[HN Gopher] Summary: "No: The Only Negotiating System You Need f...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Summary: "No: The Only Negotiating System You Need for Work and
       Home" - Jim Camp
        
       Author : chegra
       Score  : 72 points
       Date   : 2022-12-30 16:30 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.chestergrant.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.chestergrant.com)
        
       | spritefs wrote:
       | > As a negotiator aspiring to excellence, you must, at all costs,
       | avoid showing need. In order to avoid showing need, you must
       | never feel it. I cannot say this enough: You do not need this
       | deal.
       | 
       | Isn't this a contradiction? Because why would someone be
       | negotiating in the first place if they weren't needy in some sort
       | of way? On top of this though, they care about the negotiation so
       | much that they read this annoyingly long guide and obsess over
       | "not showing need"
       | 
       | Isn't suffering through this guide itself a sign of neediness?
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | maxbond wrote:
         | I read that as, "to gaslight others, you first must gaslight
         | yourself."
        
         | kstenerud wrote:
         | The point here is to move from "need" to "want".
         | 
         | If you "want" something, you're willing to pay a fair price for
         | it (maybe), but you're also perfectly willing to walk away if
         | the negotiations don't go to your liking. If the deal falls
         | through, it's a disappointment perhaps, but no biggie.
         | 
         | If you "need" something, it's suddenly very hard to back away
         | emotionally, and the other side will pick up on this and
         | exploit it.
        
       | asplake wrote:
       | "I can't do that" - after Chris Voss, Never split the difference
        
       | cesaref wrote:
       | Negotiations is a complex subject, and certainly one that us
       | engineer types normally don't get directly involved with. I had
       | some exposure to this world early in my career, as an engineer
       | for a small software house, getting involved in pre-sales
       | support. My job was to get called into meeting and to say 'no'.
       | 
       | How this worked was that at a particular point in the sales
       | cycle, the client would invariably ask a deep technical question
       | (it was usually a tech from their side who had been brought along
       | to the meeting for this very purpose). Our sales team would call
       | on me, i'd turn up, hear the question, and my job was to say 'no'
       | we couldn't solve that. I'd mention that we could do something
       | close to what they had asked for, and maybe it was worth taking
       | this discussion outside of the meeting. I'd swap cards with their
       | tech, and we'd continue the discussion over the coming days.
       | 
       | This proved to be a very important part of the negotiations. They
       | needed us to say no, our engineers and their engineers would
       | start talking about implementation and how things would work
       | together (where the boundaries were between systems). Their techs
       | would give positive feedback to their management, and the deal
       | would close.
        
         | ricardobayes wrote:
         | Not sure I fully get it, but in this case you said "maybe"?
         | Doing a workaround or even continuing to gather requirements is
         | not really a "no", in my book.
        
       | aidenn0 wrote:
       | > 48. "Sure, Frank, we're on board. We want to place the biggest
       | order ever with Acme--50, 000 widgets."
       | 
       | > 49. Then, one or two calls later, "I didn't even bring it up,
       | Frank. It seemed unnecessary. I'm assuming about a twenty percent
       | discount at that volume. Is that what you have in mind?" Never
       | fall for the quick "yes." Assume nothing. Avoid the emotional
       | roller coaster. Don't get needy. Don't "chase the results" that
       | seem to be shimmering so invitingly right in front of your eyes.
       | 
       | This is such an annoying negotiating tactic, though more common
       | than asking for a large volume discount is springing things like
       | net-90 (or longer) payment terms.
        
       | leephillips wrote:
       | He's right about people being uncomfortable with "no". I've
       | noticed that people don't expect it, and are nonplussed when I
       | simply tell them, "no". I've also noticed that people who avoid
       | saying "no" tend, because of that, to promise what they can't
       | deliver. Ultimately, my "no" is more honest and respectful then
       | their "yes".
        
       | mesozoic wrote:
       | Anyone able to compare this to "Getting to Yes"?
        
