.
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | Appreciate it!
        
       | AussieWog93 wrote:
       | Congrats on making it, Matt.
       | 
       | I quit my job to focus on the side hustle full-time back at the
       | start of 2020 (back when we all thought it was going to be like
       | any other year).
       | 
       | The hardest and most stressful part by far was renegotiating
       | boundaries with my wife. Being physically around one another _all
       | the time_ , and having no set hours is a recipe for relationship
       | woes. Having our first kid during the lockdowns (we're in
       | Melbourne, AU) didn't help either.
       | 
       | Almost 3 years later, life is great, but for a time there it was
       | the worst it had ever been. Make sure to take the time to
       | negotiate boundaries, as all problems become work problems when
       | you run your own business.
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | Appreciate the heads up here. I've been working remotely since
         | I left the Air Force a decade ago so it won't be much of a
         | change, though it is going to be interesting to see how my
         | schedule changes now that I now don't have to juggle
         | contracting anymore. Any other suggestions are welcome!
        
       | tjkrusinski wrote:
       | You love to see it. Matt is a great example of someone who has
       | bootstrapped and built a strong business while mitigating risk
       | for his personal life. Much of the start up dogma tells you this
       | isn't possible, but it is.
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | It's come a long way since the days of our old Orlando Tech
         | meetups :)
        
       | sasha_fishter wrote:
       | Great to see success stories from SaaS. Can you just share how
       | did you attract first visitors, and subscribers when you first
       | launched the web?
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | I'm not sure I'm the best person to ask about this as I was
         | very naive at that point in my journey. Launching Preceden was
         | literally posting on HackerNews and hoping for the best.
         | 
         | I would encourage you to join Microconf Connect, a Slack
         | community of software entrepreneurs, where topics like this are
         | discussed often: https://microconf.com/connect. Many of the old
         | Microconf conference presentations are also on YouTube:
         | https://www.youtube.com/c/MicroConf
        
       | ricksunny wrote:
       | Good on you; We need more examples highlighted of entrepreneurs
       | leading the slow-burn (in a good way) types of ventures. Not
       | every business activity fits the go-big-or-go-home Zuckerberg-
       | esque meteoric rise archetype that the Techcrunch-led hype media
       | attracts eyeballs for portraying.
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | +100
         | 
         | Like I mentioned in another comment, the Microconf community is
         | a fantastic resource for learning how to build this type of
         | business: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34248246
        
         | stsrki wrote:
         | I did something similar with Blazorise, a personal project of
         | mine, https://blazorise.com/. It started as a hobby project.
         | After some time it grew too large that it took most of my time,
         | not to mention the time I could spend with my wife and son.
         | Things changed during the Covid when I was laid off. Then I
         | started freelancing for a while, and last year I finally took a
         | big step and went full-time with Blazorise. Switched to dual
         | licensing, where larger enterprises must purchase a commercial
         | license. It is working, and hopefully, it will continue to
         | work. Or otherwise, my wife will rage on me :/
        
         | kilroy123 wrote:
         | It's tough though. I've been slow-burning on a side project for
         | two years.
         | 
         | I'm unsure if I need to be patient and keep working on it. Or
         | cut my losses and put my time and effort into something else.
        
           | sirsinsalot wrote:
           | Do you enjoy it?
        
         | RicoElectrico wrote:
         | Amen.
         | 
         | But if you ever happen to invent a product category that turns
         | out to be a huge untapped market, the gatekeepers-that-be
         | (Google, Facebook, Apple et al.) will try to enter it as well
         | and stomp you.
         | 
         | Even if you don't, still, they collect their rent on everything
         | we do online nowadays.
        
         | didgetmaster wrote:
         | It's not just SaaS or web based products that fall into this
         | category. There are plenty of applications and systems that run
         | stand-alone on a disconnected computer that can add real value
         | and may take many years to develop for a sole engineer.
         | 
         | I have a data management system that I have been working on for
         | many years. It is core technology that could eventually be used
         | in a SaaS or web based model, but for now it runs on a single
         | computer with no dependencies to the Internet (other than to
         | download the beta software at https://www.Didgets.com).
         | 
         | Many of the features (file system imports, database tables,
         | quick analytics, logging framework, indexing service, etc.)
         | have come about one weekend or a series of evenings at a time.
         | 
         | Congrats to Matt for sticking with it for so long.
        