         | jmalicki wrote:
         | "Getting to Yes" would call this "No" concept BATNA
        
       | snowwrestler wrote:
       | Ehh, I feel like needing to "win" every "negotiation" is its own
       | kind of emotional neediness.
       | 
       | I feel like most negotiations should be easy because both sides
       | are going to gain. (That's why transactions happen in the first
       | place.)
       | 
       | Sure you don't want one side to take advantage of the other, but
       | there's a usually a range of OK outcomes between those extremes.
        
       | faangiq wrote:
       | Low IQ. The only negotiating system is alternatives.
        
       | b5n wrote:
       | > 21. Talking is often an overt showing of need. Therefore this
       | rule: No talking.
       | 
       | I'd argue that silence is even more powerful than 'no'. Learning
       | to wield it properly has served me incredibly well.
        
         | kradroy wrote:
         | Using this technique I got a great deal on a car after the
         | salesman threw out a number first. I simply sat there looking
         | at him and said nothing for maybe 20-30 seconds. He threw out a
         | lower number. Then I said "I'll think about it" and walked off
         | the lot. He called me back later with an even lower number.
         | 
         | It felt awkward at the time to do it, but I didn't feel awkward
         | after saving thousands of dollars.
        
           | thechao wrote:
           | Walking off the lot got me into the craziest argument I ever
           | had with another human: I went to Maxwell Ford, in Austin,
           | (2018) and asked what the cash cost of the base model
           | Explorer was. These are practically "no options" vehicles, as
           | they're loss leaders. Every few minutes someone would come by
           | and try some tactic that didn't involve telling me a cost
           | (we'd swapped ph#s at some point). At the 30 minute mark, I
           | just got up and walked away, while the sales person & their
           | manager were blabbing at me. They followed me to my car as I
           | drove away. Then they just started calling ... and calling.
           | Each time I'd say "what's the cost?" I'd count to 30, and if
           | they didn't respond I'd hang up. About the 10th time, I asked
           | them to stop calling.
           | 
           | The next day the manager calls me & begins loudly complaining
           | that I can't just hang up on her staff. I hung up on her. She
           | called back screaming at me. I just lowered the volume & let
           | it go. After a minute she paused to take a breath, and I said
           | "can I ask a question?" She said "yes", then I asked how much
           | the car was. She started screaming again; I hung up & blocked
           | their number(s).
           | 
           | Anyways: don't go to Maxwell Ford, they're not mentally well.
           | 
           | I ended up getting the Ford at Lief Johnson. I showed up,
           | saying I was buying with cash. The salesman, Bob, just stared
           | at me for a few minutes and told me a number (29k$), "take it
           | or leave it, my commission is only $50". Out the door in 90
           | minutes.
        
             | xyzzy_plugh wrote:
             | I spent most of my life in a place where you get the
             | posted, manufacturer price (or maybe lower) and there's no
             | negotiating.
             | 
             | Buying a car at a dealership in the US is in my top three
             | most bizarre experiences while living in the US. I had
             | never witnessed humans acting that way to one another
             | before, and I'm not sure I've witnessed anything like that
             | since.
        
         | ahelwer wrote:
         | I wonder about the longest stretch of silence that has passed
         | in a negotiation because both parties read the same negotiating
         | self-help books and attempted to apply them on one another.
        
           | the_sleaze9 wrote:
           | Were they making direct eye contact, menacing faces of stone
           | each daring the others to make the first move? Were their
           | jaws and brows completely relaxed staring dreamily off into
           | the ether? Were they all self-consciously posing in various
           | confidence-signalling power-poses, strewn about the
           | conference table?
           | 
           | I would love to have been a fly on the wall there.
        
           | snowwrestler wrote:
           | They're still there, two desiccated corpses silently eyeing
           | each other. At least neither lost the negotiation!
        
           | 1123581321 wrote:
           | I've seen a two-party meeting end with a long silence. It
           | felt like leaving a funeral service.
        
             | vdqtp3 wrote:
             | If you saw it, doesn't that mean it was at least three
             | party?
        
               | 1123581321 wrote:
               | I was part of the group that got up and left (not my
               | ideal outcome, but I wasn't the boss.)
        