         | Alex3917 wrote:
         | > We need more examples highlighted of entrepreneurs leading
         | the slow-burn (in a good way) types of ventures.
         | 
         | There will be a lot more example of this in the coming years
         | because the costs of keeping a pre-PMF webapp online have
         | basically fallen to zero. Whereas when Zuckerberg started
         | Facebook, if it didn't take off right away then you had no
         | choice but to shut it down.
         | 
         | When you hear VCs and other folks cast doubt on the ability of
         | anything that doesn't immediately capture lightning in a bottle
         | to succeed in the long term, they are incorrectly pattern
         | matching to a trend from the past that just happened to be an
         | artifact of the economics of that time period.
        
           | waprin wrote:
           | Yeah it's interesting reading the old pg essays where he
           | says, VCs suck but they are a necessary evil. After all,
           | racking reliable servers will cost at least 20k, paying a PR
           | firm so that there's a chance anyone will hear about your
           | site will cost at least 20k etc etc
           | 
           | Now basically every PaaS has a free or cheap (<$50/mo) tier,
           | tons of helpful tools with free or cheap tiers, you can get
           | users / customers for free on social media and probably more
           | effectively than traditional ads / PR coverage.
           | 
           | It's not strictly true because some projects use GPUs for ML
           | , sometimes there's some technical rot if you don't upgrade
           | your stack a bit, market change could make you irrelevant etc
           | 
           | But in general there's a lot of products that can simmer and
           | slowly iterate for a long time as long as founder keeps
           | chipping away as evidenced here.
        
             | didgetmaster wrote:
             | It has gotten much cheaper to host stuff, but I really
             | wonder if marketing costs have fallen as well. You can
             | certainly find cheap or free avenues (like HN) to tell
             | people about your product, but it can be lost in the sea of
             | information. Good marketing to the best subset of potential
             | customers is essential in getting anything off the ground.
             | That can be expensive especially if you are an engineer
             | with very little marketing experience.
        
               | HeyLaughingBoy wrote:
               | My take is that marketing now can have very little out-
               | of-pocket cost, but a massively increased time cost
               | because you are now constantly engaging with people,
               | making new posts, answering questions, exploring new
               | avenues, etc.
        
               | hermitcrab wrote:
               | getting noticed by the right people cost-effectively is
               | hard. Anything that makes it easier for you to get
               | attention will also potentially make it easier for
               | everyone else. So it will always be hard.
        
               | Alex3917 wrote:
               | > I really wonder if marketing costs have fallen as well
               | 
               | The overall cost of building a product and getting a
               | product to PMF is higher, but the main cost is time.
               | That's why it can be advantageous to just work on
               | something for ten years rather than going out, raising a
               | bunch of money, and shutting down two years later.
        
           | macNchz wrote:
           | There was plenty of inexpensive hosting when Facebook
           | launched. You could run several tiny PHP/MySQL web apps on a
           | single shared hosting account for <$10/mo, and Linode had
           | recently launched, offering a VPS starting at $20/mo.
           | 
           | I recently migrated a little web app that has been online
           | since before Facebook existed, away from the $5/mo shared
           | hosting it had lived on since 2006.
           | 
           | My family's dialup connection even came with free web hosting
           | that ran Perl back in the 90s!
           | 
           | http://web.archive.org/web/20040612195543/http://www.linode..
           | ..
        
           | bisRepetita wrote:
           | Even back then, you did not have to grow as fast as VC made
           | you think. It was a choice by Zuck to grow fast and take a
           | lot of investment, he did not have to grow that fast.
           | 
           | This is Zuck's interview in 2005 in Stanford: >So, I mean
           | when you're 16 running a site and your core people are the
           | kitchen table, your operating expenses are relatively low.
           | 
           | >[...] we just kept our operating expenses low so far and by
           | doing that we've been able to stay cash flow positive for
           | basically the entire system's company
           | 
           | >[...] we decided that it was ok to go a few months in cash
           | flow negative while [...] like you know, using like $100,000,
           | not like millions. So, um and then but, now were back. We do
           | a lot of page views.
           | 
           | See page 26: https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/cyberhijack/2005-
           | 10-26-Zucker...
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | lotsofpulp wrote:
             | If your strategy involves needing to take advantage of
             | network effects, growing as fast as possible seems like a
             | requirement. It is a winner take all dynamic.
        
               | Alex3917 wrote:
               | > If your strategy involved needing to take advantage of
               | network effects, growing as fast as possible seems like a
               | requirement.
               | 
               | Not necessarily. Most businesses with network effects
               | (including Facebook) follow the "come for the tool, stay
               | for the network" approach.
        
               | kqr wrote:
               | Right, but in any given group of people, the first people
               | won't stick around to become the network unless they have
               | reason to believe their network will shortly span their
               | entire group -- i.e. grows fast.
        
           | chrisweekly wrote:
           | "PMF"?
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | jocaal wrote:
             | product-market fit
        
           | atleta wrote:
           | This has been the case for over a decade. I've launched my
           | first startup 11 years ago. I've used Linode and we've spent
           | something like $20/month on hosting. (This has increased to
           | around $80-$160 IIRC when we got funded, mostly due to the
           | increased storage needs. We were a music startup and while S3
           | was pretty cheap back then too, it was easier to have
           | everything on Linode at first. I.e. with enough funding, time
           | was more expensive than storage.)
           | 
           | A bit more than a year later it went bust but I hoped I could
           | still keep it alive, make it financially viable. I scaled
           | back the infrastructure so costs would be below $30/mo again.
        
       | jerryu wrote:
       | Congratulations Matt. Would love to learn more about the
       | lessons/tips you learned in the past 8 years.
       | 
       | Is your primary reason to go full-time based on reaching a
       | financial target or is it because you have more ideas for future
       | now?
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | I'll write a lessons learned post in the future, thanks for
         | suggesting it.
         | 
         | The decision to go full time now stemmed from a combination of
         | factors: partly financial milestones, partly not having enough
         | time in the day to focus on the things I want to work on,
         | partly burnout (consulting + bootstrapping a SaaS takes a toll
         | long term), partly just ready to enter a new season of my life,
         | partly because I'm excited about the recent developments in AI
         | want want more time to explore that space, partly because I
         | think Preceden still has a ton of room for growth, just to name
         | a few. For every person these factors will be different.
        
           | stevemethiew wrote:
           | [dead]
        
       | bambax wrote:
       | Congrats on going full-time!
       | 
       | I remember using Lean Domain Search in the past and that it was
       | in fact "lean" and pretty well made, super fast and easy to use.
       | 
       | As for Preceden, how did you come up with the idea, and where do
       | customers come from? That there are enough users of a tool like
       | this to support you sounds amazing -- and I hope I don't sound
       | dismissive: _envious_ would be a better word!
       | 
       | Testimonials are actually pretty inspiring, but one has to scroll
       | to find them; maybe a link at the top of the page would help one
       | see them faster?
       | 
       | It makes one wonder how many other functions are waiting to be
       | "webified" like this.
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | Glad you found Lean Domain Search useful!
         | 
         | Regarding the idea for Preceden: it was a combination of seeing
         | a lot of coworkers struggling to create timelines while I was
         | in the Air Force plus an interest in visualizing the life
         | stories of some family members.
         | 
         | And for better or worse, that's why it's a general purpose
         | timeline maker tool, not one focused just on project managers
         | or just on genealogy or any of the other myriad of use cases
         | people find for it. In retrospect though, I should have focused
         | because it would have simplified a lot of things (copywriting,
         | features, marketing, and much more).
        
       | encoderer wrote:
       | This is great to hear, congrats.
       | 
       | I took about 6.5 years to do that same journey (and having a
       | kid), and one problem I had was that the goalposts kept shifting
       | on me, partly because a slowly growing side-income is easy to get
       | accustomed to so even when I got to where my startup was able to
       | pay me as much as my day job, it felt more like I had _doubled_
       | my salary, not replaced it. Did you struggle with that at all?
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | This was my life the last few years :D.
         | 
         | Eventually just had to go for it and give up the extra income.
         | 
         | It's not clear it was the best decision financially (though it
         | may wind up being so), but it felt like the best decision for
         | my soul, if that makes sense.
        
           | encoderer wrote:
           | Oh yeah you bet. Same here. For me, it was doubly true
           | because I made the leap during the Pandemic lock-down and it
           | was an enormous relief to get out of the zoom-meeting
           | hellscape that my life had became. (I was a middle-manager).
           | 
           | It is hard because I also did not ask my wife/family to take
           | a big hit and instead figured I would burn through cash for
           | 2-3 years while I either grew the business or, eventually,
           | did something else. At the time my portfolio was doing great,
           | tons of crypto gains, real wealth effect, and then basically
           | 4 months after leaving my job the top was in and it's been
           | nothing but declining values. Nevertheless, the business has
           | grown, and as far as I can tell, in 2023, we will break even
           | as a family, and then be out of this crunch. I do wish I
           | could have refinanced my mortgage at 2% but nobody would
           | touch me because I didn't have a regular w2 income from a
           | non-affiliated company.
           | 
           | Wish you the best man! I do have timelines in my product and
           | I would pay a modest fee (maybe... 1k a year?) to license a
           | library that was better than what I currently use which is
           | fullcalendar
        
             | matt1 wrote:
             | Thanks for sharing and best of luck with your business's
             | growth in 2023!
             | 
             | Also, regarding FullCalendar, if you need an actual
             | calendar then Preceden won't be a good fit for you. But if
             | you're OK with a horizontal timeline, it might work well.
             | Worth checking out IMHO.
        