         | maxbond wrote:
         | All this talk of "not showing need" is kinda disturbing given
         | the pitch is that this is for work _and home_. If someone wants
         | to be a super hard negotiator in a professional context, I have
         | no comment on that, but being super reserved and not
         | demonstrating need in the context of _your spouse and kids_ is
         | toxic and manipulative.  "I don't need you, you must come to
         | where I am, and where I am is the status quo. We're all
         | rational adults here." is not a way to speak to people you have
         | an explicitly emotional connection to (where your relationship
         | involves what I like to call arationality, which is to say,
         | irrationality without the pejorative connotation; not employing
         | rationality in a context where rationality is inappropriate).
         | "We're all predators who take advantage of the needy" is a poor
         | outlook on life in general, but to treat people in your
         | personal life that way is. Very concerning.
        
       | Enginerrrd wrote:
       | Honestly, the biggest hack to negotiations I've ever found isn't
       | "no" or "silence" or other such nonsense. It's: "Fair".
       | 
       | When I start a negotiation, I don't think about what's best for
       | me, I think about what's fair. I think deeply about this and come
       | at it from multiple different angles of where my personal
       | jealousy-free line is were I on either side of the deal. And
       | then... I just _start there_. I describe it in detail and
       | elaborate on any nuance as needed.
       | 
       | And you know what, as a result people sure seem to like doing
       | business with me. Negotiations aren't draining experiences, they
       | get increasingly frictionless and the business relationships have
       | tended to grow into rubber-stamp deals of my proposals. Also in
       | my experience, increasing the velocity of transactions is far
       | better for growth than trying to maximize selfish individual gain
       | on any particular deal.
       | 
       | This also has worked for me in business, my personal life, and
       | many other contexts. I've solved some really bitter, decades-
       | long, emotionally charged disputes this way.
        
         | cylinder714 wrote:
         | Your story reminds me that Rotary International promotes "The
         | Four-Way Test," a simple guide to business and personal ethics.
         | (There's even a copy of the test on a bronze plaque set into
         | the corner of the Palace Hotel on Market Street in San
         | Francisco: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SF_Four_Wa
         | y_Corner...)                 The Four-Way Test of what we
         | think, say or do            1. Is it the TRUTH?       2. Is it
         | FAIR to all concerned?       3. Will it build GOODWILL and
         | BETTER FRIENDSHIPS?       4. Will it be BENEFICIAL to all
         | concerned?
        
         | _tom_ wrote:
         | The problem with "Fair" is people tend to disagree on what is
         | fair.
        
         | sz4kerto wrote:
         | When I hear someone using the word 'fair' in a negotiation, I
         | immediately think that this person is trying to manipulate me
         | because they have run out of better rational arguments and/or
         | they're not transparent.
         | 
         | If they said that 'I think would get around X after more job
         | search but I'll settle with 0.95X for a quick offer', I'd be
         | thankful for the information and consider the deal. If they
         | said that 'I want X because that's the amount I'd be free of
         | jealousy/resent/etc.', I'd be glad they shared the not
         | completely rational but honest emotional reason behind their
         | preference and also consider the deal.
         | 
         | Using the 'fair' card means that 'if you don't agree you are
         | unfair therefore you're a bad person'.
         | 
         | So I recommend everyone to unpack what 'fair' means to them and
         | explain that thing instead of using the word 'fair'.
         | 
         | My strategy is generally quite extreme transparency, especially
         | in cases when we're at the beginning of a long-term
         | relationship.
        
           | Enginerrrd wrote:
           | >So I recommend everyone to unpack what 'fair' means to them
           | and explain that thing instead of using the word 'fair'
           | 
           | Yes, that's basically how I do it, although I don't have any
           | reservations about using the word 'fair'. I don't think this
           | is problematic unless you're attempting to unilaterally
           | declare what "fair" is without offering up all of your
           | assumptions in detail with the explicit declaration that
           | they're up for debate. It's more like: "Hey so I've tried
           | really hard to define what I think a fair deal would look
           | like in this situation and here's the exact methodology,
           | angles, and assumptions I came up with to do that. When I
           | applied that methodology, here is the number I came up with.
           | I'd love to hear your thoughts on that, or if you can think
           | of any criticism or omissions in my assumptions or methods,
           | or if you have any different methodology you'd like to
           | consider, please let me know. Let's chat."
           | 
           | Usually when I go over all the different ways in which I have
           | already considered their viewpoint, needs, benefits, and
           | drawbacks, that's enough for a yes. Sometimes though, people
           | will take issue with one of the assumptions or criteria and
           | then we can debate about that, but the whole discussion at
           | that point tends to already be framed on defining what fair
           | is, rather that what they want, or what gripes they have with
           | the opposing party.
        