               | encoderer wrote:
               | Yeah they have a timeline component that we use. It's
               | nice but a bit sluggish when there are too many rows.
        
       | rathboma wrote:
       | Big congratulations! Always happy to see indies-with-kids get
       | beyond ramen profitability to a sustainable income!
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | Thanks! I read something here on HN recently about how
         | representation matters: essentially that it's important that
         | people are aware of what others in similar circumstances are up
         | to. I hope this post finds some other long-term side-project
         | solo-founder parent SaaS bootstrappers and encourages them to
         | keep going.
        
       | jordanmoconnor wrote:
       | Awesome work! It takes a lot of guts to go out on your own and
       | bet on yourself. I did that over two years ago and I'll never
       | regret it - the amount of time I get to spend with my kids is
       | incredible, and serving customers that use and love the tools you
       | build is a great feeling.
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | Thanks, I'm looking forward to the extra time with the family
         | as well!
         | 
         | And since you didn't share your startup, I'll do it for ya:
         | https://closet.tools/
        
           | jordanmoconnor wrote:
           | Ha, thanks. My customers aren't here, only the people who
           | will create a copycat this weekend
        
             | matt1 wrote:
             | Hopefully more than a weekend ;)
        
       | AndrewCopeland wrote:
       | Love the story! Breath of fresh air and a similar trajectory I
       | would like to take for my own startup.
       | 
       | The slow burn is real and making meaningful connections to
       | customers is important for consistent revenue in the long term.
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | Thanks! And yes, without the right SaaS metrics, it can take a
         | very long time to grow to a meaningful amount of revenue. I'd
         | recommend anyone interested in starting a SaaS to get familiar
         | with the economics and relevant metrics before building a
         | product.
        
       | TobyTheDog123 wrote:
       | Congrats!
        
       | llIIllIIllIIl wrote:
       | Congratulations! Your story is very inspiring, your product is
       | amazing and i wish you best of luck. I will follow your path,
       | just today got my first paying subscription purchased for my
       | SaaS.
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | Congrats to you to as well then!
        
       | sergiotapia wrote:
       | >As the sole breadwinner in our household with 4 young kids, I
       | was not comfortable going full time and merely being ramen
       | profitable or anything close to it.
       | 
       | It takes a lot of balls and willpower to take this plunge. I wish
       | you a lot of success and hope you make it. I'm also the sole
       | breadwinner of my home and it's a lot of responsibility.
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | Thanks! It was not an easy decision even after getting Preceden
         | to where I wanted it to be financially.
        
       | smarri wrote:
       | Congratulations!
        
       | mugraph wrote:
       | Interesting looking project! Good luck with going full time.
       | 
       | Under "Advanced Features for Power Users" it should read: "you'll
       | have everything you need to create _a_ professional timeline,
       | roadmap, or Gantt chart."
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | Deploying a change to fix the typo now - thank you for pointing
         | it out!
        
       | PentelicoMarble wrote:
       | A product built by an ex-soldier who was part of an occupying
       | force that committed countless war crimes? No thank you.
       | 
       | Question for other HN users - would you use a product built by an
       | officer of the Russian army who was part of the war in Ukraine?
       | 
       | Edit: Those downvoting me, did I say anything that is not true?
        
         | MrOwnPut wrote:
         | You're able to safely post that stupid comment because of
         | soldiers and Pax Americana.
        
           | PentelicoMarble wrote:
           | What's stupid about it?
        
             | MrOwnPut wrote:
             | Because of the latter half of my sentence you ignored.
             | 
             | It's easy to highroad everyone when you sit back reaping
             | the benefits of what others have done.
        
               | PentelicoMarble wrote:
               | I'm not high roading anyone, I'm merely saying I prefer
               | products not built by war criminals. I certainly don't
               | reap any benefits from what Matt and his fellow soldiers
               | did in Iraq during their illegal war, and even if I did -
               | does that mean I can't talk about it?
        
               | MrOwnPut wrote:
               | Please lookup the definition of high roading.
               | 
               | But yes, you certainly can talk about your misguided
               | views! And people can call out your misguided views as
               | well!
               | 
               | All because of the 1A which is protected from outside
               | forces with the strength of the US military.
               | 
               | Soldiers have little to do with policies such as the
               | endless Middle East wars.
               | 
               | Your moral crusade should be aimed at the defense
               | contractors and their congress buddies.
               | 
               | It's not the soldiers choosing proxy wars in Ukraine or
               | the Middle East, it's congress.
        
               | jimnotgym wrote:
               | Soldiers sent to war are not automatically war criminals,
               | whether or not the war was legitimate. Your blanket
               | statement suggests that a mechanic, chef, or nurse who
               | was sent to Iraq was a war criminal. You are just wrong.
               | 
               | I think you calling someone a war criminal is way outside
               | of what is legitimate on this forum.
        
               | [deleted]
        
         | hasmolo wrote:
         | I don't think blaming the individual soldier is ever a fair
         | choice. Most folks in the army aren't there by first or even
         | second choice. the amount of pro military military people is
         | shockingly low.
         | 
         | to say it another way:
         | 
         | veterans should never be ashamed they are veterans, the
         | government and voters should be ashamed they're creating
         | veterans.
        
         | TobyTheDog123 wrote:
         | The dream of the 90's is alive in Portland - The tattoo ink
         | never runs dry
        
         | atleta wrote:
         | I didn't downvote you but I think equating the Russian attack
         | on Ukraine with the American war on Iraq is probably what
         | earned you the downvotes. Especially because you seem to equate
         | the too based on the extent and number of war crimes.
         | Committing war crimes seems to be the norm, even an expectation
         | in the Russian army. These also seem being denied and never
         | investigated while they are pretty well documented. This
         | doesn't seem to be the case with the US army. (Yes, they did
         | happen, but they seem to happen at a much lower rate, more
         | isolated cases and some of them actually get investigated
         | officially and the perpetrators get sentenced.)
         | 
         | And then let's not forget that the American war in Iraq (and
         | Afghanistan) has been ironically labelled as "democracy export"
         | for a reason. Yes, it didn't work, yes it was probably a bad
         | idea from the start, but at least it wasn't "autocracy export".
         | Which the war on Ukraine _is_. The goal of the Russian
         | leadership (read: Putin) has been to remove the democratically
         | elected Ukrainian leadership and install a puppet government.
         | This is a bit harder to support than the US narrative of
         | toppling a dictatorship and help the people to start a
         | democracy. (Again, even if the latter was doomed to fail.)
         | 
         | Sure, the Russian soldiers and society were also sold a nice
         | (horror) story about the Ukrainian leadership (or maybe
         | Ukrainians in general) being 'nazi'. You can hear in some
         | captured phone calls from the early days of the war that the
         | soldiers try to explain to their relatives that there are no
         | 'nazis' there just normal people.
         | 
         | On I side note, I would use a product built by a Russian
         | soldier who participated in the war if he made it clear that he
         | didn't want to participate and didn't commit (or maybe even
         | opposed/prevented committing) war crimes.
        
         | bsaul wrote:
         | Didn't downvote you, but i assume that yes, most people here
         | are able to understand that human life is complex, and that we
         | should congratulate people whenever they're doing something
         | good.
         | 
         | Most people are, fortunately, also able to distinguish between
         | a soldier, his army policy, and the regime ruling over that
         | army at a given time.
        
           | PentelicoMarble wrote:
           | I disagree that we should congratulate anyone whenever they
           | do something good, no matter what they did in the past.
           | 
           | Would you blindly congratulate a participant in the Bucha
           | massacre on the launch of their new app?
           | 
           | Would you congratulate a former ISIS member?
           | 
           | Surely even the most amoral person on HN would draw the line
           | somewhere?
        
             | jimnotgym wrote:
             | Was a soldier who was posted to Iraq morally inferior to a
             | colleague who didn't get posted?
             | 
             | I mean, neither was her choice? Soldiers go where they are
             | sent.
             | 
             | Or do you think people shouldn't join the armed forces of a
             | country in case a future regime deploys them in a way they
             | disagree with?
        
       | stevoski wrote:
       | Matt, this is simply an awesome story. It's surprisingly common
       | that people take years to get to the point where they can go
       | full-time.
       | 
       | I find your story far more relatable than the "I started a SaaS
       | and reached tons of revenue in one year - and you can too!"
       | stories we are plagued with.
        