             | novok wrote:
             | Collaborative vs. Adversarial Negotiation essentially.
             | 
             | Putting yourself in the other person's shoes and knowing
             | what they want, which is what we do all the time in trying
             | to convince another person to do something for us, be it a
             | child, friend, or coworker.
        
               | bentobean wrote:
               | On a related note: It's also a good idea to walk a mile
               | in someone's shoes before you criticize them. That way,
               | when you criticize them, you'll be a mile away from them
               | - and you'll have their shoes!
        
           | number6 wrote:
           | If someone uses the F-Word on me I apologize, ask him to
           | explain where my proposition is unfair and ask him for a fair
           | deal
        
         | omoikane wrote:
         | The "fair" argument sounds like
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nash_equilibrium
         | 
         | While the "no" argument sounds like
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Best_alternative_to_a_negotiat...
        
       | bentobean wrote:
       | I'll try this tactic the next time my wife asks me to do the
       | dishes. Will report back.
        
       | Tomte wrote:
       | I've read his book "Start with No" years ago, and as far as I
       | remember he never really discusses how and when to switch to
       | "Yes".
       | 
       | So if you see negotiations like a sport or game, sure, go for it.
       | But I don't see how you would ever achieve something.
        
         | rad_gruchalski wrote:
         | ,,No" is an invite to ,,why". If no ,,why" follows, it wasn't
         | important.
        
       | Octokiddie wrote:
       | The format of this summary doesn't do the book justice. The book
       | has a big idea (seek "No", don't try to avoid it), but the format
       | hides that pretty well. There's a lot to unpack before that idea
       | makes any sense, but this ordered list doesn't do the job.
       | 
       | Also, the pronouns "I" and "my" imply that the summary was
       | written by the author (Jim Camp), which it was not.
        
         | aidenn0 wrote:
         | > Also, the pronouns "I" and "my" imply that the summary was
         | written by the author (Jim Camp), which it was not.
         | 
         | I don't know this book, but did not assume it; this read like
         | notes I might take from a book, which I will tend to write in
         | the voice of the author so that the pronouns don't reverse if I
         | take a direct quote.
        
       | kemitchell wrote:
       | I negotiate professionally. I'm still tempted into one or two
       | books a year on the subject. But the only one I'm ever tempted to
       | recommend is Jim Freund's _Smart Negotiating_. Very modest in its
       | claims.
       | 
       | Negotiation is a lot like public speaking. The first, most
       | important thing is getting past the idea that it's something
       | you're supposed to be afraid of, actually doing a deal, and
       | realizing you got away with it. Not "crushing" the other side.
       | Not scoring a "win". Just working through the process and ending
       | up better off for it.
       | 
       | Once you're confident enough to practice, it probably won't be
       | hard to find opporunities. Most other people still avoid it,
       | after all. From there you can learn.
        
       | AtlasBarfed wrote:
       | Advice from a cold-calling salesman? Yes there is a use for
       | employing strategies in the dog eat dog of raw sales, but apply
       | it to the rest of your life?
       | 
       | This is like getting childraising advice from a mafia boss,
       | marital advice from a special forces assassination squad member,
       | etc.
       | 
       | Sure, since they operate at the extremes, they have some
       | perspective, but invariably their situation doesn't apply to
       | yours, who live in the "normal" world of "normal" interaction.
       | 
       | So if your job involves collaboration, then guess what, this is a
       | shitty shitty approach. If your job involves knife fight
       | budgetary battles and internecine middle management machiavelli
       | warfare, well, yeah.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-12-30 23:01 UTC)