         | matwood wrote:
         | It sounds a lot like many (most?) small/medium companies that
         | take a decade of work to find their footing. You typically
         | don't see them on the front page of HN though.
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | Thanks for saying so! And yes, for every bootstrapped startup
         | that sees a rocket ship trajectory and makes headlines, there
         | are probably 100 that are struggling to grow. Would love to
         | read more about those journeys.
        
       | shostack wrote:
       | How has the recent Google Sheets timeline feature release
       | impacted you?
       | 
       | https://workspaceupdates.googleblog.com/2022/11/timeline-vie...
        
       | tarunkotia wrote:
       | Hey Matt,
       | 
       | Firstly, congratulations! This is very inspiring and I love the
       | pragmatic approach to starting a startup. You wrote about
       | converting to a contractor with Help Scout from being a full-time
       | employee. How did it help you free-up your time?
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | Initially my intent was to go from full time employee to a ~16
         | hours/week contractor so I could spend the rest of my time on
         | Preceden, but I wound up also picking up contracting work with
         | my former employer (Automattic) and found myself working 30+
         | hours/week contracting. So much for focusing on Preceden.
         | 
         | Eventually I stopped contracting at Automattic and gradually
         | reduced my hours at Help Scout until it made sense for me to go
         | full time on Preceden. I'm fortunate both Help Scout and
         | Automattic were open to me contracting as it made this
         | transition much easier than it would have been otherwise.
        
       | hoten wrote:
       | I'm curious about how you juggled entrepreneurship and active
       | deployment. Were there any interesting challenges, or did you
       | ever meet someone doing similar things? Did you feel the need to
       | hide what you were doing from your CO?
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | You may have seen the old post about that experience, but
         | here's a link in case not:
         | https://mattmazur.com/2016/01/04/building-a-startup-in-45-mi...
         | 
         | I never hid the fact I was working on side businesses, but also
         | didn't go out of my way to tell coworkers. Don't think my CO's
         | knew about it. I knew a few other officers who had side
         | businesses, though not in the software space.
        
       | mikkelenzo wrote:
       | Great to see this!
        
       | drewda wrote:
       | This looks like a very nicely polished marketing website and SaaS
       | product. If the creator would be open to sharing, I'd be curious
       | to hear more about whether he's engaged contractors or firms to
       | help with specific types of design over the years. Any lessons
       | learned on that front?
       | 
       | I know there are many services that claim they'll sell you a
       | "custom" logo for $100 or whatever... but assembling a nicely
       | polished marketing site and product that look good together
       | usually isn't as simple as that.
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | My design skills are alright (see the 2019 screenshot in the
         | post), but it took hiring a designer a few years ago to take it
         | to the next level (see the site today). I found him on Tailwind
         | Discord and have been very fortunate to work with him.
         | 
         | In retrospect I should have found someone much sooner given how
         | important aesthetics are for a visualization tool like
         | Preceden.
        
           | drewda wrote:
           | Makes sense. Would you be able to share a bit more about how
           | you started off with the designer?
           | 
           | (Background: I'm asking because our SaaS business is at a
           | point where we know it's ready for more polish for both
           | marketing site and web app, but are unclear how much we
           | should budget and whether we should go "all in" by hiring a
           | designer who takes everything as far as CSS, or start with a
           | couple targeted improvements that would be lower risk/budget
           | first.)
        
             | matt1 wrote:
             | I was lucky to find someone who can both design well and
             | implement the changes in the codebase (using Tailwind CSS
             | which I'd highly recommend). You can obviously have two
             | separate people (one to design, one to implement), but if
             | you can find someone who can do both it will simplify
             | things.
             | 
             | For Preceden, we kind of just went page by page converting
             | the old design over to Tailwind, making improvements along
             | the way, and gradually ripping out all of the old CSS that
             | had accumulated over a decade of me working on it. As I
             | built out new features he would help with the design, but
             | he spent the majority of his time improving the existing
             | design.
        
               | drewda wrote:
               | It sounds like selecting Tailwind helped to make clear
               | the specific skills you were looking to hire for and at
               | what level you'd be working together. Good to know.
               | Thanks for sharing.
        
       | lukko wrote:
       | That's brilliant, well done. Also, I have been looking for a
       | better tool to make GANTT charts!
        
         | matt1 wrote:
         | Hope Preceden is a good fit! It doesn't have all the bells and
         | whistles as other Gantt chart tools, but that's exactly why a
         | lot of people like it.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-01-04 23:00 UTC)